Picus launches tool for real-time validation of exploitable risks
Picus Security has introduced a new capability designed to help security teams determine which vulnerabilities in their environments are actually exploitable.
The new feature, called Picus Exposure Validation, uses real-time attack simulations to provide evidence-based assessments of vulnerability risks within a specific organisation's environment. This approach aims to address the challenge of large numbers of vulnerabilities that are often identified but not all requiring immediate attention or remediation.
With more than 40,000 new Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) disclosed in 2024 - with 61% ranked as high or critical - security teams often struggle to respond effectively, as traditional vulnerability management methods can lead to inefficient allocation of resources. Picus Security says the new capability assists security teams in distinguishing between vulnerabilities that can actually be exploited in their unique systems and those that can be safely deprioritised.
Traditional vulnerability management is typically driven by severity metrics such as Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) and Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), which provide generalised risk indicators but may not account for an individual organisation's existing security controls and asset criticality. Picus Exposure Validation aims to fill this gap with the Picus Exposure Score, an evidence-based, context-aware metric intended to reflect actual risk, according to the company.
The system continuously tests security controls using real-world attack techniques to determine whether known vulnerabilities can be exploited given the organisation's current defences. The findings are automatically updated and presented in transparent reports, enabling quicker and more confident decision-making in response to new security threats.
Volkan Ertürk, Co-Founder and Chief Technology Officer at Picus Security, commented: "The challenge today isn't finding vulnerabilities, it's knowing which ones matter in your unique environment. CVSS, EPSS and KEV offer theoretical risk signals. Picus Exposure Validation delivers proof by testing threats against your production defenses in real time. It replaces assumptions with evidence so security teams can focus on vulnerabilities that are actually exploitable."
Key features highlighted by the company include the ability for security teams to more accurately prioritise remediation work, safely deprioritise less urgent vulnerabilities, and reduce manual workloads through the use of automated validation processes. The solution is said to include tailored recommendations to quickly improve the effectiveness of security controls, offering an alternative when immediate patching is not feasible.
A global industrial firm reported that, upon deploying Picus Exposure Validation, it was able to reduce its list of critical patches by 85%. Based solely on CVSS ratings, 63% of the vulnerabilities in the organisation's systems were initially classified as critical. However, after applying Picus Exposure Validation, it was found that only 9% of those were truly high risk and required prioritisation. This reduction reportedly saved the organisation thousands of hours on patching activity and allowed the security team to focus resources more efficiently.
The company positions Picus Exposure Validation as a new methodology for combining data about vulnerabilities with automated attack simulation to create an organisation-specific analysis of exploitability. This approach, according to Picus, offers security teams a more focused view on where to deploy efforts for mitigation and remediation and thereby enables more effective closing of security gaps.
The Picus Exposure Validation feature is now available to organisations seeking enhanced vulnerability validation for their own environments.
Follow us on:
Share on:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Techday NZ
06-06-2025
- Techday NZ
Cobalt unveils platform updates to streamline pentesting workflows
Cobalt has announced a series of product enhancements within its Offensive Security Platform intended to assist customers in scaling security testing with greater clarity, automation, and control. The platform centralises access to security services provided by a team of pentesters, enabling organisations to identify and address vulnerabilities more efficiently across their environments. Features offered include faster pentest launches, real-time collaboration with testers, continuous scanning, and integration with remediation workflows. According to the company, these processes aim to support security teams in identifying critical issues and accelerating the mitigation of risks. The latest updates seek to provide customers with clearer risk prioritisation. Each finding within the platform now comes with standardised CVSS v3.1 scores alongside OWASP ratings, offering a measurable and objective understanding of vulnerability severity. Users are expected to be able to concentrate their remediation efforts on the most critical security issues first, potentially saving time and resources while maintaining their security posture. CVSS data are accessible via reports, CSV exports, the public API, and integrations. Deeper insight and increased trust in pentest results is also a focus of these enhancements. Final pentest reports now include a detailed Coverage Checklist with associated findings. This addition is designed to provide a comprehensive overview of testing scope and methodology, linking individual findings directly to test activities. This approach is intended to make it easier for users to analyse results and take appropriate action. For organisations dealing with recurring or retested vulnerabilities, workflow simplification is addressed through a new configuration option. Users can automatically associate findings carried over from previous reports with existing tracking tickets or generate new tickets for separate tracking. This is intended to save time and reduce confusion in vulnerability management processes. The process of launching a pentest has also been redesigned. The platform now provides an intuitive flow in which users can select from a range of pentest options, customise requirements - such as requesting a debrief call - and place their order in a matter of minutes. Cobalt describes this as making launching a pentest as simple as ordering a pizza, with the goal of improving the user experience and accelerating the initiation of testing. Boris Diebold, Chief Technology Officer at HeyJobs, commented, "These updates are all about delivering more impactful and efficient testing. The clearer reporting and streamlined workflows help us understand and address our security risk with more confidence and speed." Discussing the direction of the platform, Jason Lamar, SVP of Product at Cobalt, said, "These innovations mark the next chapter in the evolution of offensive security services. We're building toward a future where pentesting is continuous, deeply integrated into development workflows, and backed by data that drives real security outcomes - not just compliance. The Cobalt Platform is redefining what it means to test smarter, not harder." The enhancements are intended to make pentesting more actionable and transparent, whether an organisation is launching a test in a short timeframe, integrating insights directly into development pipelines, or supporting compliance reporting. The platform continues to prioritise usability, integration capabilities, and the timely remediation of vulnerabilities, as it serves security and development operations teams dealing with changing and emerging security threats.
