US decision to resettle Afrikaner refugees is ‘misinformed', says Cabinet
The Minister in the Presidency says South Africa is 'not worried' about the meeting scheduled between President Cyril Ramaphosa and US President Donald Trump next week, saying it is 'confident that the invitation comes from a good place'.
Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni says the Cabinet considers the US' decision to grant refugee status to a group of 59 Afrikaners is 'misinformed'.
Speaking to reporters at a post-Cabinet meeting press conference on Thursday, 15 May, Ntshavheni said: 'The decision by the United States to confer refugee status to a group of Afrikaner South Africans is misinformed, as they do not fit the definition of refugees as set out in the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol.
'Cabinet further reiterated that allegations of discrimination are unfounded and do not meet the threshold of persecution required under domestic and refugee law.'
The first group of white Afrikaners claiming to have faced persecution in South Africa who have been granted refugee status by the US arrived in Washington on Monday, 12 May.
Their arrival follows an executive order signed by US President Donald Trump in February, in which he authorised his administration to 'prioritise' the admission and resettlement of Afrikaners in the US 'who are victims of unjust racial discrimination'.
In the weeks that followed, the Trump administration deployed teams to Pretoria to screen white South Africans for consideration, studying more than 8,000 requests from people expressing interest in becoming refugees and eventually identifying 100 Afrikaners who could possibly be approved, according to a New York Times report.
As Cabinet, we express the view that there are no refugees – they do not meet the criteria for refugee status, there is no violence against farmers.
Welcoming the 'refugees' on Monday evening, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau claimed that they had been 'living under a shadow of violence and terror' in South Africa.
Pretoria has repeatedly denied that Afrikaners face persecution in South Africa. As International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola and others have stated, there is no evidence that white farmers are being singled out for murder.
Trump's accusations that their land is being confiscated followed the recent passage of the Expropriation Act, which allows the government to expropriate land without compensation in some circumstances, Daily Maverick reported.
But so far the Act has not been used.
Trump's allegations of a 'genocide' against white farmers in South Africa are not borne out by the data either.
'Moreover, the South African Police Service statistics on farm-related crimes do not support allegations of violent crime or genocide targeted at farmers generally or any race group,' Ntshavheni told repoters.
The minister in the Presidency was unable to answer questions from reporters on when the next group of 'refugees' would be leaving South Africa, saying: 'It's not our job to be briefing on when they're moving. You must go to Mr Kallie Kriel and his AfriForum and Solidary… for those updates.
'Our job is just to make sure when they leave, they don't leave any debt; they don't leave any crime in the country. And we all know that the reasons that they are leaving are not true. As Cabinet, we express the view that there are no refugees – they do not meet the criteria for refugee status, there is no violence against farmers,' she said.
Ntshavheni questioned how many of the 59 refugees were actually farmers.
Ramaphosa's working visit to the US
The arrival of the 'refugees' in America and the continued deterioration of diplomatic relations between South Africa and the US comes as President Cyril Ramaphosa is expected to visit the US next week, between 19 and 22 May.
Ramaphosa is expected to meet Trump at the White House on Wednesday, 21 May, to discuss 'bilateral, regional and global issues of interest', his office said this week.
While Ramaphosa is expected to pitch a trade deal to Trump, Ntshavheni was scant on the details of this potential package and who would be part of Ramaphosa's delegation in Washington.
There is no one who invites a guest to mistreat them, so we are expecting the highest level of decorum and necessary protocols to be afforded.
'But as the President has indicated, there will be a deal that we will offer, we will negotiate a package and that package will also be beneficial to South Africa,' she said. 'We cannot work against the interest of South Africa and its people.'
Fielding questions on whether the government is worried about the visit after confrontations between Trump and other state leaders in recent months – most notably the disastrous meeting between the US president and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in February – Ntshavehni said: 'We are not worried.'
She confirmed that Ramaphosa had been invited by Trump, and said the government is 'confident that the invitation comes from a good place' with the intention to engage and clarify.
'We expect very cordial discussions, and as I've said previously, it doesn't mean there will not be differences,' she said.
