Anti-Monarchy Protesters Made Themselves Visible at Trooping The Colour

There were cheering crowds, throngs of tourists and the most ardent of royal fans who had waited for hours to catch a glimpse of the procession. However, today's Trooping the Colour also featured a small but very visible protest from anti-,monarchy group Republic who carried yellow banners and chanted 'Not my King.' This was the group's second time protesting at Trooping having been increasingly visible at royal events throughout the reign of King Charles.
'This is the iconic royal event of the year when they come out on the balcony,' Republic's CEO Graham Smith told T&C today. 'And it's that balcony moment we're really here for…The whole point with all our protests is to disrupt this idea that we are all a nation of royalists.'
It is correct that not everyone in Britain is a fan of the royal family. Polling shows that around 60% of people have a positive view of them and just over 30% have a negative view, with the remaining undecided. However, the favorability drops to 44% amongst 18 to 25-year-olds with 43% of that age group having a negative view.
Protester Dan, 40, told T&C that he wanted to see the UK move to a model more like Germany with an elected president in a ceremonial role. 'I think we need to head towards a fairer society,' he said. 'We're trying to promote equality on behalf of the people. We're trying to raise awareness that this is an unequal society, we've got a class system that's been entrenched for hundreds of years. There are a lot of nations now who salute the flag and swear allegiance to the flag and the people and the country, and we just need to move to that model.'
There was a significant police presence around the small protest today. While it was entirely peaceful, it was clear that many in the crowd were not happy to see the protesters. As members of the public filed past them down the Mall to get to the Palace ahead of the famous balcony moment, several shouted 'God Save the King' or 'Long Live the King' in retaliation. A handful of people stuck their middle finger up at the protesters or booed them.
The protesters were let onto the Mall once the flypast had already started. As the Red Arrows roared overhead, those caring the huge and vibrant 'Not My King' and 'Down With the Crown' banners weaved their way through the cheering crowd as the royals stood on the balcony above.You Might Also Like
12 Weekend Getaway Spas For Every Type of Occasion
13 Beauty Tools to Up Your At-Home Facial Game

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

News24

41 minutes ago

• News24

UK MPs vote in favour of assisted dying bill in historic step

Britain's MPs approved initial assisted dying legislation for terminally ill adults, advancing it to the House of Lords. Supporters argue for dignity and choice, while critics fear coercion and call for enhanced palliative care. Public support grows, but the bill faces opposition and challenges before potential implementation in four years. Britain's parliament took a historic step towards allowing euthanasia on Friday when MPs backed contentious legislation that would introduce assisted dying for terminally ill people. Lawmakers in the lower House of Commons chamber voted 314 in favour to 291 to send the proposal to the upper House of Lords for further scrutiny following four hours of emotional debate. The outcome sparked celebrations among supporters gathered outside parliament who say legalised euthanasia will give people with an incurable illness dignity and choice at the end of their lives. But opponents attending a neighbouring counter-protest said they feared vulnerable people could be coerced into dying and urged lawmakers to focus on improving palliative care instead. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill would allow assisted suicide in England and Wales for adults who have been given less than six months to live. They would have to be able to administer the life-ending substance themselves, and any patient's wish to die would have to be signed off by two doctors and a panel of experts. A change in the law would see Britain emulate several other countries in Europe and elsewhere that allow some form of assisted dying, including Belgium and the Netherlands. 'Heartbreaking stories' Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who proposed the legislation, told Friday's so-called third reading debate that a law change would 'offer a compassionate and safe choice' for terminally ill people. She said maintaining the status quo would mean more 'heartbreaking stories' of 'pain and trauma, suicide attempts, PTSD, lonely trips to Switzerland, (and) police investigations'. However, Vicky Foxcroft, also of Labour, said the proposal did not include adequate safeguards for disabled people. She pleaded: We have to protect those people who are susceptible to coercion, who already feel like society doesn't value them, who often feel like a burden to the state, society and their family. Outside parliament, protesters waved placards with slogans including 'Let us choose' and 'Don't make doctors killers'. David Walker, 82, said he supported changing the law because he saw his wife of 60 years suffer for three years at the end of her life. 'That's why I'm here because I can't help her anymore, but I can help other people who are going through the same thing because if you have no quality of life, you have nothing,' he told AFP. But Elizabeth Burden, a 52-year-old doctor, said she feared the legislation would open a 'slippery slope' where those eligible for assisted dying expands. 'Once we allow this. Everything will slip down because dementia patients, all patients... are vulnerable,' she told AFP. Public support MPs in the 650-seat parliament backed an earlier version of the proposed legislation by 330 to 275 votes at an initial vote in parliament last November, a larger majority than Friday's 23. Since then, the bill has undergone several changes, including applying a ban on adverts for assisted dying and allowing all health workers to opt out of helping someone end their life. MPs added a safeguard which would prevent a person from being eligible 'solely as a result of voluntarily stopping eating or drinking', ruling out people with anorexia. Britain's medical community and Prime Minister Keir Starmer's top ministerial team are split on the proposed law change. Starmer voted in favour, while his health and justice secretaries opposed it. However, in a YouGov poll of 2,003 adults surveyed last month and published Thursday, 73% of respondents backed an assisted dying law. 'Change is coming,' hailed Sarah Wootton, chief executive of the Dignity in Dying campaign group. But Catherine Robinson of Right To Life UK insisted the bill 'still faces an uphill battle' to get through the Lords, and her opposition campaign group 'will be fighting it at every stage' to prevent it from becoming law. READ | UK politician says Bangladesh arrest warrant is 'politically motivated smear' The House of Lords now needs to approve the legislation before the end of the current parliamentary year, likely in the autumn, or the bill will fail. If it passes and receives royal assent, it would still be four years before an assisted dying service was implemented. A government impact assessment published this month estimated that approximately 160 to 640 assisted deaths could take place in the first year, rising to a possible 4,500 in a decade. Assisted suicide currently carries a maximum prison sentence of 14 years in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Separate legislation is going through the devolved Scottish parliament. At the end of March, the Isle of Man became the first British territory to pass an assisted dying bill.

