Sonia slams govt's silence on Gaza, Iran, calls it 'surrender of values'

Congress Parliamentary Party chairperson Sonia Gandhi on Saturday strongly criticised India's silence on Israel's devastation in Gaza and Iran as "not just a loss of its voice, but also a surrender of values".
In an article - "It is still not too late for India's voice to be heard", she accused the Narendra Modi government of abandoning India's long-standing and principled commitment to a peaceful two-nation solution envisioning an independent Palestine along with Israel.
Gandhi, in the article, was also critical of US President Donald Trump for following a "destructive path" in West Asia, after having spoken against America's endless wars.
"New Delhi's silence on the devastation in Gaza and now on the unprovoked escalation against Iran reflects a disturbing departure from our moral and diplomatic traditions. This represents not just a loss of voice but also a surrender of values," the Congress leader said in her article in 'The Hindu'.
"It is still not too late. India must speak clearly, act responsibly, and use every diplomatic channel available to defuse tensions and promote a return to dialogue in West Asia," Gandhi asserted.
She also said that in the face of this humanitarian catastrophe, "the Narendra Modi government has all but abandoned India's long-standing and principled commitment to a peaceful two-state solution, one that envisions a sovereign, independent Palestine living side-by-side with Israel in mutual security and dignity." Sonia Gandhi noted that on June 13, 2025, the world has, once again, "witnessed the dangerous consequences of unilateral militarism when Israel launched a deeply troubling and unlawful strike against Iran and its sovereignty".
She said the Indian National Congress has condemned these bombings and targeted assassinations on Iranian soil, which represents a dangerous escalation with grave regional and global consequences.
"As with so many of Israel's recent actions, including its brutal and disproportionate campaign in Gaza, this operation was executed with utter disregard for civilian lives and regional stability. These actions will only deepen instability and sow the seeds of further conflict," she noted.
Gandhi also alleged that the current Israeli leadership under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, "has a long and unfortunate record of undermining peace and nurturing extremism". She alleged that given the record, "it is not surprising that Netanyahu would choose escalation over engagement".
Referring to the US President, she said, Trump's statement of June 17 dismissing its own intelligence chief's assessment and claiming that Iran was "very close" to acquiring nuclear weapons is "deeply disappointing".
"The world expects and needs leadership that is grounded in facts and driven by diplomacy, and not by force or falsehoods," she said.
Gandhi said Iran has been a long-standing friend to India and is bound to us by deep civilisational ties.
"It has a history of steadfast support, including in Jammu and Kashmir at crucial junctures. In 1994, Iran helped block a resolution critical of India at the UN Commission on Human Rights on the Kashmir issue," she noted.
"Indeed, the Islamic Republic of Iran has been much more cooperative with India than its predecessor, the Imperial State of Iran, that had tilted towards Pakistan in the 1965 and 1971 wars," she added.
Referring to the India-Israel strategic relations in recent decades, she said, "This unique position gives our country the moral responsibility and the diplomatic leverage to act as a bridge for de-escalation and peace." "This is not simply an abstract principle. Lakhs of Indian citizens are living and working across West Asia, which makes peace in the region an issue of vital national interest.
"Israel's recent actions against Iran have taken place in an atmosphere of impunity, enabled by near-unconditional support from powerful western nations," Gandhi said.
She said while the Indian National Congress unequivocally condemned the "absolutely horrific and totally unacceptable attacks" by Hamas on October 7, 2023, "we cannot remain silent in the face of Israel's catastrophic and disproportionate response.
"More than 55,000 Palestinians have lost their lives. Entire families, neighbourhoods, and even hospitals have been obliterated. Gaza stands on the brink of famine, and its civilian population continues to suffer unspeakable hardship," she added.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

India Today

35 minutes ago

• India Today

"Criticising Israel is not always antisemitism" says Dr Shmuel Lederman, an Israeli genocide scholar

