Kelsey Parker mum-shamed for admitting she doesn't put suncream on her kids and strongly argues ‘they don't burn'
KELSEY Parker has come under fire after admitting she doesn't apply sunscreen on her kids.
Tom Parker's widow Kelsey, 34, made the shock confession in the latest episode of Mum's the Word! podcast with Georgia Jones.
2
After Georgia, 38, complained that putting SPF protection on her son Cooper was like torture, the actress shared her bizarre explanation.
''It's cause he knows, Georg. It's bad for you - that sunscreen.''
Kelsey, who is now expecting her first baby with boyfriend Will Lindsay, went on: ''My kids do not wear suncream. The only thing that I may put on them is an organic suncream.''
The 34-year-old, whose late husband Tom tragically passed away in 2022 at just 33, absurdly claimed that ''suncream is so bad''.
''We never used to wear suncream, suncream causes skin cancer.''
According to the TV personality and vlogger, suncream contains ''really harmful chemicals'' - and instead of using sunscreen, you should simply stay hydrated and stay out of the sun during the hottest time of the day.
''The Spanish do a siesta. Why do the Spanish do a siesta from like 12pm until 2pm? Because it's the hottest time to be out in the sun.''
When on holiday, Kelsey strongly argued that despite not covering her kids, daughter Aurelia and son Bodhi, in sunscreen ''they do not burn''.
Skin cancer is the uncontrolled growth of abnormal skin cells, and it's the most prevalent form of all cancers in the world.
"The good news is there are plenty of ways you can lower your risk of developing skin cancer," said Dr. Cheryl Peters, a senior scientist in cancer prevention at BC Cancer and BCCDC.
"Unfortunately, there are quite a few misconceptions about sun protection that can confuse the issue."
In particular, some media has reported concern with ingredients oxybenzone, a synthetic estrogen, and retinyl palmitate, a form of vitamin A stored by the skin, and other stories might talk about vitamin D and risk of sunscreen reducing the amount of this important hormone in the body.
"This myth is very concerning to me," said Dr. Peters, reassuring that there ''is no evidence that approved sunscreens cause cancer or other health problems''.
''In fact, the opposite is true: not wearing sunscreen poses a significant cancer risk,'' the expert warned.
Kids will complain about the lotion and say it is cold or pasty.
However, children must get into a routine of applying sunscreen whenever the sun is out, experts insist.
melanoma and premature ageing.
'Stop the madness'
Online, Kelsey has since come under fire, with dozens of concerned social media users flooding to slam the pregnant mum-of-two.
One person said: ''Sunscreen doesn't cause skin cancer. The sun does. Stop the madness FFS.''
Another Instagram user chimed in: ''Even if you're children have skin prone to tanning rather than burning they need UVA/B protection via sun cream to reduce skin cell damage.
''If you are reluctant to put suncream all over them then use UV suits and hats for sun protection but you should still be putting suncream on the exposed areas e.g face, arms and legs to minimise risk of skin cancer later in life.
''I appreciate there's anxiety around suncream especially with the noise on social media but as a paediatrician this is what I would recommend.''
A third commented: ''It's so important to clarify that even when skin 'tans', it is still sun damage. Our skin does not 'adjust' to the sun — that's misinformation.''
Someone else said: ''Such a strange strange flex not to protect your children from harmful UV rays.
''A simple scroll of your socials shows your don't apply a thick white cream to your children whilst in the sun.
''So you're either lying about your stance or going out of your way to harm your children. Either way incredibly strange!'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
NHS plan for all babies to undergo genome sequencing after birth
Labour plans to invest £650 million into DNA technology to proactively treat serious illnesses. Health secretary Wes Streeting stated this initiative aims to "leapfrog" diseases by predicting and preventing them. Reports suggest that within a decade, all babies could undergo whole genome sequencing as part of this drive. The investment supports the government's 10-year NHS plan, which prioritizes technology, prevention, community care, and digital services. This strategy seeks to provide personalized healthcare, reduce pressure on NHS services, and follows a recent £29 billion annual increase in NHS funding.
