Canadian teen Mboko reaches final round of French Open qualifying
PARIS — Victoria Mboko advanced to the third round of French Open qualifying with a 6-3, 6-2 win over Kathinka von Deichmann on Thursday.
The 18-year-old Canadian won 82 per cent of her first serves and converted six of seven break-point chances.
Mboko overcame six double faults and fired the match's only ace, while von Deichmann committed nine double faults.
She improved her season record to 39-5, with most of her wins coming on the lower-tier ITF World Tennis Tour circuit.
The Toronto native is bidding to reach her first Grand Slam main draw and will face Slovenia's Kaja Juvan on Friday in the final round of qualifying.
Mboko is looking to join four fellow Canadians — Leylah Fernandez of Laval, Que., Félix Auger-Aliassime and Gabriel Diallo, both of Montreal, and Denis Shapovalov of Richmond Hill, Ont. — in the main singles draw at Roland-Garros.
Fernandez, ranked No. 27 on the WTA Tour, will open against No. 34 Olga Danilovic of Serbia.
Shapovalov enters as the top-ranked Canadian on the ATP Tour at No. 27 and will face Spain's Pedro Martinez in the first round.
Auger-Aliassime, ranked No. 30, meets Italy's Matteo Arnaldi, while No. 53 Diallo opens against No. 18 Francisco Cerundolo of Argentina.
All three Canadian men are in the same quarter of the draw, which also features No. 3 Alexander Zverev, No. 6 Novak Djokovic, No. 11 Daniil Medvedev and No. 16 Grigor Dimitrov.
Fernandez and Diallo will also compete in doubles.
Canada's top-ranked women's doubles player, Ottawa's Gabriela Dabrowski, is also slated to play along with doubles partner Erin Routliffe of New Zealand. But the reigning WTA Finals doubles champions withdrew from their semifinal at the warm-up Strasbourg Open on Thursday, with the WTA saying Dabrowski is dealing with a chest injury.
Rob Shaw of North Bay, Ont., received a wild card into the wheelchair quad singles and doubles draws at Roland-Garros.
Auger-Aliassime continued his preparation for the French Open with a 7-6 (4), 6-7 (6), 6-3 win over France's Alexandre Muller in the quarterfinals of the Hamburg Open.
The sixth-seeded Auger-Aliassime had six aces and converted four of 12 break-point chances.
Auger-Aliassime will face third-seed Andrey Rublev of Russia in the semifinals. Rublev enters the match with a 6-1 record against the Canadian.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 22, 2025.
The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Markéta Vondroušová wins Berlin Open for first WTA title since Wimbledon 2023
Markéta Vondroušová has landed her first WTA title since Wimbledon in 2023, taking home the Berlin Open with a three-set victory over Wang Xinyu. Both players held their own respective droughts they wished to wipe clean in the searing Berlin heat. Vondroušová, having been plagued with injury since her triumph two years ago at the All England Club, her left shoulder clad with tape, looked to put a definitive end to a 24-month period which threatened to curtail her career. Wang, meanwhile, was playing in her maiden WTA final. Advertisement The nerves were palpable throughout before Vondroušová streaked away with the deciding set, taking the match 7-6 (12-10), 4-6, 6-2. The pair traded holds in the opening set until the Chinese world No. 49 found an advantage for 4-3, overturning three game points to force a deuce and a break of her opponent's left-swinging serve. It looked to be a foothold Wang would retain as she served for the set. It was to be the first occasion in which Vondroušová benefitted from her counterpart seemingly seizing up in the decisive moments of the first set, claiming an important break from 30-0 behind. Suddenly, serving advantage evaporated in the scorching German sun. Wang again earned the right to serve for the set by breaking the Czech, but again fumbled, this time rather more emphatically. The 23-year-old exhibited multiple unforced errors from advantageous positions. First, a glorious backhand opportunity which sat just on top of the net with the court at her mercy. It got worse for Wang when, again with the entire court to aim at, she fired long, as the opening set went the distance. Advertisement In the end, Wang couldn't find the breakthrough in the match's decisive moments. She looked to be halfway towards a maiden WTA title when she gave herself four set-point opportunities in the tie-break. Vondroušová, though, won all four points to level the tiebreak. While Wang put up a creditable defence, saving two set points before going on to establish two of her own, she eventually crumbled with Vondroušová claiming a decisive mini-break for 10-12. The Chinese No. 1 subsequently headed off court, returning from the break to be immediately broken and on the back foot. But she immediately returned the favour, and the match finally seemed to find some stability with both sides holding their serve until Wang, 5-4 up, found her opportunity to restore parity. An