Swinney did ‘nothing' to save bus jobs says Sarwar
Mr Sarwar cited a letter from August 2024 — first disclosed in The Herald — in which Paul Soubry, president and chief executive of Alexander Dennis's parent company NFI Group, wrote directly to the SNP leader warning that the Government's procurement decisions risked undermining Scotland's domestic bus manufacturing industry.
READ MORE
The company has since proposed consolidating its manufacturing operations in Scarborough, North Yorkshire, putting around 400 jobs at risk in Falkirk and Larbert.
'John Swinney received a letter almost a year ago directly from the company,' Mr Sarwar told MSPs, 'setting out how his decision to buy buses from China instead of from Scotland was putting the company and jobs at risk.'
'He did nothing for the skilled workforce. But last week, as usual, he tried to find someone else to blame for his own failure by talking about UK procurement laws — laws that did not stop Andy Burnham buying Scottish buses, but somehow stop this SNP Scottish Government.'
Mr Swinney rejected the accusation, insisting the Scottish Government had taken action following the August letter, including setting up work between the firm and Scottish Enterprise.
He said ministers had maintained a 'positive dialogue' with Alexander Dennis, which had 'expressed appreciation' for Government support, including £58 million in zero-emission bus funding.
'We established work for Scottish Enterprise with the company to support the company in securing its future,' he said. 'That work was taken forward as a consequence of that dialogue.'
But critics said the scale of the support did not match the urgency of the warning from Mr Soubry, who in his letter expressed 'regret' that Scottish Government decisions had left the firm feeling it had 'no choice but to reconsider our entire investment in the Scottish operations of Alexander Dennis'.
The Scottish Labour leader also pointed to procurement data showing that since receiving the letter, the Scottish Government had not ordered a single bus from Alexander Dennis, while Greater Manchester — operating under the same UK legal framework — had placed significantly more orders.
In a new letter from UK Cabinet Office Minister Pat McFadden to Mr Sarwar, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster acknowledged that while UK subsidy rules prevent tying grants to domestic purchases, there is nothing to stop governments awarding subsidies directly to manufacturers such as Alexander Dennis.
(Image: Cabinet Office)
He also said the Scottish Government could use the Crown Commercial Service framework — where Alexander Dennis is already a supplier — to apply social value criteria favouring local industry or to issue a direct award. Under the new Procurement Act, bids from countries such as China, which are not party to UK trade agreements, can also be lawfully disregarded.
Mr McFadden wrote: 'The Subsidy Control Act does not prevent manufacturers, such as Alexander Dennis, receiving subsidies directly and this remains an open, and viable, option for the Scottish Government.'
He added that the Procurement Act 'allows contracting authorities to disregard bids from non-treaty state suppliers, which includes countries like China'.
Alexander Dennis has argued that Scottish Government policy failed to align with its own just transition principles, noting that 83% of orders under the second phase of the Zero Emission Bus Challenge Fund (ScotZEB2) went to manufacturers in China and Egypt. The company received just 17% of the 252-bus order, despite its long-standing presence in Falkirk and years of support from Scottish Enterprise.
Andrew Learmonth Kathleen Nutt; Hannah Brown; Rebecca McCurdy Deborah Anderson; Catherine Salmond undefined 60% of recipients have opened this mail. undefined Hello, Can we start adding this source code to the bottom of every politics article? It will bring up an advert and a link to Unspun Live. To add it you need to click this button on Martini. That will take you into HTML mode. And then scroll down to the bottom of the article and then copy and paste the code below. If you click on the source button again you should be able to see if it's worked. @Deborah Anderson Can we get colleagues to do this when they're working on politics tales?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
6 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Festivals given £3m in Government funding
The events will receive a share of the £2.8 million Festivals Expo Fund, and Festivals Edinburgh will get £200,000 from Creative Scotland for branding and marketing support for the events in the capital. The Expo Fund spending has increased from £1.7 million last year. The Edinburgh Festival Fringe will receive £670,000, while the Edinburgh International Book Festival will be given £200,000, the same amount as for the Scottish International Storytelling Festival. Culture Secretary Angus Robertson said: 'Scotland's festivals are our cultural shopfront to the rest of the world. 'As well as offering performers and creatives an unrivalled international platform, they also deliver an annual economic uplift to businesses, jobs and livelihoods right across the country. 'This year's funding increase for the existing Expo festivals cohort represents an increase of £1 million across the 14 festivals in Glasgow and Edinburgh, the first in 10 years. 'It recognises the success of festivals in shaping and supporting hundreds of commissions, enhancing the ambitions of thousands of Scottish artists and attracting audiences in the millions for Expo-supported work since the fund's creation in 2007. 'From this foundation we will expand the reach of the Expo fund across the whole of Scotland, and I am working with festivals across the country through the strategic festivals partnership to realise this commitment.' Dana MacLeod, executive director of arts, communities and inclusion at Creative Scotland, welcomed the funding, saying it will enable festivals to 'commission bold ideas, develop creative collaborations and present high-quality programmes for audiences in Scotland and internationally'. Lori Anderson, director of Festivals Edinburgh, said: 'Today's announcement is welcome news for our festivals and for Scotland's cultural sector, ensuring that the guiding principle of the Scottish Government's Festivals Expo Fund – to showcase Scottish talent to the world on the country's premier festival platforms – continues to successfully support creative careers.'
