NATO's Northern Flank Prepares To Counter Russia Threat
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
"Anywhere you are, you can see Russia when you're flying," Brigadier Nick English, commander of the British Army's 1st Aviation Brigade Combat Team, said as he strode through the snow and churned ground of Europe's largest training ground in northern Finland.
"You're that close," he told Newsweek.
But NATO is ready for whatever Russia may do on the alliance's northern flank, military personnel camped out in Finland's Arctic Circle say, despite concerns about how ready Europe's armed forces are for a fight with Russia and how long certain armies could hold out.
Finnish, Swedish and British soldiers have been plugging away through joint exercises crafted to induct NATO's newest members into the alliance, live-firing howitzers and loading Hellfire missiles into Apache helicopters roughly 70 miles from the Russian border.
Soldiers participate in joint drills between the British, Finnish and Swedish armed forces in northern Finland in May 2025.
Soldiers participate in joint drills between the British, Finnish and Swedish armed forces in northern Finland in May 2025.
Finnish Defence Forces
More drills have been rolled out further south along NATO's eastern border, close to Russian soil, Belarusian territory and on Ukraine's doorstep.
Finland, Sweden and the U.K. have pledged to raise military spending in the next few years, part of a drive across NATO to dedicate significantly more money to the military in the face of fierce criticism from U.S. President Donald Trump and burgeoning worries over what Russia could do next.
Military officials across NATO countries are increasingly outspoken about the threat Russia could pose to the alliance once Moscow has had a chance to recover from more than three years of grueling war in Ukraine.
Russia's invasion of its neighbor on February 24, 2022, has hacked away at the Kremlin's ground forces but left much of the rest of the Russian military unscathed.
Finnish conscripts stand by a Soviet-era D-30 howitzer at Rovajärvi training area, northern Finland, on May 21, 2025.
Finnish conscripts stand by a Soviet-era D-30 howitzer at Rovajärvi training area, northern Finland, on May 21, 2025.
Ellie Cook
There are deepening concerns over where hundreds of thousands of battle-hardened Russian recruits, volunteers and conscripts will end up if a ceasefire deal is inked. Trump and senior officials in his administration have made putting an end to Europe's largest land war since World War II a foreign policy priority, albeit one increasingly frustrating to the Republican president.
The Finns are certainly aware that Russia is expanding its bases close to its eastern border. The construction appears to be part of a longer-looking effort to expand Russian military facilities in spitting distance of NATO, The New York Times reported this week.
Russia had about 20,000 soldiers and four standby brigades close to Finland before 2022, according to Lieutenant General Vesa Virtanen, deputy chief of the Finnish armed forces. A brigade is typically between 3,000 and 5,000 soldiers.
"Now we see that Russia is building new infrastructure and bringing more troops to this region as soon as they can," Virtanen told German newspaper Die Welt last month. "They are reorganizing themselves."
In late 2022, then-Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said the Kremlin would remodel Russia's military structure while inflating the number of service members over the next few years. Parts of the plan were to split Russia's Western Military District—close to NATO's eastern flank—into two districts, Moscow and Leningrad, and to grow the size of the military. This came into force in June 2024.
A British Army M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) during NATO drills in Rovajärvi, northern Finland, on May 21, 2025.
A British Army M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) during NATO drills in Rovajärvi, northern Finland, on May 21, 2025.
Ellie Cook
When Finland joined NATO in 2023, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that reestablishing the Leningrad Military District was a direct result of NATO increasing its presence on Russia's border. Finland's accession to the alliance doubled the size of NATO's border with Russia.
The number of Russian troops based close to Finland could double or triple compared to before the war with Ukraine, Pekka Turunen, head of Helsinki's military intelligence, told Reuters in January.
Intelligence assessments, including from Estonia just south of Finland, have warned that NATO could face a large and experienced, if less technologically advanced, Russian military in the next few years. A wavering U.S. commitment makes this possibility more likely, many suggest.
Washington's ambassador to NATO, Matthew Whitaker, said in recent days that talks on reducing the vast U.S. presence in Europe would come in the wake of the alliance's upcoming summit in The Hague. The U.S. was not involved in this round of exercises in Finland, nor did it facilitate the drills.