Dr Shmuel Lederman, a prominent Israeli genocide scholar, has publicly declared that Israel's actions in Gaza constitute genocide—a striking departure from academic caution that reflects a growing shift among experts studying mass atrocities. The Tipping PointLederman's position evolved throughout 2024 as destruction in Gaza mounted. "The accumulated effect of what Israel has been doing in Gaza was basically genocide in terms of the harm done to the Gazans as a group," he Initially hesitant to apply the genocide label, his assessment changed dramatically: "Until mid-2024 it was somewhat possible not to say that what Israel is doing is genocide, but over time, Gaza was simply being destroyed." By year's end, "the continued destruction—of hospitals, schools, and cultural sites—was genocide."Challenging Legal DefinitionsLederman argues that the legal definition of genocide has become an obstacle to prevention. "Genocide scholars for a long time have been engaged in a discourse that is critical of the legal definition because it's very narrow and originated partly in the political interests of the states that formulated it."The 1948 Genocide Convention requires proof of specific intent to destroy a group. Lederman contends: "Once you have this kind of destruction of a group, it should be called genocide—regardless of intent." More troubling, he suggests: "The legal definition of genocide actually serves to block us from preventing genocide when it actually takes place—like in the case of Israel and Gaza."advertisementConfronting Antisemitism AccusationsAs an Israeli Jew criticising his own country, Lederman faces unique challenges. "We need to distinguish very sharply between criticism—however harsh—of Israel, and anti-Semitism," he emphasises. "Anti-Semitism is about certain prejudices, stereotypes, generalisation, demonisation of Jews—not criticism of a sovereign state."He notes his identity provides some protection: "Me being an Israeli Jew, it's harder to criticise me as anti-Semitic... there's a certain privilege." However, he warns: "Very often, calling people anti-Semitic is simply a way of silencing them because they criticise Israel."Societal ComplicityLederman's critique extends beyond government policy to Israeli society itself. "Much of Israeli society either participated in it actively or gave it legitimacy," he observes. Even among government critics, "the majority of Israeli politicians criticising Netanyahu are not doing so on moral grounds—they're talking about hostages or tactical failures."Most concerning is the impact on Israeli youth: "The dehumanisation and demonisation of Palestinians has been ongoing for a long time in Israel—especially when it comes to Gaza." He warns: "For many young people, mocking the suffering in Gaza is almost a form of entertainment, revenge."International InactionLederman doesn't limit criticism to Israel. "Without American support, Israel could not have done what it did," he states bluntly. Regarding international justice mechanisms, he's pessimistic: "It's very likely that the ICJ would conclude there's no proof that Israel intended to destroy the group—because of the very high legal bar."As a genocide scholar breaking ranks with more cautious colleagues, Lederman represents a growing voice calling for fundamental changes in how mass atrocities are recognised and Watch

Time of India

37 minutes ago

• Time of India

Agriculture self-reliance: Govt says oilseeds and pulses output growing faster; MPs raise alarm over costly edible oil imports

The government has told a parliamentary committee that domestic production of pulses and edible oils has risen at a greater pace in the last 10 years compared to the previous decade, even as several MPs voiced concern over the country's continued dependence on imports to meet demand. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In a presentation to the Standing Committee on Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Food Processing, the agriculture ministry said imports accounted for 15.66 million metric tonnes (MMT), or 56 per cent, of the total domestic demand for edible oils in 2023-24. Sources said the ministry, during the committee meeting held on June 20, emphasised the ongoing efforts to achieve self-sufficiency, PTI reported. It noted that oilseeds production rose by 55 per cent between 2014-15 and 2024-25, with the third advance estimate pegging production at 426.09 lakh tonnes in the last fiscal. In contrast, the growth in oilseeds output was only 13 per cent in the 2004-05 to 2014-15 period. MPs also expressed concerns over public health, particularly in connection with India's high dependence on imported palm oil, which is relatively cheaper. Some members flagged possible health hazards associated with palm oil consumption. The ministry said the country's dependence on edible oil imports is costing more than Rs 80,000 crore annually. Based on the data presented for 2023-24, India's domestic production was adequate to meet the demand for mustard and groundnut oils. However, the country had to import 3.49 MMT of sunflower oil against a domestic consumption of 3.55 MMT and imported more than 60 per cent of its soybean oil needs. On pulses, the ministry said their production rose by 47 per cent between 2014-15 and 2024-25—a period when the BJP-led NDA was in power—compared to a 31 per cent increase in the decade before, under the Congress-led UPA government. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Some MPs suggested incentivising farmers who traditionally grow paddy and wheat to shift towards pulses and oilseeds. The ministry also elaborated on the government's roadmap to achieve 'aatmanirbharta' or self-reliance in pulses and oilseeds by 2030-31. These plans were detailed in the Union Budget earlier this year. Among the challenges flagged by the ministry was that 75 per cent of pulse crops are rainfed and grown on marginal lands with low fertility by small and marginal farmers. The sources added that the presentation also covered the government's national campaign to promote 'optimal utilization of edible oils and its health benefits' in line with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's call for a 10 per cent reduction in their intake to boost overall fitness.

India.com

38 minutes ago

• India.com

Iran Israel war: Who are favouring Israel... which countries are supporting Iran... Know details here

Iran Israel war: Who are s favouring Israel... which countries are supporting Iran... Know details here Iran-Israel War: A fierce war has been going on between Iran and Israel for the last several days, hundreds of people have lost their lives in this war, many military bases have been completely destroyed. Apart from this, displacement has also been seen on a large scale. Meanwhile, the question is which countries are supporting Iran, and which countries are standing with Israel at this time? Which countries are with Iran? Iran's biggest dilemma at this time is that many countries are supporting it, but it is not necessary that they will come forward to help it when needed. The biggest example of this is many Muslim countries that are strongly opposing Israel's attack, but it seems difficult to say whether they will jump into the battlefield if needed. Among the Muslim countries, countries like Turkey, Egypt, Lebanon and Iraq are seen standing with Iran. A big name in this is Pakistan , which is a nuclear-rich country. Pakistan is currently trying its best to get 21 Muslim countries to stand with Iran by showing solidarity. The big thing is that at this time countries like Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Turkey, Somalia, Libya and Algeria have condemned the Israeli attack. Who are supporting Israel Among these nations are prominent players such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, France, Norway, Austria, Germany, India, Canada, Poland, Spain, and even the European Union as a collective entity. The majority of these countries have affirmed their backing of Israel's legitimate right to self-defense, particularly in the face of challenges presented by groups like Hamas.