almost routine break to 15 showcased a sort of confidence which had eluded her in the opener, pushing the match to a decider. While the tide of the proceedings would suggest Wang would be riding the wave of momentum, it was Vondroušová who came out firing in the final set. A dominant break to love put her in control, while the Czech soon gained a double-break advantage for 4-1. From there, Vondroušová's first title in two years seemed a foregone conclusion, and claiming the match with a hold to love showed the superiority with which she dispatched the decider. Vondroušová's comeback has taken its time to come to full fruition. But battling past Madison Keys, Ons Jabeur and world No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka in her Berlin run suggests she may finally be back. Advertisement This article originally appeared in The Athletic. Tennis, Women's Tennis 2025 The Athletic Media Company
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Raptors mailbag: Toronto's sixth man, the Desmond Bane trade and lots of love for the NBA Finals
A very well-crafted bunch of questions for Ye Olde Mailbag . Thanks very much. Enjoy it and let's all hope that Game 7 in OKC Sunday night lives up to the lofty expectations we all have, and that this week's draft is truly uneventful so I don't have to work harder than usual. (Yes, we're at the 'it's all about me' time.) Hi, Doug! It's been such a treat to watch these NBA Finals, particularly because of the Canadians playing. Such great basketball, and it's impossible to choose a favourite — no matter who wins, Canada wins! Don't know how I missed this before, but we just noticed that SGA and Andrew Nembhard both play with the No. 2. Is there a Canadian link to that number, or is it just a coincidence? We've seen Superfan in his regular courtside seat at the Pacers games, but not at the Thunder games. Did Pascal Siakam get him those seats? Is he at both games, but just sitting elsewhere in the OKC games? And speaking of family connections, I noticed a player on OKC that looked a lot like Jalen Brunson. Turns out it's Brunson's half-brother Jaylin Williams. Are there any Canadian basketball family dynasties out there, or do we have to wait until this group of players' children get older and start playing sports? Cheers! —Cindy Some Canada Basketball stuff, cool. I don't mind talking about that any time. As far as I know, the uniform numbers for SGA and Nembhard are totally coincidental and has never been an issue with national team stuff. I don't know about any Canadian 'dynasties' coming, but if sisters Syla and Savvy Swords stay on their paths, I can certainly see them both being WNBAers in the future. One interesting Canadian familial angle few know? How about Kayla Alexander having had some time in the WNBA and her brother Kyle having a cup of coffee with Miami in the NBA. Even if they were short stints, that's quite an accomplishment, one Canadian fans should be proud of. My buddy Grange did an item a few years back that lays out part of what I'm talking about. As for Nav, he's got connections all over the place that help him buy tickets, although I don't recall having seen him in OKC. Maybe Sunday night. Hi, Doug. Just when we thought the corruption and concerns re: internet sports gambling would stabilize, we have this story from the Washington Post ( click here to read ) on increasing threats to pro athletes from frustrated online gamblers. So, now we have: But maybe the greatest threat of all is the threat to the meaning and enjoyment of sport itself. Your sports journalism colleagues are increasingly basing their sports 'coverage' and 'reporting' on discussing odds for in-game/game outcomes. Their own bets now often become the story! What has been sports journalism's joy and community now becomes shilling for the billions in the sports gambling industry. Words fail me. With sport and sports journalism corrupted like this, we all lose. We are ever more grateful to you for holding on to reporting stories about sport and people. Even if you might feel like a dinosaur. Do you? —Charles N. I do, in many ways. But I'll die on the hill that says sportswriting is storytelling about people and athleticism, and the ability and willingness of women and men to test their limits. It's about the human nature of handling both success and failure, and those are the stories we need to tell and people need to consume. It's not about parlays and point spreads and fantasy leagues. At least not for me. I understand that gambling is part of our society, for good or for bad. I think advertising of it should be more legislated — just as it is for beer and spirits and cannabis and tobacco. I do not for a second think it should encroach on what I do and how I do it. Hi, Doug. What do you think of moving RJ Barrett to the sixth-man position and, if the Raptors did this, who would you elevate to the starting five? Regards. —Creighton Hooper All things as they