Can You Guess What Single Asset Makes Up 30% Of The Average American's Portfolio? It's Not a 401(k)
When most people imagine the average American's wealth, they picture 401(k)s, mutual funds, maybe a pile of cash stashed in a bank account. But if you dig into the data, it turns out the biggest piece of the pie is something you drive by every day: a house.
According to the Federal Reserve's 2022 Survey of Consumer Finances — the most recent data available — primary residences make up 30% of the average American household's total net worth. That's right. The roof over your head often holds more weight in a family's finances than any stock ticker ever could.
The report, which surveys thousands of households across income brackets and age groups every three years, gives a unique look into what the typical American portfolio really looks like.
Don't Miss:
Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing —
Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can
Here's how the rest of it breaks down:
Retirement accounts like 401(k)s and IRAs come next, accounting for 25% of household wealth. It's the kind of savings most people don't touch until they're older, but for many, it's their biggest long-term bet.
Public equities and mutual funds make up 15% of net worth. These are the traditional stock market investments — the kind you'd expect to see topping the list. But for most households, it's just a slice of the pie, not the main course.
Private business ownership or equity stakes account for 12%, though this is more common among wealthier households and small business owners. It's a high-risk, high-reward category — one that can heavily tilt net worth upward or downward depending on success.
Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: .
Other real estate, including rental properties and vacation homes, makes up 10%. Not everyone is in the landlord game, but those who are tend to diversify here.
Cash and deposits — the checking, savings, and emergency funds — only make up 5% of household wealth on average. It's enough to pay bills, but hardly the driver of long-term financial growth.
And finally, "other" assets like vehicles, collectibles, and miscellaneous valuables total just 3%. While they might feel like assets in the garage or attic, they don't move the needle much on paper.
So why does this matter?
Because the way wealth is held in America isn't just about the number in your retirement account — it's about where your money lives. And for most households, that's still in real estate. It's a reminder that while investing is important, owning a home is still the biggest building block of wealth for everyday Americans.
Read Next:
Invest early in CancerVax's breakthrough tech aiming to disrupt a $231B market. Image: Shutterstock
Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market.
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report
TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report
This article Can You Guess What Single Asset Makes Up 30% Of The Average American's Portfolio? It's Not a 401(k) originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Travis Hunter gets his full $30.57 million signing bonus up front
When it comes to rookie contracts, there's not much to negotiate. On one of the few negotiable items, Jaguars receiver/defensive back Travis Hunter did very well. Adam Schefter of reports that Hunter will receive his full, slotted $30.57 million bonus up front. He's the first non-quarterback not taken first overall to get the full signing bonus up front. Advertisement Often, teams stagger the payments. Sometimes, a portion of the money isn't paid out for nearly a year. There's real value in getting the cash right away. It can be put to work, earning interest while Hunter does nothing. It's the least the Jaguars could do for a player who relishes the opportunity to work overtime. His contract won't pay him extra to play both ways; the total money is driven solely by the position in which he was drafted. When it's time for the Jaguars to pick up Hunter's fifth-year option, it will be driven by the position at which he takes the most snaps. Ditto for the franchise tag. Only in his second contract will Hunter have a chance to get paid for playing both positions. He won't be eligible for that until after his third regular season ends. Advertisement That's when it will get interesting. After the 2027 regular season. Hunter, if he's playing both ways on a full-time basis, will have every right to be paid for both of his jobs. The stakes will be high, for both sides. The Jaguars happily gave up their 2026 first-round pick and more to trade up three spots in the first round because they were getting two players in one — as their two-pronged social-media announcement of his signing confirms. At some point, they'll need to depart from a Collective Bargaining Agreement that doesn't contemplate paying extra money to a player who plays both ways.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Inside Disney's Campaign to Protect Darth Vader From AI
The heads of the world's largest technology companies are all competing to sustain their dominance in a world reshaped by artificial intelligence. Inc. said it is going to reduce its work force as AI handles more tasks, Meta just invested more than $14 billion in Scale AI and Apple has weighed bidding for Perplexity AI. Down here in Los Angeles, most studios, producers and talent agencies are preoccupied with other topics — the summer movie slate, the flight of production and the uncertain future of Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Has the ‘Resilient Consumer' Been Pushed Too Far?
