Budzinski introduces bipartisan biofuel bill

WASHINGTON, D.C. (WCIA) — Congresswoman Nikki Budzinski (D-IL) has introduced a bill to help support innovation in biofuels.
The Central Illinois U.S. Representative introduced the Agricultural Biorefinery Innovation and Opportunity Act to help the biofuel economy. She's co-sponsoring the bill with Congressman Zach Nunn (R-IA).
'My district is home to world-class research facilities like the University of Illinois Integrated Bioprocessing Research Lab and SIUE's National Corn-to-Ethanol Research Centerboth at the forefront of biomanufacturing innovation,' Congresswoman Budzinski said in a statement. 'I'm honored to partner with my colleague Zach Nunn on bipartisan legislation that supports the groundbreaking agricultural research led by students and scientists at these institutions. Strengthening Americas bioeconomy drives innovation, creates good-paying jobs, and opens new opportunities for family farms across the Midwest.'
Illinois' film industry bounces back after 2023 strikes
The bill strengthens the USDA's Biorefinery, Renewable Chemical, and Biobased Product Manufacturing Assistance Program by updating the current loan guarantee program to include applications year-round. It also creates a new competitive grant program to help build and expand biorefineries. If signed into law, it would also provide $100 million in mandatory funding through FY 2030.
Several industry leaders support the bill, including Plant Based Products Council, Corn Refiners Association and the Ag Bioeconomy Coalition.
The full text of the AG BIO Act can be found here online.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

8 hours ago

• Yahoo

Skiers Consider Boycotting Utah

As always, skiers on Reddit have all kinds of opinions, however wild they may or may not be. This week, r/skiing's keyboard warriors have decided to address the current reconciliation bill up for debate in the US Senate and the provision to it, which amongst other things, would mean the potential sale of a few million acres of US public lands. One particularly fired-up skier has taken to r/skiing to say that in light of the bill, Utah skiers should start boycotting the state. For context, the bill's provision that concerns the sale of public lands was published by the US Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, which is led by Republican Utah Senator Mike Lee."It's time to boycott Utah. Utah Sen. Mike Lee wants to sell millions of acres of public land. He needs to feel it where it hurts the most: his economy," the post by Reddit user Hobbitsliketoparty, is titled. Want to keep up with the best stories and photos in skiing? Subscribe to the new Powder To The People newsletter for weekly updates. The post details that, indeed, up to 3.3 million acres of US public lands would be sold across 11 western states, including Utah. In Utah specifically, this could include land near Big and Little Cottonwood Canyons, Millcreek, Parley's, and more BLM land close to some of Utah's National Parks like Zion and Arches. Under the provision, National Parks, National Monuments, National Recreation Areas, components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, National Wildlife Refuge System, National Fish Hatchery Systems, Wilderness Preservation Areas, and 'nearly every other protected designations,' would be excluded from the sale. Land sold under the bill would be for the purpose of building housing in order to ease housing shortages in the US. u/Hobbitsliketoparty has done their research, because they also state that 'but there's no requirement that the land be used for affordable housing. Developers and private buyers could snap up access points, trailheads, and wild spaces. That access could be gone for good.'The bill's provision has some vague language about proposals to purchase the land would need to include a description of how intended development would address local housing needs, including supply and affordability. However, there's no stipulation on holding the proposer to that once the sale is carried out. Considering Utah Senator Mike Lee's creation and support of the bill, u/Hobbitsliketoparty is proposing a boycott of funding to Utah's outdoor economy in protest. "If we let this happen, it sets a dangerous precedent. Politicians should not be allowed to auction off public land with almost no public input. And Utah has a history of this. From shrinking Bears Ears to resisting wilderness protections, they've been chipping away for years. If Utah's leadership insists on selling out our public lands, we should stop funding their outdoor economy. That means skipping the ski trips. Skipping the canyoneering. Skipping the visits to the Mighty 5. In 2017, Outdoor Retailer pulled its convention out of Salt Lake City after similar attacks on public land. It worked. Maybe it's time we acted again," reads the post. Several commenters point out and thank u/Hobbitsliketoparty for doing their research and reiterate the fact that while many of Utah and other state's ski areas are on public lands, often managed by USFS, the permits they operate on also exempt them from the sale. But that doesn't mean that trailheads and access points for other, non-inbounds skiing recreation wouldn't be threatened by the sale. It's hard to say whether boycotting skiing in Utah and the rest of its outdoor tourism economy would send the right message to Sen. Lee. For one, the Senate vote is slated to take place sometime in the next few weeks, which means, by the time ski season rolls around, there will already be a decision. Also, food for thought—boycotting Utah's outdoor tourism economy as a revenue source for the state would potentially fuel supporter's of the bill's fire by giving them more ammunition to sell off public lands. But I get it, u/Hobbitsliketoparty is angry like a lot of Americans right now about this potential attack on our public lands, but rather than boycotting a local tourism industry, the best course of action would be to call your local senators and let them know you oppose the bill, or use a handy form from an organization like the Outdoor Alliance or Protect Our Winters to do Consider Boycotting Utah first appeared on Powder on Jun 20, 2025

