
Mains answer practice — GS 2: Questions on caste census in India and Arctic geopolitics (Week 104)
UPSC Essentials brings to you its initiative for the practice of Mains answer writing. It covers essential topics of static and dynamic parts of the UPSC Civil Services syllabus covered under various GS papers. This answer-writing practice is designed to help you as a value addition to your UPSC CSE Mains. Attempt today's answer writing on questions related to topics of GS-2 to check your progress.
🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for May 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at manas.srivastava@indianexpress.com🚨
The decision to conduct a caste census in India has reignited debates on the efficacy and scope of affirmative action policies. Critically examine how a caste census can serve as a tool to assess and reinforce affirmative action in India.
Assess the effect of the United States' increasing interest in Greenland on Arctic geopolitics. How do territorial ambitions affect the Arctic region's stability and governance?
Introduction
— The introduction of the answer is essential and should be restricted to 3-5 lines. Remember, a one-liner is not a standard introduction.
— It may consist of basic information by giving some definitions from the trusted source and authentic facts.
Body
— It is the central part of the answer and one should understand the demand of the question to provide rich content.
— The answer must be preferably written as a mix of points and short paragraphs rather than using long paragraphs or just points.
— Using facts from authentic government sources makes your answer more comprehensive. Analysis is important based on the demand of the question, but do not over analyse.
— Underlining keywords gives you an edge over other candidates and enhances presentation of the answer.
— Using flowcharts/tree-diagram in the answers saves much time and boosts your score. However, it should be used logically and only where it is required.
Way forward/ conclusion
— The ending of the answer should be on a positive note and it should have a forward-looking approach. However, if you feel that an important problem must be highlighted, you may add it in your conclusion. Try not to repeat any point from body or introduction.
— You may use the findings of reports or surveys conducted at national and international levels, quotes etc. in your answers.
Self Evaluation
— It is the most important part of our Mains answer writing practice. UPSC Essentials will provide some guiding points or ideas as a thought process that will help you to evaluate your answers.
QUESTION 1: The decision to conduct a caste census in India has reignited debates on the efficacy and scope of affirmative action policies. Critically examine how a caste census can serve as a tool to assess and reinforce affirmative action in India.
Note: This is not a model answer. It only provides you with thought process which you may incorporate into the answers.
Introduction:
— The decision by the Centre to include caste in the forthcoming census will have a huge impact on the restructuring of India's reservation system. Reservation disrupts occupational homogeneity.
— Part III (Articles 15 and 16) and Part IV (Directive Principles of State Policy) of the Constitution provide opportunities to implement affirmative action.
— Caste-based hierarchies and discrimination are common in government and private sector jobs and educational institutions.
Body:
You may incorporate some of the following points in your answer:
Background
— While the Constitution provided for reservations for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST), the identification of backward classes occurred after the Constituent Assembly. Responding to requests for quota for Other Backward Classes (OBCs), the Congress administration established the First Backward Classes Commission in 1953, chaired by Kaka Kalelkar, to identify 'socially and educationally backward' communities.
— The Janata Dal government established the Second Backward Classes Commission, sometimes known as the Mandal Commission, in 1979. It was chaired by B P Mandal. The commission conducted a rigorous survey using social, educational, and economic indices and designated 3,743 castes as backward, recommending reservation in educational institutions and government sector employment.
— In Indra Sawhney vs Union of India (1992), the Supreme Court of India affirmed 27% reservation for OBCs but denied 10% reservation for EWS, stating that economic status cannot be the primary factor for reservation in the absence of proof of structural discrimination.
— The EWS reservation was established under the 103rd Constitutional Amendment. The Supreme Court also understood the word 'Class' in article 16(4) as 'Social Class,' rather than the economic status-based 'Marxist Class.'
Caste census and reservation
— The All India Survey on Higher Education (2021-22) study describes how different social classes are represented in India's government and private educational institutions. For example, in public colleges, just about 10.8 percent of instructors come from the SC group, while STs account for only 3.4% and OBCs for 21%. However, the general category accounts for around 49.3% of teachers in public institutions and 60.7% in private universities. In Union and state public institutions, as well as affiliated and constituent colleges, SC instructors account for 9.6%, STs for 2.6%, and OBCs for 34%.
— Caste-based concepts are so established that it is extremely difficult for marginalised communities to find work, even if they are highly qualified.
Conclusion:
— These examples demonstrate that we must impose reserves even in the private sector to combat such limits. A caste-based census provides an opportunity to strengthen the quota system and create a more inclusive society. However, it can also strengthen numerically dominant populations politically, thereby affecting the rights and prospects of numerically non-dominant communities.
(Source: Caste census gives us an opportunity to examine and reinforce affirmative action)
Points to Ponder
Read more details about caste census
Read about previous censuses
Related Previous Year Questions
Discuss the contribution of civil society groups for women's effective and meaningful participation and representation in state legislatures in India. (2023)
Whether National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) can enforce the implementation of constitutional reservation for the Scheduled Castes in the religious minority institutions? Examine. (2018)
QUESTION 2: Assess the effect of the United States' increasing interest in Greenland on Arctic geopolitics. How do territorial ambitions affect the Arctic region's stability and governance?