The Herald Scotland
32 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
The verdict on Cammy Day: little in this sordid affair surprised me
But that did not mean Cllr Day had no case to answer, that complaints against him were fabricated, that Cllr Day's alleged behaviour fell below the standard expected of a civic figurehead, or that safeguards for complainants do not need to be improved. Like the charges against the late Alex Salmond, it is entirely possible for allegations to have some substance - why else did Mr Salmond admit to being 'no angel' who indulged in 'sleepy cuddles' in his bedroom with a female colleague who was not Mrs Salmond - and for there to be a political conspiracy at the same time? One does not necessarily exclude or indeed excuse the other, especially when a personal weakness becomes a political opportunity. But the debate on the Dunion Report split very much along those lines, with the SNP and Greens in denial that politics had played any part in how the allegations came to light, when each one of them either knew it did or had been living on Bass Rock for the last six months. Worse, any attempt to shed any political light on what happened was portrayed as victim-shaming and extending ordeals. If politics and allegations of leaks of confidential information about the complaints to the Press had anything to do with the absence of Cllr Day's former coalition partner and ex-council leader, the SNP's Adam Nols-McVey, no-one was saying. This is the same Cllr Nols-McVey who failed to inform the Chief Executive, the monitoring officer, or indeed the Standards Commission, when he received a serious complaint about Cllr Day, then his deputy coalition leader, in 2018. And it's the same Cllr Nols-McVey who never missed an opportunity to attack me in council meetings with quite sickening innuendo when I was under investigation - and subsequently cleared - by the Standards Commission for doing nothing more than asking difficult questions. Read more I'm not sure Edinburgh Council's biggest problem is too many Christmas parties Edinburgh Labour U-turns on Cammy Day's council comeback bid | The Herald Cammy Day probe report debated by Edinburgh Council | The Herald No, it was nothing to do with politics when new complaints made through the council's supposedly confidential whistleblowing system, and a subsequent report, then appeared in newspapers at the end of last year. And no, when the SNP amendment said, 'disclosures were met, in some instances, with dismissiveness or minimisation by some councillors, including being labelled as 'gossip' or 'salacious', contributing to a culture of silence and power imbalance,' it was not referring to Cllr Nols-McVey's obvious failure to escalate the 2018 complaint. And when the SNP agreed with the Greens' amendment that 'Elected Members undertaking public duties should be held to higher standards than simple criminality,' it presumably did not apply to what appears to have been little more than a chat between Cllr Nols-McVey and a police officer about the complaint in 2018. It was no surprise that Cllr Day was not there to hear what little remains of his reputation being ripped to shreds, and it's impossible to see how a plan, wisely withdrawn earlier in the week, for the Labour administration to propose Cllr Day as convener of the planning committee can come off. Why anyone thought it was a good idea to try to vote in someone to a promoted post, which comes with a £14,000 a year pay rise, just as they were about to be eviscerated in the next agenda item is beyond me. At least advice was heeded, but the Labour group should be in no doubt that any attempt at the next full council meeting in August to propose Cllr Day for such a key position could end in ignominious failure and possibly the collapse of the administration. Just because his behaviour has not crossed a criminal threshold, that Cllr Day has been readmitted to the Labour Party, or that there was a political motive behind the attempt to destroy him publicly, does not mean all councillors other than the SNP and Greens are willing to give him a clean bill of reputational health. Edinburgh City Chambers (Image: Newsquest) It certainly does not apply to serial Labour rebel Katria Faccenda who in an emotional speech said the affair had 'broken her heart' and made it clear she would not welcome Cllr Day's return, saying she was unable to attend meetings with Cllr Day present because she feared for her safety. However hyperbolic that claim may be, she was not far off the mark with her assertion that the council is in a 'position of ethical crisis,' but this is not news and there are more than a few of us, and not all from the opposition ranks, who have been saying this for years. For evidence, ask the now retired education officers John and Deirdre Travers why it took them 20 years to be compensated for the appalling campaign of abuse and intimidation they suffered for blowing the whistle on institutional corruption at the highest levels. Or the people whose evidence of disgraceful practices was ignored by the 2021 inquiry into the council's whistleblowing culture. He might not quit, but readmitted to the Labour Party or not, it's hard to see how Cllr Day can carry on after the 2027 election. Little in this whole sordid affair surprised me, and if the council is to move on, then so too should some other significant individuals who have been there too long. Councillors can call for as many reports and new procedures as they want, but when fresh new voices defend, ignore or even lie about the actions of those who have come to regard power as an entitlement, absolutely nothing will change.
