Can You Guess What Americans Think They Need To Retire Comfortably? Hint: The 'Magic Number' Just Dropped From Last Year
If you've ever assumed retirement meant having a seven-figure nest egg, you're in good company — and maybe a little stressed.
For years, Americans have treated the $1 million mark as the gold standard for retiring comfortably. Anything less? Cue the panic attacks.
But according to Northwestern Mutual's just-released 2025 Planning & Progress Study, the average American now believes they need $1.26 million tucked away to retire in peace. That's actually down from $1.46 million last year.
Don't Miss:
Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing —
'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones.
Sure, the so-called magic number dropped by $200,000, but don't pop the champagne just yet. According to the same study, most Americans are still wildly unprepared. More than half – 51% – say it's somewhat or very likely they'll outlive their savings. Only 16% feel confident that outliving their savings is "very unlikely."
So if your retirement plan is "hope for the best," you're not alone.
The 'magic number' to retire comfortably may be down this year, but it's still far beyond what many people actually have. And the gap isn't just wide — it's a canyon.
Vanguard's 2024 report puts the average 401(k) balance across all age groups at just $134,128. That's barely a tenth of what Americans say they'll need to retire comfortably.
Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: .
And what's behind the drop? Inflation is still top of mind, but it's cooled off—dropping from around 6% in 2023 to about 3% in 2024. That doesn't mean prices are falling; it just means they're not rising quite as fast. Groceries still feel like a splurge and rent still makes you cry, but apparently, that slight dip was enough for Americans to shave down their expectations.
Either way, the new target still feels like a stretch. One in four Americans has just a single year of income saved. Among Gen X'ers, 52% have saved up to three times their annual income, but 54% don't think they'll be financially ready to retire when the time comes.
Which raises a fair question—not from a study or expert, just plain observation: Are Americans adjusting the number because they think they can genuinely live on less, or have they just accepted that $1.26 million sounds more reachable than $1.46 million? Maybe this is optimism. Maybe it's financial fatigue.If you're wondering how anyone hits that $1.26 million target: you either start young or start wealthy. To get there by age 65, a 20-year-old would need to sock away $330 a month at a 7% return. Wait until you're 50? That jumps to a casual $3,958 per month.
Yes, the goal dipped—but the struggle to reach it hasn't. Americans may be adjusting expectations, but most still have a long way to go before retirement feels anything close to "comfortable."
Read Next:
Many are using retirement income calculators to check if they're on pace —
Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart & Target –
Image: Shutterstock
Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market.
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report
TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report
This article Can You Guess What Americans Think They Need To Retire Comfortably? Hint: The 'Magic Number' Just Dropped From Last Year originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
23 minutes ago
- Politico
Oz nudges Senate Republicans to ease off on Medicaid cuts
House Republicans are aiming to slash funding for the nonpartisan watchdog for waste, fraud and abuse within the federal government by nearly half in the next fiscal year, according to spending bill text released Sunday night. The House Appropriations subcommittee funding Congress and its support agencies, led by chairman David Valadao (R-Calif.), is set to mark up their fiscal 2026 measure Monday evening, with the full committee set to act Thursday. The Legislative Branch bill would provide $6.7 billion — $51 million below the current funding level, which was set in fiscal 2024. Per tradition, the House bill does not touch any Senate funding. 'Chairman Valadao's bill puts the American people first — in strengthening the institutions that represent them, protecting effective governance, and safeguarding taxpayer dollars,' said House Appropriations Committee Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) in a statement. The deepest cuts in the bill are to the Government Accountability Office, an arm of Congress that would see a $396.5 million reduction from current levels to $415.4 million. GAO has served as the nation's chief investigator of wrongdoing at federal agencies for more than a century, but has been fighting for months as Republicans in Congress and the Trump administration have attempted to undercut its legal conclusions and independence. Now, they are attempting to shrink the agency into submission as it pursues nearly 40 investigations into whether the White House is illegally withholding, or 'impounding,' money Congress had previously approved. Also tucked into the bill is a major policy change that would eliminate the GAO's ability to bring civil action against the executive branch over impoundments of funds. 'GAO's work makes it possible for the legislative branch to hold government accountable,' said Daniel Schuman, executive director of the American Governance Institute. 'Congress needs independent expert advice, which is exactly what GAO provides.' Also on the chopping block is the Library of Congress, which is another legislative branch agency also engaged in a power struggle against intrusion by the Trump administration. The bill allocates $767.6 million for the Library of Congress, which is $84.5 million below the current funding level and $133.7 million below the FY26 request. 'This bill does nothing to safeguard against the growing levels of executive overreach into legislative branch agencies,' said Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.), the top Democrat on the legislative branch subcommittee. Some other key provisions in the GOP-written bill include: Capitol Police: The Capitol Police would see a $84.4 million boost to their funding under the bill, bringing the total to $891 million. Some lawmakers had asked for an increase in office funding for use for security, but the bill flat-funds the Members Representational Allowance, which can be used for some member security purposes. Member Pay: The bill would continue the member pay freeze that has been in effect since 2013, halting automatic cost of living increases that members of Congress are supposed to get under law. Gay marriage: The bill includes language that prohibits discrimination against any person who 'speaks, or acts' in accordance with a 'sincerely held religious belief, or moral conviction, that marriage is, or should be recognized as, a union of one man and one woman.'