Note: This is not a model answer. It only provides you with thought process which you may incorporate into the answers.
Introduction:
— The Arctic Council is the premier international platform for advancing regional cooperation and governance in the Arctic area.
— The forum has eight permanent members: Canada, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden, the United States, and Denmark (which includes Greenland and the Faroe Islands).
— The 14th meeting of the Arctic Council marked the end of Norway's period as chair. Following a challenging period in keeping the Arctic Council running, Norway has given the baton to Denmark as the Council's next head.
Body:
You may incorporate some of the following points in your answer:
— The addition of Finland and Sweden to NATO since the start of the war has worsened tensions within the organisation. Currently, the Arctic Council includes seven NATO member states and Russia. Given Russian concerns about NATO, any chance of the group making any progress is increasingly unlikely.
— US President Donald Trump's claim to rule the region of Greenland has muddled matters even more. Since taking office in January 2025, Trump has maintained that American control over Greenland's territory is critical to Washington's national and international security.
— Given Russia's desire to find new ways to strengthen collaboration in the Arctic, China has emerged as an important partner. Chinese interests in the Arctic have also increased. In 2014, President Xi Jinping announced China's goal to become a 'Polar Power'. Since then, China has referred to itself as a 'near-Arctic state,' indicating a desire for increased involvement in Arctic matters.
— China has no shoreline exposure to the Arctic, and it makes no claim to sovereignty in the region. As a result, Russia-China naval cooperation in the Arctic has added a new strategic dimension to the region's developing geopolitical landscape.
— The Arctic Council is dealing with significant issues. Arctic exceptionalism is dying. With competing interests in the region and a lack of efficient governance systems, the Arctic risks quickly becoming a geopolitical flashpoint. Notably, these discoveries will have significant worldwide implications.
Conclusion:
— Rising sea levels are a problem due to growing climate worries in the Arctic, which is causing ice to melt. The melting of Arctic ice has also created new opportunities for extending trade routes.
— The anticipated influx of new stakeholders into the Arctic necessitates a broader redesign of the Arctic governance architecture. The Arctic Council will have to skilfully balance these critical issues.
(Source: The Russia-China push in the arctic – a new strategic flashpoint)
Points to Ponder
Read more about Arctic Council
Read about Russia-China cooperation in Arctic region
Related Previous Year Questions
'The West is fostering India as an alternative to reduce dependence on China's supply chain and strategically to counter China's political and economic dominance.' Explain this statement with examples. (2024)
'The USA is facing an existential threat in the form of China, that is much more challenging than the erstwhile Soviet Union.' Explain. (2021)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 3 (Week 104)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 3 (Week 103)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 2 (Week 102)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 2 (Week 103)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 1 (Week 102)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 1 (Week 103)
Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week.
Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
IAS Smita Sabharwal's class 12th marksheet goes viral, she scored 97 marks out of 100 in…, 94 in...
IAS officer Smita Sabharwal is a well-known Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer. She is widely known as the 'People's Officer'. This title has been conferred on her not only because of her transparent administration, efficient governance, and people-centric policies, but she has also proactively used technology and social media to provide reforms and innovation that facilitate the efficiency of public service. As a benchmark in administration excellence and public welfare, the role of the IAS officer, as documented under Smita Sabharwal, will continue to positively impact many facets of public welfare. At 23, Smita Sabharwal cleared the 2000 UPSC CSE examination. She secured an All India Rank(AIR) of 4 in the UPSC Civil Services Examination reportedly in her second attempt. Sabharwal, who was currently Special Chief Secretary, Youth Advancement, Tourism & Culture (YAT&C) and Director, Archaeology, has been transferred to the post of Member Secretary, Telangana Finance Commission, which she previously held prior to her transfer to YAT&C in November 2024. The 2001-batch IAS officer had recently been transferred because of the protests of HCU students, environment activists, and opposition parties regarding the alleged destruction of forest on the Kancha Gachibowli land. The IAS officer from the 2001 batch very recently re-shared the post during the protests by HCU students, environmental activists, and opposition parties regarding the alleged deforestation of trees on Kancha Gachibowli land. IAS officer Smita Sabharwal is a name that inspires thousands of civil service aspirants and students across India. She has made her mark through her exemplary governance and participation on social media. She has gained a strong following in the youth community through her past professional accomplishments, but also through her role as a disciplined student, dedicated to her academics. Speaking about her educational qualification, Smita Sabharwal completed her schooling at St. Ann's High School in Secunderabad, Telangana. In 1995, she took her Class 12th Examination under the Indian School Certificate (ISC) board through Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations (CISCE), New Delhi, receiving a Grade A in SUPW & Community Service. Her subjects were English, Hindi, Economics, Structure of Commerce, and Principles of Accounts – a varied and titaniacally engineered mix that helped to lay the foundations from which she would go on to succeed in the civil services. Smita Sabharwal had an impressive overall academic performance according to her CISCE ISC (Class 12th) mark sheet. During the 1995 Indian School Certificate Examination, she scored 94 out of 100 in both English and Hindi, 90 out of 100 in Economics, 86 in Structure of Commerce, and 97 in Principles of Accounts. She is one of India's youngest female IAS officers. IAS officer Smita Sabharwal is known for her dedication and approachability, and she is often referred to as the 'People's Officer.'


