'Social prescribing helped save my life'
When she realised she was about to lose her job, Tracy Moore says her mental health hit "rock bottom". The 55-year-old, from Leicestershire, said she felt abandoned and even considered taking her life, but instead sought the advice of her GP, who in turn sent her to a social prescriber - a decision she believes saved her life.Social prescribing is a person-centred approach that connects individuals to community activities, groups, and services to improve their mental health.This can include anything from singing with a choir or volunteering with a cattery to support with household bills.
The Hinckley and Bosworth Medical Alliance, which represents 12 GP surgeries in the county, estimates that issuing social prescriptions has saved it £70,000 in GP time through reduced repeat appointments over the past year.
Tracy said her mental health plunged while going through redundancy."I needed to work to keep my brain active," she said. "I'd worked since I was 15 so the thought of not having a job devastated me."I wouldn't have been here if they hadn't intervened at the time they did."My social prescriber, Molly, listened to me, to find out what was at the root of my depression and suicidal throughts. Having someone to listen to me was just amazing."In Tracy's case, volunteering for the NHS as a patient advisor gave her the sense of purpose she needed to improve her mental health."It changed my life completely, I can't thank them enough," she said.
Lucy Moore, who shares Tracy's surname but is not related, manages the Social Prescribing team at Hinckley and Bosworth Medial Alliance.She said social prescribing had resulted in patients seeking fewer follow-up appointments - freeing up slots for people with other conditions. "One in five GP appointments are not for patients' medical health but for their social health and mental wellbeing," she said."We listen to the patient, we can direct them to a social or exercise group and even go with them if needed. Whatever their interest is, we can help."But the best thing is that people like Tracy have had their lives transformed."If you are affected by the issues raised in this article, help is available via the BBC's Action Line.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
PHP outbids rival with £1.79bn takeover deal for Assura
NHS landlord Assura has backed an improved takeover offer from a healthcare investor amid the continued bidding war for the London-listed firm. Assura said on Monday that its board has agreed a £1.79 billion offer from Primary Health Properties (PHP). PHP had laid down a £1.68 billion bid last month but was outbid by a rival suitor, with a consortium led by US private equity firm KKR valuing the business at £1.7 billion. Assura's directors said they believe the fresh deal is in the 'best interests' of the medical property firm's shareholders. Both bidders have upped their offers several times in recent months to try and clinch a deal. Assura owns more than 600 buildings, including doctors' surgeries, with a portfolio valued at around £3.1 billion. It has about 80 members of staff. PHP, which is also listed on the London Stock Exchange, said it had agreed a deal worth around 55 pence per share. Ed Smith, non-executive chair of Assura, said: 'Following recent engagement between PHP and Assura, PHP has today further increased the terms of its offer, and has also addressed some of the potential risks that Assura had previously raised. 'The Assura board has always been and will remain resolutely focused on carrying out its fiduciary duties in the interest of Assura shareholders and in this context has decided to recommend this increased offer from PHP.' Harry Hyman, non-executive chair of PHP, said: 'The PHP board continues to believe in the strong strategic rationale of the combination, which will create a leading healthcare focussed listed REIT (Real Estate Investment Trust) with the scale and expertise to deliver significant benefits for the shareholders in PHP and Assura. 'The Increased PHP offer, which is expected to deliver earnings accretion to both sets of shareholders, allows Assura shareholders to participate in significant upside compared to crystalising value in cash at an inflexion point in the current economic cycle, and benefit from the combined group's likely long-term rating, continuing capital growth and a growing dividend.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Major safety warning on popular sunscreen: 'It doesn't do what it says', study finds
