Edgar Lungu's death sparks outcry, allegations of poisoning and political suppression
Secretary General of Zambia's Patriotic Front Raphael Mangani Nakacinda addressing a media round table in Sandton Johannesburg on the impasse between the Zambian government and the Patriotic Front. Medical Staff at the hospital that treated President Lungu say they have been threatened by Zambian government officials who wanted to remove and repatriate the presidents body to Zambia without the family's consent or knowledge.
Former Zambian President Edgar Chagwa Lungu has died at the age of 68, with his final days clouded by political tension, medical struggles, and serious allegations of state-sponsored persecution.
Lungu passed away on Thursday in a South African hospital, where he had been receiving treatment for an undisclosed illness.
However, the official silence on the cause of death and mounting accusations from his political allies have sparked a storm of controversy, including claims that the former head of state may have been poisoned to prevent him from contesting the 2026 presidential elections.
Lungu, who served as Zambia's sixth president from 2015 to 2021, had announced a political comeback in late 2023 after years of relative quiet following his electoral defeat to current President Hakainde Hichilema (popularly known as HH).
But what began as a bid to return to the ballot box quickly turned into a contentious and, some claim, dangerous standoff with the ruling administration.
A Contested Comeback
Lungu's return to politics was met with immediate resistance from the Hichilema-led government.
In December 2024, the Constitutional Court ruled that Lungu was ineligible to contest again, arguing that his first, partial term from 2015 to 2016 counted as a full term under Zambia's constitutional two-term limit.
Lungu's legal team and supporters decried the judgment as politically motivated, pointing to his widespread popularity among grassroots voters and within opposition coalitions as a threat to the ruling United Party for National Development (UPND).
But critics say the court ruling was just the beginning of a broader campaign to shut Lungu out of national politics.
Stripped of Protection and Benefits
Soon after his political re-entry, Lungu was stripped of all retirement benefits typically afforded to former heads of state.
These included state-provided security, official transportation, medical support, and diplomatic privileges. The government justified the move by citing a legal provision that bars retired presidents from engaging in politics if they wish to retain those benefits.
While technically legal, the action had far-reaching consequences for Lungu's safety and well-being. Without state protection, his movements were left exposed.
More alarmingly, his access to healthcare, particularly urgent specialist treatment, was severely limited. Sources within the Patriotic Front (PF), Lungu's party, say repeated requests for travel permits to receive medical care abroad were delayed or denied.'He was denied not only political freedom but medical care too,' said a senior PF official.
'When it became clear that he needed to leave for urgent treatment, the government stalled. That decision may have cost him his life.'
Allegations of Poisoning
With the cause of Lungu's death yet to be officially confirmed, speculation is growing that he may have been deliberately poisoned. Though no forensic evidence has been made public, the PF is calling for an independent international investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death.
His daughter, Tasila Lungu-Mwansa, confirmed in a public statement that her father had been unwell for weeks and had travelled to South Africa under medical supervision. However, she also alluded to the family's belief that his condition may have been the result of "external interference" — a veiled reference to suspected foul play.
PF leaders have taken a more direct stance. 'This was not a natural death,' said Brian Mundubile, a close ally of Lungu. 'We believe this was orchestrated to eliminate him politically and permanently.'
Restricted Movement and Surveillance
Beyond the courtroom and hospital bed, Lungu's daily life was increasingly policed. Police were reportedly stationed outside his home, monitoring his activities and restricting public engagements.
Even routine morning jogs and Sunday church services were flagged as political activity and discouraged or blocked by law enforcement.'It was humiliation, plain and simple,' said one family confidant. 'He was a former president being treated like a common criminal just for exercising and praying.'
Human rights activists and opposition figures have condemned the government's treatment of Lungu as not only unconstitutional but dangerous for Zambia's democratic fabric. 'What happened to President Lungu sets a dangerous precedent,' said a representative of the Zambia Human Rights Commission.
