AI Agents Are Coming To Healthcare

A digital workforce is coming to healthcare.
getty
Y Combinator calls 2025 the 'year of AI agents,' and singled out healthcare as a key focus area. Bill Gates predicts that agents will 'upend the software industry, bringing about the biggest revolution in computing since we went from typing commands to tapping on icons." Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently proclaimed that agents "present a trillion-dollar opportunity.'
You get the point. Agents are all the rage throughout the tech industry. But what exactly are agents? What role might they play in healthcare? And what's holding them back from realizing their potential?
Because early chatbots used decision trees and scripted responses, they struggled with in-depth conversations. With ChatGPT's release, millions of people discovered how to interact with large language models across an almost unlimited range of topics.
Agents build on that foundation. They are LLMs enhanced with capabilities such as retrieval, memory, and tools—enabling them to carry out narrowly defined tasks without human supervision (e.g., booking a flight or responding to a customer service request). While copilots assist humans, agents take over tasks entirely. Agentic AI coordinates multiple task-specific agents to accomplish multi-step goals.
Many healthcare provider organizations are struggling. Their workforces are strained and shorthanded. Margins are thin, labor costs are rising, and many processes are inefficient and wasteful. Meanwhile, patients often struggle to access timely, affordable, and effective care.
Numerous industries, such as banking, travel, and personal finance, have improved productivity and service by doing more with fewer people. Agents may unlock similar opportunities in healthcare. Always on, scalable, and tireless, agents could automate a range of administrative and even clinical processes.
That's why many view agents not just as tech, but as operational infrastructure and digital labor. As Luminai CEO Kesava Kirupa Dinakaran explained, 'When you think about how computers can drive value, it's by improving operations. At their core, healthcare organizations are all about operations.' The hope is that agents can expand access, lower costs, improve experiences, and enhance outcomes.
A burgeoning wave of companies is racing to deliver AI agents that enable provider organizations to do more with less.
Call centers are today's leading use case. Most patients still make appointments by phone, and many skip them due to scheduling hassles. Agents can manage inbound calls by conversing with patients and taking the next best actions (e.g., scheduling an appointment or making a referral). When agents cannot handle an end-to-end call, they can verify key details, summarize the conversations, and hand off to human staff.
Assort Health Co-CEO Jeff Liu explained that his company aims to help healthcare organizations 'train the best operators they ever had.' By turning scheduling protocols into rules engines and plugging agents into EHRs, his co-CEO Jon Wang reported that their company automates most inbound calls—routing the rest to call center workers and nurses in priority order.
Similarly, Hello Patient CEO Alex Cohen reports that his company's 'fully generative voice and SMS agents handle real-time front‑office calls and proactively re-engage patients, letting clinics boost access and fill schedules without adding headcount.'
Agents are also handling outbound calls. Notable's agents prepare patients for clinic visits by verifying their insurance benefits, clarifying (and documenting) their reason for the visit, and checking them in for their appointments. Qventus' agents help optimize patients for procedures and surgeries by providing preparation instructions, sending appointment reminders, answering general care questions, and coordinating pre-admission testing. Infinitus deploys agents to perform health risk assessments and help patients access specialty therapies and rare disease programs.
Some agents support patients between and after visits. Ambience Healthcare is developing agents that send follow-up instructions, medication reminders, and scheduling prompts based on visit notes. Hippocratic AI provides a constellation of agents for nurse-level clinical tasks, such as making post-discharge follow-up calls and closing care gaps. The company calls this 'super staffing' since many organizations lack the staff to do enough of this work on their own. Sword Health, a digital physical therapy platform, uses agents to onboard patients, provide customer service, and even help them return hardware. And Cedar recently launched an AI voice agent, Kora, to handle billing inquiries, explain charges, surface payment options, and connect patients with financial assistance.
