Tech execs are joining the Army — no grueling boot camp required
Four top tech execs from OpenAI, Meta, and Palantir have just joined the US Army — no obstacle courses, shouted orders, or grueling marches required.
The Army Reserve has commissioned these senior tech leaders to serve as mid-level officers, skipping tradition to pursue transformation. The newcomers won't attend any current version of the military's most basic and ingrained rite of passage— boot camp.
Instead, they'll be ushered in through express training Army leaders are still hashing out, said Col. Dave Butler, a spokesman to the Chief of Staff of the Army, in a phone interview with Business Insider.
"They'll do marksmanship training, physical training, they'll learn the Army rank structure and history, and uniforms," Butler explained. Of the boot camp-lite plans, "you could think of it as a pilot," he said, adding that the new soldiers are a part of the Army's larger effort to rapidly modernize.
The execs — Shyam Sankar, chief technology officer for Palantir; Andrew Bosworth, chief technology officer of Meta; Kevin Weil, chief product officer at OpenAI; and Bob McGrew, advisor at Thinking Machines Lab and former chief research officer for OpenAI — are joining the Army as lieutenant colonels, according to an Army press statement as part of an effort to turbocharge tech innovation and adoption.
The service's decision to allow the four to skip "direct commissioning" boot camp, a shortened version of regular officer boot camp, is unusual, though not without historical precedence, Butler said.
"The Army has allowed the direct commission of civilians since 1861 to bring experts with critically needed skills into the force," he wrote in an email to BI.
William Atterbury, the president of the American Railway Association, received a direct commission into the Army in 1917 and served as the director-general of transportation for Allied Expeditionary Forces in France.
Other notable examples include the president of the Columbia Gas and Electric Corporation of New York, Edward Reynolds, who commissioned as an Army colonel to serve as chief of the Medical Supply Service during World War II, and General Motors leader, William Knudsen, who direct commissioned as a lieutenant general and became the director of production for the War Department.
The new tech lieutenant colonels will have to adhere to Army standards, Butler said, and will be expected to perform the service's annual fitness test to stay in good standing. They will spend around two weeks per year working, roughly the minimum required for military reservists.
The name of their unit, "Detachment 201" is named for the "201" status code generated when a new resource is created for Hyper Text Transfer Protocols in internet coding, Butler explained.
"In this role they will work on targeted projects to help guide rapid and scalable tech solutions to complex problems," read an Army press release. "By bringing private-sector know-how into uniform, Det. 201 is supercharging efforts like the Army Transformation Initiative, which aims to make the force leaner, smarter, and more lethal."
Lethality, a vague Pentagon buzzword, has been at the heart of the massive modernization and transformation effort the Army is undergoing to build a force that is capable of fighting and winning 21st-century conflicts.
The Army isn't currently planning a second wave of direct commission industry leaders and still has to get these new additions through an express version of basic training, though more similar iterations are expected down the road, Butler said, noting increased interest from other private sector leaders.
