Survivors urge all political parties to support residential school burial investigations

Social Sharing
WARNING: This story contains details of experiences at residential schools.
As Canada's federal election heats up, residential school survivors and their advocates are urging political parties to pledge full support for investigations into unmarked burials and missing children linked to the institutions.
The previous Liberal government announced several initiatives following the findings of potential unmarked graves at the former Kamloops Indian Residential School in 2021. Four years later, the programs face questions about their future.
Last fall, an advisory committee working on identifying historical documents resigned, citing inadequate funding. Then in February, Canada discontinued funding for the expert committee advising Indigenous communities undertaking searches.
"The government of Canada, today, in 2025, should support this," said Cadmus Delorme, who was chair of the eight-person documents committee.
Delorme was also chief of Cowessess First Nation in 2021, when the community announced 751 suspected unmarked burials were located at the site of the former Marieval Indian Residential School in Saskatchewan. He said Canada "has a fiduciary financial responsibility in this moment," as communities still seek closure.
"We have to address certain things we inherited — we can't just forget about it — and this is one of them."
Meanwhile, Crown-Indigenous Relations has announced, then reversed, funding caps to the investigations themselves, and some communities continue to face delays and red tape.
"This is Canada's fault. They're to blame," said Janalee Jodouin, finance and project lead for the Wiikwogaming Tiinahtiisiiwin Project.
"They need to bring the children home, period. It's not rocket science. They need to fund it and they need to fulfil their promises."
The project was started by Grassy Narrows First Nation to investigate the former McIntosh Indian Residential School in northwestern Ontario. The group announced in January it located 114 unmarked burial features on the property, of which 106 were in the historical cemetery area.
Frustrated with Canada's lack of ongoing financial commitment, Jodouin invited CBC Indigenous to meet with the project's elders advisory last week to hear about the impact.
'No closure'
In the meeting, one survivor likened the institution to a work camp where she was made to do hard labour. Another recalled witnessing kids being beaten. Others described the Catholic-run school's devastating legacy.
"I don't understand why they would try to erase the Indian again by not making this known," said Steve Lands, a former McIntosh student and project co-ordinator.
"Many of us here have lost friends and family members through the abuse, the trauma, the legacy of the residential schools. This is where we need the funding not cut."
"It is important that Canada knows what we have suffered, and then Canada should help us complete this project," said McIntosh survivor Geraldine Fobister.
Former Grassy Narrows chief Rudy Turtle said he's concerned about the cuts and would like to hear someone explicitly say they'll fund the residential school searches.
"It's part of our truth and reconciliation," he said.
"It's part of our healing journey that everyone talks about and to cut it now when you're in the middle, it just makes it worse. There's going to be no closure at all."
Parties respond
CBC Indigenous contacted the six leading parties for their position.
The incumbent Liberals said a new Liberal government would remain committed to advancing reconciliation and healing.
"A Mark Carney-led Liberal government will continue this important work to support survivors and communities and move forward on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Calls to Action. I would refer you to the upcoming platform for additional information," a spokesperson said.
The Conservatives cited Leader Pierre Poilievre's comment at a Jan. 22, 2024 news conference.
"We should provide the resources to allow for full investigation into the potential remains at residential schools," he said at the time.
"Canadians deserve to know the truth and Conservatives will always stand in favour of historical accuracy."
The NDP, Bloc Québécois and Green Party all pledged to support full funding for the investigations.
"This work must be community-led, trauma-informed, and backed by long-term federal support," said the NDP.
"It is essential to support these efforts so that light can be shed on this sad history," said the Bloc in French.
The Greens said they would fully support the projects "with long-term stable funding and Indigenous-led oversight to uncover and address Canada's colonial history transparently and respectfully."
The People's Party of Canada said it would not support investigations.
"We believe enough money has already been wasted on this matter. No body has been found and this story has been blown out of all proportion," a spokesperson said.
Laura Arndt, secretariat lead at the Survivors' Secretariat, formed in 2021 to investigate the former Mohawk Institute Indian Residential School in Brantford, Ont., wants candidates to recognize the issue goes beyond partisan politics.
She said funding cuts feed residential school denialism, a phenomenon some some scholars define as the twisting of facts about a system the Truth and Reconciliation Commission described as cultural genocide.
"We are talking about the truth of history in this country, and a history that can't be talked about without using the word legacy when it comes to Indigenous people," said Arndt.
"So I'd like to see the parties really committing to taking forward the issues of Indian residential school survivors and having the records disclosed."
Through document analysis, the secretariat has confirmed 101 known deaths at the Mohawk Institute — more than doubling the 48 listed by the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation — but the group is in funding dispute with Ottawa that still may force it to shut down.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

