Los Angeles is only the beginning: Trump is normalising military enforcement of law and order

When a country's leader celebrates their birthday with a big military parade it doesn't look much like democracy. Today, as
Donald Trump
turns 79, that is precisely what will happen in Washington, DC. Yet as tanks roll down the city's wide avenues, a nationwide mass opposition movement is forming.
Trump casts the use of the military as a necessary tool against growing disorder, while his opponents will try to frame it for what it is: a power grab that threatens the foundations of American democracy.
Today's events will escalate the conflict that began in Los Angeles over the past several days – and ratchet up the battle to control the narrative.
On June 6th, workplace raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) rounded up and imprisoned hundreds of people, many of whom have the legal right to live and work in the
United States
. Inevitably these raids sparked protests, which Trump used as justification to call in the national guard and the marines. He depicted LA as a city 'invaded and conquered by a foreign enemy' that 'would be burning' if he had not acted decisively. Armed forces have rarely been used to suppress civil unrest in the history of the US or any other democracy. One has to go back to the Rodney King riots of 1992 – also in Los Angeles – for precedent, and all the way back to the Selma marches of 1965 when they were deployed to protect a peaceful civil rights march, despite the objections of state and local authorities.
READ MORE
It is deeply ironic that Trump poses as a figure of law and order when a mob of his supporters led an insurrection at the US Capitol on January 6th, 2021 during which more than 150 police officers were injured. Trump called it a 'day of love' and pardoned all of the perpetrators on his first day in office.
Now he also grossly misrepresents the real situation in Los Angeles. While there is sporadic violence, it is hardly on the scale of the King uprising or even, arguably, this week's rioting in Ballymena. Most protesting in LA has been non-violent, and it was entirely non-violent until June 7th, when Trump called in the national guard. His actions have provoked violence, not quelled it. Yet images of a few protesters burning self-driving cars or throwing rocks at the police, endlessly circulated on right-wing social media, give ostensible credence to his claims.
Trump appears to have deliberately manufactured a crisis for political reasons. In the short term, he needed to rally his base behind him. His budgetary legislation – his so-called 'big, beautiful Bill' – is stalled in Congress. Because it would massively inflate the national debt, it has proved controversial among many of his own supporters, most notably Elon Musk, with whom Trump had a very public falling out earlier this month. But the spectacle of public disorder in a liberal city and state more friendly to undocumented migrants has united his supporters.
Trump's actions also have a longer-term political goal: normalising the use of military forces in law enforcement. American law generally forbids the domestic deployment of the armed forces. Two of the exceptions are in cases of invasion or insurrection. It is hardly a coincidence that the US president and his supporters have consistently referred to the 'invasion' of migrants and labelled protesters exercising a basic democratic right as 'insurrectionists'.
Yet Trump's actions do not come free of political risk. His show of force is actually an admission of weakness. After all, if the Maga movement could be sure of winning future elections, it wouldn't need to resort to military force. But it would likely lose fair and free contests in 2026 and 2028. A majority of Americans disapprove of Trump's performance as president. His economic policy – a main reason he was elected – will hurt ordinary voters. In addition to inflating the national debt, the 'big, beautiful Bill' would massively redistribute wealth upwards to the richest Americans, take away health insurance from millions of Americans and stoke inflation. Most Americans may approve of Trump's goal of deporting undocumented migrants but most disapprove of the draconian methods he is using. The deployment of armed forces to LA has not been popular.
Trump needed to generate political unrest to act the strongman, but in so doing he has sparked the first massive protest movement against his rule. Protests have spread beyond Los Angeles to other big cities including Chicago, Houston, New York and San Francisco. The vast majority of protesters have been non-violent. The previously planned 'No kings' demonstrations – happening today to challenge Trump's military display and his authoritarianism – have been given new energy. More than 2,000 demonstrations are planned throughout the country.
Trump has also unified the political opposition. The Democratic Party, which has been lost at sea for much of Trump's second term, now seems to understand its role. Democrats at all levels of government are voicing their support for peaceful protest and their opposition to Trump's use of the military and taking some personal risk in doing so. California governor
Gavin Newsom
has become a prominent spokesperson, a role that led Trump to threaten his arrest. Senator Alex Padilla from California was tackled and handcuffed by FBI and Secret Service agents just for trying to ask questions during a press conference by Kristi Noem, Trump's homeland security secretary.
Much of what happened in the US these past several days was predictable, but it is unclear how things will play out from here. The potential for violent clashes is very high. So far, Trump's narrative of civil unrest is focused on the meme of protesters burning cars. The authoritarian danger of his use of the military remains abstract, as troops have not yet been used to suppress protests. The opposition may soon have its own defining image if a US soldier is recorded beating, clubbing or shooting a nonviolent protester. Trump's second term might well be defined by violent clashes on American streets and the reverberating battles of interpreting that unrest. Los Angeles is only the beginning.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Irish Times