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
4 Ways Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Will Change How You Plan for Retirement
President Donald Trump's signature legislation, dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' includes plans for tax cuts, green energy cuts, Medicaid cuts and more. It also contains new retirement account provisions that could affect how Americans plan for their golden years. Be Aware: Read Next: As the landmark bill makes its way from the House to the Senate, here's a look at what you need to understand about how it can affect how you plan for retirement. Many Americans would receive a break on their taxes owed if the bill is passed. This means they would be able to channel more money into retirement savings accounts. 'Retirement planning fundamentally comes down to having sufficient resources to make work optional,' said Brett Horowitz, principal and wealth manager at Evensky & Katz / Foldes Financial Wealth Management. 'The proposed extensions of the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act provisions, combined with new deductions for tip income, overtime pay and seniors over 65, could significantly improve retirement outcomes for Americans.' Those who benefited from the cuts in the original Tax Cuts & Jobs Act will continue to enjoy these cuts, allowing them to continue saving for retirement as they had been. 'With many TCJA provisions set to expire at the end of 2025, the House Republican proposal to make these extensions permanent may provide the certainty we need for effective long-term planning,' Horowitz said. 'Retirement modeling depends on clear inputs and stable variables,' he continued. 'The less uncertainty in tax policy, the more accurately we can project success rates. When these changes take effect — pending Senate approval — we'll be able to deliver much better news to clients about their retirement timeline.' Horowitz believes if Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' does not ultimately pass, it could negatively affect Americans' abilities to save for retirement. 'There's a profound psychological difference between telling someone they can retire earlier than expected versus having to extend their working years,' he said. 'The former energizes people about their financial future; the latter can feel overwhelming. These tax provisions create the conditions where more Americans can realistically achieve comfortable retirement.' Learn More: Savvy long-term investment strategies should take taxes into account, so changes to tax laws can shift these strategies. 'Smart investing isn't actually about chasing the highest gross returns — it's about maximizing what clients actually keep after taxes and expenses, and this tax bill addresses some issues there,' Horowitz said. 'While we can control costs through low-fee funds, tax efficiency requires a more nuanced approach that varies by everyone's personal circumstances. 'Higher tax rates push us toward tax-free municipal bonds and tax-efficient ETFs in taxable accounts, while we place tax-inefficient investments in retirement accounts,' he continued. 'This 'tax location' strategy can significantly impact net returns, even if it means accounts perform differently.' 'Two provisions in the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act have created the most anxiety for our clients — the SALT deduction cap and estate tax exemptions,' Horowitz said. 'Both are getting significant relief under the current proposal.' The proposed increase in the SALT deduction cap means retirees will face less of a penalty if they choose to spend their golden years in a state with higher income taxes. 'The SALT deduction increase from $10,000 to $40,000 will reshape where people choose to live and retire,' Horowitz said. 'We've already seen migration patterns shift dramatically since 2017, with high-tax states losing residents to states like Florida and Texas. This change reduces the penalty for living in high-income-tax states, though it doesn't eliminate the advantage of no-tax states entirely.' Estate planning strategies would also change for many Americans if the bill were to pass. 'On the estate side, the current $13.99 million exemption was set to drop to $7.14 million in 2026 — a reduction that had wealthy clients scrambling to implement complex gifting strategies and trust structures,' Horowitz said. 'The proposed permanent increase to $15 million per person, or $30 million for couples, provides enormous relief for families in that middle tier.' This is particularly important because of state-level complications, Horowitz continued. 'Take New York, where you could face no federal estate tax, but still owe state estate taxes on estates between $7.16 million and $13.99 million,' he said. 'The interplay between federal and state rules makes domicile planning critical.' The 'One Big Beautiful Bill' should make estate planning less complex for many people. 'For clients who've already implemented sophisticated estate planning strategies, those structures remain valuable,' Horowitz said. 'But for families with estates under the new thresholds, this eliminates the pressure to make rushed gifting decisions or create complex trusts simply to avoid tax cliffs.' Overall, Horowitz believes the bill will make retirement planning easier. 'The permanent nature of these changes — assuming they pass — finally gives families the certainty to make long-term decisions about where to live, how to structure their wealth and when to implement estate planning strategies,' he said. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 10 Genius Things Warren Buffett Says To Do With Your Money 5 Types of Cars Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on 4 Ways Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Will Change How You Plan for Retirement Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
