The $10bn LA Lakers sale proves sports have outgrown billionaires

The sale of the Los Angeles Lakers is many things.
First of all, it is a record. The glitziest team in basketball is changing hands at a valuation of $10bn, the biggest ever for a sports franchise. Second, it is probably an excellent deal for the buyer, even at that astonishing valuation. And third, the shift in majority ownership from the Buss family to an investment group led by Los Angeles Dodgers owner Mark Walter, is something else: inevitable.
Advertisement
Sports teams are an eye-watering asset class. Not only does owning one confer countless perks and the kind of societal status that most money can't even buy, but team valuations in the major North American sports have been on a steep upslope for decades. The sale of the Lakers represents a new peak and is also the latest data point that illustrates a new fact about sports ownership. The best properties have become too valuable an asset class for people like Jeanie Buss to control them.
Related: Lakers to be sold to Dodgers owner at $10bn valuation, per reports
Buss' father, Jerry, bought the team in 1979, and the Lakers have since then operated like one of the world's largest family businesses. The Lakers are by far the biggest source of the Buss family's wealth, and as ESPN reported on Thursday, the team has traditionally used its own revenues to pay its expenses. Its golden goose is an enormous local television deal with the LA cable provider Spectrum.
The cable bundle is dying, however, and these days the biggest sports teams are increasingly owned not by wealthy individuals and families but by consortiums of deep-pocketed investors and institutions. The Lakers had already moved in this direction; the Buss family sold a quarter stake in the team to a group led by Walter in 2021. That same group – with Walter as the frontman, but by no means doing it alone – took control of the Dodgers in 2012 and later bought control of the WNBA's Los Angeles Sparks.
Advertisement
Blue-chip sports properties like the Lakers are now too big for even most billionaires to just reach into their pocket and by all alone. For that reason, leagues have gradually made it much easier for institutional investors to buy stakes in teams. (The NFL, with limits, has swung open the door to private equity.) The corollary to that trend is that when a longtime owner like Jeanie Buss has buyers lined up with enough liquidity to secure her family fortune in cash, rather than ownership of a team, she's likely to jump at it.
The Lakers' new owners are likely to do very well on their investment. The decline of cable is a major threat to professional sports teams, and some smaller-market clubs in the NBA, NHL and Major League Baseball have taken substantial cash flow hits as regional carriers have faded. But the Lakers are so entwined with one of the world's largest cities that to bet against their continued growth is to bet against the future popularity of basketball, the city of Los Angeles and live entertainment altogether. Angelenos will not stop buying Lakers tickets and, even more critically, will not stop happily paying to watch 82 games per year, whether they're doing that on a streamer or traditional TV. The Lakers are too big to fail, and some time down the line, someone will value them at well more than $10bn.
The sale will probably be good for Lakers fans, though they are not the priority in any transaction of this type. Walter's group has done wonders with the Dodgers, seizing on the franchise's natural advantages – a rabid fanbase and a location players want to play in – and turned the team into the most consistent winner in baseball. It is harder to flex a financial advantage in the NBA than in salary cap-less MLB, but Walter's Dodgers have become the team with the best reputation among ballplayers. Not that the Lakers have a hard time attracting stars, but one could imagine them attracting even more of the players they covet. At the end of the day, isn't that kind of product what fans want to see?
While this will all likely go fine for the Lakers, the shift in ownership models does raise questions about what will become of sports teams that don't defy gravity by their very existence. Plenty of individual club owners have been massive flops who have earned the endless scorn of their clubs' fans. But the fact of having one highly visible, specific owner has at least rendered a version of accountability. After all, it's easier for Manchester United fans to chant 'Glazers out!' than it would be to chant 'shadowy consortium of institutional investors out!' A move toward large groups of investors controlling iconic teams will make it easier for individual actors to milk them for cash without facing the kind of public shaming that has long been possible for teams with more identifiable villains in the owner's suite. The Lakers are big enough and successful enough that this dynamic might never come to a head. Most teams can't say the same.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Verge

