TVA's Clinch River Nuclear Power Project: Where Things Stand Today
The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) has for many years been evaluating emerging nuclear technologies, including small modular reactors, as part of technology innovation efforts aimed at developing the energy system of the future. TVA—the largest public power provider in the U.S., serving more than 10 million people in parts of seven states—currently operates seven reactors at three nuclear power plants: Browns Ferry, Sequoyah, and Watts Bar. Meanwhile, it's also been investing in the exploration of new nuclear technology by pursuing small modular reactors (SMRs) at the Clinch River Nuclear site in Tennessee. 'TVA does have a very diverse energy portfolio, including the third-largest nuclear fleet [in the U.S.],' Greg Boerschig, TVA's vice president for the Clinch River project, said as a guest on The POWER Podcast. 'Our nuclear power plants provide about 40% of our electricity generated at TVA. So, this Clinch River project and our new nuclear program is building on a long history of excellence in nuclear at the Tennessee Valley.'
TVA completed an extensive site selection process before choosing the Clinch River Nuclear (CRN) site as the preferred location for its first SMR. The CRN site was originally the site of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor project in the early 1980s. Extensive grading and excavation disturbed approximately 240 acres on the project site before the project was terminated. Upon termination of the project, the site was redressed and returned to an environmentally acceptable condition. The CRN property is approximately 1,200 acres of land located on the northern bank of the Clinch River arm of the Watts Bar Reservoir in Oak Ridge, Roane County, Tennessee (Figure 1). The property includes the CRN site, which is approximately 935 acres, and the Grassy Creek Habitat Protection Area, which is approximately 265 acres and located north of the CRN site. The property itself is owned by the federal government and is managed by TVA in accordance with the Watts Bar Land Management Plan. [caption id="attachment_231845" align="aligncenter" width="740"]
1. Potential SMR facility at Clinch River rendering. Courtesy: TVA[/caption] The CRN site has a number of significant advantages, which include two existing power lines that cross the site, easy access off of Tennessee State Route 58, and the fact that it is a brownfield site previously disturbed and characterized as a part of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor project. Furthermore, it is immediately adjacent to the U.S. Department of Energy's Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR), which was established in the early 1940s as part of the Manhattan Project, a secret undertaking that produced materials for the first atomic bombs. ORR consists of approximately 37,000 acres of federally owned land, the majority of which has remained undeveloped in a relatively natural state. The Oak Ridge area is also noted to have a skilled local workforce, including many people familiar with the complexities of nuclear work. 'The community acceptance here is really just phenomenal,' said Boerschig. 'The community is very educated and very well informed.' TVA began exploring advanced nuclear technologies in 2010. In 2016, it submitted an application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for an Early Site Permit for one or more SMRs with a total combined generating capacity not to exceed 800 MW of electricity for the CRN site. In December 2019, TVA became the first utility in the nation to successfully obtain approval for an Early Site Permit from the NRC to potentially construct and operate SMRs at the site. While the decision to potentially build SMRs is an ongoing discussion as part of the asset strategy for TVA's future generation portfolio, significant investments have been made in the Clinch River project with the goal of moving it forward.
TVA selected GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy's (GEH's) BWRX-300 SMR as the preferred technology for the CRN site. 'The decision to pursue GE was made about three years ago,' Boerschig explained, noting that Generation IV technology still had a lot of unknowns at the time. Fuel was a significant factor behind the decision to go with GEH. Many advanced reactors require high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) fuel, but the BWRX-300 does not. In 2022, the war in Ukraine had made many industry observers wary of HALEU's availability because much of the potential supply was expected to come from Russia. There was legitimate concern around how embargos and other potential complications could affect HALEU supplies in the future. 'The [GEH] fuel is American made. It's the same fuel assemblies as you'll have in its Gen I and II counterparts,' said Boerschig. In fact, it's the same exact fuel assemblies that are used in TVA's Browns Ferry units. Concerning the BWRX-300, Boerschig also noted there were fewer first-of-a-kind features in the design and that the supply chain was more established. 'GE's supply chain is somewhere between 85% and 90% intact,' he said. 'So, when you look at the risks of different technologies, for us—and I think it's important to say, for how this technology fit into our enterprise needs—it was the right choice.'