The Guardian
34 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Ancient trees are shipped to the UK, then burned – using billions in ‘green' subsidies. Stop this madness now
How green is this? We pay billions of pounds to cut down ancient forests in the US and Canada, ship the wood across the Atlantic in diesel tankers, then burn it in a Yorkshire-based power station. Welcome to the scandal of Drax, where Britain's biggest polluter gets to play climate hero. The reality is that billions in public subsidies has enabled Drax to generate electricity by burning 300m trees. Now the government is trying to force through an extension that would grant Drax an estimated £1.8bn in public subsidies on top of the £11bn it has already pocketed, keeping this circus going until at least 2031. This isn't green energy. The mathematics alone should horrify anyone who cares about value for money or the environment. Burning wood creates 18% more CO2 emissions than coal. Even if you replant every tree Drax destroys, it takes up to a century for new growth to reabsorb the carbon released. We're supposed to reach net zero by 2050, not 2125. Yet through circus-trick accounting, all of Drax's massive emissions magically disappear from Britain's climate ledger. They've simply been wished away – counted as 'zero', while the company becomes our largest single contributor to climate breakdown. Extraordinarily, this scandal unites opposition across the political spectrum. From the Greens to Reform, from the Morning Star to the Daily Telegraph, there's rare consensus that Drax represents everything wrong with our approach to climate policy. The Labour-dominated public accounts committee condemned Drax as a 'white elephant' that's been allowed to 'mark its own homework' while claiming 'billions upon billions' in subsidies. A Lords committee agreed, saying parliament needs to see key documents before approving any more funding. I don't agree with Ed Miliband on everything – we clearly have different views on nuclear power. I respect the energy secretary's commitment to tackling climate crisis, and it is worth noting that the further subsidies are half of what was previously on offer for Drax. But that's exactly why continuing to subsidise Drax at all is so disappointing. When Miliband announced his plans to 'ramp up' biomass burning back in 2009, he was genuinely trying to find alternatives to fossil fuels. But 16 years on, this policy has gone badly astray. What was meant to be a bridge to renewable energy is actually making emissions worse. If, on Monday, the House of Lords votes to extend this unabated wood burning for another four years, what is to stop these subsidies being extended again and again? And why should the government deal with a firm as untrustworthy as Drax? Perhaps most damning is what Drax refuses to reveal. After the BBC's devastating Panorama investigation into the company's destruction of Canadian primary forests, Drax asked auditor KPMG to investigate, hoping for a clean bill of health. However, the evidence was so damning that the reports are still being hidden from the public. If Drax has nothing to hide, why not publish these reports? A former top Treasury official turned whistleblower accused it of deliberately concealing unsustainable practices to secure subsidies. The case, now settled, raises questions of dishonesty that should disqualify any company from public funding. The extra billions Drax is seeking could help build enough wind and solar capacity to power millions of homes. It could create permanent jobs in genuine renewable industries, not temporary employment destroying irreplaceable ecosystems. Every pound spent subsidising tree burning is a pound not invested in technologies that could actually deliver net zero. While other countries race ahead with wind, solar and battery storage, we're burning money on the most primitive fuel known to humanity. There's a huge loophole in the government's pledge to stop Drax burning trees from primary forest. Their restrictions on Drax only apply to subsidised electricity supplied to the grid. Drax wants to power private data centres but there is no plan that prevents it from destroying ancient forests to power 21st-century AI searches. That means Drax could be cutting down even more primary forests than it does today. MPs have lost trust in the government's ability to hold Drax to account – the criticism from parliamentary committees has been brutal. The environmental movement didn't fight to establish renewable energy so politicians could facilitate the burning of ancient forests that took millennia to grow. Real climate action means making hard choices, not hiding behind accounting tricks that make our emissions disappear on paper while making them worse in reality. It is time for Labour MPs to speak up; the fight for net zero is hard enough. More subsidies for Drax's wood burning in the name of sustainability is just more fuel on that fire. Dale Vince is a green energy industrialist and campaigner
