‘Attractive valuations:' DBS says it's time to buy these industrial S-Reits on easing trade tensions

[SINGAPORE] The tide could soon turn for underperforming industrial Singapore-listed real estate investment trusts (S-Reits) as the sector looks set for a comeback, with attractive opportunities for re-entry, according to a DBS Group Research report on Thursday (Jun 12).
Industrial S-Reits have declined by 5 per cent on average in share price since the beginning of the year.
But the research house said that progress in recent trade negotiations between Washington and Beijing has led to an improved near-term outlook for such S-reits, which have been affected by trade uncertainties, as well as interest rate and currency fluctuations.
This opens an 'attractive opportunity not to be missed' for the sector, which has an average DPU yield of 5.8 per cent to 9.8 per cent, more than 1 per cent higher than retail S-Reits, it added.
DBS also expects borrowing costs for large-cap industrial S-Reits to decrease amid falling interest rates, which have declined by 1.4 to 1.7 per cent year-to-date compared with 2024. Furthermore, the strengthening of the yen, euro and pound against the Singapore dollar could ease FX-related pressures on earnings for such S-Reits with exposure to these markets.
Altogether, this will better enable large-cap industrial S-Reits to capitalise on acquisition opportunities to achieve further growth, it added.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'Industrial and retail SREITs, given their stable income profiles, are seen as defensive plays,' said DBS.
But in recent years, industrial S-Reits have been especially affected by high interest rates and currency volatility. From FY2021 to 2024, DPUs for industrial S-Reits have suffered an average drop of 3.7 per cent, compared with 0.1 to 1.5 per cent growth for Singapore-focused retail Reits.
For FY2025-2027, however, the research house projects industrial and retail S-Reits to experience growth of 0.3 to 1 per cent and 1.2 per cent, respectively, driven by positive reversions from growing rental, contribution from acquisition and lower interest costs.
Top picks
Capitaland Ascendas Reit, Mapletree Logistics Trust and ESR Reit are DBS' top picks for potential 'alpha opportunities'.
These stocks have been supported by attractive valuations, with implied asset yields of 6 per cent (above book cap rates) at a five-year high, with further potential upside earnings on the back of declining interest rates.
Amid trade uncertainties caused by the US tariffs, DBS' sector preferences remained unchanged. It favours the retail, industrial, office and hotel sectors, in that order, with a focus on defensive names.
Retail S-Reits, on the other hand, have been resilient and stable in recent months, compared with the industrial S-Reit sector, said the research house.
It does not anticipate any immediate effects on the retail S-Reit sector despite possible prolonged tariff conflict fuelling inflation and further uncertainty, and attributes the resilience of the sector to record-high occupancy rates.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Times

21 minutes ago

• Business Times

Investors ignore world-changing news. Rightly

MISSILE warfare has erupted in the Middle East. On Jun 13, as the bombs began to fly, S&P 500 futures fell by 1.6 per cent. But as the hours passed, the stock market steadily climbed. The index has now recovered to around 6,000, a hair's breadth from an all-time high. Such movements reflect a new market mantra: 'Nothing ever happens.' The phrase emerged from the depths of 4chan, an online forum, more than a decade ago, and has become a popular meme among youngish investors. On the face of it, the saying seems wildly out of place in an era of both trade war and conventional conflict. But consider the long list of recent events that at first seemed to have epoch-making potential, only to fizzle out, and it appears more reasonable. Examples include China's anti-lockdown protests, the Wagner Group's rebellion in Russia, and skirmishes between India and Pakistan. Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin are still in charge. Nuclear war has been avoided. And so cynicism prevails, dips are bought and markets continue to climb. Retail investors are getting in on the act, too. They have piled into stocks, buying US$20 billion worth, net, over the past three months. Crisis, what crisis? The head-in-the-sand approach is a more sophisticated strategy than it first appears, and not just because headlines tend to go over the top. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up As far back as 1988, a paper by David Cutler and James Poterba, then both of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Larry Summers, then of Harvard University, sought to establish what really moves stock prices. The trio looked at almost five decades of world-changing events, from Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 and the Cuban missile crisis of 1962 to the Chernobyl nuclear meltdown in 1986. They were surprised to discover that the volatility of returns (as measured by the standard deviation) on the day of an important news event was less than three times as large as on an ordinary day. Several of the biggest one-day falls identified by the authors occurred on days without an obvious news-related spark. Geopolitical threats are often pregnant with all-or-nothing outcomes that are difficult to price. This is especially true of the most potentially devastating events, which involve the risk of nuclear war. Take the example of South Korea, which has a stock market worth US$2 trillion that could be reduced to rubble by its belligerent northern neighbour. How should an investor price the threat? For South Koreans, hedging against such an outcome is all but impossible. Many prefer to ignore the prospect. Even the so-called Korea discount – the persistent cheapness of South Korean stocks relative to their international peers – is explained by poor corporate governance rather than geopolitical risk, according to Kang So-hyun of the Korea Capital Market Institute. Moreover, changes in the global economy are blunting events that once would have prompted turmoil. The oil shock of 1973 and the start of the Gulf War in 1990 both had a sustained impact on stock markets. Today, however, America is an exporter of energy owing to the shale revolution. This keeps its economy insulated from global affairs. Indeed, climbing global oil prices incentivise more exploration and production in America, boosting spending. And what happens in America matters, above all else, for global stock markets. The momentum of markets can be relentless. Shares tend to grind higher over time as consumers spend, entrepreneurs innovate and companies grow. Earnings per share for American firms have risen by 250 per cent or so over the past 15 years. For any event to have a meaningful impact, at least for longer than a few days, it must harm such dynamism. Even President Donald Trump's tariffs – which, unlike lots of geopolitical risks, have a direct and material impact on the bottom line of many firms – have not been enough to break the growth engine that has powered the American stock market beyond all competition. Expected earnings of firms in the S&P 500 index over the next 12 months are, at US$263 per share, very narrowly above where they were before Trump's 'Liberation Day' announcement. Of course, an event of sufficient scale to rattle markets may be on the way. That would upset the dip buyers. But what appears to be a witless stampede into stocks, even in moments of international tension and conflict, is really an appreciation of the power of capitalism. The news that matters tends to come from the real economy or financial system – not the world's battlefields. ©2025 The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved

Business Times

21 minutes ago

• Business Times

US attack on Iran: Market reaction muted, but brace for more volatility ahead, say analysts

[SINGAPORE] Markets reacted in a more muted manner than expected on Monday (Jun 23) after the US launched strikes against three nuclear facilities in Iran over the weekend. But analysts warned that there could be more volatility ahead as the world awaits Iran's reaction. US President Donald Trump announced strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities on Sunday (Jun 22), boosting Israel's efforts to destroy Iran's nuclear programme. This followed more than a week of Israeli air attacks on Iran's nuclear and military facilities and the US' attempts to persuade Iran to reach a deal to dismantle its nuclear programme. In response, Iran threatened US bases in the Middle East, intensifying concerns over a deepening of conflict in the region. Markets in the Asia-Pacific tumbled slightly initially, but by Monday's close, had recovered most of their losses – a reaction that was not as severe as when Israel first launched attacks. US futures rose marginally ahead of Monday's trading session. Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index closed up 0.6 per cent after earlier losses; on the mainland, the CSI 300 Index ended 0.3 per cent higher. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Japan's Nikkei 225 ended Monday's session around 0.1 per cent lower, and South Korea's Kospi closed 0.2 per cent down. Australia's ASX closed nearly 0.4 per cent lower. Oil prices gained initially, but were soon pared back. On Monday afternoon, they were still at levels higher than before the Jun 13 Israel attacks, with West Texas Intermediate (WTI) at a gain of around 8 per cent, and Brent at 10 per cent higher. Oil markets The spike in oil prices may have faded slightly somewhat intraday on Monday, but the broader trend reflects building pressure on global energy supply chains, said Charu Chanana, chief investment strategist at Saxo. 'Even without a direct shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz, higher shipping costs and insurance premiums could lift energy prices in a more sustained way,' she said. The Strait of Hormuz is a major trading route through which around a fifth of global oil and gas flows. Ipek Ozkardeskaya, senior analyst at Swissquote Bank, also noted that it takes a number of days to a few weeks to meaningfully disrupt global oil flows. 'A weakened Iran, if left with no other options, could still go down that road,' she cautioned. A sustainable jump in oil prices – to around US$100 a barrel for a few months – could have wider implications for the global economy by boosting inflation and preventing central banks from further easing; this would, in turn, weigh on production, business activity and growth, Ozkardeskaya said. OCBC's Vasu Menon said that, historically, past Middle East flashpoints may have caused oil prices to spike initially, but eventually failed to produce a lasting market reaction, partly because the feared impact and disruption to oil supply did not materialise. Equity and overall markets Menon, the bank's managing director of investment strategy and wealth management in Singapore, noted that Middle East markets ended mostly higher on Sunday, despite the US attack on Iran. 'The unfazed response from Middle East markets offers hope that the fallout for other global markets may not be dramatic ... they may not be down and out, and the response may be temporary, and a rebound could materialise eventually,' he said of global markets. Swissquote Bank's Ozkardeskaya noted it was 'extremely interesting' to note that S&P 500 futures were 'behaving like a normal Monday'. 'It really feels like markets have become increasingly unreactive to the news.' Menon added: 'A lot hinges on what Iran will do next, and whether it would sabotage oil supply in the Middle East in retaliation for the US attack. We will have to wait and watch over the next few days, or even a few weeks, to see how Iran responds. 'This may keep investors nervous and markets volatile in the short term, but may not be a game changer for markets. Of greater consequence to the markets may be the reciprocal tariffs that Trump will decide on by Jul 9,' he said. However, Menon urged investors to prepare for more volatility in the coming days and weeks. Saxo's Chanana said that markets now face 'overlapping risks': energy disruption, inflation shock, delayed rate cuts and rising global macro uncertainty. Rising inflation caused by energy disruptions could delay rate cuts by the inflation-sensitive US Fed. 'Trump's abrupt pivot from 'wait and see' to launching strikes reinforces a sense of strategic instability. For businesses and investors, it raises the bar for deploying long-term capital with confidence,' she said. 'While the market's initial reaction appears contained, investors should be cautious about becoming complacent.' But Menon said that these developments 'may not end the global equity bull market' if they don't result in sharply higher inflation. Markets have been very resilient this year, he pointed out, despite tariff shocks and geopolitical risks. 'What's going for markets is a lot of idle liquidity on the sidelines that could provide market support, should there be sharp pullbacks.' Gold One bright spot: Gold. Menon said that the scope for safe havens like gold to continue rising is likely to stay. This comes as global uncertainties continue, while global central banks proceed with diversifying away from their US dollar holdings towards gold. 'We see gold rising to US$3,900 per ounce over a 12-month horizon,' he said. Gold's classic hedge qualities may, however, come under the scanner if yields rise or the dollar strengthens significantly, cautioned Chanana. To her, gold miners and defence contractors stand to gain more attention if tensions from the conflict escalate further. 'These sectors have historically been sought out during geopolitical flare-ups and rising inflation concerns, and offer resilience in the face of volatility, especially if portfolios have more relative cyclical exposure to, say, tech or consumer discretionary,' said the Saxo analyst.

