Problem with Firefly's Alpha rocket puts Lockheed satellite in shallow orbit
By Joey Roulette
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Firefly Aerospace said the sixth mission of its Alpha rocket suffered a mishap in space after launching from California on Tuesday, putting a satellite owned by Lockheed Martin in a "lower than planned orbit," suggesting a potential mission failure.
Firefly said the mishap occurred during separation of Alpha's core stage booster with its second stage roughly two and a half minutes after liftoff, which "impacted the Stage 2 Lightning engine nozzle, putting the vehicle in a lower than planned orbit."
The company said it was working with Lockheed to determine the root cause of the failure. Lockheed did not immediately respond to a question on whether it believes its satellite could raise its orbit or otherwise survive the mishap.
The mission was the first in a multi-mission agreement between Firefly and Lockheed, which had on board the rocket a self-funded satellite called LM 400 Technology Demonstrator, meant to advance space technologies and lower risk for Lockheed customers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
5 hours ago
- CNBC
Musk's Tesla is launching robotaxis in Austin, Texas
After driverless Tesla Model Ys were spotted traversing Austin, Texas, streets on Sunday morning, CEO Elon Musk posted on his social platform X that Tesla's "robotaxi launch" would start this afternoon with rides for a flat fee of $4.20. A Reuters witness saw several Tesla "robotaxis" on Sunday morning in a popular area of the Texas capital called South Congress with no one in the driver's seat but one person in the passenger seat. Tesla planned to have front-seat riders acting as "safety monitors," though it remained unclear how much control they would have over the vehicles. Videos of driverless Teslas have also been posted on social media but it was not known if the vehicles carried any passengers. As the date of the planned robotaxi launch approached, Texas lawmakers moved to enact rules on autonomous vehicles in the state. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, on Friday signed legislation requiring a state permit to operate self-driving vehicles. The law does not take effect until Sept. 1, but the governor's approval of it on Friday signals state officials from both parties want the driverless-vehicle industry to proceed cautiously. A group of Democratic state lawmakers earlier this week asked Tesla to delay its planned robotaxi trial because of the legislation. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. The governor's office declined to comment. The law softens the state's previous anti-regulation stance on autonomous vehicles. A 2017 Texas law specifically prohibited cities from regulating self-driving cars. In recent days, Tesla has sent invites to a select group of Tesla online influencers for a small and carefully monitored robotaxi trial, which the company has said would include 10 or 20 Model Y vehicles operated in a limited zone of Austin. The law requires autonomous-vehicle operators to get approval from the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles before operating on public streets without a human driver. It also gives state authorities the power to revoke permits if they deem a driverless vehicle "endangers the public," and requires firms to provide information on how police and first responders can deal with their driverless vehicles in emergency situations. The law's requirements for getting a state permit to operate an "automated motor vehicle" are not particularly onerous but require a firm to attest it can safely operate within the law. It defines an automated vehicle as having at least "Level 4" autonomous-driving capability under a recognized standard, meaning it can drive itself with no human driver under specified conditions, such as within a limited area. Level 5 autonomy is the top level and means a car can drive itself anywhere, under any conditions. Compliance remains far easier than in some states, most notably California, which requires extensive submission of vehicle-testing data under state oversight. The Tesla robotaxi launch, which the company warned might be delayed, comes after more than a decade of Musk's unfulfilled promises to deliver self-driving Teslas. Most of Tesla's sky-high stock value now rests on its ability to deliver robotaxis and humanoid robots, according to many industry analysts. Tesla is by far the world's most valuable automaker. Musk has said Tesla would be "super paranoid" about safety for the Austin rollout. The company planned to operate only in areas it considered the safest. The service in Austin will have other restrictions as well. Tesla plans to avoid bad weather, difficult intersections, and will not carry anyone below the age of 18. Musk has said he is ready to delay the start for safety reasons, if needed. The planned launch has generated buzz among Tesla fans. "Wow. We are going to ride in driverless Teslas in just a few days. On public roads," posted Omar Qazi, who has 635,200 followers on X, writes often about Tesla using the handle @WholeMarsBlog, and received an invite. Commercializing autonomous vehicles has been risky and expensive. GM's Cruise was shut down after a fatal accident and regulators are closely watching Tesla and its rivals, Alphabet's Waymo, which runs a paid robotaxi service in several U.S. cities, and Amazon's Zoox. Tesla is also bucking the young industry's standard practice of relying on multiple technologies to read the road, using only cameras. That, Musk says, will be safe and much less expensive than lidar and radar systems added by rivals.
