Porsche Drops Truth Bomb on U.S. Production Plans Amid Tariff Negotiations

Porsche Drops Truth Bomb on U.S. Production Plans Amid Tariff Negotiations originally appeared on Autoblog.
Porsche has dismissed a Bloomberg report stating that the automaker is considering moving some of its final assembly to the U.S. to ease tariff impacts. The initial report referenced Porsche possibly installing interior components or fitting tires in the U.S., where it currently has no production presence. Instead, Porsche restated its stance from April that U.S. production localization doesn't make financial sense due to its relatively low sales volume.
In April, Porsche CFO Jochen Breckner added that U.S. localization wouldn't occur even if the automaker partnered with another brand from its parent company, Volkswagen Group. Still, Volkswagen Group is seriously considering expanding its U.S. manufacturing footprint with another one of its subsidiaries, Audi. An Audi spokesperson reportedly told Automotive News 'We want to increase our presence in the U.S.,' while adding that the company is confident it'll finalize specific details with Volkswagen Group by the year's end. Volkswagen currently operates one U.S. plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and its competitors, BMW and Mercedes-Benz, have factories in Spartanburg, South Carolina, and Tuscaloosa, Alabama, respectively.
Porsche's problems in 2025 aren't limited to U.S. tariffs. During Q1, the brand's sales fell 42% in China. Four years ago, Porsche achieved its highest annual sales in China, at 95,671. Chinese consumers are gravitating away from Porsche and turning to newer companies like Xiaomi and BYD's high-end Yangwang brand. Xiaomi's first model, the electric SU7 sport sedan, thrived in China with its Porsche-inspired styling available at a lower price. The $72,591 Xiaomi SU7 Ultra variant with 1,548 horsepower received about 10,000 pre-orders in two hours, slightly exceeding Porsche's Q1 China sales this year. Porsche CEO Oliver Blume said, 'We don't care about the volume,' and that the company was more concerned with keeping its prices at a high level, 'appropriate for Porsche,' Reuters reports. However, Blume also told Porsche investors at the company's annual conference on May 21: 'Our market in China has literally collapsed,' according to The New York Times.
Last month, Porsche delayed its all-electric versions of the 718 Boxster and Cayman for the second time, citing difficulty sourcing the models' high-performance battery cells. In April, Porsche said drivers could expect the two electric vehicles (EVs) in 2026, but its most recent delay pushes the release to at least 2027. Porsche has scaled back its financial outlook for 2025 by about 2 billion euros ($2.28 billion), with an expected profit margin range decline of between 6.5% and 8.5% from 10% to 12%.
Oliver Blume's desire to maintain Porsche's prices and keep the company's production out of the U.S. makes it likely that the automaker will raise its lineup's costs. Blume, who is also Volkswagen Group's CEO, confirmed he spoke directly to the U.S. commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, in Washington, D.C., but agreed with Lutnick to keep the conversation's details confidential. However, Porsche is far from the only company that could increase prices because of tariffs, and some of Volkswagen Group's other subsidiaries, such as Audi, can ease tariff impacts with increased U.S. manufacturing. Porsche's approach is more likely to hurt the company in its second-largest market, China, as the country's electric vehicle price war heats up.
Porsche Drops Truth Bomb on U.S. Production Plans Amid Tariff Negotiations first appeared on Autoblog on Jun 11, 2025
This story was originally reported by Autoblog on Jun 11, 2025, where it first appeared.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CNBC

2 hours ago

• CNBC

U.S. calls on China to prevent Iran from closing Strait of Hormuz and disrupting global oil flows

