In U.S. retreat from global media, Arab language network is latest casualty

The message was contrite but direct. 'I'm heartbroken. If you're receiving this letter, I'm letting you go — effective immediately.'
The email came from Jeffrey Gedmin, head of Middle East Broadcasting Networks,or MBN, the nonprofit overseeing the U.S.-government-funded, Arab-language news channel Alhurra.
It was April 12, and the email in the inbox of 500 of Alhurra's employees was another move by the Trump administration and its Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency to shut down U.S.-funded media initiatives abroad. Alhurra, which received around $112 million in 2024 from Congress, joined other state-supported outlets, including Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, which had their funding frozen.
Done in DOGE's chainsaw-signature style, the cuts have disrupted the lives of journalists both in Alhurra's Middle Eastern bureaus and its Virginia headquarters, leaving them with no severance or compensation. Dozens who had permits to work in the U.S. are unsure if they can remain in America.
When news about Alhurra filtered out — along with talk that even MBN might shut down — many observers saw it as an own goal, a misguided rollback of U.S. soft power in the Middle East.
The Committee to Protect Journalists, which is helping MBN with legal representation to restore its funding, called the cutbacks "a betrayal of the U.S.'s historical commitment to press freedom."
In a statement, Gedmin said, 'Media in the Middle East thrive on a diet of anti-Americanism. It makes no sense to kill MBN as a sensible alternative and open the field to American adversaries and Islamic extremists.'
But interviews with critics — including many from Alhurra and MBN's own ranks — reveal a more complicated story.
Though many insist they believe in MBN's mission to bring a pro-American perspective to the region, few mourn it in its current form. Others say Alhurra withered under an unclear mandate that never allowed the channel to find its identity and therefore audiences.
Some even agreed with Kari Lake, the pugnacious advisor Trump appointed to oversee the Agency for Global Media, which provides funding for news programming abroad. Lake recently described her new workplace as 'irretrievably broken,' where 'waste, fraud and abuse run rampant.'
'It was a relief to me when the grant was canceled because I didn't want my taxes, as little as they are, contributing to somebody's six-figure income that sucks in their work,' said a former employee who was involved in reviewing MBN's finances and who left last May. 'We didn't have to scratch very deep. We were finding things that were very disturbing."
Like many interviewed for this article, the former employee refused to have his name used to avoid reprisals. He accused MBN management of entering into needless, multimillion-dollar expansions of bureaus that went wildly over budget, all amid a culture of cronyism that often left the wrong people in place for too long.
The April firings continued a downsizing that began in September, when Congress mandated a $20-million cut to MBN's budget, forcing management to fire 160 employees and merge Alhurra with its Iraq-focused satellite news channel, Alhurra Iraq. In March, though Congress had approved MBN's budget through the end of the 2025 fiscal year, Lake blocked the disbursement to MBN a few hours later.
'I'm left to conclude that she is deliberately starving us of the money we need to pay you, our dedicated and hard-working staff,' he said in the email. Along with Alhurra, MBN supports other news outlets.
Rather than shut down and declare bankruptcy, Gedmin decided to keep Alhurra on-air with a truncated schedule — mostly broadcasting evergreen content and reruns — and a skeleton staff of 30 to 50 people. It was a gamble, Gedmin said in an interview this week, that would 'buy time for the courts.'
'If we win this in court and eventually have funding, we would pay some severance and restore some staff,' Gedmin said.
Read more: Trump signs executive order directing federal funding cuts to PBS and NPR
Susan Baumel, a former interview producer at MBN, said in an article published on the National Press Club website last month she and her colleagues were fired before the courts decided if the Trump administration acted legally, unlike staff at other U.S.-funded outlets which were put on leave.
(On Tuesday, a federal judge ordered the administration to release $12 million it had cut from Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. The administration, he ruled, could not unilaterally revoke funding approved by Congress.)