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Tesla launches robotaxis in Austin, Texas at $4.20 a pop to start
After driverless Tesla Model Ys were spotted traversing Austin, Texas streets on Sunday morning, CEO Elon Musk posted on his social platform X that Tesla's 'robotaxi launch' would start today with rides for a flat fee of $4.20. A Reuters witness saw several Tesla 'robotaxis' on Sunday morning in a popular area of the Texas capital called South Congress with no one in the driver's seat but one person in the passenger seat. Tesla planned to have front-seat riders acting as 'safety monitors,' though it remained unclear how much control they would have over the vehicles. Videos of driverless Teslas have also been posted on social media but it was not known if the vehicles carried any passengers. Advertisement 5 A robotaxi in Austin, Texas on Sunday. REUTERS As the date of the planned robotaxi launch approached, Texas lawmakers moved to enact rules on autonomous vehicles in the state. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, on Friday signed legislation requiring a state permit to operate self-driving vehicles. The law does not take effect until Sept. 1, but the governor's approval of it on Friday signals state officials from both parties want the driverless-vehicle industry to proceed cautiously. A group of Democratic state lawmakers earlier this week asked Tesla to delay its planned robotaxi trial because of the legislation. Advertisement Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. The governor's office declined to comment. The law softens the state's previous anti-regulation stance on autonomous vehicles. A 2017 Texas law specifically prohibited cities from regulating self-driving cars. In recent days, Tesla has sent invites to a select group of Tesla online influencers for a small and carefully monitored robotaxi trial, which the company has said would include 10 or 20 Model Y vehicles operated in a limited zone of Austin. 5 Texas Gov. Greg Abbott on Friday signed a law requiring a state permit to operate self-driving vehicles. Jay Janner/American-Statesman / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images Advertisement The law requires autonomous-vehicle operators to get approval from the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles before operating on public streets without a human driver. It also gives state authorities the power to revoke permits if they deem a driverless vehicle 'endangers the public,' and requires firms to provide information on how police and first responders can deal with their driverless vehicles in emergency situations. The law's requirements for getting a state permit to operate an 'automated motor vehicle' are not particularly onerous but require a firm to attest it can safely operate within the law. It defines an automated vehicle as having at least 'Level 4' autonomous-driving capability under a recognized standard, meaning it can drive itself with no human driver under specified conditions, such as within a limited area. 5 A robotaxi driving South Congress Avenue in Austin on Sunday. REUTERS Advertisement Level 5 autonomy is the top level and means a car can drive itself anywhere, under any conditions. Compliance remains far easier than in some states, most notably California, which requires extensive submission of vehicle-testing data under state oversight. The Tesla robotaxi launch, which the company warned might be delayed, comes after more than a decade of Musk's unfulfilled promises to deliver self-driving Teslas. 5 Elon Musk, right, has said Tesla would be 'super paranoid' about safety for the rollout in Austin. REUTERS Most of Tesla's sky-high stock value now rests on its ability to deliver robotaxis and humanoid robots, according to many industry analysts. Tesla is by far the world's most valuable automaker. Musk has said Tesla would be 'super paranoid' about safety for the Austin rollout. The company planned to operate only in areas it considered the safest. The service in Austin will have other restrictions as well. Tesla plans to avoid bad weather, difficult intersections, and will not carry anyone below the age of 18. Musk has said he is ready to delay the start for safety reasons, if needed. The planned launch has generated buzz among Tesla fans. Advertisement 5 A Waymo robotaxi in Austin last week. Bob Daemmrich/ZUMA / 'Wow. We are going to ride in driverless Teslas in just a few days. On public roads,' posted Omar Qazi, who has 635,200 followers on X, writes often about Tesla using the handle @WholeMarsBlog, and received an invite. Commercializing autonomous vehicles has been risky and expensive. GM's Cruise was shut down after a fatal accident and regulators are closely watching Tesla and its rivals, Alphabet's Waymo, which runs a paid robotaxi service in several U.S. cities, and Amazon's Zoox. Tesla is also bucking the young industry's standard practice of relying on multiple technologies to read the road, using only cameras. That, Musk says, will be safe and much less expensive than lidar and radar systems added by rivals.