CNA

43 minutes ago

• CNA

Singapore Airlines cancels all flights to Dubai until Wednesday amid Middle East conflict

SINGAPORE: Singapore Airlines (SIA) has cancelled all flights between Singapore and Dubai until Wednesday (Jun 25) as the conflict between Israel and Iran continues. In a notice on its website, the Singapore carrier announced that the cancellations followed 'a security assessment of the geopolitical situation in the Middle East'. The six cancelled flights are: The airline had earlier cancelled flights between Singapore and Dubai on Sunday as a result of the conflict. 'SIA will be contacting all affected customers to inform them about the flight cancellation,' said the airline. 'Customers affected by the flight cancellations will be reaccommodated on alternative flights or can seek a full refund of the unused portion of their ticket.' It added that customers who booked their flights directly can use the airline's Assistance Request Form to seek a refund. 'For bookings made through travel agents or partner airlines, customers are advised to contact their travel agent or purchasing airline directly for assistance,' said SIA. 'As the situation remains fluid, other SIA flights between Singapore and Dubai may be affected,' it added. Commercial airlines around the world are weighing how long to suspend Middle East flights as a conflict which has already cut off major flight routes entered a new phase after the US attacked key Iranian nuclear sites and Tehran vowed to defend itself. The usually busy airspace stretching from Iran and Iraq to the Mediterranean has been largely empty of commercial air traffic for 10 days since Israel began strikes on Iran on Jun 13, as airlines divert, cancel and delay flights through the region due to airspace closures and safety concerns. New cancellations of some flights by international carriers in recent days to usually resilient aviation hubs like Dubai, the world's busiest international airport, and Qatar's Doha, show how aviation industry concerns about the region have escalated. With Russian and Ukrainian airspace also closed to most airlines due to years of war, the Middle East had become a more important route for flights between Europe and Asia. Amid missile and air strikes during the past 10 days, airlines have routed north via the Caspian Sea or south via Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Added to increased fuel and crew costs from these long detours and cancellations, carriers also face a potential hike in jet fuel costs as oil prices rise following the US attacks. AIRSPACE RISKS Proliferating conflict zones are an increasing operational burden on airlines, as aerial attacks raise worries about accidental or deliberate shoot-downs of commercial air traffic. Location spoofing and GPS interference around political hotspots, where ground-based GPS systems broadcast incorrect positions which can send commercial airliners off course, are also a growing issue for commercial aviation. Flightradar24 told Reuters it had seen a "dramatic increase" in jamming and spoofing in recent days over the Persian Gulf. SkAI, a Swiss company that runs a GPS disruption map, late on Sunday said it had observed more than 150 aircraft spoofed in 24 hours there. Safe Airspace, a website run by OPSGROUP, a membership-based organisation that shares flight risk information, noted on Sunday that US attacks on Iran's nuclear sites could heighten the threat to American operators in the region. This could raise additional airspace risks in Gulf states like Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, it said. In the days before the US strikes, American Airlines suspended flights to Qatar, and United Airlines and Air Canada did the same with flights to Dubai. They have yet to resume. While international airlines are shying away from the region, local carriers in Jordan, Lebanon and Iraq are tentatively resuming some flights after widespread cancellations. Israel is ramping up flights to help people return home, and leave. The country's Airports Authority says that so-called rescue flights to the country would expand on Monday with 24 a day, although each flight would be limited to 50 passengers. From Monday, Israeli airlines will start to operate outbound flights from Israel, the authority said.