An email sent in March from a former employee in the finance department to top management which was reviewed by The Times said MBN had $8 million in its accounts, including $4.7 million that could have been used to cover unused annual leave and partial severance. The employee also wonders why some bureaus continued to operate despite loss of funding. By April, according to a WhatsApp conservation between former employees reviewed by The Times, the balance had fallen to $4.2 million.
MBN leadership, including Gedmin and the MBN board chair, former Ambassador Ryan Crocker, insist the networks will pay annual leave and end-of-service to all employees terminated last month.
Many of those laid off resent the decision to continue broadcasting, saying Gedmin knew Lake was unwilling to deal with current management, and that he and his colleagues should have stepped down weeks earlier.
'I consider that the money they used to continue [operating] was supposed to be for us, and we were neglected and our professional life destroyed so they could keep on broadcasting,' said one correspondent who worked in the Beirut bureau for six years. 'We weren't given a safe exit, to have one or two months to search for a new job. We were thrown out on the street — that's how I see it.'
Another correspondent who worked with Alhurra Iraq since 2008 characterized the firings differently.
MBN managers "basically took us as hostages so they could face the Trump administration,' he said.
Meanwhile, around 40 Alhurra employees in the U.S. on work visas must leave the country before May 12. All U.S.-based staff lost healthcare benefits at the end of April.
When President George W. Bush began Alhurra in 2004, he said it would "cut through the barriers of hateful propaganda" and act as a counterweight to what U.S. officials considered the pernicious coverage of Al Jazeera.
But launched one year after the disastrous invasion of Iraq, it faced an uphill battle.
"It was tainted, in the first place, as the mouthpiece of the American administration, placed before audiences that are already skeptical of political affiliations of any media,' said Zahera Harb, an expert on Arab media at City University in London.
'The idea you can win hearts and minds through propaganda and information by telling people how good the U.S. is — it was never going to work,' said Shibley Telhami, a University of Maryland professor and an Arab polling data expert.
'It was not a main source of news," said Telhami, who served on a Bush-era commission evaluating Alhurra's performance. "Our research showed that less than 2% of people watched it. And that's probably charitable.'
MBN claims Alhurra and its other outlets reach a combined 33.5 million people per week, but a 2023 study from the University of San Diego's Center for Public Diplomacy found that it never exceeded 27 million weekly views for the last decade.
The same study found Alhurra's share of adult Arab audiences shrank by half, from 17% in 2005 to 8.8% in 2022.
At the same time, complaints of corruption have long dogged the network. A 2009 ProPublica investigation found much of the hiring based on cronyism and office politics rather than on qualifications — a scenario all former employees interviewed for this article say still persists.
Alhurra is subject to the same forces afflicting all TV networks, with audiences increasingly finding their news on TikTok and YouTube. But even during big news events, including the war in Gaza, Alhurra live broadcasts never managed more than 167 viewers, said one former employee in the Dubai bureau.
'And 100 of those screens are people inside our studios. So who is really watching you, 20, 25 people?' she said. 'And that's probably the censors.'
Read more: Between censorship and chaos: Syrian artists wary of new regime
Gedmin, who became interim head of MBN last April and took the reins in October, acknowledges MBN's defects, but said he believed the networks were on the path to a turnaround before Lake's intervention.
None of the former employees interviewed had faith MBN's current leadership could improve.
Others question the very premise of a government-funded channel being independent.
James O'Shea, who served as chairman of MBN's board between 2022 until 2024, said, "One of the things I walked away with is I don't know if you can do this with government.'
O'Shea, a former editor of The Times, remembered how at one news meeting, Alhurra journalists were chastised for talking to Hamas representatives, because such interviews drew the ire of congressional officials.
'You can't ignore a major part of the story. Alhurra was set up to be independent, but it wasn't,' he said. He added that the 'tragedy' of Alhurra was that 'an Arabic-language news operation, with an objective, journalistic voice is really needed in the region.'
"The best thing you can do is promote the American kind of journalism: Not controlled by any government, and which adheres to the principles of the 1st Amendment."
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CNBC