It is common for the services to bring aboard officers at mid-level ranks — the vast majority of military officers join as second lieutenants, or at the rank of O-1. Historically, chaplains, veterinarians, and medical providers have been allowed to join the Army at slightly higher ranks. Other recent initiatives allow for a wider variety of commissions for highly skilled civilian workers from tech and cyber sectors, in some cases up to the rank of colonel, one level below a general.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bernstein SocGen Lifts MSFT Target to $540 on AI-Driven Cloud Outlook
Bernstein SocGen has raised its price target on Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) to $540 from $520, and kept an Outperform rating for the stock a couple of weeks ago. Shares are trading at $477, near their 52-week high, with a market cap of $3.55 trillion. The firm sees longer-term upside tied to Microsoft's partnership with OpenAI. If OpenAI's roadmap unfolds as projected, Azure stands to capture a sizable share of the resulting demand, particularly in cloud infrastructure. Bernstein believes this could materially boost Microsoft's top line by 2029–2030. Image by Tawanda Razika from Pixabay To account for this, the analysts raised their revenue forecast for FY27 and increased earnings estimates for FY26 and FY27. They've also bumped Microsoft's valuation multiple from 28.5x to 29.5x. Most of the expected gains fall outside the near-term forecast window, but the analysts argue the long-range potential is strong enough to justify the upward adjustment. Azure's position in the AI supply chain remains central to that view. While we acknowledge the potential of MSFT as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Adobe brings AI-image generation app to phones, adds partners
(Corrects paragraphs 2-4 to reflect that new partner models are not yet available on the Firefly mobile app) By Stephen Nellis SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -Adobe Inc. released its first dedicated artificial intelligence smartphone app on Tuesday that includes AI models from the company and partner firms, in a bid to tap into a growing trend of sharing AI images and videos over social media. The new Firefly mobile app packages Adobe's own AI model together with models from OpenAI and Google and is available on iOS and Android phones. In addition, Adobe is integrating models from new partner firms Ideogram, Luma AI, Pika and Runway, which can be accessed in Firefly Boards, a product that is part of the Firefly web app. Generating images that can easily be shared on social media has become a key driver of AI interest, with OpenAI's Ghibli-style AI images driving record traffic to the ChatGPT creator. Adobe's mobile service will offer subscribers unlimited basic image generation from Adobe models, while it will charge extra for access to the company's premium models and those from its partners. The subscription cost will be the same as for the web versions of Firefly, which start at $10 per month. The San Jose, California-based company had earlier released AI tools along with the mobile app version of its popular image-editing program Photoshop. Adobe has not disclosed how much it pays the partner models on the Firefly app. The company had promised users that its AI model is trained only on material that it has a legal right to use, with Adobe offering protection against copyright claims. Ely Greenfield, Adobe's chief technology officer for digital media, said Adobe's approach has also gained some resonance among consumers. "Even for many of our individual customers, that promise of the commercial safety and the story about how Firefly is trained continues to be a really important differentiator," Greenfield said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Gizmodo
3 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Reddit Looks to Get in Bed With Altman's Creepy ‘World ID' Orbs for User Verification
Gaze into the Orb if you want your upvotes. According to a report from Semafor, Reddit is actively considering partnering with World ID, the verification system co-founded by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, to perform user verification on its platform. Per the report, Reddit's potential partnership with World ID would allow users to verify that they are human by staring into one of World ID's eye-scanning orbs. Once confirmed to be a real person, users would be able to continue using Reddit without revealing anything about their identity. Currently, Reddit only does verification via email, which has been insufficient to combat the litany of incoming AI-powered bots that are flooding the platform. Gizmodo reached out to both Reddit and World ID for details of the potential partnership. Reddit declined to comment. A spokesperson for World said, 'We don't have anything to share at this time; however, we do see value in proof of human being a key part of online experiences, including social, and welcome all of the opportunities possible to discuss this technology with potential partners.' For those unfamiliar, World is somewhere between a verification system and a crypto scheme. World ID is a method for verifying that a person is a human without requiring them to provide additional personal information—something the company calls 'anonymous proof of human.' It offers several verification techniques, but the most notable is its eye-scanning Orb. The company claims that neither 'verification data, nor iris photos or iris codes' are ever revealed, but going through the scan gets you a World ID, which can be used on a platform like Reddit, should it partner with World on this endeavor. Somewhere in the backend of this whole thing is a cryptocurrency called Worldcoin, which you theoretically can use at major retailers—but like, can you really? Is anyone doing that? The founders of World, Altman and Alex Bania, launched the crypto part of the program with the intention of building an 'AI-funded' universal basic income. Mostly, it's made local governments really mad and has been at the center of legal and regulatory investigations into how it's handling user data. It's largely targeted developing nations for its early launches, and used some dubious practices along the way to get people to demo the system. Also, it's probably not technically illegal, but it does seem pretty convenient that Sam Altman offers a 'solve' for a problem that his other company, OpenAI, is in no small part responsible for. Almost seems like he knew what issues he was about to cause and decided to cash in on both ends. Must be nice.