The Sun
31 minutes ago
- The Sun
I tried a 11p Amazon buy that promises you'll never sweat out of your armpits again
NOW that the temperatures in the UK are finally rising, there's one thing many of us dread: sweat patches. They are those uncontrollable annoying damp circles under the arms - that no matter how much deodorant you put on, can not be avoided. 5 5 Whether it's a casual coffee with friends, a day out in the sunshine, or a high-stakes work meeting, visible sweat marks can leave you feeling self-conscious and desperate to cover up. I've tried everything in the past to combat this - from strong antiperspirants to breathable fabrics - but nothing seemed to truly solve the problem, especially on those warmer days when sweat patches seem inevitable. So, I decided to do a little research, convinced there must be a hack out there to help tackle this frustrating issue. After all, we live in the 21st century, where there are brilliant inventions like portable washing machines and self-cleaning gadgets. Naturally, my first stop was TikTok, where I stumbled across the trending hashtag #sweatpatches. That's when I discovered a solution that's surprisingly simple yet completely effective: Armpit Sweat Pads from Amazon, priced at just £4.59 for a pack of 40. This works out to be around 11p per pad. These pads are designed for everyone - men, women, and even children - and are perfect for a variety of situations, from commuting on the tube to exercising, giving speeches, or just enjoying a hot summer's day. They promise to absorb sweat, lock in moisture, and keep your underarms dry for up to six to eight hours. On top of that, they help prevent those dreaded yellow stains on your favourite tops, which, as we all know, are nearly impossible to get out. My feet always get freezing during the winter - my £1 hack will keep them toasty, with no need to put the heating on Using them is easy: you simply peel off the plastic backing and stick the adhesive side onto the armpit area of your top, leaving the padded side to absorb the sweat. At first, I was sceptical, but desperate enough to give them a try - and to my pleasant surprise, they actually worked. Despite a particularly sweaty day, my top stayed completely dry, and the pads themselves felt so comfortable that I forgot I was even wearing them. I kept checking throughout the day, expecting them to fail, but they didn't. The pad itself even stayed dry to the touch. Discreet padding What really impressed me was how discreet they were. They didn't leave any marks on my clothes or arms, and at the end of the day, I barely noticed they were still there - a testament to how lightweight and comfortable they are. I could stretch my arms, dance, socialise, and go about my day without worrying about embarrassing sweat patches. The only minor challenge is getting the positioning right when you first apply them, but after a couple of tries, it becomes second nature. 5 5 For just £4.59, these disposable sweat pads are an absolute game-changer. They're ultra-thin, incredibly effective, and suitable for both sports and daily wear. If you, like me, have been battling the dreaded sweat patches and pit stains, I can't recommend these enough. They've quickly become a staple in my summer survival kit, and I'll definitely be stocking up for the warmer months ahead. How to dress in a heatwave SUMMER is finally here with temperatures soaring this weekend, but it has been so long since we dressed for the warmer weather - what should we wear?The Sun's fashion team is here to help with a cut-out-and-keep guide to heatwave attire. Clemmie Fieldsend and Abby McHale reveal the ultimate dos and don'ts so that you never suffer from unsightly tan lines, sweaty patches or wardrobe malfunctions again. Cover up While you might be tempted to put on your skimpiest outfit when the mercury rises above 25C, it has actually been proven that staying covered up can keep you cooler. We're not saying wear your winter coat and wrap up. You should wear a light breathable fabric such as cotton - look for flowy midi skirts, dresses or wide leg trousers which will billow and create a nice cool breeze for you as you walk. Prepare for extremes With our unpredictable weather, it's not uncommon to see either someone in hotpants with goose-pimpled legs after an unexpected downpour, or at the other end of the spectrum, someone still wearing their winter tights in 30C heat. When you're on the fence, opt for a loose co-ord that will keep you cool but not expose you to the elements if it rains. Wear shorts Yes, you can wear shorts - and at any age. The key is getting the length just right and longer shorts are all the rage this year. Short shorts are of course allowed but they won't make you any cooler. If anything, micro-shorts can make you feel hotter. Plus, they are wedgie inducing, often too tight and often show off rather too much bum cheek. Wear white White is not the easiest to keep clean but it is the best shade for a heatwave, and looks effortlessly chic. It doesn't absorb light like black but instead, reflects it. It's also a shade that never goes out of style. If you do get the odd suncream smear on your whites, quickly dab with hand soap and water, rub in