Live updates: Attack on Iranian nuclear sites thrusts US into Israel-Iran conflict

Update:
Date: 8 min ago
Title: Fallout from US strikes as Israel-Iran conflict enters 11th day. Here's what you need to know
Content:
All eyes are on how Tehran will react to the US attack on three key Iranian nuclear facilities early Sunday local time, which thrust America into the Israel-Iran conflict that is entering its 11th day.
Early assessments raise questions over whether the US destroyed the bulk of the country's enriched nuclear material while President Donald Trump alluded to the possibility of regime change in Iran.
Here's what you need to know:
How will Iran respond?: Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said his country has 'a variety of options' when deciding how to respond to the US attacks. Tehran denounced the US and Israel at an emergency UN Security Council meeting and voiced skepticism about the potential for diplomacy. From striking US bases in the region, to possibly closing a key waterway – the Strait of Hormuz — to global shipping, Iran is likely mulling its next moves.
Calls for regime change: Trump floated the idea of possible of regime change in Iran in a social media post Sunday evening. 'If the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' Trump wrote. The president's post is a pivot from messaging by senior administration officials, though Trump did not specifically say the US would enact regime change.
Allied support: A number of close US allies have expressed support for America's strikes against Iran, arguing that Iran had presented a nuclear threat, but urging diplomacy and de-escalation. Others, including key partners in the Gulf, have expressed concern and dismay over the strikes. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, for example, said Monday that Iran 'cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon.'
Domestic criticism: Some lawmakers, including from usually highly opposed ends of the US political spectrum, have criticized Trump's decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities, and the move has highlighted a divide within Trump's MAGA movement. Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a staunch Trump ally, said 'This is not our fight' while Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders said, 'we cannot let history repeat itself.'
A misdirect: While the final call came Saturday as bombers were already in the air, those around Trump believed his mind had been largely made up for days regarding taking action in Iran. Trump directed staff to announce 2-week window – thinking the timeline could throw off the Iranians and conceal his plans, according to several sources familiar with what happened.
'Operation Midnight Hammer': B-2 stealth bombers dropped more than a dozen massive 'bunker-buster' bombs on Iran's Fordow and Natanz facilities, while Tomahawk missiles struck Isfahan, according to a US timeline of the attack. The strikes thrust the US into the Israel-Iran conflict, which has seen the two sides trade attacks for over a week. Top administration officials insist the US is not at war with Iran, but Trump has warned the US could launch more attacks if Tehran does not make peace.
Strikes continue: Israel launched fresh airstrikes targeting military infrastructure in western Iran's Kermanshah city, the Israeli military said Monday morning. Earlier, Iranian state affiliated media said Israel struck Parchin, a large military complex southeast of Tehran. Iran launched its own strike on Israel on Monday, firing a missile that was intercepted by Israel's air defenses.
Update:
Date: 17 min ago
Title: Israel launches strikes on Iranian military infrastructure
Content:
Israel launched fresh airstrikes targeting military infrastructure in western Iran's Kermanshah city, said the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) on Monday morning.
Earlier, Iran's state-affiliated Nour News reported that Israel had struck Parchin, a large military complex southeast of Tehran, in a strike during the early hours of Monday.
Iran launched its own strike on Israel on Monday, firing a missile that was intercepted by Israel's air defenses.
Update:
Date: 17 min ago
Title: China, the biggest buyer of Iranian oil, would be vulnerable to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz
Content:
As calls grow within Iran for closing the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation for US attacks on its nuclear sites, a key diplomatic and economic backer of Tehran would stand to lose from that decision: China.
Connecting the oil-rich Persian Gulf to the open ocean, the Strait of Hormuz is one of the most critical oil checkpoints in the world. Some 20 million barrels per day of crude oil, or 20% of the global consumption, flowed through the narrow strait between Iran and Oman last year, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA).
For China, the world's largest importer of oil and the biggest buyer of crude from Iran, the Strait of Hormuz is even more important.
China imported 5.4 million barrels of crude every day through the strait in the first three months of 2025, according to the EIA's estimates. That's equivalent to about half of China's daily average crude imports in the first quarter of the year, according to CNN's calculation based on Chinese customs data.
On Sunday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio highlighted that vulnerability when he called on China to dissuade Iran from closing the Strait of Hormuz.
'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil,' Rubio said in an interview with Fox News on Sunday, adding that closing the strait would hurt other countries' economies more than the US economy.
China remains by far Iran's largest energy buyer, though it has not reported purchases of Iranian oil in its official customs data since 2022, according to analysts. Some 90% of Iran's oil exports now go to China, according to commodities data company Kpler, providing a key lifeline to Tehran's heavily sanctioned economy.
China has condemned US attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities, saying the move 'exacerbates tensions in the Middle East.' It has not commented on the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
Update:
Date: 16 min ago
Title: Demonstrators across US protest strike on Iran
Content:
Americans in cities across the US took to the streets Sunday to protest President Donald Trump's decision to bomb nuclear sites in Iran. From Los Angeles to New York, demonstrators expressed worries about sparking a broader war and detracting from existing problems within the US.
Update:
Date: 17 min ago
Title: Why some officials raised doubts about whether a single bombing campaign can set back Iran's nuclear program
Content:
Intelligence analysts are still working to determine how much the US attacks on three key Iranian nuclear sites hindered Tehran's ability to build a nuclear weapon if it chose to.
Prior to the strikes, US intelligence officials believed Israel's extensive missile campaign against Iran, which also killed a number of top Iranian scientists, had only set back Iran by a matter of months.
And before President Donald Trump ordered the strikes, some US officials had raised doubts about whether a single bombing campaign would be able to entirely destroy Iran's nuclear program, especially at sites like Isfahan where the equipment is deeply buried.
The Trump administration has touted the strikes as an operational success but has provided few details.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine said Sunday morning it was 'way too early' to comment on whether Iran still retains some nuclear capabilities.
One key question, according to a senior US lawmaker, is whether Iran had already moved any of its highly enriched uranium stockpiles from the facilities in question by the time the US dropped bombs on them. Trump had made public he was weighing striking at least one of the sites, Fordow, and 'Iranians aren't idiots,' this person said.
But without American or allied boots on the ground to physically inspect the sites, answering that question is infinitely more difficult.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