The Onion

21 hours ago

• The Onion

Christian Faith An Important Part Of Who Senator Pretends To Be

WASHINGTON—Stressing that the facade informs nearly every aspect of his daily life, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) told reporters Thursday that his Christian faith is an important part of who he pretends to be. 'Whether I'm delivering a speech calling for theocracy in front of dozens of cameras or talking to my children at the kitchen table about God's separate roles for men and women, I mean it when I say the mask I wear in public is the same one I wear at home,' said the 45-year-old lawmaker, who confirmed that Christianity has been the foundation of his public-facing identity ever since he was a shameless young prep school student with his sights set on Yale Law School. 'The power of telling people you pray is incredible. My Christian faith is a pretense that's only grown stronger as I've aged. It's so strong that, sometimes, I almost forget it's all an act.' At press time, Hawley added that he is grateful to represent all of his Christian constituents through the faith he uses as a guise to seek power.

The Hill

a day ago

• The Hill

The real youth drug crisis is marijuana

Despite America's often-toxic politics, our legislators can still come together and fight the good fight: Look at the Youth Substance Use Prevention and Awareness Act, a new bipartisan Senate bill much needed in the battle to keep drugs away from kids. And what drugs are kids consuming today? It may come as a surprise, but today's youth are more likely to become addicted to ultra-high-potency marijuana than even alcohol. In an era of mass marijuana legalization, normalization and acceptance, it's the elephant in the room consuming the next generation. Marijuana consumption jumped among 12-17-year-olds from 3.4 million users in 2020 to 3.8 million in 2023. It is the drug most used by that age group. And these kids are not using yesterday's weed. The market has been flooded with dangerously high-potency THC products often disguised in colorful packaging and sold in forms that look like candy. That's why the bill, introduced in May by Sens. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Chris Coons (D-Del.), is so crucial. Yes, it does not specifically focus on preventing kids from using marijuana. But the approach it takes will nonetheless empower people fighting that battle. The bill would build out a Justice Department program to help state and local governments battle the rising tide of illicit drug use among the young by expanding grants to fund fact- and evidence-based public service announcements at the local and state level — ads aimed at stopping the next generation of users before they start. The legislation as written takes a hard-headed approach to delivering results, baking in reporting requirements on ad effectiveness, the research driving each PSA and the ways in which the problems on the ground in the relevant market inform the ads. Evidence-based policy backed up with public accountability is a win for everyone. And a quick spin through only the recent bad news about marijuana and the health risks it poses to kids will outline just what America needs to prevent. A May study from a program of the Public Health Institute, which looked at nearly 100,000 adolescents, revealed that kids living in cities and counties where marijuana storefronts and/or delivery are banned were much less likely to have had a recent diagnosis of a psychotic disorder than kids who lived closer to them. Data from European researchers published in March suggests marijuana drives up the risk of schizophrenia and psychosis, and that this elevated risk is doubled for teens. The prevalence of youth-friendly delivery systems makes prevention pushes all the more urgent. In April, Canadian researchers published a study showing that provinces where edibles and extracts were legalized saw a 26 percent increase in overall teen marijuana use. These are only the latest thuds in an endless drumbeat around the physical and mental risks marijuana carries, risks that kids above all need to know about. They provide an abundance of material for the PSAs the bill would help launch and show how specious the claims by advocates that drug use among kids today is harmless. The opposite is true — there were nearly 900,000 marijuana-related emergency room visits in 2023, more than there were for opioids. So it's imperative that Congress pass this bill and President Trump sign it. The bill is laudable and important, especially given the avalanche of counter-messaging on 'safe' drug use (some of which, horrifyingly, comes from taxpayer-sponsored PSAs in places like New York City). The way forward requires more drug use PSAs that take the ad fight national. A strong, youth-focused national campaign that centers the terrible harms marijuana does would help keep the issue top of mind for kids everywhere (and could make it a bigger issue for their parents, come national elections). The White House Office of National Drug Control Policy should relaunch a national prevention campaign along the lines of the defunct, powerful teen-targeted federal communications push from the 90s. But ad campaigns, no matter how brilliant and effective, can't reach every vulnerable adolescent and young adult. For people who slip through the prevention cracks, Washington must make sure that legal marijuana is not precision-engineered to max out psychoactive delivery with every hit, bite or sip. It is time to hold the industry accountable and exercise the existing power of the FDA to take products off the shelves. So, kudos to the senators for taking this important step. Now it's time for their colleagues and the U.S. House to get on board. Kevin Sabet is the founder of Smart Approaches to Marijuana.