'There is no one who invites a guest to mistreat them, so we are expecting the highest level of decorum and necessary protocols to be afforded. It doesn't mean we'll agree on all matters – we'll differ. But we believe that our relationship with the US is mutually beneficial.'
US bans agencies from working on G20
On Wednesday, the Washington Post reported that the White House National Security Council has ordered US agencies and departments to cease work on South Africa's G20, citing two people familiar with the issue.
The move follows Trump and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's public statements to boycott the summit in November over the claims that land is being expropriated under the Expropriation Act.
In a press conference on Monday, Trump said he didn't know how he could attend the G20 summit, which South Africa is hosting in Johannesburg in November, 'unless that situation is taken care of'.
Ntshavheni said the government had not received any official communication that the US would stop its involvement in South Africa's G20 processes.
'We've got sous sherpas and sherpas that that information would've come through. We have not received any communication from the US administration about such a ban – we are reading it from the media like everybody else. There has not been any official communication to ourselves,' she said. DM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
Abrego Garcia ordered released pending trial on migrant smuggling charges
A US judge on Sunday ordered Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the migrant returned to the US earlier this month after being wrongfully deported to his native El Salvador, released on bail pending his criminal trial on migrant smuggling charges. However, the decision by US magistrate judge Barbara Holmes in Nashville, Tennessee does not necessarily mean Abrego, as he prefers to be known, will go home to his family. The judge had acknowledged at a June 13 court hearing that Abrego was likely to be placed in immigration detention even if he is released. Abrego, a Maryland resident whose wife and young child are US citizens, was deported on March 15 to El Salvador, despite a 2019 immigration court ruling that he not be sent there because he could be persecuted by gangs. Officials called his removal an 'administrative error', but for months said they could not bring him back. Critics of US President Donald Trump pointed to Abrego's case as evidence his administration was prioritising increased deportations over due process, the bedrock principle people in the US, whether citizens or not, can contest governmental actions against them in the courts. Trump, who has pledged to crack down on illegal immigration, said Abrego belongs to the MS-13 gang, an accusation his lawyers deny. The justice department brought Abrego back to the US on June 6 after earlier securing an indictment charging him with working with at least five co-conspirators as part of a smuggling ring to bring immigrants to the US illegally. Prosecutors said Abrego, 29, picked up migrants from the US-Mexico border more than 100 times, and transported firearms and drugs. Abrego has pleaded not guilty. His lawyers said the Trump administration brought the charges to cover up their violations of Abrego's rights, and said the alleged co-conspirators cooperating with prosecutors should not be trusted because they are seeking relief from deportation and criminal charges of their own. In her ruling on Sunday, Holmes said the government failed to show Abrego posed a danger to the community or was unlikely to appear in court, scheduling a hearing for Wednesday. In a separate civil case, Greenbelt, Maryland-based US district judge Paula Xinis is investigating whether the Trump administration violated her order to facilitate Abrego's return from El Salvador. The US Supreme Court unanimously upheld the order.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Political leaders demand stricter laws for whistle-blower safety
There is a need for laws that protect whistle-blowers. Image: Meta AI World Whistle-blowers Day on June 23 is dedicated to raising awareness about the crucial role that whistleblowers play in exposing wrongdoing and promoting transparency. THERE have been heightened calls for the Government of National Unity (GNU) to provide better protection to whistle-blowers. During a recent mini-plenary session, members of parliament (MP) from various political parties debated the need for strengthening whistle-blower protection by enacting robust laws that guarantee anonymity, job security, and legal support for individuals who reported corruption. Visvin Reddy, an uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party member of parliament, said they tackled corruption head on. 'We don't silence whistle-blowers. We protect them because in a country drowning in lies, the person who tells the truth is the bravest one of all. I will say this loud and clear, if Babita Deokaran had spoken out under an MK government, she would still be alive today. She would be protected, not hunted; celebrated not assassinated; and the people stealing from our people, they would be behind bars, and not behind desks.' Reddy said those who spoke the truth, faced losing their jobs or lives. 