![[Kim Seong-kon] Out of the 'Badlands' and into a 'Dreamland'](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F04%2F22%2Fnews-p.v1.20250422.0d5720d5208f4101b308cab5d1b3b203_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
[Kim Seong-kon] Out of the 'Badlands' and into a 'Dreamland'
These days, we are witnessing some extraordinary global crises: territorial disputes, trade wars and ideological clashes. Many of us are worried about severe inflation and the sharp increase in prices. Others are concerned about the worldwide decline of democracy and the prospect of Orwellian societies looming everywhere. Suffice to say, many of us feel that our future has become nebulous and grim.
Recently, I watched a television drama that mirrors our present and foretells our possible future. It was a 2015 American TV series titled 'Into the Badlands,' a futuristic, post-apocalyptic drama that depicts the world five hundred years from now after it is completely ruined by war. The narrator says, 'They destroyed themselves because they had no way to control the power they unleashed.' In the drama, human beings have degenerated into primitive tribes who fight with swords and crossbows.
In a territory called the Badlands, several feudal states have developed, ruled by tyrannical barons. People there live in an authoritarian society that demands absolute loyalty to their baron, who seeks total power and control. Among the states, there are endless territorial disputes, trade wars over drugs and fuel, and ideological conflicts. Naturally, the states are divided by an 'us and them' mentality of antagonism toward one another. 'The Badlands' presciently depicts the predicament of our world today.
The Widow, one of the barons, leads an antifeudal campaign and opens her territory as a sanctuary for escapees from other states. To accomplish her grand cause, however, she cannot avoid battles with other barons and thus causes many warriors to die. Then one day, she wonders, 'I told myself it was for the greater good. But what if it wasn't? What if I've become the monster I swore to defend them from?'
Our ideologically oriented politicians should ask themselves the same question, because they do not seem to hesitate to sacrifice others for their ideologies, which they believe are for the 'greater good.' They also believe 'the ends justify the means' and that collateral damage is inevitable in the pursuit of a grand cause. Such firm convictions eventually lead to a self-righteousness that makes them believe they are always right, whatever they do. Indeed, when fighting a tyrant, it is easy to become a tyrant oneself.
In "Badlands," there are those who have dark energy inside them that turns them into black-eyed, ferocious killing machines when they get angry or see their own blood spilled. Blinded by hate, they attack others in madness. Naturally, the barons want to use these people as lethal weapons to win wars with other states. Originally, this ability was considered a 'gift' for healing the injured, but they mistook it for a tool for revenge. In our real world, we can also find people who become easily enraged and vengeful when provoked or offended. Such extremists are prone to manipulation by belligerent politicians.
The Totemists and some other people in the Badlands believe there is a utopian city called Azra outside the Badlands. Thus, they set out on a journey to find the mythical city. Their leader is a pseudoreligious man called the Pilgrim, who is, in fact, another self-righteous, power-wielding tyrant who pretends that he is both God and the Messiah. He calls himself a liberator and savior, while condemning others as 'heretics.'
He does not tolerate differences and kills those who do not believe in him. Under the pretext of rebuilding the lost utopian city, he and his black-eyed warriors attack the Badlands and massacre innocent people. His religion has become a dogmatic ideology. The Pilgrim reminds us of some of our political leaders whose ideologies have become religions to them.
The series illustrates that choosing the wrong leader destroys not only our lives but also our country. The wrong leader can be either an autocratic tyrant or a phony preacher who deludes himself that he can resuscitate an already failed and obsolete ideology that he believes will save the world. Both will take us down the wrong path, and we all will have to suffer the consequences.
In 'Badlands,' people do not welcome pregnancy because they see a bleak future. However, the Widow, who is pregnant, decides to give birth to her baby because 'children can be a new beginning.' Sagely, she says, 'We should teach our children not to make the same mistakes we made.'