In March 2023, GEH, TVA, Ontario Power Generation (OPG), and Synthos Green Energy (SGE) agreed to team up to advance the global deployment of the BWRX-300 SMR. Through a technical collaboration agreement that was announced in Washington, D.C., TVA, OPG, and SGE agreed to invest in the development of the BWRX-300 standard design and detailed design for key components, including the reactor pressure vessel and internals. GEH, meanwhile, said it was committed to standard design development and anticipated a total investment of about $400 million associated with the development. Each contributor said it would fund a portion of GEH's overall cost and collectively would form a 'Design Center Working Group' with the purpose of ensuring the standard design would be deployable in multiple jurisdictions. The long-term goal is for the BWRX-300 design to be licensed and deployed in Canada, the U.S., Poland, and beyond. Notably, OPG has a BWRX-300 project well underway at its Darlington New Nuclear Project site in Clarington, Ontario, with construction expected to be complete by the end of 2028. This is expected to be the first grid-scale SMR in North America. While OPG is developing its project in parallel with the design process, TVA expects to wait for more design maturity before launching its CRN project. 'As far as the standard design is concerned, we're at the same pace, but overall, their project is about two years in front of ours,' said Boerschig. 'And that's by design—they are the lead plant for this effort.' In the meantime, there are two primary items on TVA's to-do list. 'Right now, the two biggest things that we have on our list are completing the standard design work, and then the construction permit application,' Boerschig said, noting the standard design is 'somewhere north of 75% complete' and that TVA's plan is to submit the construction permit application 'sometime around mid-year of this year.' To hear the full interview with Boerschig, which contains much more about the CRN project, the development of a domestic nuclear supply chain, the role government leaders have played in supporting advanced nuclear technology, and the importance of the project to furthering U.S. competitiveness on the world stage, listen to The POWER Podcast. Click on the SoundCloud player below to listen in your browser now or use the following links to reach the show page on your favorite podcast platform:
Apple Podcasts
Spotify
YouTube
YouTube Music
Amazon Music
iHeart
TuneIn
SoundCloud
The POWER Podcast · 187. TVA's Clinch River Nuclear Power Project: Where Things Stand Today
For more power podcasts, visit The POWER Podcast archives. —Aaron Larson is POWER's executive editor (@AaronL_Power, @POWERmagazine).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Every fusion startup that has raised over $100M
Over the last several years, fusion power has gone from the butt of jokes — always a decade away! — to an increasingly tangible and tantalizing technology that has drawn investors off the sidelines. The technology may be challenging to master and expensive to build today, but fusion promises to harness the nuclear reaction that powers the sun to generate nearly limitless energy here on Earth. If startups are able to complete commercially viable fusion power plants, then they have the potential to upend trillion-dollar markets. The bullish wave buoying the fusion industry has been driven by three advances: more powerful computer chips, more sophisticated AI, and powerful high-temperature superconducting magnets. Together, they have helped deliver more sophisticated reactor designs, better simulations, and more complex control schemes. It doesn't hurt that, at the end of 2022, a U.S. Department of Energy lab announced that it had produced a controlled fusion reaction that produced more power than the lasers had imparted to the fuel pellet. The experiment had crossed what's known as scientific breakeven, and while it's still a long ways from commercial breakeven, where the reaction produces more than the entire facility consumes, it was a long-awaited step that proved the underlying science was sound. Founders have built on that momentum in recent years, pushing the private fusion industry forward at a rapid pace. With a $1.8 billion Series B, Commonwealth Fusion Systems catapulted itself into the pole position in 2021. Since then, the company has been quiet on the fundraising front (no surprise), but it has been hard at work in Massachusetts building Sparc, its first-of-a-kind power plant intended to produce power at what it calls 'commercially relevant' levels. Sparc's reactor uses a tokamak design, which resembles a doughnut. The D-shaped cross section