Residents show support for Jonesboro mayor amid questions over resignation withdrawal
The Brief
Jonesboro city leaders continued to clash on Monday at the city council's regularly scheduled meeting.
It was the first meeting since the mayor resigned and then swiftly rescinded her resignation last week.
Donya Sartor is still mayor for now, but some council members questioned the legality of that as an audit over city spending looms.
JONESBORO, Ga. - A power struggle in Jonesboro continued on Monday night at the city's first formal council meeting since Mayor Donya Sartor resigned abruptly last week and withdrew that resignation hours later.
The fate of city leadership is still hanging in the balance with questions about the legality of that move.
What we know
Mayor Donya Sartor is still in office after withdrawing her resignation last Thursday. That resignation was supposed to be effective April 19.
Sartor made the tearful resignation announcement at a specially-called meeting, but hours later said she changed her mind about the decision.
Sartor cited a 1960s Georgia Attorney General opinion, which states that public officials can withdraw a resignation before it's accepted unless it was effective immediately.
The mayor says the abrupt resignation came under duress by several of her colleagues.
SEE MORE:Jonesboro mayor explains why she decided not to resign
Council members were poised to accept her resignation at the meeting Monday night.
Dixon says he believes the council has until April 19 to vote to accept Sartor's resignation, and that there could be legal action taken.
What they're saying
Dozens of Jonesboro and Clayton County residents packed inside the Jonesboro City Center for Monday's regularly scheduled council meeting to have their say on whether Sartor should stay or go.
Many came in with signs and seemingly came to Sartor's defense —accusing council members of bullying her during public comments.
A few residents stated they were disappointed with the council and mayor's inability to work together. Others made it clear they stood by her leadership.
"The Bible says a house divided against itself cannot stand … We must find a way … We have elected a mayor and a city council," one resident said.
"A few hours later you retracted it … This is why everyone's here and in an uproar … You started it," another woman told Sartor.
"You guys may not support her, but Clayton County and Jonesboro will continue to support her," another resident said.
Dig deeper
The city has been working to find a firm for a forensic audit, separate from its regular annual audit, on the city's finances and the charge cards used by employees and elected officials.
Councilman Don Dixon told FOX 5 that council members recently learned about budget inconsistencies but didn't specify who he felt may have been responsible.
"You're looking at $450,000 in the last three or four months that they weren't, and this is something that we're blindsided by," he explained.
Sartor denied any wrongdoing and said she had originally planned to stay until the audit was complete. She maintained she had nothing to hide.
"I'm up under the premise that my withdrawal is legal, and I stand before you as the mayor of the City of Jonesboro, and nothing can change that right now," she said. "We asked on the record if there were some clear allegations that you have, and they were not presented for us. I am just as concerned as anyone else that our numbers are in line, and I can assure you that they are," she added.
City officials voted Monday to approve a regular audit of its FY22 and FY23 spending and present the findings to a forensic auditor who could examine the specific area of concern for council members.
The Source
FOX 5's Joi Dukes reported this story out of Jonesboro.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
4 days ago
- USA Today
Red Jumpsuit Apparatus singer blasts Donald Trump supporters: 'Don't come to my shows'
Red Jumpsuit Apparatus singer blasts Donald Trump supporters: 'Don't come to my shows' President Donald Trump may have won the popular vote, but he doesn't have a fan in The Red Jumpsuit Apparatus. The alternative rock band's lead singer, Ronnie Winter, spoke out against supporters of the controversial president in a fiery video shared on his Instagram page. "If you're Christian and you're watching this and you voted for Donald Trump, shame on you," Winter, a self-identified Christian, said in the June 14 post. "You are not allowed to come to my shows. I don't want you there. Don't come to my shows." Winter's comments come as several celebrities have criticized the Trump administration amid sweeping deportation efforts targeting undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. Stars react to ICE sweeps in LA: Jimmy Kimmel slams Trump, calls him 'arsonist with a hose' "Don't come to my shows because you're going to hear a lot of propaganda, and you're going to hear like the actual words of Jesus," Winter, 42, continued. "You're going to see a lot of acceptance from all areas of life and races, and you're just going to see a lot of harmony, OK? That's not what you're about, OK? Don't come. Refunds are available. Forever, don't come." Winter doubled down on his politically charged stance in a follow-up Instagram post on June 18. The post included a quote from fellow rock singer and Nirvana frontman Kurt Cobain, which read, "If any of you in any way hate homosexuals, people of a different color, or women, please do this one favor for us. … Don't come to our shows and don't buy our records." "Voting for Trump doesn't make you a bad person," Winter wrote. "Who are you to judge when you directly go against the moral framework that you follow listed in the Bible? I say this (with) love (and) as a Christian; stop attempting to ostracize those you disagree with. "We are stronger together than separate. Let music bring people together (and) set aside their differences. Wishing you the best." 10 bingeable memoirs to check out: Celebrities tell all about aging, marriage and Beyoncé Winter has served as lead vocalist for The Red Jumpsuit Apparatus since its 2003 inception. The emo rock group is best known for its 2006 hit "Face Down," which peaked at No. 3 on Billboard's Modern Rock Tracks chart and No. 24 on the Hot 100.