are now, I don't think he should be moved. Depending on what happens in the draft and around trades, starting Immanuel Quickley , Barrett , Scottie Barnes , Brandon Ingram and Jakob Poeltl and seeing how it works makes the most sense. I guess if it had to happen — and again, I don't think it should — putting in a defensive-minded wing like Ochai Agbaji might make sense. Hi, Doug. Who called Pacers vs. Thunder going seven games? Really looking forward to it! Then, a few days later … the draft! Some questions: 1) Maybe I'm jumping the gun a bit, but I am hoping to see an article about Maxime Raynaud, the seven-foot centre from Stanford, or Creighton's Ryan Kalkbrenner, another big centre. Both sound intriguing and are roughly the same size as Khaman Maluach , who many are speculating might be gone before our scheduled pick. Also hearing talk of trading down. What do you think? If Maluach is gone, would you think of trading down for extra picks or alternatively taking the best available player and making things work? Whatever happens Sunday night, Hamilton's Shai Gilgeous-Alexander has ascended into the heavens in these NBA playoffs. Let's take a closer look. Whatever happens Sunday night, Hamilton's Shai Gilgeous-Alexander has ascended into the heavens in these NBA playoffs. Let's take a closer look. 2) Between the Pacers and Thunder, one team will lose on Sunday. However, I can't really see any glaring holes in either lineup. What, if anything, would GM Doug Smith do for either team? Stand pat and run it back? 3) Speaking of running it back, what would you think of Toronto running it back with a healthy roster? How would they do against the new Eastern Conference? Or are trades absolutely necessary? 4) Does the Desmond Bane trade throw the scale of all other trades out of whack? As much as I like him as a player … if he's worth two players and FOUR first-round picks, Kevin Durant is worth a franchise and 20 draft picks (slight exaggeration). In the past weeks, what Orlando parted with was about what many suggested Durant or Giannis Antetokounmpo would require. Thoughts? As the season ends, almost immediately there will be news of draft-day deals, followed by free-agent signings. A couple of weeks later, Summer League starts and we get to see this season's next Jamal Shead or undrafted gems show the world that they deserve a roster spot. Lots for you to write about and keep us fans entertained! —Bernie M. I don't know much about those other two guys, but I'll ask. I don't think trading back for multiple picks makes sense because the Raptors already have enough young kids, and probably don't want to afford two first-round guaranteed salaries as well. All teams can get better, for sure. I think the Pacers need some bench size; they get awfully small when Turner isn't playing. The Thunder can still use some consistent shooting off the bench. Unless it's for a proven star — Antetekounmpo or Durant — I think the Raptors should stand pat, see how it works and I suspect they'll be right in the fifth to eighth range next season. The Magic probably paid a premium, but they got what I think is a perfect fit. I don't see it having any ripple effect on other transactions around the league. Yeah, you'd like to think the off-season is coming. But when I just did some advance planning with the draft, any trades, a week at Vegas and some Canada Basketball stuff coming up, it seems there is no off-season. Maybe late August/early September will be slow. Hi, Doug. Hope you are well. I saw the story about Ace Bailey backing out of a personal workout with the Philadelphia 76ers. Had me wondering, what exactly would a team glean from an individual workout that they could not glean from scouting/observing games/asking questions from sources? I would think most teams are pretty well resourced at that and have a LOT of information already. Second — wouldn't doing something like this say something worrisome about his character? It would be one thing if he never agreed to go in the first place, but it sounds like he agreed to go then backed out, which … well, that just doesn't seem right. Finally, I suppose if he doesn't make it in basketball he could try hockey — he's got the name for it! Thanks for all you do. —MSG I suspect red flares are exploding around the league about Bailey and his unwillingness to visit teams and work out for them. I also suspect someone high in the lottery will take him regardless, thinking that it's worth the gamble. And the workouts are much more than just testing. It's seeing how he interacts with the staff, how he can take coaching and instruction and, most important, how he handles himself in interviews, dinners and meetings over a day or so. But yeah, he's got the name, and the fact that a banner in his honour is hanging in Scotiabank Arena already is kind of interesting. No matter who wins, hasn't this Finals been a breath of fresh air both on and off the court? Do you think it will help