Agents are not limited to patient-facing roles—they're also streamlining the back office. For example, one of Luminai's agents reads incoming faxes and automatically triggers downstream workflows like refills and referrals. VoiceCare AI automates communication between provider organizations, insurers, and patients. Its CEO, Parag Jhaveri, reported that their agent, Joy, can wait on hold for more than 30 minutes, navigate phone trees, sustain multi-hour conversations, and take actions like updating claims and filing requests.
Building a well-scripted, polished demo is easy. Delivering reliable performance on real-world healthcare tasks is much harder. Agents often score far short of human performance. For one, healthcare is complex—filled with edge cases, exceptions, and contextual nuance. As legendary software engineer Steven Sinofsky noted, automation is ultimately about handling exceptions, not the routine.
Several technical barriers stand in the way. Healthcare data is deeply siloed and fragmented. Lisa Bari, Head of External Affairs at Innovaccer, warns against deploying agents without full contextual data.
Also, while LLMs enable agents to handle a wide range of inputs, they can produce uncontrolled outputs. Longer conversations and more contextual data can reduce accuracy and increase latency. Moreover, error rates compound across multi-step processes. For example, an agent with 98% per step will complete a five-step task successfully only 90% of the time (0.98⁵).
Developers use various strategies to make agents more reliable. As Sword Health product lead Rik Renard, RN, emphasized, "Evaluating agents' output against pre-specified criteria is essential for deploying reliable agents, yet few people discuss this.'
Many agentic systems use specialized knowledge graphs to contextualize information and 'coordinating agents' to link multiple, narrow task-specific agents. Technical guardrails help ensure agents stay within scope and flag questionable output for human review.
Still, picking the right use cases is critical. Notable Chief Medical Officer Dr. Aaron Neinstein told me that his company first deploys agents in low-risk areas (e.g., patient intake) to build trust before expanding into more complex workflows.
Even with clear use cases, deployment remains hard and no shortcuts exist. As Cedar CEO Dr. Florian Otto summed it up, 'Agents must be built workflow by workflow and only deployed when they reliably work well.'
Agents must also integrate with other tech systems—like EHRs and CRMs—to access contextual data and execute tasks. Most use native API integrations, though some interact through the same point-and-click interfaces that healthcare workers use.
Ultimately, in an 'agentic economy,' agents must interact with one another—communicating information, transferring resources, collaborating, and tracking transactions. This will require persistent identity and seamless communication protocols, which developers are now building. Several companies, including Salesforce, Microsoft, and Innovaccer, have launched platforms to orchestrate multi-agent healthcare workflows.
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.'
Arthur C. Clark famously explained, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.' If you haven't interacted with an AI agent or tried a modern voice model, you should. This isn't your mother's old pharmacy's IVR system. The technology has crossed the uncanny valley — it feels like magic.
But unlike magic, it's not infallible. In high-stakes situations, unreliable AI can cause real harm. As extreme examples, consider how the National Eating Disorder Association's chatbot 'Tessa' encouraged users with eating disorders to diet, or how a Character.AI companion allegedly pushed a teenager to commit suicide.
Agents, however, are more than chatbots. They are tireless digital workers who are always ready to complete specific tasks. When stitched together, they can form multi-agent systems—or 'agent swarms'— that handle complex, interdependent processes and behaviors.
Yet, US and EU regulators have approved exceedingly few healthcare AI agents. Hardian Health's Dr. Hugh Harvey warns, "Health systems and clinicians using unregulated AI agents must accept all the risk.' Will they be willing? While regulatory approval is cumbersome, it may be necessary to speed adoption.
Also, unlike magic, AI agents aren't plug-and-play. Implementing agents is a massive change-management undertaking.
Patients will need to adjust their expectations and learn to interact differently with technology and healthcare. In his book Alchemy, Rory Sutherland explains that in our 'unrelenting quest' for greater efficiency, we often forget to ask 'whether people like efficiency as much as economic theory believes they do.'