Wall Street Journal

an hour ago

• Wall Street Journal

Week Ahead for FX, Bonds: PMI Data, Middle East Conflict in Focus

Preliminary purchasing managers' surveys in the eurozone, U.K. and U.S. are among the biggest highlights in the week ahead. The surveys on manufacturing and services activity are an important indicator of economic growth. The data come amid concerns about President Trump's tariff policy and the Israel-Iran conflict. Noting that the global PMI data for May signaled some improvements in current and expected future output growth, S&P economists said in a note: 'With tensions rising in the Middle East, pushing oil prices sharply higher, the flash PMI data will be keenly assessed to see whether April really represented 'peak gloom' in terms of business confidence, or whether executives consider the economic and political environment to have deteriorated further.'

CBS News

2 hours ago

• CBS News

U.K. lawmakers back assisted dying bill that would allow terminally ill adults to choose to end their lives

London — After hours of impassioned debate, British lawmakers in the House of Commons voted Friday to pass a bill that would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales to choose to end their lives. The bill passed by 23 votes, with hundreds protesting about the divisive issue outside of parliament, from both sides of the debate. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will now undergo months of scrutiny by the House of Lords, the upper chamber of Britain's Parliament. The lords, who are not elected, can debate, delay and amend the bill, but they have little power to block legislation passed by the elected Members of Parliament in the House of Commons. The central tenet of the bill is that adults over 18 who are deemed to have less than six months to live could — after a series of safeguarding checks — be provided help to end their lives, in the form of fatal drugs that they could self-administer. Campaigners for a change in the law on assisted dying celebrate outside The Palace of Westminster, home to the Houses of Parliament, in central London, June 20, 2025, after the vote to allow assisted dying for terminally ill people by the House of Commons. CARLOS JASSO/AFP/Getty In November, British lawmakers gave initial approval to the new law, passing it by 330 votes to 275 — a wider margin that indicates some members of parliament changed their minds before Friday's vote. Since the first vote, the original bill proposed by Labour Party lawmaker Kim Leadbeater underwent several changes, including the dropping of a provision that would have required a judge to sign off on any final decision granting a medically assisted death. The current bill requires any request to be approved by two doctors and a panel that includes a social worker, a senior legal figure, and a psychiatrist. In a debate before the vote on Friday, Leadbeater told parliament about the many stories she had heard from people who witnessed friends and family suffer traumatic deaths. "Not supporting the bill today is not a neutral act. It is a vote for the status quo," she said, according to The Associated Press. "And it fills me with despair to think MPs [Members of Parliament] could be here in another 10 years' time hearing the same stories." Leadbeater and other supporters of the bill argue that people with terminal diagnoses should have the right to choose whether to continue living. They have cited stories of people taking their own lives in secret because no-one could legally help them. They also argue that it isn't fair that people with enough money can currently seek life-ending care by traveling to Switzerland. More than 500 Britons have ended their lives in Switzerland, where foreigners can opt for an assisted death. Protesters against a change in the law on assisted dying hold placards during a demonstration outside The Palace of Westminster, home to the Houses of Parliament in central London, June 20, 2025. CARLOS JASSO/AFP/Getty Opponents argue that elderly or disabled people could be manipulated — overtly or covertly — into ending their lives, to save money or to relieve a perceived burden on loved ones. Others say better end-of-life and health care would be a better alternative. Outside parliament on Friday, protesters faced off with contrasting slogans. Some wore clothes bearing the phrase: "Campaign for Dignity in Dying," while opponents held banners calling the U.K.'s state-run National Health Service, the "National Suicide Service." The vote paves the way for what could be one of the biggest changes in social policy in the U.K. since the partial legalization of abortion in 1967. If the bill passes the House of Lords, it is expected to take another four years to be fully implemented.