Scientist bitten by deadly snakes 200 TIMES helps create ‘unparalleled' anti-venom to save thousands of lives
A WACKY scientist has allowed the world's deadliest snakes to bite him over 200 times to help create an "unparalleled" anti-venom.
Tim Friede has been injected by snake toxins over 850 times across his 18-year career and once even fell into a coma due to two cobra bites.
6
6
6
Snake venom kills up to 140,000 people each year and can leave over 420,000 people needing life altering amputations.
The cases remain so high due to their being no universal antivenom against all snakebites.
But after nearly two decades of death-defying work, Tim's research may have finally paid off.
His fearless antibodies have been shown to protect against fatal doses from a wide range of dangerous species in recent animal tests.
The American initially allowed himself to be bitten to help further his career on YouTube where he handled a range of snakes.
He believed it would help him build up an immunity to protect himself when finding some of the world's worst snakes.
His bizarre plan once left the former truck mechanic fighting for his life after two Egyptian cobra bites in quick succession left him in a coma for days.
Tim told the BBC he "didn't want to die" and so when he awoke and was back to full health he used his second chance at life to help others survive.
He explained: "It just became a lifestyle and I just kept pushing and pushing and pushing as hard as I could push for the people who are 8,000 miles away from me who die from snakebites."
His brave work was soon noticed by research teams who got in contact and asked to examine his blood.
The team of scientists were searching for a type of immune defence which had neutralised antibodies - something they believed Tim may have developed.
Dr Jacob Glanville, chief executive of biotech company Centivax, reached out to him and asked if they could take a blood sample for testing.
Tim soon agreed after he was told his body has been able to repel venom which would "normally kill a horse", according to Dr Glanville.
The research focused on two families of venomous snakes which included coral snakes, mambas, cobras, taipans and kraits.
These reptiles use neurotoxins in their venom to paralyse their victim to the point where their muscles can no longer supply the body with enough oxygen.
Researchers handpicked 19 of these creatures which are considered as being among the deadliest snakes on the planet.
Soon after analysing Tim's blood they uncovered two broadly neutralising antibodies that target neurotoxins, according to their work which is detailed in the journal Cell.
A third drug was later added to the antivenom cocktail before it was used on mice.
6
6
Out of 19 test subjects, 13 survived lethal doses of snake venom.
The remaining six were found to have partial protection against the poison.
Dr Glanville described the results as "unparalleled" in the current world of antivenom research.
He also believes this means the cocktail will likely cover a whole range of other snakes.
The team is now trying to see if they can add a fourth component to the drug mixture in order to offer full protection to venom.
Currently, testing has only been done on elapid snake venom which covers the two most common families of deadly snakes.
The other major snake types which contribute to global death rates are vipers.
Tim's antibodies are really quite extraordinary - he taught his immune system to get this very, very broad recognition
Professor Peter KwongColumbia University
They use haemotoxins to attack blood cells rather than neurotoxins which target muscles - a key difference to elapids.
But Professor Peter Kwong, a researcher at Columbia University, believes the initial results prove that one day a complete antivenom will be discovered.
He said: "I think in the next 10 or 15 years we'll have something effective against each one of those toxin classes."
The ultimate goal is to create a single antivenom or discover two injections which cover elapids and vipers.
And Tim is planning on helping out for as long as he can.
He said: "I'm doing something good for humanity and that was very important to me. I'm proud of it. It's pretty cool."
Prof Kwong says his team owes Tim and the world a huge thank you for what he has put his body through for science.
"Tim's antibodies are really quite extraordinary - he taught his immune system to get this very, very broad recognition," he said.
The team are now preparing to test its antivenom cocktail in Australia on dogs who have been bitten by a snake.