21 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Mideast governments condemn Syria church bombing as death toll jumps to 25

DAMASCUS, Syria (AP) — The death toll from an attack on a church in Syria has gone up to 25, state media said Monday. The attack Sunday on the Mar Elias Greek Orthodox church during a Divine Liturgy in Dweil'a near Damascus was the first of its kind in Syria in years, and comes as Damascus under its de facto Islamist rule is trying to win the support of minorities. As President Ahmad al-Sharaa struggles to exert authority across the country, there have been concerns about the presence of sleeper cells of extremist groups in the war-torn country. The ministry and most witnesses said a gunman entered the church, and started firing at the people there before detonating his explosive vest. SANA, citing the Health Ministry, said 63 other people were wounded in the attack. Father Fadi Ghattas told The Associated Press after the attack that some 350 people were praying at the church. The United States, the European Union and governments across the Middle East condemned the attack, decrying it as a terrorist attack. No group immediately claimed responsibility, but the Syrian Interior Minister has blamed the extremist Islamic State group. Since the toppling of Bashar Assad and his family's decades-long dictatorial rule of Syria last December in a lightning insurgency, al-Sharaa has been pushing to win the support of Syria's non-Sunni-Muslim minority groups who are concerned about life under Islamist rule.

Bloomberg

25 minutes ago

• Bloomberg

World Braces for Iran's Response to US Attacks on Nuclear Sites

Good morning. The world braces for Iran's response after the US strikes. The State Department warns Americans to be cautious. And the Oklahoma City Thunder are NBA champions. Listen to the day's top stories. The US airstrikes on Iran set markets and governments worldwide on edge, as the Islamic Republic vowed to retaliate and Israel showed no sign of letting up. Donald Trump has threatened further military action if Tehran doesn't make peace with Israel. The fallout is just starting: the State Department issued a 'Worldwide Caution' alert for US citizens, while some airlines are canceling flights to the Persian Gulf and Japan's biggest banks are considering pulling their staff from the region. Keep up with the latest developments via our Live Blog.

Associated Press

25 minutes ago

• Associated Press

What to know about debate over protesters and ICE agents wearing masks amid immigration crackdowns

CHICAGO (AP) — President Donald Trump and his allies have repeatedly called for mask-wearing at protests to be banned and for protesters whose faces are covered to be arrested, with the most recent push following demonstrations in Los Angeles over immigration raids. Legal experts told The Associated Press there are a variety of reasons people may want to cover their faces while protesting, including to protect their health, for religious reasons, to avoid government retaliation, to prevent surveillance and doxing, or to protect themselves from tear gas. With legislative action happening across the U.S., they say it's only a matter of time before the issue returns to the courts. Protesters, meanwhile, have voiced anger over footage of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents covering their faces at immigration raids and masked officers at the Los Angeles protests, calling it a double standard. Here are some things to know about the debate over face masks: Legislative efforts target masked protesters At least 18 states and Washington, D.C., have laws that restrict masks and other face coverings in some way, said Elly Page, senior legal adviser with the International Center for Not-For-Profit Law. Since October 2023, at least 16 bills have been introduced in eight states and Congress to restrict masks at protests, according to the center. Many of these laws date back to the 1940s and '50s when many states passed anti-mask laws as a response to the Ku Klux Klan, whose members hid their identities while terrorizing victims. Amid protests against the war in Gaza and the Republican president's immigration policies, Page said there have been attempts to revive these rarely used laws to target protesters, sometimes inconsistently. Concerns over masked ICE agents Trump's calls to arrest protesters for wearing masks came as federal agents were seen donning masks while conducting raids in Los Angeles and other U.S. cities. Democratic lawmakers in California have introduced legislation aiming to stop federal agents and local police officers from wearing face masks amid concerns that ICE agents were attempting to hide their identities and avoid accountability for potential misconduct during high-profile immigration raids. The issue also came up at a congressional hearing on June 12, when Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a Democrat, criticized ICE agents wearing masks during raids, saying: 'Don't wear masks. Identify who you are.' Republican federal officials have maintained that masks protect agents from doxing. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin called the California bill 'despicable.' Unresolved First Amendment question Geoffrey Stone, a University of Chicago law professor, said the U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that the right to free speech includes the right to speak out anonymously. But he said how it should apply to protesters wearing masks remains 'an unresolved First Amendment question.' For Stone, that raises a key question: Why should protesters and ICE agents be subject to different rules? 'The government doesn't want them to be targeted because they engaged in their responsibilities as ICE agents,' Stone said. 'But that's the same thing as the argument as to why you want demonstrators to wear masks. They want to wear masks so they can do their 'jobs' of engaging in free speech properly. The same rationale for the officers wearing masks should apply to the protesters.'