GOP lawmaker criticizes Trump's military parade: 'Never liked the idea'

"I grew up in the 70s and 80s, and the only parades I can remember are Soviet parades for the most part, or North Korean parades. And the parades I remember from our history were different," he said, referencing the iconic photograph of a sailor kissing a woman in New York City's Times Square at the end of World War II.
"We were rejoicing the end of war and we were rejoicing our soldiers coming home, and that absolutely ought to be commemorated...but we never glorified weapons so much. And I know he means well. I don't think he means for any of this to be depicted in another fashion, but I'm just not a big fan," Paul added.
Paul also knocked the cost of the parade. "We're $2 trillion in the hole and just an additional cost like this, I'm not for it," he said.
An Army estimate for its commemoration totaled $40 million, USA TODAY previously reported.
Trump defended his decision to stage the parade, saying in remarks on June 14 that, "Every other country celebrates their victories. It's about time America did, too."
It's not the first time Paul has bucked Trump in recent weeks. He's also voiced opposition to the president's sweeping tax and domestic policy bill, arguing that it would only balloon the country's budget deficit.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that it would add roughly $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. The legislation would also have major impacts on Medicaid, taxes, food programs and more.
Paul told Welker that he spoke with Trump on June 14 after the parade, and he's not an "absolute no" on Trump's bill. "I don't have as much trouble with the tax cuts. I think there should be more spending cuts. But if they want my vote, they'll have to negotiate," he said.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Times

2 hours ago

• Times

Pakistan to recommend Donald Trump for Nobel peace prize

Pakistan has announced that it will formally recommend President Trump as a nominee for the Nobel peace prize for his 'great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship' in securing a ceasefire its recent conflict with India. The announcement came on Saturday, hours after Trump took credit for a peace deal negotiated in Washington between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda, and at a time the US leader is considering potential intervention in the Middle East. • US moves B-2 stealth bombers as Israel-Iran conflict continues 'The government of Pakistan has decided to formally recommend President Donald J Trump for the 2026 Nobel peace prize,' the Pakistani government wrote on social media. It said the decision was taken 'in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis'. It comes after Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, had an unprecedented one-on-one meeting with Trump on Wednesday at the White House, during which they engaged in discussions for more than two hours. Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the media wing of the Pakistan Armed Forces, reported that Munir conveyed his 'deep appreciation' for Trump's role in brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after a four-day conflict in May between the two nuclear-armed nations. Last month, Trump recounted his memory of the conflict while speaking to reporters. 'I said, 'Come on, we're going to do a lot of trade with you guys [India and Pakistan]. Let's stop it. Let's stop it. If you stop it, we'll do a trade. If you don't stop it, we're not going to do any trade.'' India, meanwhile, denied that the US president had any role in its ceasefire with Pakistan. 'The talks regarding cessation of military action were held directly between India and Pakistan under the existing channels established between both militaries,' India's foreign secretary, Vikram Misri, said in a press release on Wednesday. Some analysts have said Pakistan's nomination is absurd. Maleeha Lodhi, a former Pakistani ambassador to the US and UN, said: 'Ingratiation cannot serve as policy. It is unfortunate that the government is recommending Trump for a Nobel peace prize. 'A man who has backed Israel's genocidal war in Gaza and called Israel's attack on Iran as 'excellent'. This move does not reflect the views of the people of Pakistan.' Despite concerns in Washington about Pakistan's close alignment with Beijing, Pakistan remains significant to the US. Islamabad has not alleviated these worries, particularly as it seeks new deals for advanced weaponry and technology from China, its primary arms supplier. Amit Ranjan, a research fellow at the Institute of South Asian Studies at the National University of Singapore, told The Sunday Times: 'Trump's lunch with Field Marshal Munir suggests a growing closeness between Pakistan and the US. However, the nature of this relationship will depend on how China looks at it. 'The nomination is Pakistan's way to thank Trump for his role in the ceasefire during military confrontation with India.' Pakistan has had a complicated security relationship with the US, collaborating with Washington while also supporting militants opposing Nato forces in Afghanistan. General Michael Kurilla, the head of US Central Command, recently commended Pakistan's military, describing their collaboration as a 'phenomenal partnership' in the fight against Afghanistan-based militant Islamist group Isis-K. Trump expressed gratitude to Pakistan for handing over an Isis-K member suspected of involvement in a bombing that killed 13 American troops during the withdrawal from Afghanistan. In the past, Trump has received several Nobel peace prize nominations from his supporters, and is said to crave the award. However, on Friday he posted on social media to lament he will probably never win the accolade. 'No, I won't get a Nobel peace prize no matter what I do … whatever those outcomes may be, but the people know, and that's all that matters to me!' he wrote.

