Israeli airstrikes kill 52 in Gaza amid growing calls for ceasefire
The body of a Palestinian is transported on a car as mourners attend the funeral of Palestinians who were killed, according to medics, in Israeli fire, at Al-Shifa hospital, in Gaza City, June 12, 2025. PHOTO: REUTERS
Listen to article
At least 52 people have been killed across Gaza in Israeli airstrikes since dawn, according to medical sources reported by Al Jazeera.
Among those killed, at least 26 died in Israeli drone attacks while waiting for food and aid being distributed by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a controversial organization backed by the United States and Israel.
Gaza's al-Awda Hospital received 10 bodies and approximately 200 injured individuals after drones struck a civilian gathering near an aid distribution point at the Netzarim checkpoint.
The al-Shifa Hospital also reported receiving six bodies following similar drone strikes on aid queues in the northwestern Gaza areas of Netzarim and as-Sudaniya.
The GHF's aid distribution model has faced sharp criticism from the United Nations, with UNRWA chief Philippe Lazzarini calling it "deeply flawed."
He further criticised the operation, comparing the situation to a "dystopian 'Hunger Games.'" Lazzarini urged the UN to take charge of providing humanitarian aid to avoid exacerbating the crisis.
In addition to the airstrikes, two Palestinians were killed in Israeli shelling in the Bir an-Naaja area near Jabalia refugee camp in northern Gaza.
Meanwhile, communication lines in Gaza were disrupted, with Hamas condemning the move as part of Israel's "war of extermination." The blackout has hindered emergency services and humanitarian coordination, leaving organizations like UNRWA unable to contact their staff in Gaza.
As these incidents unfold, the United Nations General Assembly is preparing to vote on a draft resolution urging an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in Gaza.
Diplomats anticipate overwhelming support for the resolution, despite opposition from Israel, which has lobbied against what it calls a "politically motivated, counterproductive" move.
Last week, the United States vetoed a similar resolution in the UN Security Council.
The violence and humanitarian crisis continue to escalate as the international community seeks a resolution, with the UN General Assembly vote representing a pivotal moment in the ongoing conflict.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
US B-2 bombers used Indian airspace to attack Iran's nuclear facilities
Listen to article US B-2 stealth bombers reportedly used Indian airspace to carry out strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, according to regional sources cited in multiple reports on Sunday. Sources claimed the US Air Force's strategic bombers departed from Guam Island in the western Pacific, passed over the Andaman Sea, and then traversed central Indian airspace before reaching their strike zone near Iran via the Arabian Sea. The route reportedly covered coordinates including 15°N, 145°E (Guam), through 10°N, 95°–100°E (Andaman Sea), crossing 20°N, 75°–80°E (central India), and reaching the vicinity of 25°–30°N, 60°–65°E (near Iran's borders). The development comes amid escalating tensions in the Middle East following recent US airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear sites — an escalation triggered by over a week of Israeli aggression, according to Iran. Defence analysts have called this a potentially significant signal of India's evolving strategic role in the region. 'The reported use of Indian airspace by US bombers could mark a new chapter in the regional security calculus,' one analyst told local media. There has been no official confirmation from the Indian government or the US military regarding the use of Indian airspace for these operations. Washington enters Iran conflict US forces struck Iran's three main nuclear sites, President Donald Trump said in a televised speech late on June 21 and he warned Tehran it would face more devastating attacks if it does not agree to peace. The US strikes included 14 bunker-buster bombs, more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles and over 125 military aircraft, in an operation the top US general, General Dan Caine, said was named "Operation Midnight." After days of deliberation and long before his self-imposed two-week deadline, Trump's decision to join Israel's military invasion against its major rival Iran is a major escalation of the assault and risks opening a new era of instability in the Middle East. "A short time ago, we carried out massive precision strikes on three nuclear facilities in the Iranian regime," announced Trump. Read More: Tehran vows self-defence with 'all force' after US strikes three nuclear installations The strikes were a spectacular military success," Trump said in the White House televised address. "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated." Iran's Foreign Ministry has strongly condemned a US military strike on its nuclear facilities, calling the action an unprecedented breach of international law and a grave violation of the UN Charter. In a statement, the Islamic Republic of Iran accused the United States of a 'brutal military aggression' against its peaceful nuclear infrastructure. Tehran held Washington fully responsible for what it called a 'heinous crime' and warned of 'dangerous consequences' stemming from the attack.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