with a brush and then wash as normal. Don't show bra straps Whilst everyone wants to wear strappy clothing in the summer, there really is nothing classy about your bra straps being on show - especially when they're the opposite colour to your top. Instead, if you are plumping for a strappy top, stick a strapless bra underneath. Don't attempt a boob tube The boob tube has got to be one of the most faffy and unflattering pieces of clothing you can own. Yes, you will avoid shoulder strap tan lines, but you will spend the whole day pulling your top up and trying to keep your boobs in place. Come evening, you will have grubby fingerprints all over and will have no doubt experienced the odd nip slip. Don't choose espadrilles Espadrille wedges were once Kate Middleton's go-to summer shoe but they have well and truly fallen off the fashion wagon. While noughties ballet flats are back, the espadrille is yet to have its revival. It's one of those fashion items that Gen Z won't be seen dead in, and have even dubbed 'the granny sandal'. For now, opt for a ballet flat or a sandal. Don't wear crochet The crochet trend is nice enough and while it looks great on the likes of Love Island presenter Maya Jama, it's simply not practical. If the sun is out, chances are, you'll end up with tragic tan lines like a mosaic. Plus, it's essentially knitwear - hot and itchy. For men, knitted polos have also crept into the fashion fold, masquerading as summer wear but they are made from synthetic materials and induce swear. Wear at your own risk.
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rantzen warns peers not to hamper progress of assisted dying law
Assisted dying campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen has urged members of the House of Lords not to block landmark legislation on the issue. The Terminally Ill Adults (End Of Life) Bill cleared the Commons with a majority of 23 votes on Friday, but opponents have vowed to continue their resistance in the unelected chamber. The legislation could face a difficult passage through the Lords, with critics poised to table amendments to add further restrictions and safeguards to the Bill. Dame Esther told BBC Radio 4's Today: 'I don't need to teach the House of Lords how to do their job. They know it very well, and they know that laws are produced by the elected chamber. 'Their job is to scrutinise, to ask questions, but not to oppose. 'So yes, people who are adamantly opposed to this bill, and they have a perfect right to oppose it, will try and stop it going through the Lords, but the Lords themselves, their duty is to make sure that law is actually created by the elected chamber, which is the House of Commons who have voted this through.' Dame Esther, who turns 85 on Sunday and has terminal cancer, acknowledged the legislation would probably not become law in time for her to use it and she would have to 'buzz of to Zurich' to use the Dignitas clinic. Paralympian and crossbench peer Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson told BBC Breakfast: 'We're getting ready for it to come to the Lord's and from my personal point of view, about amending it to make it stronger. 'We've been told it's the strongest Bill in the world, but to be honest, it's not very high bar for other legislation. 'So I do think there are a lot more safeguards that could be put in.' Conservative peer and disability rights campaigner Lord Shinkwin said the narrow Commons majority underlined the need for peers to take a close look at the legislation. He told Today 'I think the House of Lords has a duty to expose and to subject this Bill to forensic scrutiny' but 'I don't think it's a question of blocking it so much as performing our duty as a revising chamber'. He added: 'The margin yesterday was so close that many MPs would appreciate the opportunity to look at this again in respect of safeguards as they relate to those who feel vulnerable, whether that's disabled people or older people.' Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who steered the Bill through the Commons, told the PA news agency she hoped peers would not seek to derail the legislation, which could run out of parliamentary time if it is held up in the Lords. She said: 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.' A group of 27 Labour MPs who voted against the legislation said: 'We were elected to represent both of those groups and are still deeply concerned about the risks in this Bill of coercion of the old and discrimination against the disabled, people with anorexia and black, Asian and minority ethnic people, who we know do not receive equitable health care. 'As the Bill moves to the House of Lords it must receive the scrutiny that it needs. Not about the principles of assisted dying but its application in this deeply flawed Bill.' Meanwhile, one of the leading opponents of the Bill, Conservative Danny Kruger, said 'these are apocalyptic times'. In a series of tweets on Friday night, the East Wiltshire MP – who is at odds with his mother, Great British Bake Off judge Dame Prue Leith in her support for legalisation – accused assisted dying campaigners of being 'militant anti-Christians' who had failed to 'engage with the detail of the Bill'.