A popular sunscreen does not work, potentially leaving consumers at risk of skin cancer, according to a report. Consumer champion Which? tested 15 sun creams from Boots, Garnier and Nivea, as well as own-brand alternatives, and saw surprising results. While a £2.99 supermarket-own sun protectant passed the stringent testing process, a £28 branded favourite failed to reach industry standards. As a result, the consumer body warned, users may not be adequately protected from the sun's ultraviolet (UV) rays - putting them at risk of cancer. Ultrasun Family SPF30, sold by some of the biggest high street retailers and costing £28, markets itself as being 'perfect for the whole family' and 'especially suitable for children with sensitive skin'. But the cream failed two separate tests that measured both its sun protection factor -or SPF - and UV protection. To trial the creams, scientists applied a small amount on volunteers' backs, before shining a lamp on the patch to simulate the sun's rays. The time it takes for the skin to become red was then measured. Ultrasun Family SPF30 (left), sold by some of the biggest high street retailers, markets itself as being 'perfect for the whole family' and 'especially suitable for children with sensitive skin'. Another sunscreen that made it on to the Don't Buy list was Morrisons Moisturising Sun Spray SPF30 - £3.75 per bottle In another test, scientists took a sample of the cream and spread it onto a glass plate to measure the absorption of UV radiation directly. To pass, the sunscreen needed to provide at least one third of the claimed SPF. SPF is measurement of the length of time you can be in the sun before you get burnt. For example, a sunscreen with an SPF of 30 will take 30 times longer to damage your skin compared to no protection at all. If a product failed to demonstrate the level of SPF it claimed to have on its first test, Which? repeated the test. If it passed the second time around, a third test was done. Any product that failed either test twice overall, was labelled a 'Don't Buy' by Which?. Natalie Hitchins, Which?'s head of home products and services, warned shoppers to look out for these products, as they are not guaranteed to protect as expected. 'It's really concerning that widely available sunscreens could be putting families at risk by failing to offer the level of sun protection claimed on the packaging,' she said. 'Our results prove that there's no need to splash out to keep you and your loved ones safe in the sun as we've found other cheap and reliable options.' A spokesman from Ultrasun told Which? the brand was fully confident in its testing protocols and that these surpass industry standards, adding: 'As an independent brand delivering very high UVB and UVA protection options for over 30 years, our detailed testing processes, independent and peer reviewed, continue to not only meet but surpass industry standards. Our chosen testing protocol is one of the strictest available. 'Further detail and clarification from Which? on their testing protocols would also be helpful, particularly on how these resulted in two different results from the same sample. We conclusively support the results of our independent tests which found the Ultrasun Family SPF30 reached a UVB-SPF in vivo of 31.4 and a UVA-PF in vitro of 13.1 which equates to a 92 per cent UVA absorbance. The UVA absorbance is calculated by the formula 1-(1/UVA-PF).' Another sunscreen that made it on to this year's Don't Buy list was Morrisons Moisturising Sun Spray SPF30, priced at £3.75 per bottle. Morrisons says it is looking closely at the data and working with its supplier to carry out additional independent testing. Sunscreens that did pass the Which? test included Aldi's Lacura Sensitive Sun Lotion SPF50+, which costs just £2.99. At just £1.50 per 100ml, it also earned a Which? Great Value badge. Lidl's Cien Sun Spray 30SPF High (£3.79) Boot's Soltan Protect & Moisturise Suncare Spray SPF30 (£5.50) Nivea's Sun Protect and Moisture Lotion SPF30 (£7.90) and Sainsbury's Sun Protect Moisturising Lotion SPF30 (£5.50) all also passed the safety tests. The damning report comes days after Kelsey Parker, 34, came under fire for admitting she doesn't put sunscreen on her children. The podcast host claimed daughter Aurelia, five, and son Bodhi, four, 'don't burn' and that using sunscreen 'causes skin cancer'. The children's father, The Wanted star Tom Parker, tragically died from brain cancer in 2022. Speaking in the latest episode of her Mum's The Word! podcast about 'the secret world of parenting', Ms Parker confessed that she opts to keep her children out of the sun rather than using SPF to protect them. She added that she makes 'organic' sunscreen out of beeswax for UV protection instead. 'It's bad for you–that sunscreen,' she said. 'My kids do not wear sun cream. 'The only thing that I may put on them is an organic sun cream. 'My kids, we went on holiday, I never put sun cream on them and they do not burn. 'I never used to wear sun cream, sun cream causes skin cancer.' Since making the controversial remarks, the expectant mother has been blasted by listeners, who have accused her of spreading 'dangerous misinformation. One listener wrote on social media: 'This is really dangerous spreading this information. Please research.' 