US strikes on Iran 'incredible success', says Pentagon chief
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth holds a briefing at the Pentagon, after the U.S. struck Iranian nuclear facilities, during the Israel-Iran conflict, in Arlington, Virginia, US, June 22, 2025 in this still image taken from handout video. PHOTO: REUTERS US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Sunday that US military strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities were an incredible and overwhelming success that have obliterated Tehran's nuclear ambitions. The US strikes included 14 bunker-buster bombs, more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles and over 125 military aircraft, in an operation the top US general, General Dan Caine, said was named "Operation Midnight." The operation pushes the Middle East to the brink of a major new conflagration in a region already aflame for more than 20 months with wars in Gaza and Lebanon and a toppled dictator in Syria. "Iran's nuclear ambitions have been obliterated," Hegseth told reporters in a briefing, adding that said the strikes did not target Iranian troops or people. "The operation President Trump planned was bold and it was brilliant, showing the world that American deterrence is back. When this president speaks, the world should listen," Hegseth said.
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Oil to open higher as US strikes on Iran boost supply risk premium
LONDON: Oil is likely to rise by $3-5 per barrel when trading resumes on Sunday evening after the U.S. attacked Iran at the weekend, market analysts said, with gains expected to accelerate only if Iran retaliates hard and causes a major oil supply disruption. U.S. President Donald Trump said he had 'obliterated' Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes overnight, joining an Israeli assault in an escalation of conflict in the Middle East as Tehran vowed to defend itself. Iran is OPEC's third-largest crude producer. 'An oil price jump is expected,' said Jorge Leon, head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad and a former OPEC official. 'Even in the absence of immediate retaliation, markets are likely to price in a higher geopolitical risk premium.' Global oil benchmark Brent crude could gain $3 to $5 per barrel when markets open, SEB analyst Ole Hvalbye said in a note. Brent settled at $77.01 a barrel on Friday and U.S. West Texas Intermediate at $73.84. Oil prices settle lower Ole Hansen, analyst at Saxo Bank, said crude could open $4 to $5 dollars higher, with potential for some long positioning being unwound. Crude had settled down on Friday after the U.S. imposed fresh Iran-related sanctions, including on two entities based in Hong Kong, and counter-terrorism-related sanctions, according to a notice on the U.S. Treasury Department website. Brent has risen 11% while WTI has gained around 10% since the conflict began on June 13 with Israel targeting Iran's nuclear sites and Iranian missiles hitting buildings in Tel Aviv. Currently stable supply conditions and the availability of spare production capacity among other OPEC members have limited oil's gains. Risk premiums have typically faded when no supply disruptions occurred, said Giovanni Staunovo, analyst at UBS. 'The direction of oil prices from here will depend on whether there are supply disruptions - which would likely result in higher prices - or if there is a de-escalation in the conflict, resulting in a fading risk premium,' he said. A senior Iranian lawmaker said on June 19 that the country could shut the Strait of Hormuz as a way of hitting back against its enemies, though a second member of parliament said this would only happen if Tehran's vital interests were endangered. About a fifth of the world's total oil consumption passes through the strait. SEB said any closure of the strait or spillover into other regional producers would 'significantly lift' oil prices, but they saw this scenario as a tail risk rather than a base case given China's reliance on Gulf crude. Ajay Parmar, oil and energy transition analytics director at consultancy ICIS, said it was unlikely Iran would be able to enforce a blockage of the strait for too long. 'Most of Iran's oil exports to China pass through this strait and Trump is unlikely to tolerate the inevitable subsequent oil price spike for too long - the diplomatic pressure from the world's two largest economies would also be significant,' he said.