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday called for China to prevent Iran from closing the Strait of Hormuz, one of the most important trade routes for crude oil in the world. "I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil," Rubio said in an interview on Fox News. China is Iran's most important oil customer and maintains friendly relations with the Islamic Republic. Iran's foreign minister warned earlier Sunday that the Islamic Republic "reserves all options to defend its sovereignty," after the U.S. bombed three key nuclear sites over the weekend. Iranian state-owned media, meanwhile, reported that Iran's parliament backed closing the Strait of Hormuz, citing a senior lawmaker. However, the final decision to close the strait lies with Iran's national security council, according to the report. An attempt to block the narrow waterway between Iran and Oman could have profound consequences for the global economy. Some 20 million barrels per day of crude oil, or 20% of global consumption, flowed through the strait in 2024, according to the Energy Information Administration. Oil prices could shoot above $100 per barrel if the strait is closed for a prolonged period, according to Goldman Sachs and consulting firm Rapidan Energy. Iran is the third-largest oil producer in OPEC, pumping 3.3 million barrels per day. The Islamic Republic exports at least 1.6 million bpd, with nearly 80% sold to China, according to the EIA. Rubio said it would be "economic suicide" for Iran to close the strait. "We retain options to deal with that," the U.S. secretary of state said. "It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours," Rubio said. "It would be, I think, a massive escalation that would merit a response, not just by us, but from others." The U.S. Fifth Fleet is stationed in Bahrain and tasked with protecting maritime trade in the Persian Gulf. Oil market participants generally believe the U.S. Navy would swiftly vanquish any attempt by Iran to block the Strait of Hormuz. But some analysts warn that the market is underestimating the risk. "They could disrupt, in our view, shipping through Hormuz by a lot longer than the market thinks," said Bob McNally, founder of Rapidan Energy and former energy advisor to President George W. Bush. Shipping could be interrupted for weeks or months, McNally said, rather than the oil market's view that the U.S. Navy would resolve the situation in hours or days. "It would not be a cakewalk," McNally told CNBC.

Business Upturn

4 hours ago

• Business Upturn

NSSC DEADLINE TUESDAY: ROSEN, RECOGNIZED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages NAPCO Security Technologies, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important June 24 Deadline in Securities Class Action

NEW YORK, June 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of NAPCO Security Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: NSSC) between February 5, 2024 and February 3, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'), of the important June 24, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased NAPCO securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the NAPCO class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than June 24, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements. Specifically, they created the false impression that they possessed reliable information pertaining to NAPCO's projected revenue outlook and anticipated growth while also minimizing risk from seasonality and macroeconomic fluctuations. In truth, NAPCO's optimistic margin growth goals and demand reassurances for NAPCO's hardware sales fell short of reality; NAPCO was simply not equipped to adequately forecast demand for its products or otherwise minimized the impact of potential demand fluctuations to continue to promote its lofty margin projections which relied upon continually increased sales volumes. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the NAPCO class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ——————————- Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected]

Miami Herald

5 hours ago

• Miami Herald

Porsche's $290K Collector Car Just Had a Very Human Error

Launched in 2023 to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the legendary 911, the Porsche 911 S/T is one of the most exclusive modern Porsches ever built. With just 1,963 units produced – a nod to the model's debut year – the S/T is a purist's and collector's dream. It pairs the 911 GT3 RS engine with a six-speed manual transmission, and thanks to weight-saving measures, it stands as one of the lightest 911s of the 992 generation. Its base price of $290,000 didn't stop well-heeled collectors from optioning theirs up well past that mark. For collectors, part of the appeal lies in the limited-run serial plaque that comes with each unit, serving as a tangible reminder of exclusivity. But that sense of uniqueness has been shaken after a pair of 911 S/Ts were spotted online – both bearing the same production number: 1,724 of 1,963. Located in Guatemala, one of the cars was finished in Shore Blue launch. It was shared on an enthusiast Instagram page nearly a year ago, clearly showing its dash badge. The second car, a Sonderwunsch commission in a custom Rose Red finish, recently appeared at a German Porsche dealership. In a video, its badge also reads "1,724 of 1,963." Porsche has confirmed the manufacturing glitch in a statement to CarBuzz. A representative from the brand confirmed that the duplication of the plaques was an accident. The automaker also assured that it is now working with the customer with the incorrect plaque. However, it was not confirmed which of the two 911 S/Ts had the wrong identifier. While unusual, the good news is that the mix-up seems confined to the serial number plaque, which is just a cosmetic feature. Both vehicles still retain their unique VINs, which are the actual legal identifiers for the cars. In all likelihood, the problem stems from a simple assembly line or parts inventory error. Still, when it comes to highly personalized cars like the 911 S/T, especially ones involving Porsche's bespoke Sonderwunsch program, a duplicated plaque is the sort of detail that makes owners raise an eyebrow, even if it doesn't affect the car's mechanical integrity or value. Manufacturing mistakes aren't new, even for brands with reputations as sterling as Porsche's. From misapplied badges to much more serious issues like powertrain defects or faulty airbags, human error is part of production reality. In this case, the error is largely harmless – an amusing footnote in the car's history rather than a safety concern. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.