logo
Global economic growth outlook plunges to 2.3%, says World Bank

Global economic growth outlook plunges to 2.3%, says World Bank

Gulf Today14-06-2025

The World Bank lowered its 2025 global growth forecast to 2.3 per cent, down from 2.7 per cent previously expected.
In its latest economic prospects report, the 189-country organisation attributed the downgrade to escalating trade tensions and policy uncertainty, noting that the US President Donald Trump's extensive tariffs have strained international ties and dampened economic outlooks worldwide.
This revision marks the latest in a series of downgrades by international organisations.
Meanwhile the International Monetary Fund said that its next global growth forecast in July will take into account both positive and negative trade developments but declined to predict a tariff-driven GDP downgrade similar to that released by the World Bank this week.
IMF spokesperson Julie Kozack said that since the last release of the Fund's World Economic Outlook in April, there have been some positive developments that could support improved economic activity, including a major tariff reduction between the US and China and an initial trade deal between the US and Britain.
'So taken together such announcements combined with the April 9 pause on the high level of tariffs, these could support activity relative to the forecast that we had in April,' Kozack told a regular IMF news briefing. 'But nonetheless, we do have an outlook for the global economy that remains subject to heightened uncertainty, especially as trade negotiations continue.'
The IMF also will take into account US President Donald Trump's added steel and aluminium tariffs, she said. These have now reached 50 per cent for all exporters.
The World Bank slashed its 2025 global growth forecast by four-tenths of a percentage point from its January forecast to 2.3 per cent, saying that higher tariffs and heightened uncertainty posed a 'significant headwind' for nearly all economies.
The development lender cut forecasts for nearly 70 per cent of all economies - including the US, China and Europe, but the prior forecast came before Trump took office and imposed tariffs on nearly all trading partners.
The IMF's steep April forecast cut did take into account Trump's initial tariff assault, reducing the 2025 global growth outlook by half a percentage point from its January forecast to 2.8 per cent, with a slower decline in inflation.
Kozack said the next IMF World Economic Outlook update will be issued toward the end of July, but did not provide a specific date.
Trump's 'reciprocal' tariff pause is currently scheduled to expire on July 8, with many countries seeking to negotiate tariff-reducing deals before then. And Trump has said there could be extensions of that deadline for countries engaged in good faith negotiations with the US Kozack said that more recent activity indicators reflect 'a complex economic landscape' with first quarter front-loading activity to beat tariffs, while there has been some diversion of trade and an unwinding of import activity in the second quarter. There also could be more trade deals or other developments to take into account.
'So all of this creates kind of a complicated picture for us, with some upside risk, some other developments, and we'll take all of these developments together into account as we update our forecast,' Kozack said.
The International Monetary Fund said that its next global growth forecast in July will take into account both positive and negative trade developments but declined to predict a tariff-driven GDP downgrade similar to that released by the World Bank this week.
IMF spokesperson Julie Kozack said that since the last release of the Fund's World Economic Outlook in April, there have been some positive developments that could support improved economic activity, including a major tariff reduction between the US and China and an initial trade deal between the US and Britain.
'So taken together such announcements combined with the April 9 pause on the high level of tariffs, these could support activity relative to the forecast that we had in April,' Kozack told a regular IMF news briefing. 'But nonetheless, we do have an outlook for the global economy that remains subject to heightened uncertainty, especially as trade negotiations continue.'
Meanwhile world stock markets fell on Friday, and oil prices surged, as Israel launched military strikes on Iran, sparking inflows into safe havens such as gold and the dollar. An escalation adds uncertainty to financial markets at a time of heightened pressure on the global economy from US President Donald Trump's unpredictable trade policies.
Brent crude oil prices were last up 7.25 per cent at $74.39 per barrel, having jumped as much as 14 per cent during Asian trading hours. They were set for their biggest one-day jump since 2022, when energy costs spiked after Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Gold, a safe haven in times of global uncertainty, rose 1.4 per cent to $3,432 per ounce, bringing it close to the record high of $3,500.05 from April.
The rush to safety was matched by a dash out of risk assets. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.65 per cent, the S&P 500 dropped 0.86 per cent, and the Nasdaq Composite lost 0.9 per cent.
Reuters

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why womenomics is becoming a mathematical necessity
Why womenomics is becoming a mathematical necessity

