Digital Rupee vs Crypto: What the debate misses about the future of money
When the debate gets wrong
The Digital Rupee is a sovereign, state-backed currency that retains all the regulatory control of fiat, with some of the benefits of digital settlement—speed, transparency, and auditabilit.
Crypto, especially stablecoins and DeFi protocols, represents open, global finance—designed to reduce reliance on intermediaries, enable 24/7 global settlement, and allow innovation at the edges.
Live Events
Whether it's a CBDC or a stablecoin, the average Indian citizen wants:
Instant settlement
Low transaction fees
Universal acceptance
Interoperability across borders
Clear privacy and control over their funds
Google Pay
PhonePe (majority owned by Walmart)
Paytm (with large foreign ownership)
India needs a strategic payments agenda
To avoid this, India must learn from UPI's journey:
Create favorable policies and early access for Indian startups to build on top of the Digital Rupee.
Ensure neutral interoperability layers so no single app dominates wallet access or merchant onboarding.
Offer incentives and sandboxes for fintechs and Web3 startups to create novel CBDC use cases in sectors like trade, MSME finance, insurance, and mobility.
Consider public-private models where infrastructure remains open but innovation is encouraged locally.
It's not Crypto vs CBDC. It's about empowering Indians
A Digital Rupee that settles instantly, works offline, and integrates with UPI? Excellent.
A crypto wallet that lets an Indian freelancer receive USD-stablecoins from a US client and cash out into INR at low cost? Also excellent.
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
India is in the midst of a silent revolution in money. On one hand, we have the Digital Rupee , the Reserve Bank of India 's Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), and on the other, the rapidly growing world of crypto-assets and stablecoins operating on public blockchains.Both are vying to redefine how value is transferred in the digital age. And yet, the ongoing debate—often framed as CBDC vs Crypto—misses the point entirely. Because the real question is not about which technology wins, but who benefits from it.Public discourse often pits the Digital Rupee and crypto against each other—as if they are fundamentally incompatible. The truth is, both are programmable forms of digital money, designed for different purposes, but potentially coexisting in the same future financial system.But focusing only on the instruments is missing the forest for the trees. What matters most is the end user's experience.For the user, convenience is kingIf the Digital Rupee delivers this, it wins. If crypto and stablecoins can do it better, they will continue gaining ground—especially among tech-savvy users, freelancers, SMEs, and NRIs.So far, Digital Rupee usage is modest—with just 19 banks live and around 100,000 daily transactions reported in mid-2024. By comparison, UPI clocks 350 million+ transactions a day, and stablecoins globally settled over $7 trillion in 2023.The bigger problem: Not who builds it, but who controls itLet's zoom out. India built UPI—arguably the most successful public payments infrastructure in the world. But despite being a product of NPCI (a quasi-government entity), UPI adoption is now dominated by three major apps:Together, these three control over 94% of UPI transaction volume.So while UPI is Indian in origin, the monetization, data leverage, and platform control rests in the hands of foreign-backed companies. Indian startups in the payments space face high entry barriers, and the market has become increasingly difficult to penetrate due to high compliance, capital, and branding costs.If India repeats the same model with the Digital Rupee—where state infrastructure is handed over to foreign-led platforms for distribution—we will be building Indian rails for global profits, again.After all, payments aren't just a technical tool—they are an instrument of economic sovereignty . And whoever controls the interface to money, controls much more than just transactions.At the end of the day, the user doesn't care whether their money comes from a central bank node or a smart contract. They care about speed, cost, and usability.The key is not to fixate on the rails, but to ensure that the value stays in India, and Indian entrepreneurs are not locked out of building the future. Because if we don't, we risk creating another UPI story—built by India, but controlled by others. And that's a mistake we can't afford to make twice.(The author, Aishwary Gupta is the Global Head of Payments & Real World Assets at Polygon Labs): Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
9 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Will not release aircraft for service ‘where there is any doubt', Air India CEO tells staff
Air India has voluntarily decided to continue with enhanced pre-flight checks and will not release any aircraft for service 'where there is any doubt', the Tata group airline's CEO Campbell Wilson wrote in a message to the carrier's employees a week after the deadly crash of an Air India Boeing 787-8 aircraft in Ahmedabad. Wilson also reiterated that Air India is cooperating completely in the air crash investigation as it is 'vital that the facts, whatever they may be, are known'. Wilson also said that even though a tragic crash has taken place, Air India's ambition on all counts, including safety and quality, stays the same, 'if not higher than before'. He also assured staff that Air India continues to have the full support of both its shareholders—Tata Sons and Singapore Airlines. 'We have completed the additional precautionary checks on our operating Boeing 787 fleet as requested by the DGCA (Directorate General of Civil Aviation), who have publicly declared that they meet required standards. We have also, as a matter of abundant precaution, voluntarily decided to continue additional pre-flight checks for the time being. Where there is any doubt, we will not release aircraft—of any type—for service,' Wilson told staff. An Air India Boeing 787-8 aircraft—operating flight AI171 from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick, crashed moments after take-off last Thursday. The ill-fated aircraft had 242 people on board, but only one survived the accident. There were several casualties on the ground as well. This was the worst aviation disaster involving an Indian airline in at least four decades, and the first-ever crash of the Boeing 787 anywhere in the world. The crash is being investigated by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB). 