Take the 'doorman fallacy:' a hotel that replaces doormen with automatic doors may save money, while overlooking the other valuable functions doormen provide, such as hailing taxis, providing security, welcoming guests, and signaling the hotel's status.
Similarly, healthcare workers often do far more than their simple job description. For example, if agents automate scheduling, who will reassuringly mention that 'everyone loves Dr. Smith' or that she tends to run late at the end of the day?
Of course, healthcare workers aren't perfect or always available. Several company leaders I spoke with say patients prefer interacting with their agents over healthcare workers. But this remains to be seen. Outside healthcare, Klarna—the buy now, pay later company—recently walked back its ambitious efforts to replace two-thirds of its customer service workforce with AI agents. It turns out many customers still want to talk to real people.
Agents will also reshape how healthcare workers do their jobs. By offloading drudgery, agents could empower some. Yet others may resent having to babysit new digital coworkers that could potentially replace them.
Interestingly, one company CEO shared that executives and managers–not frontline staff–are often the most resistant. Perhaps they worry agents will shrink their teams and reduce their influence. Or, more likely, they may feel daunted by all that responsible deployment demands: surfacing tacit knowledge, defining ground truths, streamlining workflows, and retraining workers for new forms of human-AI collaboration.
Infinitus CEO Ankit Jain explained his company 'sells outcomes, not technology.' It focuses on supporting change management, recognizing that 'organizations must be able to crawl before they walk and then run.'
For agents to succeed, organizations must look inward. Technology is an amplifier. It can boost productivity or magnify inefficiency. Healthcare organizations, which strongly pull towards inertia, must actively reexamine their operations, rebalance their workforces, and reinforce their digital governance. Otherwise, poorly integrated agents could cause confusion and chaos.
Optimizing workflows is essential. So is relieving downstream constraints. For example, a flawless appointment-scheduling agent is of limited value if doctors' schedules are always full. An outreach agent that flags patient needs is only helpful if there are enough nurses and clinicians available to respond.
Taken together, these developments point toward a future that's both promising and uncertain.
'Technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral.'
Healthcare's digital history has taught us hard lessons: technology can help, but it cannot miraculously solve all problems. And tech doesn't work in isolation—lasting change depends on rethinking people, processes, and priorities, not just deploying tools.
Roy Amara famously observed, 'We tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run.' That seems likely with AI agents.
In the near term, agents will make existing workflows faster and cheaper—answering calls, managing intake, and making appointments. Next, they may improve those workflows—coordinating across channels, adding personalization, and responding with context. Eventually, they may enable entirely new approaches, with networks of agents operating semi-autonomously across systems.
At the heart of this evolution is a core tension: leverage versus certainty. Agents promise a kind of abundance—tireless labor at negligible cost. But that leverage introduces risk. For now, they'll likely remain in administrative domains, where errors are less costly and rarely dangerous.
Still, care delivery is also quite inefficient. Care models for both acute and chronic illness have barely changed in decades—and the clinician-patient encounter remains healthcare's choke point.
Here, too, agents may help: handling triage, guiding protocol-driven decisions, even managing chronic conditions. Much of this is already technically feasible. But real progress will require much more: rigorous evaluation, regulatory clarity, updated business models, cultural acceptance, redesigned teams, and seamless escalation paths to human care.
Melvin Kranzberg's First Law reminds us: 'Technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral.' The promise of agents is real—but conditional. Their impact depends on how we design, deploy, and govern them.
Will agents make care more personalized—or more transactional? Will they return time to clinicians—or reduce their autonomy and turn them into machine supervisors? Will they bring people closer together—or insert more distance? Will they relieve burden—or hollow out the human core of care?
Agents are coming. What they become depends on us.
