The music industry is building the tech to hunt down AI songs
The music industry's nightmare came true in 2023, and it sounded a lot like Drake.
'Heart on My Sleeve,' a convincingly fake duet between Drake and The Weeknd, racked up millions of streams before anyone could explain who made it or where it came from. The track didn't just go viral — it broke the illusion that anyone was in control.
In the scramble to respond, a new category of infrastructure is quietly taking shape that's built not to stop generative music outright, but to make it traceable. Detection systems are being embedded across the entire music pipeline: in the tools used to train models, the platforms where songs are uploaded, the databases that license rights, and the algorithms that shape discovery. The goal isn't just to catch synthetic content after the fact. It's to identify it early, tag it with metadata, and govern how it moves through the system.
'If you don't build this stuff into the infrastructure, you're just going to be chasing your tail,' says Matt Adell, cofounder of Musical AI. 'You can't keep reacting to every new track or model — that doesn't scale. You need infrastructure that works from training through distribution.'
The goal isn't takedowns, but licensing and control
Startups are now popping up to build detection into licensing workflows. Platforms like YouTube and Deezer have developed internal systems to flag synthetic audio as it's uploaded and shape how it surfaces in search and recommendations. Other music companies — including Audible Magic, Pex, Rightsify, and SoundCloud — are expanding detection, moderation, and attribution features across everything from training datasets to distribution.
The result is a fragmented but fast-growing ecosystem of companies treating the detection of AI-generated content not as an enforcement tool, but as table-stakes infrastructure for tracking synthetic media.
Rather than detecting AI music after it spreads, some companies are building tools to tag it from the moment it's made. Vermillio and Musical AI are developing systems to scan finished tracks for synthetic elements and automatically tag them in the metadata.
Vermillio's TraceID framework goes deeper by breaking songs into stems — like vocal tone, melodic phrasing, and lyrical patterns — and flagging the specific AI-generated segments, allowing rights holders to detect mimicry at the stem level, even if a new track only borrows parts of an original.
The company says its focus isn't takedowns, but proactive licensing and authenticated release. TraceID is positioned as a replacement for systems like YouTube's Content ID, which often miss subtle or partial imitations. Vermillio estimates that authenticated licensing powered by tools like TraceID could grow from $75 million in 2023 to $10 billion in 2025. In practice, that means a rights holder or platform can run a finished track through TraceID to see if it contains protected elements — and if it does, have the system flag it for licensing before release.
'We're trying to quantify creative influence, not just catch copies.'
Some companies are going even further upstream to the training data itself. By analyzing what goes into a model, their aim is to estimate how much a generated track borrows from specific artists or songs. That kind of attribution could enable more precise licensing, with royalties based on creative influence instead of post-release disputes. The idea echoes old debates about musical influence — like the 'Blurred Lines' lawsuit — but applies them to algorithmic generation. The difference now is that licensing can happen before release, not through litigation after the fact.
Musical AI is working on a detection system, too. The company describes its system as layered across ingestion, generation, and distribution. Rather than filtering outputs, it tracks provenance from end to end.
'Attribution shouldn't start when the song is done — it should start when the model starts learning,' says Sean Power, the company's cofounder. 'We're trying to quantify creative influence, not just catch copies.'
Deezer has developed internal tools to flag fully AI-generated tracks at upload and reduce their visibility in both algorithmic and editorial recommendations, especially when the content appears spammy. Chief Innovation Officer Aurélien Hérault says that, as of April, those tools were detecting roughly 20 percent of new uploads each day as fully AI-generated — more than double what they saw in January. Tracks identified by the system remain accessible on the platform but are not promoted. Hérault says Deezer plans to begin labeling these tracks for users directly 'in a few weeks or a few months.'
'We're not against AI at all,' Hérault says. 'But a lot of this content is being used in bad faith — not for creation, but to exploit the platform. That's why we're paying so much attention.'
Spawning AI's DNTP (Do Not Train Protocol) is pushing detection even earlier — at the dataset level. The opt-out protocol lets artists and rights holders label their work as off-limits for model training. While visual artists already have access to similar tools, the audio world is still playing catch-up. So far, there's little consensus on how to standardize consent, transparency, or licensing at scale. Regulation may eventually force the issue, but for now, the approach remains fragmented. Support from major AI training companies has also been inconsistent, and critics say the protocol won't gain traction unless it's governed independently and widely adopted.