India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
US Vice President JD Vance: We're at war with Iran's nuclear programme, not Iran
US Vice President JD Vance states that the US is not at war with Iran, but with its nuclear program. He claims that American strikes ordered by President Donald Trump have caused significant damage to three key Iranian nuclear sites, which will take a long time to replenish. Vance emphasises that the objective is to end Iran's nuclear program, not achieve regime change. The use of B-2 bombers in the attack was intended to cause the level of damage the US is claiming.


Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Operation ‘Midnight Hammer': 5 key takeaways from the Pentagon briefing on US bombing Iran
Senior Pentagon officials on Sunday gave a media briefing on 'Operation Midnight Hammer', the codename given to the US' precision strikes on three of Iran's nuclear facilities hours earlier, which marked a dramatic escalation in the Middle East and brought Washington and Tehran relations to a historic low since the Iranian Revolution. US Secretary of Defence Peter Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine on Sunday reiterated the Washington's policy on Tehran's nuclear programme and revealed new details on the covert operation, which was conducted well before the two-week self-imposed deadline set by Trump. The covert operation involved the use of over 125 aircraft and deception tactics, and the fleet included seven B-2 stealth bombers, the press briefing revealed. The US strike targeted three of Iran's most sensitive nuclear facilities — Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Natanz, Tehran's primary enrichment site, reportedly housed 13,500 operational centrifuges, capable of purifying uranium to 5 per cent, and over 160 advanced centrifuges capable of purifying uranium up to 60 per cent — a small step away from 90 per cent (weapons-grade purity). The Isfahan facility housed three Chinese-built research reactors. It also included the Uranium Conversion Facility, which converts 'yellowcake' uranium to uranium hexafluoride (the raw input for centrifuges). The Fordow enrichment site housed 2,000 operational centrifuges. What sets this site apart from the other facilities damaged in Israeli barrages since June 13 is its depth: built into the side of a mountain and buried approximately 260 to 300 feet underground, it is effectively impervious to conventional air strikes. Amid the Israeli bombardment, the Fordow nuclear facility stood unscathed. This site required the direct involvement of the US, which houses the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOP) in its arsenal – a 30,000-pound 'bunker buster' capable of destroying it. The Pentagon said these strikes were conducted to 'severely degrade Iran's nuclear programme.' The covert op featured seven B-2 Spirit bombers – with two crew members in each – flying from Missouri, backed by over 125 aircrafts, including 4th and 5th generation fighter jets (as decoys), surveillance planes, and aerial refuelers. The B-2s dropped 14 Massive Ordnance Penetrators (GBU-57s) on Natanz and Fordow, while a US guided missile submarine launched more than 24 Tomahawk missiles at Isfahan in a coordinated strike. The mission was conducted during a timeframe of 18 hours and involved multiple in-flight refuellings and deception tactics such as decoys and airspace clearing. All three nuclear facilities were struck between 6:40 pm and 7:05 pm (Eastern Time), with the Tomahawks delivering the final blow at Isfahan. In what marked the longest B-2 mission since 2001 and the first operational employment of the GBU-57, the White House maintained complete secrecy. Describing the operation as 'highly classified', Caine said that very few people in Washington were aware of the 'timing and nature' of the plan. Iran's air defenses failed to respond, and no US aircraft was fired upon. Caine concluded that the US was able to retain the element of surprise. Hegseth said the sites were 'obliterated,' and warned Tehran against retaliation. Hegseth described the strikes as 'bold and brilliant,' adding that it showed the world that 'American deterrence is back' and reaffirmed Washington's stance on the enrichment programme — that 'Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.' He also called the operation a 'spectacular success,' highlighting that no Iranian troops or civilians were targeted. 'As President Trump has stated, 'the US does not seek war', but… we will act swiftly and decisively when our people, our partner, or our interests are threatened,' Hegseth said, to pressure Tehran to come to the negotiation table. Following the attack, President Trump gave a press briefing from Washington, reiterating his previous calls that 'Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.' He warned Tehran against carrying out retaliatory attacks, saying that 'there will either be peace or tragedy for Iran, far greater than what we have witnessed over the last eight days.' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed Washington's move and, in a video message addressed to the US President, said, 'Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities, with the awesome and righteous might of the United States, will change history.' Iran's Supreme Leader of Iran Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said, 'the US entering the war is 100% to its own detriment.' Later in the day, Iran's Parliament approved plans to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway between the Gulf of Persia and the Gulf of Oman, responsible for 20 per cent of global trade. The Supreme National Security Council, the highest security body in the state apparatus, is yet to take the final call, Major General Kowsari, a member of the National Security Committee, said.