is wound with high-temperature superconducting tape, which when energized, generates a powerful magnetic field that will contain and compress the superheated plasma. In Sparc's successor, the commercial-scale Arc, heat generated from the reaction is converted to steam to power a turbine. CFS designed its magnets in collaboration with MIT, where co-founder and CEO Bob Mumgaard worked as a researcher on fusion reactor designs and high-temperature superconductors. Backed by Breakthrough Energy Ventures, The Engine, Bill Gates, and others, Devens, Massachusetts-based CFS expects to have Arc operational in the early 2030s. The company has raised a total of $2 billion, according to PitchBook. Founded in 1998, TAE Technologies (formerly known as Tri Alpha Energy) was spun out of the University of California, Irvine by Norman Rostoker. It uses a field-reversed configuration, but with a twist: after the two plasma shots collide in the middle of the reactor, the company bombards the plasma with particle beams to keep it spinning in a cigar shape. That improves the stability of the plasma, allowing more time for fusion to occur and for more heat to be extracted to spin a turbine. The company raised $150 million in June from existing investors, including Google, Chevron, and New Enterprise. TAE has raised $1.79 billion in total, according to PitchBook. Of all fusion startups, Helion has the most aggressive timeline. The company plans to produce electricity from its reactor in 2028. Its first customer? Microsoft. Helion, based in Everett, Washington, uses a type of reactor called a field-reversed configuration, where magnets surround a reaction chamber that looks like an hourglass with a bulge at the point where the two sides come together. At each end of the hourglass, they spin the plasma into doughnut shapes that are shot toward each other at more than 1 million mph. When they collide in the middle, additional magnets help induce fusion. When fusion occurs, it boosts the plasma's own magnetic field, which induces an electrical current inside the reactor's magnetic coils. That electricity is then harvested directly from the machine. The company raised $425 million in January 2025, around the same time that it turned on Polaris, a prototype reactor. Helion has raised $1.03 billion, according to PitchBook. Investors include Sam Altman, Reid Hoffman, KKR, BlackRock, Peter Thiel's Mithril Capital Management, and Capricorn Investment Group. Pacific Fusion burst out of the gate with a $900 million Series A, a whopping sum even among well-funded fusion startups. The company will use inertial confinement to achieve fusion, but instead of lasers compressing the fuel, it will use coordinated electromagnetic pulses. The trick is in the timing: All 156 impedance-matched Marx generators need to produce 2 terawatts for 100 nanoseconds, and those pulses need to simultaneously converge on the target. The company is led by CEO Eric Lander, the scientist who led the Human Genome Project, and president Will Regan. Pacific Fusion's funding might be massive, but the startup hasn't gotten it all at once. Rather, its investors will pay out in tranches when the company achieves specified milestones, an approach that's common in biotech. Shine Technologies is taking a cautious — and possibly pragmatic — approach to generating fusion power. Selling electrons from a fusion power plant is years off, so instead, it's starting by selling neutron testing and medical isotopes. More recently, it has been developing a way to recycle radioactive waste. Shine hasn't picked an approach for a future fusion reactor, instead saying that it's developing necessary skills for when that time comes. The company has raised a total of $778 million, according to PitchBook. Investors include Energy Ventures Group, Koch Disruptive Technologies, Nucleation Capital, and the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation. Now its third-decade, General Fusion has raised $440.53 million, according to PitchBook. The Richmond, British Columbia-based company was founded in 2002 by physicist Michel Laberge, who wanted to prove a different approach to fusion known as magnetized target fusion (MTF). Investors include Jeff Bezos, Temasek, BDC Capital, and Chrysalix Venture Capital. In an General Fusion's reactor, a liquid metal wall surrounds a chamber in which plasma is injected. Pistons surrounding the wall push it inward, compressing the plasma inside and sparking a fusion reaction. The resulting neutrons heat the liquid metal, which can be circulated through a heat exchanger to generate steam to spin a turbine. General Fusion hit a rough patch in spring 2025. The company ran short of cash as it