34 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's 50 percent aluminum, steel tariffs will create new American manufacturing jobs
At the G-7 meetings in Canada last week, President Trump reaffirmed his commitment to put American manufacturing workers first. Our president previously told thousands of steel workers in Pennsylvania that 'we are going to bring it from 25 percent to 50 percent' the tariffs 'to further secure' domestic steel and aluminum manufacturing. Trump keeps telling Prime Minister Mark Carney that 'we really don't want Canadian steel and we don't want Canadian aluminum because we want to be able to do it ourselves.' As Trump's chief of staff during his first term, I travelled with him across our great country and saw firsthand his commitment to rebuild manufacturing communities that had been hollowed out by foreign countries engaging in unfair trade practices. Upon reassuming office, Trump moved swiftly to sign new Section 232 national security proclamations and most recently increased the tariffs from 25 percent to 50 percent to stop American aluminum and steel workers getting ripped off. While the targeted tariffs were met with hysteria by the left-wing media and Canadian backed special interest groups, American manufacturing workers reacted with joy. In my home state of North Carolina, we have seen firsthand what happens when foreign producers take aim at American manufacturing. Aluminum, steel, furniture and textile manufacturing have been devastated by foreign government subsidized cheap products imported into the United States. Families suffer and jobs are lost and most of those jobs, sadly, will never return. Now globalist elites that are heavily funded by non-U.S. interest groups are pushing for Canada to get an exemption or an alternative agreement to avoid the Section 232 aluminum tariff. Canada's aluminum industry must not be rewarded at the expense of thousands of American aluminum jobs. The Organization for Economic Development and Co-operation has reported on Canada's subsidization of its electricity industry for the benefit of its aluminum producers. The simple reality is that the Canadian government provides significant subsidies to its aluminum industry, in the form of cheap electricity. Canada handed out over $850 million in subsidies to its aluminum industry. Here in the United States, domestic producers purchase electricity in accordance with free market principles. During my time at the White House, Canadian aluminum imports surged by 47 percent by mid-2020 after Canada was granted a tariff exemption a year prior. The Canadian aluminum surge devastated American manufacturing families and led to the closure of three U.S. aluminum smelter. Seven hundred American aluminum workers lost their jobs in Washington state, 400 aluminum workers lost their jobs in Missouri and 600 aluminum workers lost their jobs in Kentucky. At the time, President Biden could have used the mechanisms in the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement we negotiated to reimpose relief and stop the bleeding after the first smelter closed. Instead, Biden under pressure from the same globalist groups, allowed the Canadian government and industry to keep their exemption and siphon off American jobs. We cannot allow history to repeat itself. Now in 2025, the globalist aluminum associations and their foreign proxies are once again saying there must be zero tariffs on Canadian aluminum and peddling the same sky-is-falling rhetoric they used previously about Trumps' targeted aluminum and steel tariffs. The sad reality is that these globalist special interest groups are more interested in lining the pockets of their members with foreign plants rather than putting American manufacturing workers first. In 2000, there were 23 U.S. aluminum smelters and 10 in Canada. Today, there are still 10 aluminum smelters in Canada thanks to the Canadian government's subsidies and only four aluminum plants remaining in the United States, a staggering 82 percent reduction in U.S. production capacity. Any exemption or special deal for Canadian aluminum will likely destroy the rest of our domestic industry and result in thousands of American jobs lost. Our president is right, the U.S. is 'done subsidizing Canada' and no exemptions for countries that have a track record of not playing by the rules. The president is not fighting for foreign countries like Canada and Mexico that rip us off on trade, he is fighting for you, your family's future and millions of American manufacturing workers. With over $14 billion in new U.S. investment announced, Trump's 50 percent aluminum and steel tariffs address the root cause of the cheating and unleash a new Golden Age for our country. Now is the time to cast aside the loud voices of these radical globalist special interest groups that seek to undermine Trump's trade agenda. Mark Meadows served as the 29th White House chief of staff and as a member of Congress for North Carolina's 11th District from 2013 to 2020.