National Observer

an hour ago

• National Observer

The climate discussion requires Indigenous leadership — every single day

Today is National Indigenous Peoples Day, a time for people across the country to come together to reflect on and celebrate the unique heritage, traditions and knowledge of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Peoples. Today we're reflecting on the importance of Indigenous leadership when it comes to climate policy. That's not always the first thing that comes to mind when people reflect on Indigenous contributions — but it should be. Indigenous people are often at the forefront of climate impacts and leaders in the development of the clean economy. We see this playing out in our current moment: Indigenous communities are grappling with the devastating impacts of wildfires supercharged by climate change and spreading across vast stretches of territory. Concurrently, Indigenous nations are leading the charge to be better prepared for future fires by reviving cultural burning practices that have been a longstanding part of land management. With much of the country seized by how to get major projects off the ground in the wake of trade uncertainty south of the border, Indigenous people continue to remind the country that they are critical partners in any path forward. Indigenous nations have shown the way ahead when it comes to the energy transition, developing renewable energy, battery storage, electricity transmission and mining projects, among many others. Indigenous knowledge systems have sustained communities since time immemorial, embedded in relational and holistic approaches to lands and waters. The reflection of this relationship must extend beyond a single day. It must be engrained in how we think about, develop and deliver climate policy. If you've learned the language of a country you've visited, ask yourself: Have you learned any of the Indigenous languages of the land you live on now? Learning these words can transform how we understand the land, the climate crisis and the cultural survival of those most deeply connected to it. Supporting Indigenous climate leadership requires moving beyond conventional ideas of co-development toward centering Indigenous nationhood. This includes supporting Indigenous land and water governance systems, which would contribute to more equitable and reciprocal policy and decision-making approaches. Indigenous Peoples are often at the forefront of climate impacts and leaders in the development of the clean economy, write Maria Shallard, Shianne McKay and Grace Donnelly Amplifying Indigenous-led climate solutions Five years ago, the Canadian Climate Institute and Centre for Indigenous Environmental Resources partnered to create the Indigenous Perspectives Program. This mentorship and case study initiative was designed to amplify Indigenous-led research that identifies successful strategies, highlights systemic barriers and shares lessons learned from Indigenous responses to climate impacts, mitigation efforts and the clean energy transition. Each year, we support the development of case studies with stipends, offering a platform for research led by and for Indigenous people. Case studies are given an opportunity for language translation as a way to advance the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's call to support language and culture, and as a way to respect time-honoured ways of knowing and being. The case study program culminates in a live, virtual roundtable that brings together a national audience of community members, government representatives, industry leaders, academics, and non-profits. The roundtable is a space to elevate Indigenous climate policy recommendations, uphold reciprocity in participant feedback, and spotlight the individuals and organizations enacting change in their communities. The roundtable brings together Indigenous and non-Indigenous leaders to listen, learn and collaborate in pursuit of Indigenous-led climate policy. Indigenous governance is power for climate policy This year, as with the previous five years, we heard powerful testimony from Indigenous climate leaders across the country. Their insights highlight both successes and ongoing systemic failures, including the persistent limitations of co-development frameworks that do not fully account for Indigenous governance systems. On the East Coast, we heard about the incredible opportunities Indigenous communities like the North Shore Mi'kmaq Tribal Council have to lead in the clean energy transition through community-owned distributed energy systems. This approach not only cuts emissions, it also supports self-determination and economic independence. In light of the current national conversation around energy corridors, we heard how Indigenous-inclusive transmission projects offer a path to unlocking Canada's remarkable renewable energy potential — a crucial part of building the bigger, cleaner, smarter electricity systems needed to cut emissions and support a cleaner economy. In Cowichan territory, we heard about the opportunities and challenges faced by a commercial fishing business owned and operated by the Cowichan tribes called Quw'utsun Kw'atl'kwa Enterprises, as they work to address the interconnected challenges of climate change, industry practices, and environmental sustainability in adaptive fisheries' management through a holistic lens. In the territory of the Omushkego Cree, also known as the water people, we learned how the Friends of the Attawapiskat River are raising grassroots Indigenous voices to protect the land for future generations in Ontario's Ring of Fire region. These risks, alongside the call to return to Indigenous governance, were themes that were echoed in the stories of the Anishnabe Moose Committee, a grassroots collective from several Anishnabe (Algonquin) communities working directly to protect moose, land, and culture from deforestation, mismanagement and climate impacts. A call to reflect and learn Each of these authors' perspectives adds an important dimension to how we address the challenge of climate change and build a better future together. As we mark National Indigenous Peoples Day, we invite everyone to reflect on the lands they inhabit. Consider the diversity of Indigenous nations, the history of treaties — or their absence — and the deep relationships between people, place and non-human kin. Maria Shallard is the Director, Indigenous Research at the Canadian Climate Institute and lives as a guest on unceded K'ómoks territory. Shianne McKay is a member of the Minegoziibe Anishinaabe, a Senior Project Manager at the Centre for Indigenous Environmental Resources & representative of Canadian Climate Institute Council of Advisors.