31 minutes ago

• The Verge

Tesla's first robotaxi rides will have a ‘safety monitor' in the passenger seat

Tesla has begun sending out invitations for its highly anticipated robotaxi service, but there's one significant caveat: it's installing a 'safety monitor' in the front passenger seat, as previously reported by Electrek. The invites, which were sent to Tesla influencers and investors, say the human monitor will 'accompany you on your trip' when rides begin on June 22nd — a move that's at odds with Elon Musk's promise of fully unsupervised rides. Details about Tesla's robotaxi service have been slim in the weeks leading up to its launch, but Musk said in January that the company would launch its 'unsupervised' robotaxi service with 'no one in the car' this summer. Musk expanded on this in an April earnings call, saying the 10 to 20 Model Y vehicles would be remotely operated in the event of an emergency. Tesla's invitation outlines some requirements for robotaxi rides, including that riders must request service between 6AM and 12AM within a geofenced area, 'excluding airports.' It adds that 'service may be limited or unavailable in inclement weather,' which is often a challenge for autonomous vehicles. Invitees can bring one additional guest 18 or older. Over the past couple of months, Tesla has faced pressure from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which has asked the EV-maker for more information about 'the ability of Tesla's system to react appropriately to reduced roadway visibility conditions.' Texas lawmakers have requested that Tesla delay its robotaxi launch until a revision to the state's autonomous driving law takes effect in September. It will require robotaxi services to get authorization from the Department of Motor Vehicles before operating without a human driver.

Wall Street Journal

32 minutes ago

• Wall Street Journal

Fed's Waller Suggests Support for a July Cut

Federal Reserve governor Christopher Waller said the central bank could be positioned to cut interest rates at its next meeting in July, notwithstanding potential inflation pressures caused by new tariffs. In a Friday morning interview with CNBC, Waller said the Fed should 'look through' one-time price increases from tariffs and instead respond to the underlying trend in inflation, which has been cooling.

Forbes

32 minutes ago

• Forbes

The High Price Of Leadership (And Ways To Bring It Down)

Joe Altieri is the CIO at RiteScreen and the Inventor of FlexScreen, the cutting-edge innovation revolutionizing the window industry. Leadership isn't glamorous. Motivational speeches, grateful teams and energizing collaborations are a part of it— sometimes. But more often than not, leadership is like that Rolex watch—so appealing but so incredibly expensive. University of Georgia head football coach Kirby Smart shared three very wise and insightful points about leadership that I think seasoned leaders don't talk about enough and young or aspiring leaders ignore to their peril. Here's how I interpreted them: When you're in a leadership position, you're entrusted with making decisions that serve the greater good—even if that means hurting someone you genuinely like or care about. Leaders who take the easy path and let a bad situation continue because they don't want to make any waves can expect an eventual tsunami of resentment. You can get away with tipping the scales for a difficult or incompetent (but very loyal) person a few times, but it won't take long for the grumbling to start among the faithful, hardworking employees who see the injustice with striking clarity. Action Step: Stay steadfast in your decisions. Do what you can to lessen the blow for the people who will be negatively affected, but don't neglect or put off doing the right thing. The short-term discomfort is far better than the likely long-term pain of shirking your leadership responsibilities. We all want to be effective AND liked, but the reality is that someone will always be unhappy or disapprove of your decision or direction. That is unavoidable. The goal must be to base our decisions on effectiveness—not popularity. And that's harder than it seems. When I was building a company, I made choices that prioritized innovation and long-term growth. Sometimes, that meant saying "no" to things others thought would be beneficial or necessary. Some people didn't like it. Some still don't. But leadership isn't a popularity contest, and the last thing you want is a room full of "yes" people. If everyone always agrees with you, it's time to check yourself. That red flag almost always means one of two things: They're afraid to voice an opinion or have relegated themselves to the reality that it wouldn't matter anyway. In either case, the leader is missing the mark entirely. So what can you do? Surround yourself with people who understand your heart, even if they don't always agree with your decisions. Communicate clearly and often. Allow yourself to be vulnerable. People may not like your choices, but they'll most likely respect you for being consistent, honest and mission-driven. The sooner you accept that you will be misunderstood—a lot—the better your leadership journey will be. Every leader will find themselves in the hot seat regularly. The first instinct is usually to defend and protect yourself, but that's a losing long-term strategy. The people who aren't you have no idea what it actually takes to be you, and no amount of explaining will help. Of course, if you can set the record straight, do it. But don't obsess over it. Unless the misunderstanding threatens to lead to long-term team or corporate damage, let your trusted inner circle handle it while you stay focused on the main objectives. The vast majority of the dust-ups will die down quickly with very little consequence, and if you have surrounded yourself with the right people, they will let you know if your intervention is necessary. What's the action step here? Rise above the fray. Resist the urge to strike back, keep moving forward with the company agenda and remember that it is always wise to overcommunicate, especially when tensions run high. Success, progress and wins tend to naturally quiet the discord. The common saying about war and sports perfectly applies to business, too; the best defense is a good offense. Leadership costs something. It costs comfort, ease, and sometimes relationships. But remember that you're not just building "something." You're investing in and building people. You're shaping culture and moving things forward. Sure, the weight of leadership can feel like a massive burden at times, but that's when perspective is critical. So, think of it like this. We get to do something that can be life-changing for so many. We get to empower and lift others up and lead people toward their full potential. We get to make a difference and, hopefully, make the world a better place. And that, my fellow leaders, is a rare privilege that is definitely worth the cost. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?