The National

time3 hours ago

  • The National

Why womenomics is becoming a mathematical necessity

The theory of 'womenomics' – that increasing women's workforce participation boosts economic growth – was popularised nearly three decades ago by Kathy Matsui, a former Goldman Sachs executive, based on her study of imbalances in Japan. The International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the OECD have consistently promoted a similar thesis: investing in greater female labour force participation pays off in the form of higher GDP. In 2015, McKinsey put a number on the idea, by estimating that $28 trillion could be added to global economic output over the ensuing decade if women played an identical role in labour markets to that of men. In a world economy reeling under crises and profound change, is womenomics still relevant? Maybe more so than at any point in history. The global economy is now faced with a historically low growth rate of 2.8 per cent this year. For advanced economies the forecast is just 1.4 per cent, while for emerging and developing economies it's 3.7 per cent. Short-term headwinds are symptoms of a momentous longer-term transformation, driven by technology and geopolitics and making just about every type of indicator far more uncertain and difficult to predict. In this context, countries are seeking strategies to boost growth through domestic measures. They are working towards more regional and bilateral trade agreements, pursuing industrial policy often with security and self-reliance considerations, boosting local demand and consumption, and aiming to attract local and foreign investment to newly emerging growth areas. Central to these endeavours is talent. In past waves of globalisation, many countries competed on the basis of cheap labour alone. This will no longer suffice. Trading will require more refined skills, boosting domestic demand will need a focus on analysing local incomes and spending behaviour, and attracting investment will require a focus on the quality of local human capital. In 109 of the 148 countries covered in the World Economic Forum's Global Gender Gap Report 2025, women are enrolled in tertiary degrees in equal or higher numbers than men. And yet, men continue to comprise 65 per cent of workers without a tertiary degree, and 60 per cent of those with one. Among tertiary educated women, just 29.5 per cent make it to top leadership, despite representing 40.3 per cent of the overall workforce. Even for women with master's or bachelor's degrees, top-level representation plateaus below 31 per cent. Women's talent remains a stranded asset in much of the world. The cheapest form of stimulus in a down economy can therefore come by bringing university educated women into the workforce, including leadership roles. This is particularly true at a time when already constrained fiscal space limits other options. There's also a secondary, but no less important, role for womenomics in a turbulent economy driven by geopolitical conflict, threatened by climate change and facing both the risks and opportunities of new technologies. Solving problems often relies on a diversity of thought, knowledge and experience. So does the creativity necessary to unleash innovation in the form of new technologies and scientific breakthroughs. This is true across teams and organisations. The pattern holds for entire countries. Economies that tap into the full spectrum of their talent and human capital are best positioned to accelerate innovation, productivity and prosperity, even more so amid unprecedented uncertainty. Demographic pressures create a third vital role for womenomics in an uncertain economy. With the exception of countries in sub-Saharan Africa and parts of emerging Asia, much of the world is faced with a declining working-age population. It peaked in Germany in 1986, in the US in 2007 and in China in 2010. Even with technology driven job losses, there is a net rise in demand for talent for growing roles in agriculture, teaching, technology, health and more. Amid increased polarisation and pushback on migration, greater female labour participation will be a mathematical necessity to maintain productivity. Yet, the question remains: is progress possible? In two decades of tracking gender parity, despite slow movement in global averages, we've found that the answer is a resounding 'yes'. Since 2006, gender gaps have closed in terms of senior economic leadership (by more than 17 percentage points), in professional and technical roles (by seven percentage points), higher education (by about 16 percentage points), and representation in both governing cabinets and legislative bodies (by nearly 13 and 15 percentage points, respectively). Among the 100 countries we have consistently tracked over the years, 99 have closed gender gaps – some remarkably quickly, through a blend of smart strategy and policy. Economies sprinting to parity include Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Mexico, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Among regions, Latin America and the Caribbean made the biggest leap over the years. If its progress continues at current rates, it's on track to become the first region to close the overall gap. Of course, there are looming risks to contend with. Technology is displacing jobs in fields that employ a majority of women, while more pervasive use of AI may disproportionately impact women's white-collar careers. Fragmenting trade and global supply chains could roll back decades of progress for women who have increasingly gained formal employment in export-driven industries like clothing and textiles in lower and middle-income countries. In addition, inadequate care economies in most countries are disproportionately placing the burden on women who would otherwise be in the formal workforce. But relatively small investments in care infrastructure, gender-lens reskilling and upskilling, and supporting job transitions for women in trade and tech-disrupted sectors would provide immense returns. It may not be a new concept, but womenomics is essential for navigating the new economy.