Winnipeg Free Press

3 hours ago

• Winnipeg Free Press

Canada still doesn't understand respecting Indigenous rights

Opinion Thirty-five years ago this week, history was made in Manitoba. Events this week in Ottawa point to just how little we have learnt from that history. In Manitoba in June of 1990, Elijah Harper, MLA for what was then the third party NDP Opposition in a minority government, said 'No', and opposed the Meech Lake Accord. The backdrop was clear. A crisis. In this case, the 'need' to include Quebec in the constitution. The solution, Canadians were told, was the Meech Lake Accord. It was agreed to by Canada's premiers with an artificial deadline set by then-prime minister Brian Mulroney. He talked about rolling the dice. There was one problem. There were many people opposed to Meech Lake. In particular, Indigenous people were clear. It not only excluded Indigenous people, but threatened to be a major step backwards. Elijah Harper was the voice for Indigenous Peoples when he came out against the Accord. What is often missed is how Elijah Harper said 'No'. He said no to procedurally giving leave to rush through the ratification of Meech Lake. Despite great pressure from the federal government, Speaker Denis Rocan ruled in favour of the key point of order brought forward by Elijah Harper arguing that the proper notice procedure had not been followed. There was no closure and the Legislature could not pass the Accord before the deadline. Thirty-five years later, in Ottawa, the House of Commons is rushing through Bill C-5 without consultation. It is a bill that claims to respond to a crisis. That somehow Canada's response to the so-called existential threat with Donald Trump is to throw out our existing processes for approving major projects, and instead we must speed up approvals by threatening to sideline Indigenous rights and environmental protections. To achieve this, the government is relying on the full support of the Conservative opposition, not only to support the legislation but to bring in closure, limiting debate. A handful of MP's have spoken out against both the contents and process of Bill C-5. The Green and NDP MPs who face a challenging situation because they do not have party status have opposed it. Even one Liberal MP called out the unfairness of the process. What is different is that in 1990, despite all the pressures, the Manitoba legislature followed its own procedures based on hundreds of years of parliamentary democracy and did not ram through the Meech Lake Accord. The actions of not only Elijah Harper, but so many other Indigenous people forced Canada to recognize the need to respect Indigenous rights. In many ways, it was a major first step towards what in subsequent years has been reconciliation. What has been happening with Bill C-5 in 2025 couldn't be more different. There has been a blatant disregard for the process you would expect for a bill of this significance. The hasty introduction and closure being attached to Bill C-5 fly in the face of the consultation you would normally expect on any bill, let alone the constitutionally required consultation on matters involving Indigenous peoples. Indigenous peoples have been clear in opposing both the process and substance of the bill. Many people have been calling out what is seen as a betrayal of reconciliation. We learned a major lesson in 1990. That Indigenous peoples will defend their rights. That reconciliation starts with not only recognizing Canada's history of genocide against Indigenous peoples but that provincial and federal governments must recognize the limits of their own powers in the context of Indigenous rights. But as Santayana said 'Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it ' Sadly, in 2025, key political leaders have chosen not to remember these lessons of history and are repeating Canada's failure to recognize Indigenous rights. There is one more lesson too. We also learned that the 'crisis' of 1990 was greatly exaggerated. Despite subsequent efforts with the failed Charlottetown accord, the constitutional question was never finally closed. But Canada continues. The so-called crisis we are facing currently will go the same way. What will matter is not just how we react to Donald Trump or any other political leader or economic threat. In terms of history, it is how much we will have acted in accordance with our own values based on our own distinct history. The events of 1990 set us on a better course. The events of 2025 with Bill C-5 threaten to set us back dramatically. Steve Ashton is a former member of the Manitoba Legislature. He was the NDP House Leader during the debate on the Meech Lake Accord in the Manitoba Legislature in 1990. Niki Ashton is the former NDP MP for Churchill-Keewatinook Aski

Toronto Star

9 hours ago

• Toronto Star

Mark Carney promises to consult with Indigenous communities in choosing projects under controversial Bill C-5

OTTAWA — Facing concerns and warnings of Indigenous resistance against a key part of his governing agenda, Prime Minister Mark Carney acknowledged Friday that 'more fulsome conversations are needed' to choose the development projects his government wants to fast-track through controversial new legislation, Bill C-5. Speaking moments after the bill passed third reading in the House of Commons, Carney pledged to hold meetings in the coming weeks with First Nations, Inuit and Métis leaders and experts in a series of summits to 'launch the implementation of this legislation in the right way' in 'full partnership' with Indigenous communities.