I thank the following people for discussing this topic with me: Ray Chen and Jonathan Fullerton (Ambience Healthcare), Jeffery Liu and Jon Wang (Assort Health), Florian Otto (Cedar), Hugh Harvey (Hardian Health), Alex Cohen (HelloPatient), Rick Keating (Hippocratic AI), Ankit Jain (Infinitus), Abhinav Shashank and Lisa Bari (Innovaccer), Pankaj Gore (Insight Health), Kesava Kirupa Dinakaran (Luminai), Aaron Neinstein and Tushar Garg (Notable), David Atashroo (Qventus), Rouhaan Shahpurwala (Sully.AI), Rik Renard and Kevin Wong (Sword Health), Maria Gonzalez Manso (Tucuvi), Parag Jhaveri (VoiceCare AI), Sergei Polevikov (WellAI), and Stuart Winter-Tear.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

31 minutes ago

• Yahoo

10 Brilliant Growth Stocks to Buy Now and Hold for the Long Term

Electric vehicles, next-generation data centers, semiconductors, digital technology, and machine vision are just a few of the investment themes explored. Some of these companies have encountered near-term headwinds, creating attractive buying opportunities. All these stocks have powerful underlying secular growth drivers. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Not all of the growth stocks featured here will likely deliver outsize returns, so it makes sense to spread portfolio risk around a collection of holdings. In that line of thought, here are 10 growth stock ideas for investors to consider. They range from a couple of high-profile household names, such as Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) and Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL), to companies like Navitas Semiconductor (NASDAQ: NVTS) and Synopsys (NASDAQ: SNPS), which are less well known. You might want to consider buying and holding any (or all) of these equities long-term. The key to the investment case for Tesla lies in its promised robotaxis and unsupervised full self-driving (FSD) software, which is scheduled to launch on a limited basis beginning this week. Tesla is already a highly successful automaker and the dominant player in electric vehicles (EVs) in the U.S., and robotaxis offer the prospect of transforming it into a company able to generate high-margin and recurring revenue from owning its robotaxi fleet or revenue sharing from Tesla's transformed fleet using Full Self-Driving (FSD) software. There's also the dedicated robotaxi, Cybercab, and the potential to sell FSD on a subscription basis. And all of it will be supported by Tesla's market-leading position in EVs and its ability to develop affordable EVs in the future. Nvidia partners Navitas Semiconductor and Vertiv (NYSE: VRT) and the next generation of data centers, namely 800-volt (V) high voltage direct current (HVDC), which I've discussed in more detail elsewhere, so investors with the time and inclination can peruse. Nvidia believes they will be more efficient, with lower maintenance costs and significantly lower costs of ownership. The new data centers, scheduled for 2027, employ a different power conversion method, and Navitas is developing Gallium Nitride (GaN) and Silicon Carbide (SiC) power semiconductors to enable more efficient power conversion in 800V HVDC data centers. Similarly, another Nvidia partner, and leading data center equipment provider, Vertiv, is developing critical power and cooling equipment and systems for the new data centers and expects to have them available in the second half of 2026, in time for the launch of the 800V HVDC data center in 2027. What makes both companies particularly interesting is that, unlike their rivals, they are more like pure plays in their end markets. For example, Navitas specializes in GaN and SiC chips for power conversion (not silicon), and 80% of Vertiv's revenue comes from data centers. Speaking of SiC and GaN chips, Aehr's (NASDAQ: AEHR) stock has soared recently on speculation that Navitas might be a customer for Aehr's testing and burn-in equipment. Aehr's equipment helps semiconductor manufacturers ensure quality and reliability throughout the manufacturing process. Aehr has struggled recently as its revenue at SiC customers, including ON Semiconductor, has declined in light of pullbacks in EV investment. Still, Aehr is making good progress in opening up and winning customers in new markets, including GaN semiconductors and semiconductors for artificial intelligence (AI) processing. Synopsys is a leader in electronic design automation software (used to design and verify chips), and its intended acquisition of engineering simulation and analysis company Ansys is a key event. The aim is to create a company offering design software, as well as simulation and analysis software to test the fruits of the design. It will also open up Synopsys' solutions to