While there is a public confidence in the strength of the alliance, there are concerns about gaping capability gaps across Europe. Air defense systems and supplies, as well as ammunition, are among the most urgent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What to know about the Iranian nuclear sites that were hit by US strikes
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — U.S. forces have attacked three Iranian nuclear and military sites, further upping the stakes in the Israel-Iran war. President Donald Trump said the strikes, which he described as 'very successful,' had hit the Natanz, Fordo and Isfahan sites, with Fordo being the primary target. The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran confirmed there were attacks early Sunday at all three nuclear sites. Israel launched a surprise barrage of attacks on sites in Iran on June 13, which Israeli officials said was necessary to head off what they claimed was an imminent threat that Iran would build nuclear bombs. Iran, which has long insisted its nuclear program is peaceful, has retaliated with a series of missile and drone strikes in Israel, while Israel has continued to strike sites in Iran. The U.S. and Iran had been in talks that could have resulted in the U.S. lifting some of its crushing economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for Tehran drastically limiting or ending its enrichment of uranium. Until Saturday, Washington had helped shoot down Iranian strikes on Israel but had not launched direct attacks on Iran. Here's a look at the sites Trump said the U.S. struck and their importance to Iran's nuclear program. Natanz enrichment facility Iran's nuclear facility at Natanz, located some 220 kilometers (135 miles) southeast of Tehran, is the country's main enrichment site and had already been targeted by Israeli airstrikes. Uranium had been enriched to up to 60% purity at the site — a mildly radioactive level but a short step away from weapons grade — before Israel destroyed the aboveground part of the facility, according to the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. Another part of the facility on Iran's Central Plateau is underground to defend against potential airstrikes. It operates multiple cascades, or groups of centrifuges working together to more quickly enrich uranium. The IAEA has said it believes that most if not all of these centrifuges were destroyed by an Israeli strike that cut off power to the site. The IAEA said those strikes caused contamination only at the site itself, not the surrounding area. Iran also is burrowing into the Kūh-e Kolang Gaz Lā, or Pickax Mountain, which is just beyond Natanz's southern fencing. Natanz has been targeted by the Stuxnet virus, believed to be an Israeli and American creation, which destroyed Iranian centrifuges. Two separate attacks, attributed to Israel, also have struck the facility. Fordo enrichment facility Iran's nuclear facility at Fordo is located some 100 kilometers (60 miles) southwest of Tehran. It also hosts centrifuge cascades, but isn't as big as Natanz. Its construction began at least in 2007, according to the IAEA, although Iran only informed the U.N. nuclear watchdog about the facility in 2009 after the U.S. and allied Western intelligence agencies became aware of its existence. Buried under a mountain and protected by anti-aircraft batteries, Fordo appears designed to withstand airstrikes. Military experts have said it could likely only be targeted by 'bunker buster' bombs — a term for bombs that are designed to penetrate deep below the surface before exploding — such as the latest GBU-57 A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb in the American arsenal. The roughly 30,000 pound (13,600 kilogram) precision-guided bomb is designed to attack deeply buried and hardened bunkers and tunnels. The U.S. has only configured and programed its B-2 Spirit stealth bomber to deliver that bomb, according to the Air Force. The B-2 is only flown by the Air Force, and is produced by Northrop Grumman, meaning that Washington would have to be involved in such an operation. Isfahan Nuclear Technology Center The facility in Isfahan, some 350 kilometers (215 miles) southeast of Tehran, employs thousands of nuclear scientists. It also is home to three Chinese research reactors and laboratories associated with the country's atomic program. Israel has struck buildings at the Isfahan nuclear site, among them a uranium conversion facility. The IAEA said there has been no sign of increased radiation at the site. Other nuclear sites Iran has several other sites in its nuclear program that were not announced as targets in the U.S. strikes. Iran's only commercial nuclear power plant is in Bushehr on the Persian Gulf, some 750 kilometers (465 miles) south of Tehran. Iran is building two other reactors like it at the site. Bushehr is fueled by uranium produced in Russia, not Iran, and is monitored by the IAEA. The Arak heavy water reactor is 250 kilometers (155 miles) southwest of Tehran. Heavy water helps cool nuclear reactors, but it produces plutonium as a byproduct that can potentially be used in nuclear weapons. Iran had agreed under its 2015 nuclear deal with world powers to redesign the facility to relieve proliferation concerns. The Tehran Research Reactor is at the headquarters of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, the civilian body overseeing the country's atomic program. It initially required highly enriched uranium but was later retrofitted to use low-enriched uranium over proliferation concerns. ___ Associated Press staff writer Abby Sewell in Beirut contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content. ___ Additional AP coverage of the nuclear landscape:
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Threatens Iran With 'Many' More Bombings After U.S. Attack
WASHINGTON, June 21 (Reuters) - U.S. forces struck three Iranian nuclear sites in a 'very successful attack,' President Donald Trump said on Saturday, adding that Tehran's nuclear program had been obliterated. After days of deliberation and long before his self-imposed two-week deadline, Trump's decision to join Israel's military campaign against its major rival Iran represents a major escalation of the conflict. 'The strikes were a spectacular military success,' Trump said in a televised Oval Office address. 'Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.' In a speech that lasted just over three minutes, Trump said Iran's future held 'either peace or tragedy,' and that there were many other targets that could be hit by the U.S. military. 'If peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill.' The U.S. reached out to Iran diplomatically on Saturday to say the strikes are all the U.S. plans and it does not aim for regime change, CBS News reported. Trump said U.S. forces struck Iran's three principal nuclear sites: Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow. He told Fox News six bunker-buster bombs were dropped on Fordow, while 30 Tomahawk missiles were fired against other nuclear sites. U.S. B-2 bombers were involved in the strikes, a U.S. official told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity. 'A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow,' Trump posted. 'Fordow is gone.' 'IRAN MUST NOW AGREE TO END THIS WAR,' he added. Reuters had reported earlier on Saturday the movement of the B-2 bombers, which can be equipped to carry massive bombs that experts say would be needed to strike Fordow, which is buried under a mountain south of Tehran. An Iranian official, cited by Tasnim news agency, confirmed that part of the Fordow site was attacked by 'enemy airstrikes.' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu congratulated Trump on his 'bold decision' which he said will change history. 'History will record that President Trump acted to deny the world's most dangerous regime, the world's most dangerous weapons,' Netanyahu said. The strikes came as Israel and Iran have been engaged in more than a week of aerial combat that has resulted in deaths and injuries in both countries. Israel launched the attacks on Iran saying that it wanted to remove any chance of Tehran developing nuclear weapons. Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only. Diplomatic efforts by Western nations to stop the hostilities have been unsuccessful. In recent days, Democratic lawmakers and some Republicans have argued that Trump must receive permission from the U.S. Congress before committing the U.S. military to any combat against Iran. Republican Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker of Mississippi applauded the operation but cautioned that the U.S. now faced 'very serious choices ahead.' Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Jim Risch, a Republican, said that despite the heavy U.S. bombings over Iran, 'This war is Israel's war, not our war.' He added, 'There will not be American boots on the ground in Iran.' One Republican lawmaker, Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky, simply said, 'This is not constitutional.' Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia said the U.S. public 'is overwhelmingly opposed to the U.S. waging war on Iran' and accused Trump of displaying 'horrible judgment.' Israel launched attacks on June 13, saying Iran was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons. Israel is widely assumed to possess nuclear weapons, which it neither confirms nor denies. At least 430 people have been killed and 3,500 injured in Iran since Israel began its attacks, Iranian state-run Nour News said, citing the health ministry. In Israel, 24 civilians have been killed by Iranian missile attacks, according to local authorities, in the worst conflict between the longtime enemies. More than 450 Iranian missiles have been fired towards Israel, according to the Israeli prime minister's office. Israeli officials said 1,272 people have been injured since the beginning of the hostilities, with 14 in serious condition.
Bloomberg
32 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Gives National Address on Iran Airstrikes
President Donald Trump gave a national address Saturday evening speaking on the joint Israeli airstrikes in Iran. He said Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities were 'completely and totally obliterated' and that this bombing would be the most difficult by far. (Source: Bloomberg)