These days, the world seems to be turning into the Badlands. Young people are reluctant to have children because of the uncertain future, and their elders either hate and fight one another out of prejudice or join the 'panic buying' madness, worrying about drastic rises in prices. As a result, we feel that we are going through another pandemic frenzy. Indeed, fears, ideologies and racial biases in our world are as contagious and harmful as the COVID-19 virus. Nevertheless, we will overcome this crisis, too -- and prevail. We should build a Dreamland for our children, instead of stumbling mindlessly into the nightmarish Badlands.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
12 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Here's how Iran could retaliate after US strikes on its nuclear program
Iran has spent decades building multi-tiered military capabilities at home and across the region that were at least partly aimed at deterring the United States from attacking it. By entering Israel's war, the US may have removed the last rationale for holding them in reserve. Thet could mean a wave of attacks on US forces in the Middle East , an attempt to close a key bottleneck for global oil supplies or a dash to develop a nuclear weapon with what remains of Iran's disputed program after American strikes on three key sites. A decision to retaliate against the US and its regional allies would give Iran a far larger target bank and one that is much closer than Israel, allowing it to potentially use its missiles and drones to greater effect. The US and Israel have far superior capabilities, but those haven't always proven decisive in America's recent history of military interventions in the region. Ever since Israel started the war with a suprise bombardment of Iran's military and nuclear sites on June 13, Iranian officials from the supreme leader on down have warned the US to stay out, saying it would have dire consequences for the entire region. It should soon be clear whether those were empty threats or a grim forecast. Here's a look at what Iran's next move might be. The Strait of Hormuz is the narrow mouth of the Persian Gulf, through which some 20 percent of all oil traded globally passes, and at its narrowest point it is just 33 kilometers (21 miles) wide. Any disruption there could send oil prices soaring worldwide and hit American pocketbooks. Iran boasts a fleet of fast-attack boats and thousands of naval mines that could potentially make the strait impassable, at least for a time. It could also fire missiles from its long Persian Gulf shore, as its allies, Yemen's Houthi rebels, have done in the Red Sea. The US, with its 5th Fleet stationed in nearby Bahrain, has long pledged to uphold freedom of navigation in the strait and would respond with far superior forces. But even a relatively brief firefight could paralyze shipping traffic and spook investors, causing oil prices to spike and generating international pressure for a ceasefire. The US has tens of thousands of troops stationed in the region, including at permanent bases in Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, Arab Gulf countries just across the Persian Gulf from Iran — and much closer than Israel. Those bases boast the same kinds of sophisticated air defenses as Israel, but would have much less warning time before waves of missiles or swarms of armed drones. And even Israel, which is several hundred kilometers (miles) further away, has been unable to stop all of the incoming fire . Iran could also choose to attack key oil and gas facilities in those countries with the goal of exacting a higher price for US involvement in the war. A drone attack on two major oil sites in Saudi Arabia in 2019 — claimed by the Houthis but widely blamed on Iran — briefly cut the kingdom's oil production in half . Iran's so-called Axis of Resistance — a network of militant groups across the Middle East, is a shadow of what it was before the war ignited by Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel out of the Gaza Strip — but it still has some formidable capabilities. Israel's 20-month war in Gaza has severely diminished the Palestinian Hamas and Islamic Jihad groups, and Israel mauled Lebanon's Hezbollah last fall, killing most of its top leadership and devastating much of southern Lebanon, making its involvement unlikely. But Iran could still call on the Houthis, who had threatened to resume their attacks in the Red Sea if the US entered the war, and allied militias in Iraq. Both have drone and missile capabilities that would allow them to target the United States and its allies. Iran could also seek to respond through militant attacks further afield, as it is widely accused of doing in the 1990s with an attack on a Jewish community center in Argentina that was blamed on Iran and Hezbollah . It could be days or weeks before the full impact of the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites is known. But experts have long warned that even joint US and Israeli strikes would only delay Iran's ability to develop a weapon, not eliminate it. That's because Iran has dispersed its program across the country to several sites, including hardened, underground facilities. Iran would likely struggle to repair or reconstitute its nuclear program while Israeli and US warplanes are circling overhead. But it could still decide to fully end its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency and abandon the the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. North Korea announced its withdrawal from the treaty in 2003 and tested a nuclear weapon three years later, but it had the freedom to develop its program without punishing airstrikes. Iran insists its program is peaceful, though it is the only non-nuclear-armed state to enrich uranium up to 60 percent, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90 percent. US intelligence agencies and the IAEA assess Iran hasn't had an organized military nuclear program since 2003.