Ukraine asks allies to allocate 0.25% of GDP to boost its weapon production
Ukraine asks allies to allocate 0.25% of GDP to boost its weapon production

Dubai Eye

time5 hours ago

  • Dubai Eye

Ukraine asks allies to allocate 0.25% of GDP to boost its weapon production

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has called on Ukraine's Western partners to allocate 0.25 per cent of their GDP to helping Kyiv ramp up weapons production and said the country plans to sign agreements this summer to start exporting weapon production technologies. In remarks released for publication by his office on Saturday, Zelenskyy said Ukraine was in talks with Denmark, Norway, Germany, Canada, the United Kingdom and Lithuania to launch joint weapon production. "Ukraine is part of Europe's security and we want 0.25% of the GDP of a particular partner country to be allocated for our defence industry and domestic production," Zelenskyy said. As the war with a bigger and better-equipped Russia has intensified in recent weeks, Ukraine's need for new weapons and ammunition is constantly growing. This year Kyiv had secured $43 billion to finance its domestic weapon production, Zelenskyy said. Member nations of the NATO military alliance are expected to meet next week in The Hague, to discuss higher defence spending. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has proposed that countries should each agree to spend 5 per cent of their GDP on defence and security measures. Zelenskyy said he was likely to visit the NATO summit, adding that several meetings with Western leaders had been set up on the sidelines. He also said that he hoped to meet US President Donald Trump. Last week, Zelenskyy attended the Group of Seven summit in Canada as he sought to discuss stronger sanctions against Russia and more military support for Ukraine with Trump there. But he failed to meet with the US President as Trump left a day early for Washington to address the Israel-Iran conflict. Ukraine currently covers about 40 per cent of its defence needs with domestic production, and the government is constantly looking for ways to increase production further. Kyiv plans to launch joint weapon production outside of the country and will start exporting some of its military production technologies, Zelenskyy said. "We have launched a programme 'Build with Ukraine' and in summer we will sign relevant agreements to start exporting our technologies abroad in the format of opening production lines in European countries," Zelenskyy said. The discussions focused on producing different types of drones, missiles, and potentially artillery, he added.

Investors brace for oil price spike, rush to havens after US bombs Iran nuclear sites
Investors brace for oil price spike, rush to havens after US bombs Iran nuclear sites

Al Etihad

time5 hours ago

  • Al Etihad

Investors brace for oil price spike, rush to havens after US bombs Iran nuclear sites

22 June 2025 05:46 NEW YORK (Reuters) A US attack on Iranian nuclear sites on Saturday could lead to a knee-jerk reaction in global markets when they reopen, sending oil prices higher and triggering a rush to safety, investors said, as they assessed how the latest escalation of tensions would ripple through the global attack, which was announced by President Donald Trump on social media site Truth Social, deepens US involvement in the Middle East conflict. That was the question going into the weekend, when investors were mulling a host of different market scenarios. In the immediate aftermath of the announcement, they expected the US involvement was likely to cause a selloff in equities and a possible bid for the dollar and other safe-haven assets when trading begins, but also said much uncertainty about the course of the conflict Trump called the attack "successful", few details were known. He was expected to address the nation later today."I think the markets are going to be initially alarmed, and I think oil will open higher," said Mark Spindel, chief investment officer at Potomac River however, said there was time to digest the news before markets open and said he was making arrangements to talk to other market participants. OIL PRICES, INFLATION A key concern for markets would center around the potential impact of the developments in the Middle East on oil prices and thus on inflation. A rise in inflation could dampen consumer confidence and lessen the chance of near-term interest rate global benchmark Brent crude futures have risen as much as 18% since June 10, hitting a near five-month high of $79.04 on Thursday, the S&P 500 has been little changed, following an initial drop when Israel launched its attacks on Iran on June average, the S&P 500 slipped 0.3% in the three weeks following the start of conflict, but was 2.3% higher on average two months following the conflict, according to data from Wedbush Securities and CapIQ Pro. DOLLAR WOES An escalation in the conflict could have mixed implications for the US dollar, which has tumbled this year amid worries over diminished US the event of US direct engagement in the Iran-Israel war, the dollar could initially benefit from a safety bid, analysts said. Stock Markets Continue full coverage

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store