'This is insane and so unsafe. It's so damaging, burning doesn't indicate sun damage, it can literally kill them. Wow,' a second said. A third slammed the 'dangerous advice', while a fourth called the dismissal of conventional sun cream 'irresponsible'. Experts say there is no evidence that sunscreen causes cancer in humans. Dr Bav Shergill a consultant dermatologist at the Queen Victoria Hospital, London and spokesperson for the British Association of Dermatologists, previously told MailOnline: 'Sunscreens are a safe and effective way to protect your skin from burning and other forms of sun damage. 'Millions of people have used sunscreen over many decades so we can be confident about their safety profile.' Studies have long shown sun creams can contain both mineral and chemical UV filters. Mineral UV filters mainly remain on the skin's surface and form a physical barrier to deflect UV rays before they penetrate your skin. Chemical UV filters, meanwhile, absorb UV light and convert it into heat energy. As well as being used in sun creams, they may be added to other personal care products, such as moisturisers. Some research on animals, mainly mice, has indicated many commonly used chemical UV filters in high quantities could be endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) — chemicals that interfere with hormones — such as mimicking natural oestrogen found in our bodies. Lifetime exposure to oestrogen is an established risk factor for cancers, including breast. But no research on humans has backed this up. Going without sunscreen, meanwhile, has been shown to directly raise the risk of developing skin cancer. Around 15,000 people in the UK are diagnosed with melanoma each year—the UK's fifth most common cancer—with the incidence rate rising faster than any other common cancer. A recent study from Cancer Research UK warned found that an alarming 87 per cent of melanoma cases, the equivalent of 17,100 in the UK each year, are caused by overexposure to ultraviolet radiation, either directly from the sun or sun beds—meaning they could be avoided. This is because increased UV exposure can damage the DNA in skin cells, triggering mutations that become cancerous. From here, the cancer can spread to the blood vessels beneath the skin, getting into the bloodstream and spreading throughout the body. Last year, rates of the cancer reached a record high in the UK, with new diagnoses increasing by almost a third in just a decade, according to the charity. According to the NHS website, people should apply suncream to avoid burning and use 'at least factor 30'. 'Sunburn increases your risk of skin cancer. Sunburn does not just happen on holiday. You can burn in the UK, even when it's cloudy,' the site reads. The health service also recommends avoiding the sun when it is at its strongest, between the hours of 11am and 3pm from March to November, and to cover up with suitable clothing and sunglasses.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Deborah James' dad calls for NHS cancer revolution in letter to Government
DAME Deborah James' dad has backed calls for Wes Streeting to end cancer diagnosis and treatment delays, warning 'there is no time to lose'. Alistair James issued a plea for the Health Secretary to overhaul NHS care with the upcoming cancer strategy. 4 4 4 He has signed an open letter led by Cancer Research UK that calls for faster diagnosis, waiting time targets to be met, smoking reduction and more equal access to treatment. Sun columnist Dame Debs died in 2022 after a years-long battle with bowel cancer. Her Bowelbabe charity fund has since raised £17million for research and a laboratory at the prestigious Francis Crick Institute was recently named after the mum-of-two. Dad Alistair said: 'Three years ago this week, Deborah died at the age of 40 from bowel cancer. 'I am so proud that her legacy continues through the fantastic Bowelbabe Fund. 'Too many people are waiting too long to be diagnosed and treated for bowel cancer. 'And the percentage of cancers being diagnosed at an early stage, when there is a greater chance of survival, has hardly changed for almost a decade. 'We have an opportunity to shape the next decade of the government's plans for cancer and you can help make a difference by signing Cancer Research UK's open letter to the Health Secretary, Wes Streeting.' 4 The letter to Mr Streeting has already been signed by 5,500 people. It said: 'Nearly 1 in 2 of us will get cancer in our lifetimes, and across England, cancer cases are increasing, patients face unacceptable waits and unequal access to treatment. 'In 2024 alone, 74,000 people in England were not treated on time for cancer. 'People with cancer deserve better. They need better. 'There is no time to waste.' Sign the letter online at
