Bangladesh ex-PM accused of 'systematic attack' in deadly protest crackdown
Fugitive former Bangladesh prime minister Sheikh Hasina orchestrated a "systematic attack" that amounted to crimes against humanity in her attempt to crush the uprising that toppled her government, Bangladeshi prosecutors said at the opening of her trial on Sunday.
Up to 1,400 people were killed between July and August 2024 after Hasina's government launched its crackdown, according to the United Nations.
Hasina, 77, fled by helicopter to her old ally India as the student-led uprising ended her 15-year rule and she has defied an extradition order to return to Dhaka.
Bangladesh's International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) is prosecuting former senior figures connected to Hasina's ousted government and her now-banned party, the Awami League.
"Upon scrutinising the evidence, we reached the conclusion that it was a coordinated, widespread and systematic attack," ICT chief prosecutor Mohammad Tajul Islam told the court in his opening speech.
"The accused unleashed all law enforcement agencies and her armed party members to crush the uprising."
Islam lodged five charges each against Hasina and two other officials that included "abetment, incitement, complicity, facilitation, conspiracy, and failure to prevent mass murder during the July uprising".
Prosecutors say such acts are tantamount to "crimes against humanity".
- 'Not an act of vendetta' -
Hasina, who remains in self-imposed exile in India, has rejected the charges as politically motivated.
As well as Hasina, the case includes ex-police chief Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun -- who is in custody but did not appear in court on Sunday -- and former interior minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal, who is also on the run.
The prosecution of senior figures from Hasina's government is a key demand of several of the political parties now jostling for power. The interim government has vowed to hold elections before June 2026.
The hearing is being broadcast live on state-owned Bangladesh Television.
Prosecutor Islam vowed that the trial would be impartial.
"This is not an act of vendetta but a commitment to the principle that, in a democratic country, there is no room for crimes against humanity," he said.
Investigators have collected video footage, audio clips, Hasina's phone conversations and records of helicopter and drone movements, as well as statements from victims of the crackdown, as part of their probe.
The prosecution argues that Hasina ordered security forces, through directives from the interior ministry and police, to crush the protesters.
"They systematically committed murder, attempted murder, torture, and other inhuman acts," Islam said.
Prosecutors also allege that security forces opened fire from helicopters after Hasina's directives.
They also accused Hasina of ordering the killing of student protester Abu Sayeed, who was shot dead at close range in the northern city of Rangpur on July 16.
He was the first student demonstrator killed in the police crackdown on protests and footage of his last moments was shown repeatedly on Bangladeshi television after Hasina's downfall.
The ICT court opened its first trial connected to Hasina's government on May 25.
In that case, eight police officials face charges of crimes against humanity over the killing of six protesters on August 5, the day that Hasina fled the country.
Four of the officers are in custody and four are being tried in absentia.
The ICT was set up by Hasina in 2009 to investigate crimes committed by the Pakistani army during Bangladesh's war for independence in 1971.
It sentenced numerous prominent political opponents to death and became widely seen as a means for Hasina to eliminate rivals.
Separately on Sunday, the Supreme Court restored the registration of Bangladesh's largest Islamist party, Jamaat-e-Islami, allowing it to take part in elections.
Hasina had banned Jamaat-e-Islami and cracked down on its leaders.
Bangladesh's interim government banned the Awami League in May, pending the outcome of her trial, and those of other party leaders.
