Social media fuelling 'devastating' kids' mental health crisis: NGO
HighlightsThe KidsRights report reveals that one in seven children and adolescents aged 10 to 19 suffer from mental health issues, with a global suicide rate of six per 100,000 among those aged 15 to 19. Marc Dullaert, chairman of KidsRights, emphasizes that the unchecked expansion of social media platforms is exacerbating the mental health crisis among children, calling for immediate coordinated action worldwide. The report warns against blanket bans on social media for under-16s, stating that such measures may infringe on children's civil and political rights, while advocating for comprehensive child rights impact assessments and better education.
The "unchecked expansion" of social media platforms is driving an unprecedented global
mental health crisis in kids
and teens, a children's NGO said Wednesday, calling for urgent coordinated action worldwide.
The KidsRights report said one in seven children and adolescents aged between 10 and 19 suffered mental health issues, with the global suicide rate at six per 100,000 for those aged 15-19.
Even these high rates represent "the tip of the iceberg" as suicide is widely under-reported due to stigma, according to the Amsterdam-based group.
"This year's report is a wake-up call that we cannot ignore any longer" said Marc Dullaert, KidsRights chairman.
"The mental health... crisis among our children has reached a tipping point, exacerbated by the unchecked expansion of social media platforms that prioritise engagement over child safety," he added.
The report said what it termed "problematic" social media use was on the rise, with a direct link between heavy internet use and suicide attempts.
However, blanket bans are not the answer, the group warned.
Australia passed a law to ban social media use for under-16s.
"Such blanket bans may infringe on children's civil and political rights," including access to information, said the report.
The group urged "comprehensive
child rights impact assessments
" at a global level for social media platforms, better education for kids, and improved training for mental health professionals.
The report seized on the popularity of Netflix sensation "Adolescence", which highlighted some of the toxic content kids view online.
The mini-series "demonstrated global awareness of these issues, but awareness alone is insufficient," said Dullaert.
"We need concrete action to ensure that the digital revolution serves to enhance, not endanger, the wellbeing of the world's 2.2 billion children," he said. "The time for half-measures is over.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Axiom-4 astronauts to study insulin behaviour in microgravity, revolutionise diabetes treatment
New Delhi: Indian astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla's Axiom-4 mission to the International Space Station (ISS) is set to offer a ray of hope for diabetics to travel to space, as a UAE-based healthcare provider is conducting an experiment on how glucose behaves in microgravity part of the "Suite Ride" experiment planned by Burjeel Holdings and Axiom Space, some astronauts of the Axiom-4 mission will be wearing continuous glucose monitors during their 14-day stay on board the orbital lab. The studies of the behaviour of glucose and insulin in microgravity conditions will help scientists develop wearable technologies for astronauts and patients who are bedridden or have limited mobility due to illnesses such as paralysis. "We are trying just to see if there is any change or fluctuation to the blood-sugar levels while they are in space," Mohammad Fityan, chief medical officer at Burjeel Holdings, Abu Dhabi, told PTI. The astronauts will also carry insulin pens in refrigerated and ambient temperatures to examine how the molecules respond to microgravity conditions. "We are hoping that if we learn something about the metabolism or the effect, we will bring some information and we can do something for our patients on Earth," Fityan said. Currently, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) does not allow insulin-dependent diabetics to travel to space. There are no official exclusions for non-insulin-dependent diabetics, but so far, no astronaut with diabetes has travelled to space. "It has the potential to transform the future of space travel for astronauts with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), a condition historically considered disqualifying for space missions," Fityan said. He said the study will pave the way for several innovative technologies and treatment approaches for developing advanced glucose-monitoring tools optimised for extreme or low-activity environments, improving wearable tech for both astronauts and patients with limited mobility on Earth. It will also help identify new pharmacologic targets by observing how metabolic and hormonal responses change in microgravity, leading to drugs that enhance insulin sensitivity or mimic the benefits of exercise in sedentary individuals. The AI-powered predictive models based on real-time physiologic data in space can be adapted to personalise diabetes care on Earth by forecasting insulin needs or metabolic shifts with higher accuracy. The research will also help develop remote monitoring platforms for continuous metabolic-data capture that could revolutionise diabetes care in underserved or remote areas on Earth as well as in tele-health settings.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Major chocolate recall sweeps U.S stores — here's why your favorite sweet treat might be unsafe