Korea Herald
13 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Mahmoud Khalil vows to continue protesting Israel
NEWARK, New Jersey (AP) — A Palestinian activist who was detained for more than three months pushed his infant son's stroller with one hand and cheered as he was welcomed home Saturday by supporters including US Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Mahmoud Khalil greeted friends and spoke briefly to reporters at New Jersey's Newark International Airport a day after leaving a federal immigration facility in Louisiana. A former Columbia University graduate student and symbol of President Donald Trump 's clampdown on campus protests, he vowed to continue protesting Israel and the war in Gaza. "The US government is funding this genocide, and Columbia University is investing in this genocide," he said. "This is why I will continue to protest with every one of you. Not only if they threaten me with detention. Even if they would kill me, I would still speak up for Palestine." Joining Khalil at the airport, Ocasio-Cortez said his detention violated the First Amendment and was "an affront to every American." "He has been accused, baselessly, of horrific allegations simply because the Trump administration and our overall establishment disagrees with his political speech," she said. "The Trump administration knows that they are waging a losing legal battle," Ocasio-Cortez added. "They are violating the law, and they know that they are violating the law." Khalil, a 30-year-old legal resident whose wife gave birth during his 104 days of detention, said he also will speak up for the immigrants he left behind in the detention center. "Whether you are a citizen, an immigrant, anyone in this land, you're not illegal. That doesn't make you less of a human," he said. Khalil was not accused of breaking any laws during the protests at Columbia. However the administration has said noncitizens who participate in such demonstrations should be expelled from the country for expressing views it considers to be antisemitic and "pro-Hamas," referring to the Palestinian militant group that attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Khalil was released after US District Judge Michael Farbiarz said it would be "highly, highly unusual" for the government to continue detaining a legal resident who was unlikely to flee and had not been accused of any violence. The government filed notice Friday evening that it was appealing Khalil's release.


Korea Herald
13 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Belarus frees dissident Siarhei Tsikhanouski and 13 others after a rare visit from top US envoy
TALLINN, Estonia (AP) — Belarus has freed Siarhei Tsikhanouski, a key dissident figure and the husband of exiled opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, and 13 others following a rare visit by a senior US official, Tsikhanouskaya's team announced on Saturday. Tsikhanouski, a popular blogger and activist who was imprisoned in 2020, arrived in Vilnius, Lithuania, alongside 13 other political prisoners, his wife's team said. The release came just hours after Belarusian authorities announced that authoritarian President Alexander Lukashenko met with US President Donald Trump's envoy for Ukraine in Minsk. Keith Kellogg became the highest-ranking US official in years to visit Belarus, Moscow's close and dependent ally. A video published on Tsikhanouskaya's official Telegram account showed Tsikhanouski disembarking from a white minibus, smiling broadly despite his shaved head and emaciated frame. He pulled his wife into a long embrace as their supporters applauded. "My husband is free. It's difficult to describe the joy in my heart," Tsikhanouskaya told reporters. But she added her team's work is "not finished" while over 1,100 political prisoners remain behind bars in Belarus. Tsikhanouski, known for his anti-Lukashenko slogan "stop the cockroach," was jailed after announcing plans to challenge the strongman in the 2020 election. Following his arrest, his wife ran in his stead, rallying large crowds across the country. Official results of the election handed Lukashenko his sixth term in office but were denounced by the opposition and the West as a sham. Tens of thousands of people poured into the streets in the aftermath of the August 2020 vote, in the largest protests in the country's history. In the ensuing crackdown, more than 35,000 people were detained, with many beaten by police. Prominent opposition figures either fled the country or were imprisoned. Tsikhanouski was sentenced to 19 1/2 years in prison on charges of organizing mass riots. Lukashenko has since extended his rule for a seventh term following a January 2025 election that the opposition called a farce. Since July 2024, he has pardoned nearly 300 people, including imprisoned US citizens, seeking to mend ties with the West. At the meeting in Minsk, Lukashenko hugged and warmly welcomed Kellogg and the American delegation to his residence. "I really hope that our conversation will be very sincere and open. Otherwise, what is the point of meeting? If we are clever and cunning in