6
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
29 minutes ago
- Metro
BBC Newsreader eye-rolls and refuses to say 'pregnant people' instead of women
BBC newsreader Martine Croxall appeared to roll her eyes as she switched 'pregnant people' for 'women' during a news report. The 56-year-old news host was presenting a segment on new research about the number of heat-related deaths expected amid Britain's current heatwave when the moment occured. Initially quoting the phrasing used in the research, Croxall said: 'Malcolm Mistry, who was involved in the research, said the aged, pregnant people… women… and those with pre-existing health conditions need to take precautions.' 'I have a new favourite BBC presenter,' Harry Potter author J.K Rowling, who has faced backlash for her views on the transgender community and trans-inclusive langage, posted on X. Rowling has previously taken issue with phrases such as 'people who mensturate'. After one commenter on X said they 'hope you don't get hauled before the BBC News beak,' the Celebrity mastermind winner said she was 'braced'. The national broadcaster currently has no specific policy of saying pregnant people. Last year, Croxall notably returned to the BBC after taking legal action against the broadcaster. She claimed that she was one of a group of BBC employees kept off-air during a rebrand and returned to her place behind the newsdesk after an employment tribunal. The use of gender-neutral language within maternity care has been a topic of fierce debate in recent years. In 2021 a Brighton hospital faced backlash for rolling out a 'gender-includive language policy'. Elsewhere a maternity bill in the UK changed the word 'person' to 'mothers and 'expecting mothers' after complaints. The trans rights movement has faced intense scrutiny with figures like Rowling stoking debate such as her support of the superme court ruling around the definition of a woman. Sir Stephen Fry, who has previously defended the writer, appeared to change his stance in recent comments saying she has been 'radicalised'. 'She has been radicalised, I fear, and it may be she has been radicalised by TERFs, but also by the vitriol that is thrown at her. More Trending 'It is unhelpful and only hardens her and will only continue to harden her, I am afraid.' He added that she is a 'lost cause for us'. 'I am not saying that she should not be called out when she says things that are really cruel, wrong and mocking,' he said at a live event. Metro has reached out to BBC for comment. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. View More » MORE: Dame Prue Leith's son blasted after saying she doesn't 'see sense' in debate MORE: Dragons' Den star reveals their strict rule children's friends must follow MORE: Disgraced Strictly star slams 'double standards' at BBC after Naga Munchetty 'sex jibe'
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
JK Rowling praises BBC presenter for ‘pregnant women' correction
JK Rowling has praised a BBC presenter who corrected the term 'pregnant people' to 'women' during a live news broadcast in an apparent rejection of gender-neutral language. Martine Croxall was citing a heart-related study about protecting vulnerable people against extreme weather when she appeared to roll her eyes at the phrase. 'London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine has released research which says that nearly 600 heat-related deaths are expected in the UK,' she read. 'Malcolm Mistry, who was involved in the research, says that the aged, pregnant people … women … and those with pre-existing health conditions need to take precautions.' The original wording came from the study's authors rather than the BBC, it is understood. Responding to Saturday's incident, Rowling, the gender-critical author, wrote on X: 'I have a new favourite BBC presenter.' The BBC does not have specific guidelines on the use of gender-neutral terms such as 'pregnant people', which has become more frequent in the wake of calls to remove gender from discussions of pregnancy and childbirth. JK Rowling DAVE J HOGAN/GETTY IMAGES The BBC News style guide does, however, encourage 'appropriate language' when reporting on a person's gender, including using whichever gender pronouns are 'preferred by the person in question, unless there are editorial reasons not to do so'. In April, the Supreme Court ruled that the legal definition of a woman was based on biological sex. In a previous statement, the BBC said that it was assessing how to implement the ruling into its editorial guidelines. A spokesman said: 'In our news reporting, we always aim to deal with issues fairly and impartially, and this is informed by our editorial guidelines. BBC News are assessing the ruling to consider any updates which might need to be made to the style guide as a result.' The BBC has been approached for comment.
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Martine Croxall has just struck a dazzling blow for common sense
A rebellion can take many forms. Sometimes it's an uprising in the streets. Sometimes it's a ballot-box revolt against the status quo. And sometimes – as BBC newsreader Martine Croxall has brilliantly shown – it's just a droll, one-word aside. Croxall struck a dazzling blow for common sense this week by daring to say the unsayable, by giving voice to a word that's become bizarrely verboten in certain circles. What blasphemous term did she utter? Women. It was during an item on the heatwave. Croxall was talking about new research on the number of heat-related deaths Britain might see as the temperature rises. She read the following from her autocue: 'Malcolm Mistry, who was involved in the research, said the aged, pregnant people…'. Then she stopped. Pregnant people? What in the politically correct hell is this? She mutinied against her teleprompter and told the truth. 'WOMEN', she said, with excellent exasperation. Then she carried on. The elderly, pregnant women and people with pre-existing health conditions 'need to take precautions' in the heat, she said. Post-truth baloney put in its place by a woman who's clearly had enough – you love to see it. 'Pregnant people' is one of those Newspeak phrases that is said to be 'trans-inclusive' but which in truth just erases women. The idea is that if we say 'pregnant people', we won't offend that infinitesimally small chunk of womankind that identifies as male. That 'pregnant people' is offensive to many women – not to mention to science and reason – seems not to matter. Let's be honest – 'pregnant people' is a lunatic term. Every single human being who has ever fallen pregnant has been a woman. They can call themselves Tom, Dick or Harry if they like and ask their woke pals to refer to them as 'he'. But they're women, and it isn't offensive to say so. Other 'trans-inclusive' terms include 'chest-feeding' (what we used to call breastfeeding) and 'birthing bodies' – or 'WOMEN!', as Croxall might say, with that righteous irritation shared by many of us. The memory-holing of the word 'woman' to appease the trans lobby is an outrage. It adds up to a sexist scrubbing from the public record of half of humankind. This is why Croxall's quiet vexation and gentle eye-roll as she said the W-word has chimed with so many: because we are sick of seeing the rights of women and the very language of womanhood be sacrificed at the altar of a dumb and dangerous fad. 'I have a new favourite BBC presenter', said JK Rowling. Same, Joanne. Croxall's rage against the autocue, her one-woman, one-word insurrection against correct-think, was as refreshing as a breeze in this heatwave. Some are now worried the BBC might haul her in for a telling-off. They wouldn't dare. Millions of decent folk will seethe if the public broadcaster even thinks about rapping a woman's knuckles for telling the truth.