14 minutes ago

• Irish Times

Oil prices expected to jump after US attacks on Iran

US president Donald Trump 's decision to intervene on Israel's behalf in its war with Iran is likely to see crude oil prices spike when commodities markets open on Sunday night, experts have warned, with potential consequences for the Irish and world economies. Oil prices have increased by 11 per cent since Israel's June 13th attack on Iran, but moved sharply up and down last week as investors weighed the potential for the conflict to impact global oil supply. Mr Trump's decision to bomb Iranian nuclear sites overnight on Saturday is likely to result in spot crude prices surging in early trading when the market reopens at 11pm on Sunday. Brent crude, the global benchmark for oil prices, closed at $77 (€67) a barrel on Friday evening. READ MORE While it could take several weeks for higher crude oil prices to feed into petrol and diesel costs in Ireland, prices at the pump have been ticking upwards in recent days as tension ratcheted up in the Middle East. Saul Kavonic, an energy analyst at MST Marquee, told Bloomberg on Sunday the market's reaction will largely depend on Iran's response. 'But this could set us on a path toward $100 oil, if Iran responds as they have previously threatened to. 'This US attack could see a conflagration of the conflict to include Iran responding by targeting regional American interests that include Gulf oil infrastructure in places such as Iraq, or harassing passage through the Strait of Hormuz.' The maritime chokepoint at the mouth of the Gulf is a vital conduit for not just Iranian shipments, but also for those from Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait and other members of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. Washington's intervention in the war and the White House's messaging have injected fresh uncertainty into an already anxious macroeconomic environment. Even before Israel's strikes on June 13th that killed several senior Iranian military commanders, economists warned that the global economy had entered into a period of heightened volatility with clear risks for Ireland. In its financial stability review earlier this month, the Central Bank of Ireland warned that the structure of the Republic's economy and its high level of integration with global capital means the effects of 'geopolitical and macroeconomic shifts abroad' can be amplified domestically. 'The potential for further fragmentation in global supply chains or tightening in international financial conditions could have material implications for Irish firms and households,' the regulator said. – Additional reporting: Bloomberg

Irish Examiner

20 minutes ago

• Irish Examiner

Diplomacy not an option, warns Iran after US attacks key nuclear sites

Iran's foreign minister has warned that diplomacy is not an option after a US strike on its nuclear facilities. Abbas Araghchi said while the 'door to diplomacy' should always be open, 'this is not the case right now'. The United States attacked three sites in Iran overnight, inserting itself into Israel's war aimed at destroying the country's nuclear programme, and President Donald Trump claimed the facilities had been 'completely and fully obliterated'. The Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran confirmed attacks took place on its Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz sites, but it insisted its nuclear programme will not be stopped. Mr Araghchi said: 'The warmongering, lawless administration in Washington is solely and fully responsible for the dangerous consequences and far reaching implications of its act of aggression.' He said 'there is no red line' that the US has not crossed, adding: 'The most dangerous one was what happened only last night when they crossed a very big red line by attacking nuclear facilities only.' Satellite images taken on Sunday show damage to the mountainside at the underground site at Fordo. The images, by Planet Labs PBC, show the once-brown mountain now has parts turned grey and its contours appear slightly different than in previous images, suggesting a blast threw up debris around the site. That suggests the use of specialised American bunker-buster bombs on the facility. Light grey smoke also hung in the air. Iran and the UN nuclear watchdog said there were no immediate signs of radioactive contamination at the three locations following the strikes. It is not clear whether the US will continue attacking Iran alongside its ally Israel, which has been engaged in a nine-day war with Iran. Iran targeted Tel Aviv with missiles in the hours after the US attack (Oded Balilty/AP) Mr Trump acted without congressional authorisation, and he warned there will be additional strikes if Tehran retaliates against US forces. 'There will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran,' he said. Iran's foreign ministry said Washington had 'betrayed diplomacy' with the military strikes, and that 'the US has itself launched a dangerous war against Iran'. Its statement added: 'The Islamic Republic of Iran reserves its right to resist with full force against US military aggression and the crimes committed by this rogue regime, and to defend Iran's security and national interests.' Hours after the American attacks, Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard said it launched a barrage of 40 missiles at Israel, including its Khorramshahr-4, which can carry multiple warheads. Israeli authorities reported that more than 80 people suffered mostly minor injuries, though one multi-storey building in Tel Aviv was significantly damaged, with its entire facade torn away to expose the apartments inside. Houses across the street were almost completely destroyed. Following the Iranian barrage, Israel's military said it had 'swiftly neutralised' the Iranian missile launchers that had fired, and that it had begun a series of strikes towards military targets in western Iran. President Donald Trump addressed the nation from the White House following the air strikes (Carlos Barria/pool/AP) Iran has maintained its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only, and US intelligence agencies have assessed that Tehran is not actively pursuing a bomb. However, Mr Trump and Israeli leaders have argued Iran could quickly assemble a nuclear weapon, making it an imminent threat. The decision to directly involve the US in the war comes after more than a week of strikes by Israel that significantly degraded Iran's air defences and offensive missile capabilities, and damaged its nuclear enrichment facilities. But US and Israeli officials have said American B-2 stealth bombers and the 30,000-pound bunker-buster bomb that only they have been configured to carry offered the best chance of destroying heavily fortified sites connected to the Iranian nuclear programme buried deep underground. Mr Trump appears to have made the calculation – at the prodding of Israeli officials and many Republicans – that Israel's operation had softened the ground and presented a perhaps unparalleled opportunity to set back Iran's nuclear programme, perhaps permanently. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordo, Natanz, and Esfahan,' Mr Trump said in a post on social media. 'All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordo. All planes are safely on their way home.' Mr Trump later added: 'This is an HISTORIC MOMENT FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISRAEL, AND THE WORLD. IRAN MUST NOW AGREE TO END THIS WAR. THANK YOU!' Israel announced on Sunday that it had closed its airspace to both inbound and outbound flights in the wake of the US attacks. US officials said the attack used bunker-buster bombs on Iran's Fordo nuclear fuel enrichment plant, while submarines launched about 30 Tomahawk missiles. The decision to attack was a risky one for Mr Trump, who won the White House partially on the promise of keeping America out of costly foreign conflicts and scoffed at the value of American interventionism. But he has vowed he will not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon and he had initially hoped the threat of force would bring the country's leaders to give up its nuclear programme peacefully.