27 minutes ago

• CNBC

Bank of America bets on ‘outsized price movements' in Australia's bond market as investors rotate away from the U.S.

As international investors pivot out of the U.S., another part of the world — and its bond market in particular — is gaining attention, according to Bank of America. The analysts pointed to Australia's bond market as potential beneficiary of the dollar losing its safe haven status. Dedollarization Market volatility under U.S. President Donald Trump's presidency has led some investors to diversify to other markets in 2025. Trump's controversial trade policies sparked a "Sell America" trade earlier this year that raised questions about dedollarization as investors cashed out of U.S. Treasurys, Wall Street stocks and the greenback. The U.S. dollar index , which measures the greenback against a basket of major rivals, is down 9% so far this year. .DXY YTD mountain Price of the U.S. dollar index so far this year. In a note on Wednesday, FX strategists at Bank of America forecast significant price moves ahead for Australian sovereign debt, in part because of the dedollarization trend. They suggested the country's fixed income market could see an inflow of capital as U.S.-focused positions were reassessed — but noted that even a modest rotation out of U.S. dollar-denominated assets had the potential to "overwhelm AUD fixed-income and [lead to] outsized price movements." In its most recent Global Fund Managers Survey, published last week, Bank of America found that fund managers were the most underweight on the U.S. dollar then they have ever been in 20 years. One in five of the 222 fund managers — who collectively manage assets worth $587 billion — polled this month said they saw a short U.S. dollar position as the most crowded trade. "High-frequency data" suggests foreign and official demand for the Australian dollar may be "intensifying," BofA's Oliver Levingston, Adarsh Sinha and Janice Xue said in a Wednesday note. 'Major impact' on pricing "For small fixed-income markets like Australia's, a modest rotation out of USD assets could have a major impact on market pricing," they added. "Dedollarization was a major theme on our trip to the United States and Canada, and we continue to highlight the significant impact small shifts in global fund managers' asset allocations could have on the demand profile for AUD fixed income." So far this year, the yield on Australia's benchmark 10-year government bond has cooled slightly to around 4.24%. On Friday, the yield gained 1 basis point. Bond prices and yields move in opposite directions, and 1 basis equals 0.01%. Comparatively, the yield on the benchmark U.S. 10-year Treasury was last trading at around 4.43% — giving the two assets a spread of 19 basis points. AU10Y US10Y YTD line The chart shows the yield on the Australian 10 year government bond versus the U.S. 10 year Treasury. Bank of America's strategists said they expected that spread to widen further in the coming years, as demand for Australian sovereign debt surged. Noting that the bonds were "highly sensitive to shifts in global reserve manager demand," they forecast that demand would exceed supply by 2027/28. "We recommend going long spreads and see AU 10y bonds trading 75bps rich vs USTs … by end-'26," they wrote. A wider spread of 75 basis points would imply stronger Australian bond prices relative to U.S. Treasurys. 'Peripheral dollar bloc assets' Part of the appeal, according to Levingston, Sinha and Xue, is rising demand for what they referred to as "peripheral dollar bloc assets." Over the past decade, the share of official reserves — that is, assets held by central banks — denominated in Australian dollars has doubled, they said. Another 1-percentage-point gain in global reserve demand would translate to 185% of net supply of Australian sovereign bonds in the current fiscal year, they added. Conversely, demand for U.S. Treasurys — historically seen as a safe investment in times of macroeconomic or geopolitical turmoil — has been shaky this year. In the aftermath of Trump's so-called "liberation day" tariffs announcement, U.S. Treasurys sold off , pushing yields — representative of government borrowing costs — higher, and prices of the bonds lower. "Coupled with tailwinds from Australian superannuation [pension] funds' rapidly growing footprint in AUD fixed-income markets and potential bank deregulation, the demand profile for AUD fixed income looks robust," BofA's Levingston, Sinha and Xue said in their note. "In our view, AUD bonds' high sensitivity to small shifts in global reserve demand for AUD assets has not been priced. On a comparative international basis, AUD term premium looks excessively high."

Newsweek

27 minutes ago

• Newsweek

Russia Responds To US Strikes, Will Hold Direct Talks With Iran

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Russian government on Sunday "strongly condemned" the United States' strikes the day before against three key Iranian nuclear facilities and is preparing to hold direct talks with Iranian officials to address the fallout. Why It Matters Trump on Saturday evening announced what he described as a "very successful attack" against three Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. U.S. officials said the attacks caused severe damage, but questions remain about the full extent of the damage and how much of a setback it is for Iran's nuclear program. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised the Trump administration for taking an offensive position in the conflict, which Israeli officials have strongly advocated for since Israel first ignited the war on June 13. The Israelis said the U.S. should strike Iran's nuclear facilities because Tehran was getting close to developing a nuclear weapon. Iran denies the charge, saying its nuclear program is for civilian purposes. Iran vowed to retaliate after Saturday's strikes, accusing the U.S. of crossing "a very big red line" with its decision to pummel the three nuclear sites with 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs. What To Know "It is already clear that a dangerous escalation has begun, fraught with further undermining of regional and global security," the Russian foreign ministry said in a statement addressing the U.S.'s strikes. "The risk of the conflict spreading in the Middle East, which is already gripped by multiple crises, has increased significantly." Russia also called the strikes "irresponsible" and a "gross violation of international law." Iran and Russia will hold talks in the aftermath of the U.S. strikes and Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said hours after the attacks that he will travel to Moscow while emphasizing Iran's "strategic partnership" with Russia. A top Russian official and close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin also skewered Trump on social media after he announced the U.S.'s strikes, which hit Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. "The US is now entangled in a new conflict, with prospects of a ground operation looming on the horizon," Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, wrote in a thread on X (formerly Twitter). Medvedev went on to praise Iran's "political regime," saying it "survived" the strikes and "in all likelihood, has come out even stronger." "Donald Trump, once hailed as 'president of peace,' has now pushed the US into another war," Medvedev wrote, taunting Trump. The vast majority of countries around the world oppose the actions of Israel and the United States." "At this rate, Trump can forget about the Nobel Peace Prize — not even with how rigged it has become," he added. "What a way to kick things off, Mr. President. Congratulations!" Trump, for his part, said on social media after that if Iran retaliated against the U.S., it would "BE MET WITH FORCE FAR GREATER THAN WHAT WAS WITNESSED TONIGHT." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