Ansys' wider range of end-market customers, particularly as semiconductors and electronics are increasingly being embedded in a range of new industries. The advanced materials company's lightweight composites are the future of the aerospace industry, as every new generation of airplane contains more composites. This means Hexcel (NYSE: HXL) can grow as airplane production increases (Airbus and Boeing have multiyear backlogs in place) and new, more composite-rich airplanes are developed. Hexcel has faced headwinds in recent years as Airbus' and Boeing's delivery rates have fallen short of expectations, but it's only a matter of time before they improve. Cognex (NASDAQ: CGNX) is another company with excellent long-term secular growth prospects (the use of machine vision in automated processes) that has suffered near-term headwinds (weakness in key end markets like automotive and consumer electronics). Still, this is a temporary slowdown in a long-term growth story. PTC (NASDAQ: PTC) provides computer-aided design (CAD), product lifecycle management (PLM), and other solutions essential to creating a so-called "digital thread" for a physical product as it moves from design through manufacturing, use, servicing, and ultimately disposal. As such, it's a leading player in the digitization of the industrial sector. Trimble's (NASDAQ: TRMB) precise positioning hardware (its origins) and growing software/services also make it a leading play on digitization. In Trimble's case, it's about integrating physical positioning with the digital world, such as in construction and infrastructure work, transportation, and geospatial activities. Through the use of advanced analytics in the digital world, Trimble's solutions can be integrated into its customers' daily workflows. Last but not least, Delta's growing mix of premium cabin revenue, loyalty program, co-brand card remuneration, and ability to adjust and compete in economy tickets when necessary means it's a much more diversified airline than a decade ago. In addition, as a network operator, it's much better positioned to deal with the growing cost pressures in the industry than low-cost carriers. Despite headwinds in 2025, it's ideally placed to generate value for shareholders over the long term. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $373,066!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,158!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $664,089!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Cognex, Nvidia, Synopsys, and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends Ansys, Delta Air Lines, Hexcel, ON Semiconductor, PTC, and Trimble. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 10 Brilliant Growth Stocks to Buy Now and Hold for the Long Term was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Yahoo

42 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Upgrade your operating system to Windows 11 Pro for $15

The following content is brought to you by Mashable partners. If you buy a product featured here, we may earn an affiliate commission or other compensation. TL;DR: Upgrade your PC with Windows 11 Pro for only $14.97 (reg. $199) before codes sell out. If you haven't heard already, Microsoft has officially announced the countdown clock on Windows 10. Are you still running your PC on this dated operating system? Now might be the perfect time to finally upgrade your device's performance, because the latest operating system, Windows 11 Pro, is now less than $15. With these Windows 11 Pro keys, you can completely revamp two compatible PCs, whether they're your personal or work computers. For starters, you'll enjoy a refreshed user interface that's been designed to be intuitive and aesthetically pleasing with rounded corners. This updated operating system provides more than just an improved navigation experience. New productivity tools like snap layouts, easy redocking, and improved voice typing can help you complete personal and professional tasks, and you'll even have a more powerful search experience to get you further. Digital safety is paramount for anyone online, which is why Windows 11 Pro is outfitted with enhanced security measures like Smart App Control, TPM 2.0, BitLocker device encryption, and more for greater peace of mind as you browse, stream, or game. And speaking of gaming, this operating system is designed to improve PC gaming graphics with DirectX12 Ultimate. Since this is the Pro version of Windows 11, you'll additionally get remote work-friendly features, such as remote desktop access for viewing files and running programs from your mobile device. There's also Azure AD, Hyper-V, and Windows Sandbox for extra professional usage. Score this Windows 11 Pro discount for just $14.97. Act while the price is still at an all-time low, or before codes sell out for good. StackSocial prices subject to change Opens in a new window Credit: InterPlein Microsoft Windows 11 Pro $14.97 $199 Save $184.03 Get Deal