RTÉ News​

an hour ago

• RTÉ News​

US strikes on Iran: what we know

The United States has carried out strikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities, with US President Donald Trump saying it was a "very successful attack" and that all American planes were safely on the way home. Mr Trump had spent weeks pursuing a diplomatic path to replace the nuclear deal with Tehran that he tore up in 2018. But he has since backed Israel's military campaign against Iran's nuclear facilities and top military brass, which it launched a little over a week ago. Here we examine what we know about the US strikes on Iran. The targets Mr Trump said the United States struck three main Iranian nuclear sites: Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan, with the former being hit with a "full payload of bombs". Fordo - which was built in violation of UN resolutions under a mountain near the holy central city of Qom - was an enrichment plant capable of housing about 3,000 centrifuges. Centrifuges are used to enrich uranium, both for civilian and military use, with the radioactive metal needing to be enriched to high levels for use in atomic weapons. Fordo's location deep underground presented a challenge to Israeli forces, which do not have the deeply penetrating munitions needed to hit the facility. Natanz was Iran's main uranium enrichment site, with nearly 70 cascades of centrifuges at its two enrichment plants, while a uranium conversion facility and a nuclear fuel fabrication facility were located at Isfahan. The munitions Mr Trump did not identify the type of munitions used in the strikes, but the GBU-57 - a powerful 30,000-pound (13,600-kilogram) American bunker-busting bomb - was likely used to hit Fordo. The US military says the GBU-57 - also known as the Massive Ordnance Penetrator - is designed to penetrate up to 200 feet (60 meters) underground before exploding. This differs from most other missiles or bombs that typically detonate their payload near or upon impact. Testing of the weapons began in 2004 and Boeing was in 2009 awarded a contract to complete the integration of GBU-57 with aircraft. The aircraft The only aircraft capable of deploying the GBU-57 is the American B-2 Spirit, a long-range stealth bomber that can carry two. Prior to the Iran strikes, specialist flight tracking sites and US media reported that multiple B-2s had left a base in Missouri in the central United States. The bombers - which can fly 6,000 nautical miles (9,600 kilometers) without refueling - are designed to "penetrate an enemy's most sophisticated defenses and threaten its most valued, and heavily defended, targets," according to the US military. The B-2 was first publicly displayed in 1988 and flew for the first time the following year, with the first of the planes delivered in 1993. The bomber took part in operations against Serbian forces in the 1990s, flying non-stop from Missouri to Kosovo and back. B-2s were subsequently employed by the United States in the Afghanistan and Iraq wars in the 2000s. What comes next? Mr Trump called on Iran to "agree to end this war," saying that "now is the time for peace". But it remains to be seen whether the strikes will push Tehran to deescalate the conflict, or to widen it further. If Iran chooses the latter option, it could do so by targeting American military personnel who are stationed around the Middle East, or seek to close the strategic Strait of Hormuz, which carries one-fifth of global oil output.