front of each other, we will not achieve results," Lukashenko said. "You have made a lot of noise in the world with your arrival." Lukashenko's press secretary, Natalya Eismont, told Russian state media hours later that he freed the 14 prisoners following a request from US President Donald Trump. Eismont said among those released were two Japanese nationals, three Polish nationals and two Latvians, as well as citizens of Estonia, Sweden and the United States. It was not immediately clear whether Kellogg's visit might pave the way for the lifting of some US sanctions against Minsk, imposed over the brutal crackdown against the 2020 protests and Lukashenko's support of Russia's all-out invasion of Ukraine. "Lukashenko is clearly trying to get out of international isolation, and the release of such a large group of political prisoners signals a desire to start a dialogue with the US in order to soften international sanctions," Belarusian political analyst Valery Karbalevich told The Associated Press. "After five years, Lukashenko is trying to loosen the knot with which the Kremlin tied him, using him for the war against Ukraine," Karbalevich said. Belarus has allowed the Kremlin to use its territory to send troops and weapons into Ukraine, and also to station its forces and nuclear weapons there. Released alongside Tsikhanouski was longtime Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty correspondent Ihar Karnei, the US government-funded broadcaster confirmed. Karnei, who had also worked with prominent Belarusian and Russian newspapers, had been serving a three-year service on extremism charges he rejected as a sham. "The release was a big surprise for me," Karnei told AP in a phone interview Saturday. "I didn't believe it until the very end, but now I understand that other political prisoners deserve the same." He said that he spent about six months in solitary confinement. "Most people suffer simply for their beliefs and do not deserve these terrible conditions and terms," Karnei said. RFE/RL's Belarusian service had been designated extremist in the country, a common label handed to anyone who criticizes Lukashenko's government. As a result, working for it or spreading its content has become a criminal offense. "We are deeply grateful to President Trump for securing the release of this brave journalist, who suffered at the hands of the Belarusian authorities," the broadcaster's CEO Stephen Capus said Saturday in a press release. Karnei was detained several times while covering the 2020 protests. Unlike many of his colleagues, he chose to stay in Belarus despite the ensuing repression. He was arrested again in July 2023, as police raided his apartment seizing phones and computers. The group Reporters Without Borders says Belarus is Europe's leading jailer of journalists. At least 40 are serving long prison sentences, according to the independent Belarusian Association of Journalists. Many face beatings, poor medical care and the inability to contact lawyers or relatives, according to activists and former inmates. Belarus also freed an Estonian national who had set up an NGO to raise funds for Belarusian refugees. According to the Estonian Foreign Ministry, Allan Roio was detained last January, and sentenced to 6 1/2 years in prison on charges of establishing an extremist organization. Many other prominent dissidents still languish in Belarusian jails, among them Nobel Peace Prize winner Ales Bialiatski, a human rights advocate serving a 10-year prison sentence on charges widely denounced as politically motivated. Bialiatski, founder of Viasna, Belarus' oldest and most prominent rights group, was arrested in 2021 during raids by the country's main security agency that still goes by its Soviet-era name, the KGB. In March 2023, he was convicted on charges of smuggling and financing actions that "grossly violated public order," and sentenced to 10 years. Authorities labeled him especially dangerous because of alleged "extremist" tendencies. He, his family and supporters say the charges against him are politically motivated, and a UN panel of human rights experts called on Belarus to release him. In 2022, when Bialiatski was behind bars, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize along with the prominent Russian rights group Memorial and Ukraine's Center for Civil Liberties. Bialiatski has been serving his sentence at a penal colony for repeat offenders in the city of Gorki. The facility is notorious for beatings and hard labor. Bialiatski's wife warned last year about his deteriorating health, saying the 62-year-old battles multiple chronic illnesses. Also behind bars is Viktor Babaryka, a former banker who was widely seen in 2020 as Lukashenko's main electoral rival, and Maria Kolesnikova, a close ally of Tsikhanouskaya and charismatic leader of that year's mass protests. With her close-cropped hair and trademark gesture of forming her hands into the shape of a heart, Kolesnikova became an even greater symbol of resistance when Belarusian authorities tried to deport her. She responded by tearing up her passport at the border and walking back into Belarus.