Woman sues 'rapist' for child support
The Lahore High Court (LHC) has directed a trial court to seek evidence from a woman to substantiate her claim that a certain individual is the biological father of her child conceived after her alleged rape.
A single-member bench of the LHC comprising Justice Ahmad Nadeem Arshad allowed a petition filed by a Muhammad Afzal against the verdict of a trial court.
According to an FIR on March 4, 2020 for offences under section 376, 109 of Pakistan Penal Code, 1860, Maryam Zahid was allegedly raped by Afzal.
As a result of the rape, Maryam conceived and ultimately gave birth to a female child.
Later, a suit was filed on behalf of the child for recovery of maintenance allowance from Afzal. According to the suit, the child being the biological daughter of Afzal was entitled to get an allowance.
Muhammad Afzal contested the suit by filing a written statement, negating the version that he was the biological father of the child.
However, the trial court decreed in the respondent minor's favor. When Afzal failed to pay the interim maintenance allowance, his defense was struck off and the suit was decreed by awarding maintenance allowance to the minor at the rate of Rs3,000 per month.
Muhammad Afzal later challenged the trial court's order in the LHC, which allowed his petition.
In his order, Justice Ahmad Nadeem Arshad noted that this was not a case of recovery of maintenance allowance simpliciter.
He noted that the contention of Maryam Zahid in the plaint was that as a result of rape she conceived the minor, who being the biological daughter of the present petitioner is entitled to get maintenance allowance.
The verdict said that in case of a legitimate child, the mother institutes a suit under the Family Courts Act, 1964 or approaches the chairman of the concerned union council in the light of Section 9 of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, for recovery of maintenance allowance.
The court then fixes an interim maintenance allowance as a temporary arrangement and on failure of the defendant/father to pay interim maintenance the court strikes off his defence and decrees the suit straightaway under Section 17-A of the Family Courts Act, 1964.
"But in the case where a woman claims maintenance for her child against the biological father, who denies the version, the woman would first need to establish, through trustworthy evidence, that the defendant is indeed the biological father of the child.
"The burden of proving that the defendant [Afzal] is the biological father of the child lies on the woman who claims the maintenance," it said.
The LHC said the trial court erred in law by granting maintenance for the child without first ensuring, through the proper process of evidence, that the child is indeed the biological offspring of the petitioner.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
21 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Two booked for TikToker's 'gang rape'
Khanpur police have registered a case against two suspects for allegedly gang-raping a content creator. The woman had approached the district police officer (DPO) of Haripur seeking justice after allegedly being gang-raped in a moving vehicle on Khanpur Road. The DPO, Farhan Khan, took notice and ordered Khanpur police to register a case. An FIR has been filed under Sections 376, 392, 505, and 34 of the Pakistan Penal Code. However, no arrests have been made yet. Sources claim that police in Khanpur are allegedly facilitating the suspects. It is reported that intermediaries conveyed messages to the accused advising them to seek pre-arrest bail immediately after the FIR was filed. The victim, identified as a 26-year-old from Taxila, has also allegedly received a message criticising her for going directly to the DPO. Insiders further reveal that Khanpur police have been deliberately delaying the investigation and are keeping the suspects informed of all developments. The victim's close associates stated she is prepared to pursue all legal avenues to ensure the arrest of the culprits and, if necessary, will approach the courts.
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
May 9 riot cases: LHC adjourns proceedings of IK's bail pleas
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Thursday adjourned the proceedings of bail petitions filed by former prime minister Imran Khan in eight May 9 riot cases to June 23 after prosecutor concluded its arguments. The prosecutor also submitted detailed records of co-accused individuals in the Corps Commander House attack and other related cases. The court questioned the basis of treating Imran Khan differently from other accused who had already secured bail. The prosecutor submitting the details of the cases said an accused Sheikh Imtiaz Mahmood was granted pre-arrest bail in the Corps Commander House case on August 6, 2024, whereas Zain Qureshi's bail was dismissed. In the Askari Tower arson case, which includes murder charges, no accused has been granted bail so far, he told the court. He, however, responding to a court query said that Imran Khan being the PTI chairman held a commanding position at the time of the riots. He claimed that Imran Khan's conduct has been based on a pattern of hide and seek from the beginning. In response, Khan's lawyer argued that individuals cannot be held responsible for others' actions. He maintained that the presence of PTI supporters at protest sites due to their admiration for Imran Khan does not constitute a crime under Pakistan's Penal Code. He said the trial court will determine the actual facts. The court directed both the sides to conclude their arguments on next hearing and rose for the day. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
TikToker allegedly raped by two men
A social media influencer and TikToker from Taxila was allegedly gang-raped by two men on the pretext of a job offer. As per reports, a 25-year-old woman was lured for a job offer and called in by the two suspects, Najeeb Khan and Faizan. According to her statement, she went to a location near Khanpur Road, where the suspects boarded her in their car and raped her. The suspects also allegedly snatched her phone, Rs3,000 in cash and a gold pendant before abandoning her. Despite reporting the incident to the police, the authorities reportedly hesitated to register a case, and the woman was sent back to Taxila after a perfunctory investigation. When the woman reported the crime to the Khanpur police station, but instead of registering a case, the police allegedly labeled her a "prostitute" and contacted her husband to come to the station. The woman was then sent back home with her husband, who has reportedly been having marital issues with her for the past three years. Sources claim that the accused men have police backing, which raises questions about the police's handling of the case. The fact that the police did not take action on the woman's complaint and instead sent her back with her husband has sparked concerns about the fairness of the justice system in the area. Local sources say that seeking justice from the Khanpur police is extremely challenging, and that the woman may need to reach out to high-ranking officials like the Hazara DIG or Haripur DPO to get her case heard. Meanwhile, the police officer on duty claimed that the woman had gone to Khanpur Dam with the accused individuals of her own accord and that the matter had been resolved.