Weaver Nut Company is recalling certain semi-sweet chocolate nonpareils distributed throughout the United States. If you recently purchased semi-sweet chocolate nonpareils from a grocery or retail store, you should double-check the lot number. Major chocolate recall sweeps U.S. stores: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced in a news release on Wednesday that Weaver Nut Company was recalling its semi-sweet chocolate nonpareils with white or Christmas-colored seeds, with particular lot codes, due to possible unreported milk allergies, as per a report by Newsweek. Although no illnesses have been reported, people who are allergic to milk face a serious risk. The chocolates were sold through supermarkets and retail stores throughout the United States. ALSO READ: McDonald's boycott June 24: Who's behind it, why it's happening, and how long it will last Why is your favourite sweet treat unsafe? According to the FDA's release, the problem was discovered after a wholesale customer complained about differences in product specifications. Live Events The chocolates were labelled as being free of milk, but later laboratory testing revealed that they did contain milk proteins, it added. It further stated that consuming the affected items could result in severe or fatal allergic reactions for people with a milk allergy or severe sensitivity. One of the top nine allergens that the FDA requires to be declared is milk, and improper labelling can be very risky. Why is this recall important? According to the Pennsylvania-based Weaver Nut Company, the recall is a preventative step to protect the public's health. The business is taking all necessary steps to ensure the safety of its products. Which chocolates are affected? Customers are advised to verify product lot codes and return or dispose of any impacted items. Throw away the items or return them to the store for a complete refund. Lot numbers 204206, 204207, 204208, 204209, 204212, 224225 are for Item 47518-Nonpareil, Semi-Sweet Chocolate (Christmas Seeds). Lot numbers 204214-RL, 204214, 204215, 224221, 224222, 224223, 135215, 135216, 135217, 135220, 135221, 145204, 145205-1, 145207-1, and 145210-1 are for Item D2645, Nonpareils, Semi-Sweet Chocolate (White Seeds), as per a report by Newsweek. FAQs What do I do if I have these chocolates? Check the lot number, and if it is recalled, do not eat it. Return it for a refund or dispose of it. Why is the recall so serious? Milk is a major allergen, and consuming it when allergic can result in serious or life-threatening reactions. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
Economic Times
6 hours ago
- Economic Times
Trump expands ban on transgender rights: VA denies fertility treatment for veterans under new rules
Transgender veterans barred from fertility treatment Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel When US President Donald Trump returned to the White House, one of his first acts was to sign an executive order to ban transgenders from participating in the military. Now months later, the Department of Veterans Affairs followed suit with a ban on medical insurance coverage for gender-affirming care, reports NewsWeek.A leaked email from a person at the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) revealed that transgender veterans eligible for health benefits will no longer receive financial coverage for egg- and sperm-freezing fertility treatments. The email shows the department will no longer cover the costs for those transgender veterans preparing for gender dysphoria treatment and seeking cryopreservation. Dsyphoria treatment is a process in which eggs or sperm (gametes) are frozen and stored to be thawed for later since Donald Trump has returned to office, he has taken a slew of actions regarding transgender people, including signing an executive order stating that there are only two unchangeable sexes and another attempting to ban transgender women from competing in women's sports. He also signed an order aimed at restricting access to puberty blockers and other gender care for people under age 19 with some of his actions sparking legal challenges in the March, it was announced in the VA specifically that the department began phasing out treatment for gender dysphoria following Trump's executive order recognizing only two sexes. However, the VA stated that transgender veterans would still have access to VA health care the email now indicates a shift from the previous policy. "On yesterday's (6/16/2025) National Fertility Interdisciplinary Teams Office Hours call, it was announced that VA will no longer pay for cryopreservation of gametes for a medical indication if it involves transgender veterans seeking cryopreservation in preparation for treatment of Gender Dysphoria or Gender Identity Disorder. This will reportedly affect new authorizations and will not disrupt cryopreservation that has already been initiated," the email viewed by NewsWeek added that according to another senior official in the Veterans Health Administration "the change is reportedly already in effect and an official announcement will be forthcoming" and advised the department to "hold on authorizing any new cryopreservation for medical indications related to gender dysphoria/gender identity disorder" while waiting for further guidance."We want to avoid a situation where veterans could be told they are approved for cryo, only to find out after the fact that VA cannot pay for care they received," the email Keith, the founder and executive director of the Michigan-based transgender charity Stand With Trans, said the policy was "discrimination.""Clearly, the rights of the trans community are the target of attack," she told Newsweek. "It doesn't matter whether someone is an adult, a minor, a veteran, a professional, or other, if one is trans identified, they are seeing rights being taken away one by one. It is deplorable. If one class of people can receive treatment paid for with their benefits, then other classes of people should receive the same. This is why we have the equal protection clause in our Constitution."No one should be excluded from a particular treatment because they are transgender. This is the very definition of discrimination."This comes days after the Trump administration denied reporting by The Guardian that said new VA hospitals could refuse care to veterans based on factors like marital status and political affiliation due to an executive order by President Guardian earlier Monday published a report saying VA hospitals are implementing new rules in response to Trump's executive order in January, which would permit workers to deny care to veterans based on characteristics not protected by federal House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly adamantly denied The Guardian's reporting. Writing on social platform X, Kelly addressed the article's writer, Aaron Glantz, saying, 'Aaron, this is a totally FALSE story that The Guardian should retract immediately. Fearmongering with our Veterans to try to score clicks for your failing 'news outlet' is pathetic and shameful.'