'The opt-out protocol needs to be nonprofit, overseen by a few different actors, to be trusted,' Dryhurst says. 'Nobody should trust the future of consent to an opaque centralized company that could go out of business — or much worse.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
In the Arena: Serena Williams review – there is just no one in the world that matches up to her (and her sister)
Serena Williams, holder of 39 grand slam titles and four Olympic gold medals, who spent 319 weeks as tennis's world No 1 and became the highest-earning female athlete in history, never thought she was that good when she was a young player. That was because she was always training against her older sister, Venus ('she was the prodigy of prodigies'), the only person in the world who could really challenge her. A year younger, Serena remembers being shorter and weaker and resorting to cheating on line calls at practice so she could occasionally beat her. In the Arena: Serena Williams (the title comes from President Roosevelt's 1910 speech to the Sorbonne – 'It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena' so, yes, consider me told) is an eight-part docuseries that covers Serena's rise and rise over her 27-year tennis career before she retired three years ago. Since then, incidentally, she has been busy with her venture capital firm, production company, body care and pain relief startup, beauty line and raising two children. Honestly, it's like looking in a mirror, is it not? Advertisement In the Arena was executive produced by Serena and is clearly meant to be the definitive version of events. It would be too strong to call it hagiographic, but it is a full-blooded celebration of her achievements. It is not the place to come if you want, for example, an interrogation of the techniques used by the sisters' astonishing father and coach, Richard Williams, to mould two champions. 'My dad was a marketing genius,' says Serena of his marshalling of press attention round his children in the early years, regardless, some might say and have said, of the psychological impact. 'There's a very thin line between parent and coach … But I would say at the end it was all worth it,' is as far as Serena goes here in acknowledging the criticism Richard has faced for his intense focus on their professional success. Then it's on to the good stuff. The sisters turning pro – Venus flying from the start, Serena stumbling slightly before she too took off. The beating of rivals and established stars ('I was determined, determined to take her down … I'm coming for you. I'm coming for everyone') and their swift domination of a game that had hitherto been almost solely the preserve of a white, moneyed elite. 'Little sisters from Compton. Can't really take that too seriously, right?' Inevitably, of course, they begin to meet in grand slam finals. The footage – the grace, the power of them – is astonishing. Almost as astonishing, if in a gradually emerging way, is the grace with which they handle the competition between them, the wins and the losses. Serena talks about benefiting from Venus going first in everything, from turning pro, to handling good and bad press, to playing individuals Serena will later face in tournaments. They talk with sincerity about being pleased for each other's wins even as they mourn and analyse their own losses. And they talk about the bifurcation between life as sisters and life as absolutely dedicated competitors and not letting either one infect the other. They warmed up together before their first joint grand slam final, the 2001 US Open. Venus won. 'I can't say I enjoyed it. I did what I had to do.' 'I wasn't happy,' adds Serena. 'But I was OK. She was the phenom. It was never me.' Her turn would come. She learned to pretend she was playing someone else when it was Venus on the other side of the net. By the time Wimbledon rolled round a year later, she was ready to be No 1. 'I gotta have it,' Serena grins, remembering. 'That's what I need in my life. Because it's just an extension of who I was. As Thanos says: I was inevitable. I couldn't stop the roll.' Advertisement Nor could anyone – including the haters behind the racial and misogynist abuse she dealt with – or anything, including the difficult birth of her first child, in 2017, which nearly killed her. She retired in 2022, and plunged straight into what is already a highly successful and lucrative second act. It would be fascinating to compare and contrast another pair of sisters or – perhaps even more fascinatingly – a pair of brothers who followed the same trajectory. Would they have stayed so close, maintained the same boundaries between love and work, or would they have disappeared under the pressure of competition? Would they have spurred each other on to greater heights in the same way, or destroyed each other? Would they remain such generous supporters of each other, or have combusted by now? What makes the mind not just of a champion – but of a champion who survives the ride intact? Maybe one day we'll find out. But there is as yet nothing to compare to Serena or to Venus separately, let alone together. • In the Arena: Serena Williams airs on BBC One and is on iPlayer now
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Kids battling cancer enjoy Hollywood movie experience thanks to Michigan nonprofit
A Michigan-based nonprofit rolled out the red carpet for kids undergoing cancer treatment and their families on Saturday afternoon. The Bottomless Toy Chest hosted its 12th annual movie event. Nothing says Hollywood movie experience more than a private screening of the new movie Elio at Emagine Theater in Royal Oak, Michigan. "It brings them hope. It brings them joy and then healing in all the same moments," Stephanie Zinser, Matthew and Ignacio's mother, said. As 11-year-old Mathew Zinser walked through the door, he was greeted by cheering fans and paparazzi. Matthew Zinser is still recovering from a bone marrow transplant two years ago. He and his 8-year-old brother Ignacio Zinser both have a rare genetic disorder called Shwachman-Diamond syndrome, which can develop into leukemia. They spend a lot of time at the hospital, away from their other six siblings, getting treatment. "When you're going through a treatment, it separates the family at times, and this is a great event to bring them together to celebrate something that they don't have on a daily basis," Stephanie Zinser said. After the movie, attendees got to enjoy some pizza, crafts and cookie decorating, all thanks to the nonprofit. "Our mission is to promote a positive state of mind in children who are going through very difficult treatment by providing them with empowering toy experiences that help them stay focused, stay comfortable, and, you know, have a sense of normalcy during a very difficult time in their lives," Micky Guisewite, founder & executive director of the Bottomless Toy Chest, said. While Ignacio loved Elio and the lesson he learned, his favorite part of the day was spending time with his family. "Because you get to be with your family, and you get to just enjoy being with your family," Ignacio Zinser said. And that's what makes moments like this special. The Bottomless Toy Chest serves children in 15 hospitals and clinics throughout Michigan. It has expanded to 15 other states. This year, the nonprofit says it will give out more than 35,000 toys.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Video: Mariya Agapova kisses Jessica Eye on the mouth during BKFC faceoff
Two former UFC fighters shared a kiss during BKFC 76 pre-fight faceoffs, though one was not happy. While fighters occasionally get physical during their final opportunity to mean-mug their opponent, it's not usually in the way Mariya Agapova did it Friday when she kissed Jessica Eye on the mouth. Advertisement Eye was not a consenting party in the lip-locking. She appeared caught off guard by the action and vented some frustration toward Agapova moments later. The maneuver could add an additional layer of heat to Saturday's matchup, which takes place on the main card at Dickies Arena in Fort Worth, Texas. This article originally appeared on MMA Junkie: Video: Former UFC fighters unexpectedly kiss during BKFC 76 faceoff