'This has been a tragic event and we will learn whatever we can from it so that we are stronger in future. However, our aim in every respect, be it safety, quality, service, scale, reach, professionalism or any other dimension, remains the same if not higher than before,' Wilso said. The Air India CEO also dismissed speculation that Air India management was absent at the last rites of the crew of the doomed flight, assuring employees that the airline had 'senior representation' at each service. 'You may have read social media commentary on the perceived lack of visibility of Air India at the services held for our colleagues. I can assure you that we have had senior representation at each and every one. We are, however, taking care that our presence does not cause disruption at a time so important for families and loved ones, as a matter of respect,' he stated. Wilson said that he had met many Air India staff members who had some similar questions about the crash. In his communication to staff on Friday, the Air India CEO attempted to answer some of those. 'There are many theories (about why the aircraft crashed) but, as the accident is now under official investigation by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, it is not appropriate for us to comment or speculate. We are providing all information requested by the AAIB and are cooperating completely. It is vital that the facts, whatever they may be, are known so that we and the industry at large can learn from them,' Wilson said. On the question of when the investigation report is expected, Wilson said: 'This is completely up to the AAIB. The final report can take many months, though the AAIB may choose to issue interim updates or reports. If there is any discovery during the investigation that suggests airlines or suppliers need to change something urgently, we have confidence that such information would be shared quickly. For our part, we will be transparent with what is shared with us'. Wilson also reiterated that Air India and the Tata group will continue supporting the families of victims 'long after the work in Ahmedabad is done for'. 'This is equally true for those of our colleagues, who we will support in the same way. We are also supporting those staff who have served in Ahmedabad upon their return to base with a mandatory break and counselling. The counselling services, which are confidential and provided by professionals, continue to be available to everyone and I encourage you to avail of it,' Wilson said. Sukalp Sharma is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express and writes on a host of subjects and sectors, notably energy and aviation. He has over 13 years of experience in journalism with a body of work spanning areas like politics, development, equity markets, corporates, trade, and economic policy. He considers himself an above-average photographer, which goes well with his love for travel. ... Read More
New Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Centre flags possible tax evasion as Indian funds in Swiss banks triple to Rs 38,000 crore
Amid reports that Indian funds in Swiss banks tripled to Rs 38,000 crore in 2024, the Centre said it is closely monitoring possible tax evasion, leveraging various information exchange mechanisms with Switzerland on foreign assets and income. In a statement issued on Friday, the finance ministry said that India regularly receives information about such foreign accounts and assets from 100+ tax jurisdictions, including Switzerland. It further said that Switzerland has been providing annual financial information about Indian residents since 2018 under the Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) framework. The first data transmission to Indian authorities occurred in September 2019, and the exchange has continued regularly since then, covering even those accounts suspected of involvement in financial irregularities. According to a Swiss National Bank report, money parked by Indians in Swiss banks more than tripled in 2024, reaching 3.54 billion Swiss francs, or Rs 37,600 crore. Elaborating the mechanism to check tax evasion, the finance ministry has said that the tax department regularly undertakes a systematic review of data so received and identifies taxpayers, whose cases require further verification.
The Hindu
19 minutes ago
- The Hindu
I-T Dept's data analysis has nudged taxpayers to declare ₹30,298 crore of foreign assets, income
The Income Tax Department's efforts to match data obtained from other countries, including Switzerland, with income tax returns (ITRs) filed in India has resulted in taxpayers reporting additional foreign assets worth ₹29,208 crore and additional foreign income of ₹1,089.88 crore, the government said. In a statement issued on Friday evening, the Ministry of Finance also sought to address some allegations on social media that the black money of Indians stored in Swiss banks had ballooned. 'Some media reports have suggested that money deposited in bank accounts of Indian entities in Switzerland has increased,' the statement noted. 'It is reported that the data pertains to different types of funds, including deposits from enterprises, banks and individuals.' It added that Switzerland has been providing India annual financial information about Indian residents under the Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) agreement signed by the two countries. The first such data transmission was in 2019 and has 'continued regularly' since then, 'covering even those accounts suspected of involvement in financial irregularities'. On the basis of such information received from other countries, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) undertakes a review of the data and identifies taxpayers whose cases require 'further verification', the statement added. 'For AY 2024-25 (FY 2023-24), CBDT compared the data shared under AEOI with the information about foreign assets and income filed in the ITRs by the taxpayers, for the purpose of verification,' the statement said. 'The analysis covered all jurisdictions, including Switzerland.' Following this, SMSs and emails were sent to various taxpayers whose foreign assets and incomes were not reported in the correct schedules of the ITRs asking them to review their returns. 'As a result, a total of 24,678 taxpayers reviewed their ITRs and 5,483 taxpayers filed their belated return for the A.Y.2024-25, reporting foreign assets valuing to Rs. 29,208 crores and additional income of Rs.1,089.88 crores as foreign income,' the statement said. 'Suitable action under the extant provision of law is under consideration for non-responsive taxpayers,' it added.