Metro

2 hours ago

• Metro

British man arrested on suspicion of terror offences near vital UK airbase

A British man has been arrested on suspicion of espionage and terrorism offences in Cyprus. The man is reported to have kept the RAF Akrotiri base on the island under surveillance and is alleged to have links with Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. RAF Akrotiri is the UK's most important airbase for operations in the Middle East. Local media reported the man was arrested on Friday following intelligence that he was planning an imminent terrorist attack. He is alleged to have lived in a flat in Zakai, Limassol, close to Akrotiri and was observed near the base carrying a camera with a long lens and three mobile phones. Local reports suggested he was Azerbaijani, but the UK Foreign Office said they were working with the authorities over the arrest of a Briton. A Foreign Office spokesman said: 'We are in contact with the authorities in Cyprus regarding the arrest of a British man.' His arrest comes amid heightened tensions between Iran and Israel, as both countries have fired missiles at each other for well over a week now. Today, Israel's military said it struck an Iranian nuclear research facility overnight and killed three senior Iranian commanders in targeted attacks as the war between the two nations continued into a second week. The prospect of a wider war is threatened too, as Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen said they would resume attacks on US vessels and warships in the Red Sea if the Trump administration joins Israel's military campaign against Iran. The Houthis had paused such attacks in May as part of a deal with the administration. Early on Saturday, smoke could be seen rising from an area near a mountain in Isfahan, where a local official said Israel had attacked the nuclear research facility in two waves. The target was two centrifuge production sites, and the attacks came on top of strikes on other centrifuge production sites elsewhere in recent days, according to an Israeli military official speaking on condition of anonymity under army guidelines to brief reporters. It was the second attack on Isfahan, which was hit in the first 24 hours of the war as part of Israel's goal to destroy the Iranian nuclear programme. Akbar Salehi, Isfahan province's deputy governor for security affairs, confirmed the Israeli strikes had caused damage to the facility, but said there had been no human casualties. Iran launched a new wave of drones and missiles at Israel, but there were no immediate reports of significant damage, and the Israeli official called it a 'small barrage' that was largely intercepted by Israel's defences. The official said part of the reason that Iran's overnight attack had been relatively small was that the military had been targeting its launchers, and estimates it has now taken out more than 50% of them. 'We've been able to take out a large amount of their launchers, creating a bottleneck – we're making it harder for them to fire toward Israel,' he said. 'Having said all that, I want to say the Iranian regime obviously still has capabilities.' More Trending US President Donald Trump is still weighing active US military involvement in the war but, on Saturday, Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said, 'I think that it would be very, very dangerous for everyone.' He spoke on the sidelines of an Organisation of Islamic Cooperation meeting in Turkey. Barring a commando raid or even a nuclear strike, Iran's underground Fordo uranium enrichment facility is considered out of reach to all but America's 'bunker-buster' bombs. Trump said he would put off his decision on military involvement for up to two weeks. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Suspected terrorist arrested for 'plotting attack on British military base' MORE: Pro-Palestine group that broke into RAF base 'will be banned in the UK' MORE: Donald Trump's hand mark and 'cover up' raises concerns again

NBC News

3 hours ago

• NBC News

Columbia student Mahmoud Khalil returns home to New York area

Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia University student released after more than three months in ICE detention, arrived in the New York metropolitan area on Saturday. Immigration authorities had arrested Khalil, 30, in March at the university housing complex where he lived in New York City. He was quickly transported thousands of miles away to a detention center in Louisiana, where he spent the last few months. His unprecedented detention has sparked national outrage. Further fueling the controversy, Khalil's American wife gave birth to the couple's first son in April while he remained behind bars. Upon his release in Louisiana on Friday, Khalil addressed reporters briefly, saying he was excited to return to New York City and see his family. 'Although justice prevailed,' he said upon his release, 'it's long, very long overdue. And this shouldn't have taken three months.' 'Trump and his administration, they chose the wrong person for this,' he added. 'That doesn't mean that there is a right person for this. There's no right person who should be detained for actually protesting a genocide, for protesting their university, Columbia University.' Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin on Friday denounced the judicial order freeing Khalil and the judge who issued it. 'This is yet another example of how out of control members of the judicial branch are undermining national security,' McLaughlin said in a statement. 'Their conduct not only denies the result of the 2024 election, it also does great harm to our constitutional system by undermining public confidence in the courts.' The Trump administration claimed it had the authority to detain and deport the pro-Palestinian student activist, arguing that his presence in the U.S. threatened national security. Another charge against Khalil alleges that he omitted details about his work history and membership in organizations on his permanent residency application. The government cited an obscure provision in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 that gives Secretary of State Marco Rubio authority to 'personally determine' whether a foreign national can remain in the U.S. on national security grounds. An NBC News review of more than 100 pages of court filings found that prosecutors relied on unverified tabloid reports and anecdotal claims, raising doubts about the strength of their case for deporting Khalil. Less than 10 minutes after Khalil, who has no criminal history, was released from the detention center in Jena, Louisiana, the Trump administration filed a notice of appeal. Khalil helped lead student protests over the war in Gaza and negotiations with university officials at Columbia last year. The protests at the Ivy League school gripped national headlines for weeks and inspired similar demonstrations at universities around the world. Some Jewish students at universities across the U.S. reported antisemitic incidents as the protest movement gained traction. Khalil was the first of several foreign academics apprehended by immigration authorities in the first months of Trump's second term. Tufts University student Rümeysa Öztürk, a doctoral candidate from Turkey, was arrested outside her home in Somerville, Massachusetts, by immigration authorities on March 25. Viral street footage of her arrest showed Department of Homeland Security officials dressed in plain clothes surrounding Öztürk, grabbing her by the wrists and escorting her into an unmarked vehicle. Mohsen Mahdawi, a 34-year-old graduate student at Columbia who was born in the West Bank, was apprehended by immigration authorities during his naturalization interview in Vermont. Federal judges also ordered the release of both Öztürk and Mahdawi in recent weeks. Other notable cases include a Georgetown University professor who was detained by ICE and later released after a judicial order, and a Brown University professor who was deported to Lebanon.