Kearney's latest Consumer Stress Index report predicts that the current market is in a moment of calm before the storm with calculations of consumer sentiment mirroring consumer behavior and spending in the market. The authors of the report said that the findings 'provide a snapshot of sentiment unclouded by immediate reactions to these economic changes,' adding that predicting consumer behavior is never straightforward. Notably, Kearney Consumer Institute's surveys were taken ahead of tariff announcements. More from WWD Suite Talk: Frank Darling's Kegan Fisher on Making the Move From Tech to Art Suite Talk: Tanya Taylor Finds Inspiration in Her Everyday Routine Shoppers Are Investing in Luxury Handbags Over Stock Overall, the Consumer Stress Index report revealed a general sentiment that consumers 'feel less flexible and less able to impact the macroeconomic challenges they are facing' as they continue to be pulled in different directions, with global uncertainty as a persistent factor. Compared to the consumer stress index taken during the first quarter of 2024, Katie Thomas, lead at Kearney Consumer Institute, said 'a critical development is that consumers have moved from a phase of optimization to being on the brink of sacrifice.' Thomas explained that in recent years a persistent and accurate narrative has been around the resilient consumer and that despite rising prices, they had continued to spend. But tariffs could put consumers over the edge in terms of prices and job security. 'The most notable change in this edition is the sharp increase in consumer concern about trade disputes,' said Thomas. According to Kearney's data, in third-quarter 2024, only 36 percent of consumers expressed concern about trade disputes affecting them personally, but by first-quarter 2025, that number had surged to 54 percent — a 50 percent increase. The findings represent a significant shift in consumer awareness of macroeconomic trade implications. Thomas explained that without buffers, like stimulus checks, and post-pandemic spending gone, 'retailers should expect consumer resilience to run out when tariffs and additional price pressures hit.' Reactions will be delayed but retailers should prepare for a lag effect where consumers 'wait and see' before purchasing. 'Most consumers will wait until price increases hit shelves before changing their habits — a delay that could mask the full impact of tariffs until later this year,' said Thomas. 'This means the current calm could suddenly shift to significant behavioral changes once new costs become visible.' Looking specifically at consumers in the U.S., Kearney's research found that the current consumer stability is fragile and temporary, requiring retailers to have proactive strategies rather than relying on continued resilience. 'The overall picture suggests that while stress levels appear stable, consumers are reaching a breaking point in their ability to adapt to rising costs and economic pressures,' said Thomas. 'Retailers need to understand that consumers have already absorbed substantial price increases and made significant behavioral adjustments. This apparent stability indicates that consumers are operating at their adaptation limits, not that they're comfortable.' Early indicators of recession behaviors are being seen across categories. As an example, Thomas pointed to hair care and salon services reporting a pullback in spending as consumers go longer between appointments or try to do the service at home. 'There is a general thoughtfulness around spending money, with many consumers price shopping, experimenting with private label and evaluating whether they need to purchase luxury goods or higher-ticket items,' said Thomas. Apparel and footwear brands, Thomas told WWD, are particularly vulnerable to tariff impacts given their supply chains. This means consumers are likely to revert to pandemic-era behaviors such as delaying purchases and prioritizing essentials. 'Brands can expect extended purchase cycles and increased price sensitivity.' Kearney's report also called out the beauty category as the company continues to watch for headwinds and tailwinds. While traditionally the lipstick effect has worked because consumers had fewer alternatives and established brand loyalties, the flood of new options in recent years means that not all brands will win. Thomas warned that this abundance of choices can 'work against individual brands during economic stress, as consumers can find lower-priced alternatives or dupes, and often do not feel they are sacrificing quality or status.' As brands look ahead, Thomas said that a key metric to watch will be job security. 'While the focus to date has largely been on how tariffs will impact prices, many brands are also considering layoffs or right-sizing their workforces,' said Thomas. 'Consumers are already cutting back, but the budget will completely change if they are no longer employed.' Best of WWD The Definitive Timeline for Sean 'Diddy' Combs' Sean John Fashion Brand: Lawsuits, Runway Shows and Who Owns It Now What the Highest-paid CEOs at U.S. Fashion and Retail Companies Make Confidence Holds Up, But How Much Can Consumers Take? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