was building LM26, its latest device that it hoped would hit breakeven in 2026. Just days after hitting a key milestone, it laid off 25% of its staff. Tokamak Energy takes the usual tokamak design — the doughnut shape — and squeezes it, reducing its aspect ratio to the point where the outer bounds start resembling a sphere. Like many other tokamak-based startups, the company uses high-temperature superconducting magnets (of the rare earth barium copper oxide, or REBCO, variety). Since its design is more compact than a traditional tokamak, it requires less in the way of magnets, which should reduce costs. The Oxfordshire, UK-based startup's ST40 prototype, which looks like a large, steampunk Fabergé egg, generated an ultra-hot, 100 million degree C plasma in 2022. Its next generation, Demo 4, is currently under construction and is intended to test the company's magnets in 'fusion power plant-relevant scenarios.' Tokamak Energy raised $125 million in November 2024 to continue its reactor design efforts and expand its magnet business. In total, the company has raised $336 million from investors including Future Planet Capital, In-Q-Tel, Midven, and Capri-Sun founder Hans-Peter Wild, according to PitchBook. Zap Energy isn't using high-temperature superconducting magnets or super-powerful lasers to keep its plasma confined. Rather, it zaps the plasma (get it?) with an electric current, which then generates its own magnetic field. The magnetic field compresses the plasma about 1 millimeter, at which point ignition occurs. The neutrons released by the fusion reaction bombard a liquid metal blanket that surrounds the reactor, heating it up. The liquid metal is then cycled through a heat exchanger, where it produces steam to drive a turbine. Like Helion, Zap Energy is based in Everett, Washington, and the company has raised $327 million, according to PitchBook. Backers include Bill Gates' Breakthrough Energy Ventures, DCVC, Lowercarbon, Energy Impact Partners, Chevron Technology Ventures, and Bill Gates as an angel. Most investors have favored large startups that are pursuing tokamak designs or some flavor of inertial confinement. But stellarators have shown great promise in scientific experiments, including the Wendelstein 7-X reactor in Germany. Proxima Fusion is bucking the trend, though, having attracted a €130 million Series A that brings its total raised to more than €185 million. Investors include Balderton Capital and Cherry Ventures. Stellarators are similar to tokamaks in that they confine plasma in a ring-like shape using powerful magnets. But they do it with a twist — literally. Rather than force plasma into a human-designed ring, stellarators twist and bulge to accommodate the plasma's quirks. The result should be a plasma that remains stable for longer, increasing the chances of fusion reactions. Marvel Fusion follows the inertial confinement approach, the same basic technique that the National Ignition Facility used to prove that controlled nuclear fusion reactions could produce more power than was needed to kick them off. Marvel fires powerful lasers at a target embedded with silicon nanostructures that cascade under the bombardment, compressing the fuel to the point of ignition. Because the target is made using silicon, it should be relatively simple to manufacture, leaning on the semiconductor manufacturing industry's decades of experience. The inertial confinement fusion startup is building a demonstration facility in collaboration with Colorado State University, which it expects to have operational by 2027. Munich-based Marvel has raised a total of $161 million from investors including b2venture, Deutsche Telekom, Earlybird, HV Capital, and Taavet Hinrikus and Albert Wenger as angels. First Light dropped its pursuit of fusion power in March 2025, pivoting instead to become a technology supplier to fusion startups and other companies. The startup had previously followed an approach known as inertial confinement, in which fusion fuel pellets are compressed until they ignite. First Light, which is based in Oxfordshire, U.K., has raised $140 million, according to PitchBook, from investors including Invesco, IP Group, and Tencent. Though nothing about fusion can be described as simple, Xcimer takes a relatively straightforward approach: follow the basic science that's behind the National Ignition Facility's breakthrough net-positive experiment, and redesign the technology that underpins it from the ground up. The Colorado-based startup is aiming for a 10-megajoule laser system, five times more powerful than NIF's setup that made history. Molten salt walls surround the reaction chamber, absorbing heat and protecting the first solid wall from damage. Founded in January 2022, Xcimer has already raised $109 million, according to PitchBook, from investors including Hedosophia, Breakthrough Energy Ventures, Emerson Collective, Gigascale Capital, and Lowercarbon Capital. This story was originally published in September 2024 and will be continually updated. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Los Angeles Times