Cosmopolitan
9 hours ago
- Cosmopolitan
Breaking Down the ‘28 Years Later' Ending
The apocalyptic pandemic coined the 'Rage Virus' in the 2002 hit 28 Days Later is still with us, 28 years later. The not-so-subtly named illness is a social mutation and a metaphor for our own fractured times. 28 Years Later, Danny Boyle and Alex Garland's long-awaited return to this cinematic universe, is set exactly 10,228 days after the original outbreak. There is no word count large enough to recap what has happened IRL in the last 28 years, but in this world, society has quarantined, rewilded, and brutalized. In the words of Bo Burnham, 'there it is again, that funny feeling…' The new film, the third in the series, opens on the 'Holy Island' of Lindisfarne, where survivors of the virus have built a rustic dystopia. If you're a fan of The Last of Us, Lindisfarne is Jackson, but with a spooky Yellowjackets oeuvre; masked hunters, primitive rituals, and the like. Jamie (Aaron Taylor‑Johnson) puts his son Spike (Alfie Williams) through the coming-of-age rites of manhood through a hunting excursion off-island. Armed with a bow and arrow, the pair face evolved infected on the mainland – a tense chase sequence through marshfields, filmed using iPhones, drones, and even a goat-mounted camera. They see that this group of infected seem to be led by an Alpha, showing that the ever-evolving virus is becoming stronger and smarter. They spend the night in an abandoned cottage, observing a bonfire in the distance, before returning to Lindisfarne. The source of the fire, they later learn, is a spooky survivor Dr. Ian Kelson (Ralph Fiennes). The community of Lindisfarne fears Dr. Kelson, fueled by rumors that he ritualistically burns bodies like a freak. Now is a good time to mention Isla (Jodie Comer), Jamie's wife and Spike's mother. Our girl Isla is sick as a dog, terminally so. Spike wonders of Dr. Kelson might be able to help his mother, and after discovering Jamie's cheating ass with another woman, he says 'to hell with it' and returns to the mainland with his mom. Meanwhile, a group of Swedish NATO soldiers have been washed ashore with a sunken boat. They are almost no match for the infected, leaving one sole survivor – a soldier named Erik, who soon crosses paths with Isla and Spike. The trio band together and continue their search for Dr. Kelson. In a tense scene involving an infected pregnant woman—again, welcome back The Last of Us season two—Erik is killed by an Alpha, who is subdued by Dr. Kelson, who arrives seemingly from nowhere. Dr. Kelson brings Spike, Isla, and the aforementioned woman's now-infected newborn to his sanctuary of sterilized bones. Dr. Kelson confirms that Isla's cancer is terminal, and upon her request, euthanizes her with a morphine dart. He cleans her skull and hands it to Spike, who places it atop Dr. Kelson's boneyard shrine. Let's fast forward through another close encounter with the infected, bringing us to Spike's return to Lindisfarne. He places the baby at the gates of the village with a note addressed to Jamie, promising to return when he's ready. A fitting number of days later (read: 28), Spike is rescued from a pack of infected by a cult-like group of survivors led by Sir Jimmy Crystal (Jack O'Connell). This sudden tonal swerve—neither horror nor satire, but an unsettling mix—sets up the next chapter. Spike's alignment with Jimmy's cult, at the film's close, sets a collision course: the grieving, virus-scarred reality of Spike met with Jimmy's cultic salvation. So, it looks like we're in for another film. We're just left with one question, what titles are left? We kid. It's called 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, and it's already scheduled for January 2026.