Techday NZ
22-05-2025
- Techday NZ
Picus launches tool for real-time validation of exploitable risks
Picus Security has introduced a new capability designed to help security teams determine which vulnerabilities in their environments are actually exploitable. The new feature, called Picus Exposure Validation, uses real-time attack simulations to provide evidence-based assessments of vulnerability risks within a specific organisation's environment. This approach aims to address the challenge of large numbers of vulnerabilities that are often identified but not all requiring immediate attention or remediation. With more than 40,000 new Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) disclosed in 2024 - with 61% ranked as high or critical - security teams often struggle to respond effectively, as traditional vulnerability management methods can lead to inefficient allocation of resources. Picus Security says the new capability assists security teams in distinguishing between vulnerabilities that can actually be exploited in their unique systems and those that can be safely deprioritised. Traditional vulnerability management is typically driven by severity metrics such as Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) and Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), which provide generalised risk indicators but may not account for an individual organisation's existing security controls and asset criticality. Picus Exposure Validation aims to fill this gap with the Picus Exposure Score, an evidence-based, context-aware metric intended to reflect actual risk, according to the company. The system continuously tests security controls using real-world attack techniques to determine whether known vulnerabilities can be exploited given the organisation's current defences. The findings are automatically updated and presented in transparent reports, enabling quicker and more confident decision-making in response to new security threats. Volkan Ertürk, Co-Founder and Chief Technology Officer at Picus Security, commented: "The challenge today isn't finding vulnerabilities, it's knowing which ones matter in your unique environment. CVSS, EPSS and KEV offer theoretical risk signals. Picus Exposure Validation delivers proof by testing threats against your production defenses in real time. It replaces assumptions with evidence so security teams can focus on vulnerabilities that are actually exploitable." Key features highlighted by the company include the ability for security teams to more accurately prioritise remediation work, safely deprioritise less urgent vulnerabilities, and reduce manual workloads through the use of automated validation processes. The solution is said to include tailored recommendations to quickly improve the effectiveness of security controls, offering an alternative when immediate patching is not feasible. A global industrial firm reported that, upon deploying Picus Exposure Validation, it was able to reduce its list of critical patches by 85%. Based solely on CVSS ratings, 63% of the vulnerabilities in the organisation's systems were initially classified as critical. However, after applying Picus Exposure Validation, it was found that only 9% of those were truly high risk and required prioritisation. This reduction reportedly saved the organisation thousands of hours on patching activity and allowed the security team to focus resources more efficiently. The company positions Picus Exposure Validation as a new methodology for combining data about vulnerabilities with automated attack simulation to create an organisation-specific analysis of exploitability. This approach, according to Picus, offers security teams a more focused view on where to deploy efforts for mitigation and remediation and thereby enables more effective closing of security gaps. The Picus Exposure Validation feature is now available to organisations seeking enhanced vulnerability validation for their own environments. Follow us on: Share on:
Techday NZ
09-05-2025
- Techday NZ
Broadcom forces VMware clients to roll back crucial updates
Broadcom's recent changes to VMware licensing agreements are causing concern among IT professionals. Reports suggest that customers are being forced to roll back security updates, potentially exposing them to previously patched vulnerabilities. In early May 2025, VMware's parent company Broadcom began issuing cease-and-desist letters to customers with perpetual licences whose customer support had expired. These letters, according to reports verified by Ars Technica and highlighted by Comparitech in an analysis, demand that customers remove all updates made after the end of their support contracts, under threat of audits and possible litigation. The only exception to this demand allows customers to retain updates addressing zero-day vulnerabilities, or those with a Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) score of 9.0 or higher. All other security updates must be rolled back in compliance with Broadcom's current policy. Network administrators and IT professionals have expressed alarm at this directive's potential security and operational ramifications. According to users active on technical forums, including Reddit's /r/sysadmin, affected companies are placed in a difficult position: either remove important updates and risk security lapses, switch to more expensive subscription packages, or face the possibility of legal actions. Comparitech's analysis described this as leaving companies in a "zero-sum game" that could jeopardise future business prospects and the security of sensitive data. "Broadcom has effectively created a zero-sum game in which many existing customers who were grandfathered in after it purchased VMWare must now make a choice that could cost them millions and risk not only the future of their company but also the secure data that they maintain," the analysis stated. The policy has broader cybersecurity implications because rolling back updates reintroduces known vulnerabilities into network environments. These are security flaws that cybercriminals, including ransomware groups such as those behind the notorious WannaCry attacks, have previously exploited. "Update and security patch rollbacks are not benign. They reintroduce well-documented security flaws that cyber criminals have already learned to scan for and exploit," the analysis explained. The security concern is that ransomware gangs may target these known vulnerabilities, exploiting them to breach companies that had already patched the flaws. "Broadcom's efforts to force security rollbacks effectively threaten license holders with an order-of-magnitude increase in their risk of a data breach. While the company holding the license ultimately has the legal responsibility and business imperative to protect data, such actions on Broadcom's part raise serious ethical questions when businesses are forced to decrease protections and increase risk," Comparitech notes. Beyond security, update rollbacks could negatively affect the stability of critical IT infrastructure. Many updates patch security holes and deliver performance improvements and compatibility enhancements. Reverting to previous software states may destabilise hypervisors, break integrations with backup or disaster recovery tools, and disrupt operations in environments where reliability is crucial. "When companies are forced to revert their systems to an earlier state, it can quickly destabilise hypervisors, completely invalidate integrations with backup or DR tooling, and painfully disrupt resource scheduling for virtual workloads," Comparitech warned. For organisations in sectors such as education, healthcare, and government, where large volumes of regulated personal or health information are managed, system failures and downtime can become significant operational and financial risks. The sentiment among long-time VMware customers is described as betrayal and frustration. "This is like a mafioso shaking down a shopkeeper for protection money. I swear, if they won't be reasonable on my next phone call with them, then I will make it my mission — with God as my witness — to break the land speed record for fastest total datacenter migration to Hyper-V or Proxmox or whatever and shutting off ESXi forever. I'm THAT pissed off," one IT professional commented in April 2025 on /r/sysadmin. Comparitech's analysis suggests that Broadcom's actions put companies in a position where expensive migration to alternative platforms or subscription services may be the only safe option. However, these can be lengthy and complex processes. Many organisations may face significant costs or risks during the transition, and some may be unprepared to switch off VMware infrastructure quickly. With Broadcom reportedly willing to take legal action against non-compliant customers, as seen in an ongoing case against Siemens, the only immediate recourse for affected companies is to fortify their IT security. Steps recommended include hardening network perimeters, isolating vulnerable systems, implementing strict access controls, enhancing monitoring and detection, regular vulnerability scanning, auditing backup systems, reducing internet-facing exposures, and establishing a rapid response plan during the migration period. Broadcom completed its acquisition of VMware in 2023 and subsequently shifted VMware's licensing strategy. Perpetual licences for VMware products were discontinued, and new requirements pushed customers towards pricier, multi-year subscription models. In early 2024, the company also ended the availability of VMware's free ESXi hypervisor. It began restricting access to software downloads and binaries for customers without an active support-and-subscription agreement. "Broadcom's push to change VMware's licensing strategy was terrible from a customer service and customer satisfaction standpoint, but not immediately dangerous to customers and their data. However, the company's new efforts to strong-arm perpetual license holders into pricier subscription packages by canceling or failing to allow renewals of SnS agreements push its strategy into potentially unethical realms that endanger companies and their customers," Comparitech noted in its analysis. Comparitech plans to continue monitoring ransomware attack trends to assess whether future incidents can be traced to systems exposed through the forced rollback of security updates under Broadcom's policy.