'Take Babita for example, she worked in the Gauteng health department. She saw money meant for hospitals and nurses being looted through dodgy PPE tenders. She did the right thing and what did she get? She was killed in front of her home. The big fish behind it, where are they? They are still free. 'There are officials in licensing departments who are watching bribes being taken daily. There are municipal officials who see tenders given to cronies while people go without water. They stay silent because they know the risk. Over 10 years, the AG (Auditor General) has flagged billions in corruption. That's why the MK Party says enough is enough. We are not here to protect the corrupt. We are here to protect the brave souls who speak up,' he said. Reddy said there was a need for laws that protected whistle-blowers, guarantee anonymity and job safety, provide legal support and emergency relocation if needed. 'We propose a whistle-blower protection act, an independent whistleblower agency, a national whistle-blower heroes fund and jail time for leaking a whistle-blower's identity. All whistle-blower reports need to be automatically investigated by a corruption unit free from political interference. Let us honour Babita and let us protect the next brave voice. This is not about politics; this is about the soul of our nation,' he said. Dereleen James, an ActionSA MP said: 'If the GNU even cared one iota about protecting whistle-blowers they would have done it by now. If they were remotely serious about strengthening protections for the brave South Africans who risk everything to expose corruption then the Zondo Commission's recommendations would not be gathering dust three years later. Untouched, unimplemented and just forgotten.' She said the GNU was not a unity of purpose. 'It's a coalition of coverups and the so-called progressive. The GNU does not want to protect whistle-blowers because they are protecting themselves. They drag their feet on funding the NPA because they are terrified of being prosecuted. They do not want to fight corruption because they are corrupt. The GNU does not want justice, they want silence. Silence from Babita Deokaran, silence from every South African who dares speak the truth. 'Well not on our watch. This is why ActionSA will be introducing a Zero Tolerance Corruption Bill to take on public enemy number one which is corruption. The bill is a warning shot to every crooked politician who thinks they will be shuffled from one coy cozy position to the next. We are coming for you. To every official who thinks that looting the State can be followed by a quiet retirement or diplomatic posting, your time is up. The bill will ensure that anyone convicted of corruption will never hold public office again. Once you break the bond of public trust, you are out forever. 'We will be introducing whistle-blowers rewards based on international best practice. If the State won't protect whistle-blowers, then let us do so. We will give whistle-blowers the means, the safety and the legal support they need to come forward and take down the syndicates that have embedded themselves at the heart of government. The truth is, the GNU is not a solution to our crisis, it is the crisis. The so-called progressive caucus is not a solution. They are the wolves eyeing the sheep and ActionSA will not sit quietly while South Africans are expected to accept corruption that goes unpunished,' she said. Glynnis Breytenbach, a Democratic Alliance MP said: 'In this country are at a crossroads in democracy. One where the integrity of our institutions, the trust of our citizens and the sanctity of our constitutional values are under immense strain.' She said the matter of whistle-blower protection in South Africa was an issue not only of legal and administrative reform, but of moral imperative. 'Whistle-blowers play an important role in our society. They are not saboteurs, they are not enemies of the state, they are brave men and women who often at great personal cost shine a light on corruption, maladministration, abuse of power and gross human rights violations. They are guardians of public interest, uncompensated sentinels of our democracy. 'Whistle-blowers act in the spirit of Section 195 of our Constitution which enshrines principles of transparency, accountability and good governance. They ensure that State power is exercised lawfully, ethically and in the service of the people. When they step forward to expose wrongdoing they are often met not with gratitude or protection but with intimidation, harassment, unemployment isolation and in far too many cases, death,' she said. Breytenbach said that the current state of whistle-blower protection in South Africa was inadequate and incoherent. 'The main legislative instrument, the Protected Disclosures Act (PDA) was a progressive step forward at the time of its enactment. But over two decades later it has not evolved sufficiently to address the sophisticated threats whistle-blowers face today. The act applies primarily to employees in the workplace context. It does not extend adequately to contractors, consultants, volunteers or community members who may witness corruption or wrongdoing. 'The PDA offers no proactive physical protection or financial support. It only provides post-op remedies which are often difficult, expensive and time consuming to pursue. No independent whistle-blower protection authority exists. Oversight is fragmented across the public protector the SAPS, the Hawks and other bodies, none of which are solely or effectively tasked with whistle-blower protection. As a result many whistleblowers have had their identities leaked often by those entrusted with their safety. 