4 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
California decarbonization projects are among two dozen eliminated by Trump's Department of Energy
California Democrats are denouncing the Trump administration's decision to terminate $3.7 billion in funding for two dozen clean energy projects, including three in the Golden State. The 24 awards recently canceled by the U.S. Department of Energy were issued by the Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations under the Biden administration and primarily focused on carbon capture and sequestration and decarbonization initiatives. Trump officials said the projects do not 'advance the energy needs of the American people' and would not generate a positive return on investment for taxpayers. 'While the previous administration failed to conduct a thorough financial review before signing away billions of taxpayer dollars, the Trump administration is doing our due diligence to ensure we are utilizing taxpayer dollars to strengthen our national security, bolster affordable, reliable energy sources and advance projects that generate the highest possible return on investment,' DOE Secretary Chris Wright wrote in his announcement about the terminations. One of the largest cuts was a $500-million award for the National Cement Company of California, whose first-of-its-kind Net-Zero Project in Lebec was geared toward developing carbon-neutral cement. Cement production is notoriously emission-intensive, accounting for as much as 8% of planet-warming greenhouse gases due to both the high heat needed in the process and its byproducts. National Cement Company officials said the project would capture up to 1 million tons of CO2 per year — effectively the entire emissions profile of its cement plant near the border of Los Angeles and Kern counties — but also would act as a roadmap for the cement industry as a whole. 'As we understand the new priorities of the U.S. Department of Energy, we want to emphasize that this project will expand domestic manufacturing capacity for a critical industrial sector, while also integrating new technologies to keep American cement competitive,' the company said in an email. It is now exploring options to keep the project alive. The funding cuts arrive amid sweeping changes driven by Trump's orders to rein in federal spending and 'unleash American energy.' The president has removed barriers for fossil fuel companies, such as regulations that limit greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, and called for increased oil and gas drilling and natural resources mining. California, meanwhile, has set some of the nation's most ambitious decarbonization goals, including its aim to reach carbon neutrality by 2045. Environmental experts, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, say capturing and storing carbon will be essential for slowing global warming, in addition to efforts to reduce overall carbon emissions. In a letter to Wright dated Tuesday, California Sens. Adam Schiff and Alex Padilla said the terminations 'run counter to our shared interest in boosting energy production, innovation, and economic vitality.' They urged Wright to reinstate the projects. 'The United States cannot afford to halt our progress and hinder American companies' efforts to move beyond outdated technologies if we hope to remain competitive and truly energy dominant around the globe,' the senators wrote. 'These irrational cancellations will increase energy prices, hamper innovation, and set us backwards as we strive toward a clean energy future.' The cement project wasn't the only one canceled in California. The DOE also terminated a $270-million award for an air-cooled carbon capture and sequestration facility at the Sutter Energy Center, a natural gas power plant in Yuba City. Carbon sequestration is the process of capturing CO2 and preventing it from entering the atmosphere by storing it underground, in aquifers or other geologic formations. The Sutter project was projected to reduce emissions from the plant by up to 95% and capture and store up to 1.75 million metric tons of CO2 each year, according to its federal project page. The federal government also canceled $75 million for a project at the Gallo Glass Company in Modesto, which would have demonstrated the viability of