move the needle from the LeBron/Steph/K.D./Giannis quicksand that the U.S. basketball media get so completely bogged down with? —Paul M. You'd sure think that some ascendant young stars emerging might herald a new era in the NBA, but the old heads still drive conversations and their time is not at the end yet. But we're getting closer to it. Hi, Doug. This is just a really dandy Finals, isn't it? I'm a Raptors fan first, not really an NBA fan, but have followed much of these playoffs, mostly for the ex-Raptors content but also for the Canadian content. OG Anunoby in New York, Pascal Siakam in Indiana, Fred VanVleet in Houston. Andrew Nembhard, Lu Dort, Bennedict Mathurin, SGA — lots of rooting interest. Really a great two months of basketball. Here's the question: If the Pacers win Game 7, does Nembhard get an MVP vote (a la VanVleet in 2019) for the work he has put in guarding SGA? I certainly hope so. All the best. —Jim It's certainly great, and I hope Game 7 lives up to the high expectations we all have for it. While Nembhard's done an admirable job and certainly opened a lot of eyes, I think Gilgeous-Alexander going for 30-plus in four of the first six games probably works against Andrew. There are usually about nine voters. If the Pacers win, I'm guessing the best player Sunday between Haliburton and Siakam will win.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Markéta Vondroušová wins Berlin Open for first WTA title since Wimbledon 2023
Markéta Vondroušová has landed her first WTA title since Wimbledon in 2023, taking home the Berlin Open with a three-set victory over Wang Xinyu. Both players held their own respective droughts they wished to wipe clean in the searing Berlin heat. Vondroušová, having been plagued with injury since her triumph two years ago at the All England Club, her left shoulder clad with tape, looked to put a definitive end to a 24-month period which threatened to curtail her career. Wang, meanwhile, was playing in her maiden WTA final. Advertisement The nerves were palpable throughout before Vondroušová finally broke through the winning line, taking the match 7-6 (12-10), 4-6, 6-2. The pair traded holds in the opening set until the Chinese world No. 49 found an advantage for 4-3, overturning three game points to force a deuce and a break of her opponent's ominous, left-swinging serve. It looked to be a foothold Wang would retain as she served for the set. It was to be the first occasion in which Vondroušová benefitted from her counterpart seemingly seizing up in the decisive moments of the first set, claiming an important break from 30-0 behind. Suddenly, serving advantage evaporated in the scorching German sun. Wang again earned the right to serve for the set by breaking the Czech, but again fumbled, this time rather more emphatically. Statement made 👊@VondrousovaM claims the title in Berlin after defeating Wang in a three set thriller. #BTO — wta (@WTA) June 22, 2025 The 23-year-old exhibited multiple unforced errors from advantageous positions. First, a glorious backhand opportunity which saw just on top of the net with the court at her mercy. That she could not even push the effort over the net spoke to her visibly racing mindset, her tight hands miscuing completely. It got worse for Wang when, again with the entire court to aim at, she fired long, as the opening set went the distance. In the end, Wang couldn't find the breakthrough in the match's decisive moments. She looked to be halfway towards a maiden WTA title when she gave herself four set-point opportunities in the tie-break. Vondroušová, though, battled back to level. While Wang put up a creditable defence, saving two set points before going on to establish two of her own, she eventually crumbled with Vondroušová claiming a decisive mini-break for 10-12. Advertisement The Chinese No. 1 subsequently headed off court, returning from the break to be immediately broken and on the back foot. But she immediately returned the favour, and the match finally seemed to find some stability with both sides holding their serve until Wang, 5-4 up, found her opportunity to restore parity. An almost routine break to 15 showcased a sort of confidence which had eluded her in the opener, pushing the match to a decider. While the tide of the proceedings would suggest Wang would be riding the wave of momentum, it was Vondroušová who came out firing in the final set. A dominant break to love put her in control, while the Czech soon gained a double-break advantage for 4-1. From there, Vondroušová's first title in two years seemed a foregone conclusion, and claiming the match with a hold to love showed the superiority with which she dispatched the decider. Vondroušová's comeback has taken its time to come to full fruition. But battling past Madison Keys, Ons Jabeur and world No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka in her Berlin run suggests she may finally be back. (Tobias Schwarz/AFP via Getty Images)