'One of the proposals is a private bill which is being prepared by the DA to be introduced in the near future. We must always remember the words of Archbishop Desmond Tutu, who said, 'If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor'. I urge this parliament to act boldly, decisively and immediately. Let us institutionalise the values of our constitution. We should not wait for another name to be added to the tragic lists of those betrayed by the very system they try to save,' she said. Marlon Daniels, a Patriotic Alliance MP, said whistle-blowers, who had the courage to expose corruption often at great personal risk are not just informants. 'They are patriots. They are defenders of justice and deserve our full protection. If the information they provide us is factual, if it exposes the fraud or abuse of power then we must stand with them without any hesitation.' Daniels said whistle-blowers also played a critical role in holding the powerful accountable. 'Without whistle-blowers, State capture would have remained hidden. Billions of taxpayers money would still be looted with impunity and public trust in government would be completely eroded. Yet, what happens to those who speak out? They face intimidation, job losses and even threats to their lives. This is unacceptable. If we are serious about fighting corruption we must ensure that those who expose it are protected and not persecuted. 'We demand robust whistle-blower protection laws that guarantee anonymity. Whistle-blowers must be able to report corruption without fear of exposure. No individual should also lose their livelihood for doing the right thing and as far as legal support goes, the State must provide legal defense to whistle-blowers against frivolous lawsuits or retaliation. 'South Africa is at a crossroads. We can either side with those who steal from the poor or we can stand with the brave men and women who risk everything to expose the truth. The Patriotic Alliance chooses the side of justice. If South Africa is to be saved from corruption we must empower the whistle-blower. Let us pass these laws and defend the brave. Let us rebuild this nation,' he said. THE POST
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Floyd Shivambu party‘unlikely to take wings'
Analysts say Floyd Shivambu's party is unlikely to gain the popularity of the EFF and MK party. Former uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party secretary-general Floyd Shivambu's plan to launch a new political party may bring him some support, but it won't have the mass appeal of the EFF, let alone MK, according to experts. They believe Shivambu is not as populist or charismatic as EFF leader Julius Malema or former president and MK leader Jacob Zuma, whose parties are the fourth- and third-largest parties in the country, respectively. Rather, they say, Shivambu is a thinker and strategist who is skilled at working behind the scenes, but not a front-line leader. Shivambu, was removed as secretary-general by Zuma on the pretext that he would be redeployed to the National Assembly, but was subsequently excluded from the list of nine party members to be sworn in as MPs this week. ALSO READ: Floyd Shivambu not on list of MK party members going to parliament Some regard his removal as 'constructive dismissal' and part of Zuma's revenge after Shivambu led an EFF campaign against state capture in which Zuma was a prime suspect. They said his sidelining indicates that in the ongoing public spat between Shivambu and Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla, Zuma has chosen his daughter's side because 'blood is thicker than water'. This is despite the fact that Zuma had earlier condemned Zuma-Sambudla's behaviour towards Shivambu and forced her to make a public apology to him or face disciplinary action. ALSO READ: Shivambu makes public appeal for progressive volunteers Independent political analyst Sandile Swana said: 'I don't see Shivambu's party becoming bigger than the EFF. Of course, there will be people who will move from MK and elsewhere to join Floyd. 'He will get a measure of support, but probably his ambition is to lead the country. That is not going to happen,' Swana said. Another independent analyst Goodenough Mashego said as someone who is not a populist or a great orator, Shivambu would not be able to attract members. 'To put it bluntly, there is no space for whatever Floyd is trying to start. There is no vacuum that Floyd is going to fill,' he said. ALSO READ: Shivambu says money stolen from MK party – and he won't resign Shivambu announced last week that he would establish a political party although he remained an MK member. He said he would undertake a consultation process, including listening to different stakeholders before launching the party. Mashego said Shivambu might face an ideological dilemma as a leftist in trying to appeal to a cross-section of the audience as many South Africans are centrist and want centrist policies. In light of the global outlook, such an approach would make him unpopular with investors and the international community. Shivambu is also an avowed Lennist-Marxist scholar. NOW READ: Does South Africa need a political party led by Floyd Shivambu?