'If a former president can be silenced this way, what protection exists for the ordinary citizen?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Confronting racism in our schools
The latest incident of alleged racism at Bryandale Primary School in Bryanston is yet another painful reminder that South African schools still have a long way to go before genuine transformation and inclusion are achieved. It is alleged that an Indian learner told two Black students, 'You stupid Black people are so predictable.' Such language is deeply offensive, dehumanising, and has no place in any learning environment. This incident must be treated with the seriousness it demands, not as a 'playground misunderstanding,' but as a reflection of wider issues of racism and marginalisation that persist in our schools. While many public and private schools proudly promote values of diversity and transformation in their mission statements, these values must go beyond lip service. Transformation is not a passive hope; it requires active, ongoing engagement and institutional introspection. Schools play a critical role in redressing the deep inequalities and marginalisation embedded in our society. They must be proactive in creating safe and affirming environments for all children, not only through symbolic gestures but through deliberate action, anti-racism training, and clear accountability mechanisms. The incident at Bryandale is not isolated. Just two days ago, a Grade 8 learner at De La Salle Holy Cross College was reportedly told, 'You don't belong… go home, you (K-word).' In 2024, Pretoria High School for Girls made headlines after racist WhatsApp messages targeted Black pupils. That same year, Jeppe High School for Girls in Johannesburg came under fire when Black pupils were removed from class for wearing coloured braids, while white pupils with dyed hair faced no repercussions. These are not isolated "bad apples." They reflect systemic failures that schools must urgently address. We call on school governing bodies, education departments, and communities to treat these incidents with the seriousness they deserve. Silence or delay enables racism to fester. We must demand not only awareness but transformation that is measurable, monitored, and real. Because if our schools can't be safe and just spaces for our children, we cannot expect our society to be either. Matthew Cook, GOOD National Chairperson and City of Johannesburg Councillor
Eyewitness News
10 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Growing calls for SA to lead the UN in drafting a new Human Rights Treaty
JOHANNESBURG - There are growing calls for South Africa to take a lead role in shaping a new United Nations (UN) treaty on crimes against humanity including apartheid. Human rights groups, including international organisation Madre, are urging government to contribute to the drafting process. The calls come after a two-day dialogue co-hosted by the Nelson Mandela foundation, bringing together lawyers, feminists, and civil society to address the legacy of apartheid and other global atrocities. International lawyer Wendy Isaack said existing laws don't go far enough. "International human rights law is not enough because it does not enable individual prosecution of those that should be held accountable for the crime of apartheid which means inhumane acts committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination on the basis of race, and these acts include murder, torture and assassinations that were committed by apartheid era security forces and agents of the state in South Africa," said Isaack. She said the treaty should be broadly applicable to crimes worldwide. "These matters because when we think of apartheid as a domineering system, as a regime that oppressed black people in SA we also bear in mind that when international law is being developed, this law must also be applicable to other contexts, and at the top of our list are the Israeli apartheid policies and practices in occupied Palestinian territory. And the South African government made this very submission in the international court of justice in the 2014 advisory opinion proceedings," said Isaack. South Africa has previously made similar submissions at the International Court of Justice.
The South African
14 hours ago
- The South African
Cyril Ramaphosa calls for Israel and Iran to talk, not attack
President Cyril Ramaphosa has called for dialogue between Israel and Iran, warning that continued conflict will only lead to further devastation and economic fallout across the globe. Speaking to members of the media on the sidelines of the 30-year anniversary celebration of the Constitutional Court on Friday, Ramaphosa expressed grave concern over the escalating tensions in the Middle East, particularly following reports that the United States may join Israel in potential military action against Iran. The White House said on Thursday that President Donald Trump would decide on 'whether or not to go' with US involvement in the conflict in the next two weeks. Having just returned from the G7 summit in Canada, President Ramaphosa cautioned that the world was entering a dangerous period of heightened geopolitical instability. 'The world has become a very dangerous place now, with all these conflicts that are flaring up into the destruction of infrastructure and loss of life. 'We want to continue calling on all actors that dialogue peace-making is the only way in which to solve problems, the disputes that arise in various parts of the country, including the dispute between Israel and Iran now should be solved through dialogue, and we say that it must happen immediately, without resorting to further air strikes to further bombs,' President Ramaphosa said. Ramaphosa emphasised that continued violence was claiming lives and causing ripple effects across the globe, including here at home. 'Lives are being lost, and it is actually having a devastating blow on the economies of the world because there is now uncertainty and prices are beginning to rise. We are already suffering from price rises in our fuel… We want the conflict to come to an end,' he said. Ramaphosa reiterated South Africa's longstanding foreign policy principle of peaceful resolution through diplomacy, warning that prolonged armed conflict would only deepen global instability. According to reports, Iran and Israel traded strikes overnight, with no signs of de-escalation in their weeklong conflict. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his military's objective was to strike all of Iran's nuclear facilities. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