replacing gas-powered furnaces with a hybrid electric melter, reducing natural gas use by as much as 70%, the federal database shows. Schiff and Padilla said all of the awards were provided through legally binding contract agreements between the recipients and the federal government, and so cannot be canceled 'on a political whim.' For its part, the DOE said it arrived at its decisions following a thorough and individualized financial review of each project, which found that they 'did not meet the economic, national security or energy security standards necessary to sustain DOE's investment.' However, the terminations also appear to run counter to the administration's own public commitments. The White House on Earth Day said Trump seeks to promote energy innovation 'by supporting cutting-edge technologies like carbon capture and storage, nuclear energy, and next-generation geothermal.' The DOE eliminated funding for projects across the country, including in Texas, Mississippi, Kentucky, Wyoming, Louisiana, Texas, Alabama, Ohio, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, Texas, Washington, Arizona and Nevada. But the cancellations in California mark yet another affront to the climate conscious state, which has in recent weeks also seen the Trump administration overturn its ability to set strict tailpipe emission standards and eventually ban the sale of new gas-powered gars. The state is suing the administration over that decision.
San Francisco Chronicle
6 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Tech entrepreneur pushes plan for ‘Silicon Valley 2.0' on Bay Area waterfront
A Silicon Valley entrepreneur is circulating plans for a futuristic tech enclave in Alameda, on land that is already slated for development. The pitch for Frontier Valley, a 512-acre waterfront complex that combines dense residential buildings with space to launch drones and rockets, surfaced on social media Sunday and instantly went viral. It confounded officials in Alameda, who said the project's founder, James Ingallinera, had not contacted them about his proposal. Cloaked in flashy visuals and brash marketing language, the idea for Frontier Valley still seems inchoate. Ingallinera envisions his development as a special jurisdiction independent from the Bay Area and the state, a form of zoning that would require an emergency declaration from President Trump. Frontier Valley fits the template of a 'Freedom City,' or deregulated area meant to serve as a vast open-air laboratory for new technology. Trump has vowed to build ten of them. Renderings of Frontier Valley show a landscape that resembles the world of a video game, with steel zeppelins and hovercrafts floating among cylindrical glass towers. Promotional materials on the website advertise a culture of 'radical moonshots and freedom,' steeped in techno-optimism and the celebration of personal liberty, with ambition to match Trump's erstwhile advisor, Elon Musk. The plan was first reported by the Nerd Reich website. 'This is the Manhattan Project of our time,' Ingallinera says in a video posted on his project's website. He also describes Frontier Valley as 'a wholly new, self-contained, Silicon Valley 2.0,' with loose regulations and complete independence from both the Bay Area and the state. According to his LinkedIn profile, Ingallinera previously founded another company that built co-habitational dwellings in San Francisco and New York City, aimed at young techies who would sleep in bunk beds. He also advised a nonprofit dedicated to whole brain emulation, the concept that scientists could create a digital replica of the human brain. Ingallinera did not respond to inquiries from the Chronicle on Monday. A spokesperson for the city of Alameda said the parcel that Ingallinera's group is targeting, a former naval air station called Alameda Point, has other development projects underway. These include a Veterans Administration medical facility and columbarium that Congress has authorized and funded, as well as a 158-acre open space park, created in partnership with East Bay Regional Parks District. 'No reasonable fact supports the proposed declaration of emergency at Alameda Point,' city spokesperson Sarah Henry said in a statement, noting that city leaders fully support turning the area, now home to a shoreline park, several craft breweries, two ferry terminals, into a 'vibrant community of commercial, industrial, and residential uses, including many high-tech and bio-tech uses.' Ingallinera is eyeing land adjacent to those buzzy transit hubs and dining corridors, which is currently empty but will ultimately house the park and VA medical campus. As of now it has no infrastructure, Henry said.