Android Authority

an hour ago

• Android Authority

5 carriers you should sign up for instead of T-Mobile

Joe Maring / Android Authority If you're shopping for a new cell phone carrier in the US, there's a good chance you're considering T-Mobile. As one of the most well-known cell service providers in the country, it's likely at the top of your shopping list. But before you pull the trigger on T-Mobile, I'd advise you to first consider the alternatives. Between lackluster new plan offerings and the removal of long-beloved features like taxes and fees bundled into monthly prices, T-Mobile has seen better days. Whether you're considering joining T-Mobile for the first time (or are a current customer and thinking about switching), here are a few other carriers I recommend joining instead. Which T-Mobile alternative would you choose? 0 votes Visible NaN % Google Fi NaN % US Mobile NaN % Mint Mobile NaN % Metro by T-Mobile NaN % Other (let us know in the comments) NaN % Visible Joe Maring / Android Authority My first recommendation is a personal one, as it's the carrier I switched to after being a T-Mobile customer myself for 10 years. If you want a cell provider with easy-to-understand plans, simple pricing, and solid features, Visible is one of the best options out there. One of the reasons I like Visible so much is how straightforward its plans are. You have just three to choose from, all of which include unlimited talk, text, 5G data, and hotspot usage. The more expensive plans include additional perks such as 5G UW connectivity, faster hotspot speeds, higher-quality video streaming, and enhanced international coverage. You can pay for the plans monthly or yearly, and taxes and fees are included in the price you see on Visible's website – something T-Mobile is (annoyingly) moving away from. Joe Maring / Android Authority And speaking of those prices, they're highly competitive. The standard Visible plan is currently available for just $20/month and has everything most people need. If you want more out of your cell service, the Visible Plus and Visible Plus Pro plans are still really well-priced at $30/month and $40/month, respectively. Visible Plus Pro is the plan I chose, and it comes with 4K UHD video streaming, Visible's fastest hotspot speeds, and free smartwatch data. Perhaps the biggest difference between T-Mobile and Visible is that Visible uses Verizon's network for its coverage. This shouldn't be an issue at all, but if you know you're in an area with a good T-Mobile connection, you'll want to double-check that Verizon is available in your area as well (which it almost certainly is). Google Fi Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority One of the other carriers that was at the top of my list when I was looking for a T-Mobile replacement was Google Fi. While Visible worked out better for my situation, my colleague Andrew Grush swears by Google Fi as being the best T-Mobile alternative for most people, and I don't disagree with him. For starters, Google Fi uses T-Mobile's towers for its coverage, meaning if you have good T-Mobile service where you live, you'll be equally covered by Google Fi. Plus, unlike the other carriers mentioned below, Google Fi customers are prioritized on the same level as regular T-Mobile postpaid plans. During times of network congestion, Google Fi users are prioritized ahead of those with US Mobile, Mint Mobile, and even Metro by T-Mobile. Joe Maring / Android Authority Google Fi's plans are also significantly cheaper than T-Mobile's, starting at $35/month for the Unlimited Essentials plan and going up to $65 for Unlimited Premium. T-Mobile's cheapest Essential Savers plan costs $50/month and goes up to a staggering $100/month for the Experience Beyond plan. T-Mobile's Experience plans have extra streaming perks you won't find with Google Fi, but if you don't care about those things and just want fast, reliable T-Mobile coverage, Google Fi is the better (and cheaper) way to go. Google Fi's Unlimited Premium plan is much better than any of T-Mobile's plans if international data is important to you, and it's also unique in that it comes with free data connectivity for tablets and laptops. Plus, no matter what Google Fi plan you choose, you also get free smartwatch data. Visible ultimately worked out better for my needs and budget, but if you prefer T-Mobile to Verizon's network — and you don't want your data throttled when cell towers are busy — Google Fi is an easy recommendation. US