Chicago Tribune

29 minutes ago

• Chicago Tribune

President Donald Trump's go-it-alone strategy on Iran risks dividing an already split Congress

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's decision to launch a military strike on Iran's nuclear sites without fully consulting the U.S. Congress layered a partisan approach onto a risky action, particularly because the White House briefed top Republican leaders beforehand without doing the same for Democrats. While House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Republican leader John Thune and the GOP chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee were all briefed before the action, their counterparts were not. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer was given a perfunctory heads-up by the White House shortly before the strikes were made public. And House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries' office received a 'courtesy call' before Trump announced it. The so-called Gang of Eight congressional and intelligence leaders were not notified before the mission, according to two people familiar with the situation and granted anonymity to discuss it. One, Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said he learned of the strikes on social media, which he said 'is an uncomfortable thing for the ranking member of the Intelligence Committee.' 'Bad enough that we weren't informed,' Himes, of Connecticut, said Sunday on CNN, 'but unconstitutional that we didn't have the opportunity to debate and speak, as the representatives of the people, on what is one of the more consequential foreign policy things that this country has done in a long time.' It's a highly unusual situation that is complicating the difficult politics ahead for the president and his party as the U.S. enters an uncertain national security era with the surprise military attack on the nuclear facilities, an unprecedented incursion in Iran. Trump faces a vote in Congress as soon as this week on a war powers resolution from Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., that would 'direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.' Another resolution has been introduced by lawmakers from both parties in the U.S. House. And at least one Democrat, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, said Trump's actions are 'clearly grounds for impeachment.' At the same time, the Trump administration is expecting Congress to send an additional $350 billion in national security funds as part of the president's big tax breaks bill also heading soon for a vote. Senators are set to be briefed Tuesday behind closed doors on the situation in Iran. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Sunday that the White House made 'bipartisan courtesy calls' to congressional leadership. She said in a social media post that the White House spoke to Schumer 'before the strike' but that House leader Jeffries 'could not be reached until after, but he was briefed.' While the president has authority as the commander in chief of the U.S. armed forces to order specific military actions, any prolonged war-time footing would traditionally need authorization from Congress. The House and Senate authorized actions in Iraq, Afghanistan and beyond after the Sept. 11, 2001, attack. 'Congress should be consulted,' Kaine said on CBS' 'Face the Nation.' 'We were not.' As soon as Trump announced the actions late Saturday, he won swift support from the GOP leadership in Congress. Johnson, Thune and the Senate Intelligence Committee chairman, Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, were all briefed ahead of time and sent almost simultaneous statements backing the military campaign, as did the House Intelligence Committee chairman, Rep. Rick Crawford, also of Arkansas. But by apparently engaging with only one side of the political aisle, Trump risks saddling his Republican Party with political ownership of the military action against Iran, which may or may not prove popular with Americans. Rather than rally the country to his side, Trump risks cleaving its already deep divisions over his second term agenda. Johnson, who praised Trump's action against Iran as 'the right call,' said the president's targeted strike was within his authority and in line with past presidential actions. 'Leaders in Congress were aware of the urgency of this situation and the Commander-in-Chief evaluated that the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act,' Johnson, R-La., said on social media. Trump himself has shown little patience for political dissent from within his party, even as criticism rolls in from among his most trusted backers. The Iran military campaign threatens to splinter Trump's Make America Great Again movement, which powered his return to the White House. Many Trump supporters aligned with his campaign promises not to involve the United States in overseas actions and instead to be a peace-making president. 'I think I represent part of the coalition that elected Trump,' said Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., on CBS. 'We were tired of endless wars in the Middle East.' Massie and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California have introduced their own war powers resolution in the House, a sign of how close the far left and far right have bonded over their opposition to U.S. campaigns abroad, particularly in the Middle East. The Trump administration insisted Sunday the U.S. is not seeking a war with Iran. 'We're not at war with Iran. We're at war with Iran's nuclear program,' said Vice President JD Vance on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' And Trump swiftly attacked Massie, who is one of the most steadfast non-interventionist GOP lawmakers in Congress — along with Sen. Rand Paul, also of Kentucky — and the president suggested he would turn his Republican Party against the congressman. 'MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER, Tom Massie, like the plague!' the president said on social media. 'The good news is that we will have a wonderful American Patriot running against him in the Republican Primary, and I'll be out in Kentucky campaigning really hard.'