UPI
4 days ago
- UPI
Senate committee grills Hegseth on protests and the Middle East
1 of 3 | Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth denied ordering troops to shoot Los Angeles protesters during a Senate Armed Services Committee budget hearing at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday. Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo June 18 (UPI) -- Some members of the Senate Armed Forces Committee and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth sparred over Los Angeles troop deployments and the Israel-Iran war during a hearing on Wednesday morning. Hegseth appeared before the committee to answer questions about the proposed $961.6 billion Fiscal Year 2026 defense budget, but the questioning quickly turned to current events. Sen. Elise Slotkin, D-Mich., said Hegseth deployed 4,700 military personnel to Los Angeles and asked if he had "authorized uniformed military to detain or arrest protesters" there. "You're not a protester if you are throwing concrete at law enforcement officers," Hegseth responded. Slotkin agreed "100%," and said, "Throw them in jail," before adding, "What you're doing is something different." She again asked if Hegseth gave an order for 4,000 National Guardsmen and 700 Marines to "detain or arrest" protesters in Los Angeles. Hegseth said his orders to the troops in Los Angeles are a matter of public record and they are there to protect law enforcement and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents while they try to do their jobs. "If necessary, in their own self-defense, they could temporarily detain or hand over to ICE, but there's no arresting going on," Hegseth said. "You know this better than anyone," he told Slotkin and accused her of "playing political games." Slotkin also asked Hegseth if he had "given the order ... to be able to shoot at unarmed protesters in any way." Hegseth asked what basis Slotkin had to ask the question and what evidence she had to suggest such an order ever had been given. Slotkin cited a book written by former Defense Secretary Mark Esper in which Esper said he rejected a similar order by President Donald Trump in 2020. "Senator, I'd be careful what you read in books and believing it, except the Bible," Hegseth responded. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., chastised Hegseth for the troop deployments in Los Angeles and for discussing pending military strikes against Houthi targets in Yemen in Signal chats. "I wonder when you will actually focus on our nation's warfighting mission," Duckworth said. "We know that California is just a deliberate, systematic, political and dangerous campaign led by you." When Duckworth asked if Hegseth plans to remove troops from Los Angeles, he said he will respect a federal appellate court's decision allowing the deployments and not a district court judge's decision against them. Democratic Party Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire asked Hegseth if Trump had ordered him to create options for military strikes in the Middle East. Hegseth declined to answer Shaheen's question. "If I had or had not, I wouldn't disclose that in this forum, senator," Hegseth told Shaheen. Hegseth and Sen. Jacky Rosen, D-Nev., also exchanged barbs as the senator asked if he would fire a staffer who is accused of making anti-Semitic comments. Rosen cited comments attributed to Defense Department press secretary Kingsley Wilson. "Since I don't believe the characterization of many officials in the news media, I would need to see precisely what's being characterized," Hegseth responded. Hegseth said Wilson "does a fantastic job" and accused Rosen of engaging in hyperbole. Rosen then accused Hegseth of not being "serious" about "rooting out [and] fighting anti-Semitism within the ranks of the Department of Defense."
4 days ago
Hegseth spars with Democratic senators during congressional hearing
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth sparred with some Democratic senators as he was grilled at a congressional hearing Wednesday about the Trump administration's latest military actions. The former Fox News host, who faced a contentious confirmation hearing, got into a heated exchange before the Senate Armed Services Committee with Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., who questioned him over the military's authority to arrest and detain protesters. "It's sort of amusing the extent to which the speculation is out there," Hegseth said. "So what is the order? Then list it out for us. List it out for us. Be a man. Did you authorize them to detain or arrest?" Slotkin, a former CIA analyst who served in Iraq, said. The senator questioned Hegseth about the possibility of an order given for the military to use lethal force against protesters. "I'm just asking the question. Don't laugh," Slotkin said after Hegseth brushed off the question. "What is that based on?" Hegseth responded. "What evidence do you have that that order has ever been given?" Slotkin responded that his predecessor, Mark Esper, didn't accept such an order during the first administration. "He had more guts and balls than you because he said, I'm not going to send in a uniformed military to do something that I know in my gut isn't right … You're pooh-poohing this," the senator said. Hegseth testified that there was "zero indication that an order was given to shoot protesters and that has not happened." But when she asked whether troops could use force against unarmed civilians, Hegseth wouldn't say. "I'd be careful what you read in books and believing it. Except for the Bible," he said. Hegseth responded similarly when questioned by Sen. Jacky Rosen, D-Ariz, earlier in the hearing. Rosen asked about the firings of several top national security officials, including the director of the National Security Agency, Gen. Timothy Haugh, that were allegedly done at the request of far-right social media influencer Laura Loomer. "She's been denounced even by Republicans, and the idea is that any leaders within our agency responsible for our nation's security, somebody would be dismissed based on the advice of a social media influencer," Rosen said. Hegseth reiterated that the panel should not be "believing everything you read in the media." "I don't discuss who I talk about anything with, but ultimately, this is my decision and he serves at the pleasure of the president and that's why he's no longer there," he said. "Do you believe it's appropriate for social media to influence personnel decisions in your department, yes or no?" Rosen asked. Time then expired. The chairman left a moment for Hegseth to answer the question, as witnesses often do after a lawmaker has asked their final question. Hegseth took a beat, and said, "I believe your time is up." Rosen pushed back. "Oh, it is not up to you to tell me when my time is up. I am going to say, Mr. Secretary, you're either feckless or complicit. You're not in control of your department," she replied. "You [are] unserious. ... I yield back and I don't appreciate the smirk, sir. You are the secretary of defense."