Mobile Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority If you're unable to decide if you should get a carrier with T-Mobile or Verizon coverage — or maybe one with AT&T's network — it might be worth joining US Mobile. Rather than relying on cell towers from one of these companies, US Mobile provides service from all three of them. All US Mobile plans can switch between the three networks (with some restrictions), while US Mobile's two more expensive plans also allow you to use two of the three networks simultaneously, with automatic switching to whichever one has better coverage at any given time. While that's easily US Mobile's most unique feature, it's not the only reason to consider it instead of T-Mobile. You can pay for US Mobile plans monthly or annually, and all of them include taxes and fees in the listed price. Joe Maring / Android Authority US Mobile also supports multi-line family accounts (something Visible doesn't have), lets you choose unlimited or by-the-GB data plans, and even includes free subscriptions to services like Spotify and Netflix, depending on the plan you choose. Sorting through all of the plan and add-on options from US Mobile can make it a little overwhelming at first, but it's by far one of the most robust options on this list — and the only one with coverage from T-Mobile, Verizon, and AT&T. Mint Mobile Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority If you want to keep things as simple (and cheap) as possible, Mint Mobile may be a great fit for you. Like Google Fi, Mint Mobile relies on T-Mobile towers for its cell service. You'll be subject to throttling during high network congestion more often than if you have Google Fi, but that may be a perfectly fine compromise for you, considering how affordable Mint Mobile is. Unlike all of the other carriers mentioned here, Mint Mobile exclusively sells its plans in bulk. Instead of paying a phone bill every month, you buy 3, 6, or 12 months of service at a time. That means a higher upfront cost, but the effective monthly rates are among the cheapest you'll find. Joe Maring / Android Authority For example, you can currently pay $45 to get 3 months of unlimited talk, text, and 5G data, working out to just $15 per month. Alternatively, you can pay $240 upfront to get 12 months of unlimited everything, equalling $20 per month. Are there any downsides? Mint Mobile says you 'may experience' slower data speeds if you have the unlimited plan and go over 35GB of data in a single month, and video streaming is restricted to 480p on all plans. Still, for plans that cost this little, Mint Mobile is worth checking out. Mint Mobile - plans starting at $15/mo Mint Mobile - plans starting at $15/mo Get the Deal Mint Mobile plans - starting at $15/mo per line Metro by T-Mobile Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority Last but not least, if you like some of the features of T-Mobile but want them for cheaper, Metro by T-Mobile could be for you. It's on the more expensive side of things, but it also mimics the traditional T-Mobile experience better than anything else on this list. How so? All Metro plans include the same access to T-Mobile Tuesdays that you get with regular T-Mobile plans, giving you perks like gas discounts, free and more. Metro plans also come with T-Mobile's Scam Shield technology to help prevent spam calls. Unlike all the other carriers I've discussed, Metro has physical stores where you can walk in to sign up for service, buy a phone, or get help with your account. Joe Maring / Android Authority Metro's prices range from $40 to $60 per month for its unlimited plans, with the $60 option offering perks such as 25GB of hotspot data, 100GB of cloud storage via Google One, and a complimentary Amazon Prime membership. Better yet, taxes and fees are included in all of the prices. Your monthly bill with Metro won't be as low as going with another carrier like Visible or Mint, but if those T-Mobile perks are important to you, Metro might make the most sense. What's the best T-Mobile alternative? Joe Maring / Android Authority As happy as I've been with Visible in my post-T-Mobile life, there's a good argument to make for every carrier mentioned above. And there are even more T-Mobile alternatives I didn't include, such as Helium Mobile and Klarna's new cell plan. As such, I don't think it's fair to say that one is objectively best compared to everything else. I like the straightforward pricing and features of Visible's plans, but you may prefer the data prioritization that comes with Google Fi, or maybe getting T-Mobile Tuesdays with Metro. There's ultimately no wrong choice here. So long as you pick the plan/carrier that fits your needs the best, that's all that really matters.