sa/pjm/pbt
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
20 hours ago
- ABC News
Why politicians in India are offering cows and cash to encourage having kids
A politician in southern India has offered new parents 50,000 rupees ($911) if they have a third child, as long as it's a girl. If it's a boy, the offer is a cow. The promise from Kalisetti Appalanaidu, an MP from the state of Andhra Pradesh, reflects heightened anxiety over population in southern India. Leaders in some of India's biggest southern states are now offering incentives for people to have bigger families — a dramatic shift in a country that, for more than 50 years, actively promoted smaller families. The reversal in population policy comes as India prepares for a long-delayed national census and a political process known as delimitation, which could dramatically reshape who holds power in the country's parliament. Delimitation is the redrawing of the boundaries of India's parliamentary constituencies based on population. The ongoing process was frozen in 1976 so that nationwide family planning efforts did not affect states' political representation in the union. However, the Modi government has indicated it will restart the process of delimitation after India conducts its census in 2027. The goal is to ensure that each elected representative in India's lower house, the Lok Sabha, represents roughly the same number of people. But this has sparked concerns in India's south. For decades, states like Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh had reduced their birth rates through proactive family planning policies. In contrast, many northern states have higher fertility rates. Under the delimitation formula, states with faster-growing populations could gain more seats in parliament, while states that have successfully curbed their population growth may lose political influence. Seeing a loss of political power on the horizon, some leaders are urging citizens to reverse decades of population control and start having more children. Both Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu and Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin have spoken publicly about the need for population growth to protect their states' political representation. Mr Stalin encouraged his constituents to start having children "immediately". In the meantime, there have been calls for the redrawing of boundaries to be delayed. "We have requested that the delimitation freeze be extended for another 25 years," said Manu Sundaram, a spokesperson for Tamil Nadu's ruling party, the DMK. In 2004, then-treasurer Peter Costello introduced a baby bonus — a one-time cash payment of up to $5,000 for new parents. The goal was to encourage population growth. It appeared to modestly increase the birth rate before it was eventually scrapped in 2014. In India, while politicians worry about seats in parliament, many families say that getting by is the priority — and that cash handouts won't change their reality. Malleshwari, a 28-year-old woman from a tribal community in Andhra Pradesh, has one child and says that is enough. "Considering the uncertainties of health and life, I would rather have one child and give them everything I can," she said. She said she believed the government needed to change its priorities if it really wanted to support families. "The main focus should be on education. The government must provide free and quality education. Not just academic, but life and vocational skills," she said. "Simply offering money as an incentive to have children will not be enough or widely accepted." Keshav, a 32-year-old tribal man working with an NGO, said his own upbringing had been marked by poverty and domestic violence and he did not want to see that cycle repeated. "Without being able to provide a good education, financial stability and a healthy lifestyle, I don't think it's right to bring more children into this world," he said. Those working closely with women and health care in southern India say the proposed strategy is misguided. Andhra Pradesh women's advocate Keerthi Bollineni said short-term cash incentives missed the bigger picture. "Sustainable population growth is essential," she said. Andhra Pradesh MP Appala Naidu has acknowledged women need more support — and part of his plan has been to promise greater access to maternity leave. But these moves are unlikely to have a measurable effect before the census in 2027. Dr Geetha Devi, a gynaecologist with more than 30 years of experience in Andhra Pradesh, said she was already seeing the limitations of the politicians' approach. She said investment in health care needed to be the priority. "To some extent [the incentives] may work. But educated and working women, I don't think they will be influenced by 50,000 rupees and a cow," she said. "Nowadays I see many families having a single child … I know many people who are having only one child in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and other southern states." "If you encourage population growth, we have to improve our healthcare system first," she said. "The public health system lacks doctors, functioning equipment and even basic repairs. Many centres are short on staff."
News.com.au
2 days ago
- News.com.au
Air India releases new details of the two engines on doomed London flight
Air India has revealed that one of the two engines on the doomed Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner flight that crashed seconds after taking off from Ahmedabad Airport was new, and the other wasn't due for a service until the end of the year. 'The right engine was a new engine put in March 2025,' the airline's chairman N Chandrasekaran told local Indian news channel, Times Now. 'The left engine was last serviced in 2023 and (was) due for its next maintenance check in December 2025'. Investigations are underway into how the flight bound for London's Gatwick Airport crashed into a medical students hostel last Thursday, killing at least 270 people. Mr Chandrasekaran said it may be a month before preliminary results are available and discouraged speculation until the investigation is complete. 'There are speculations about human error, speculations about airlines, speculations about engines, maintenance,' he said, 'But the fact that I know so far is this particular aircraft, this specific tail, AI171, has a clean history. 'I am told by all the experts that the black box and recorders will definitely tell the story. So, we just have to wait for that.' The plane's two black boxes have been recovered allowing for analysis of the cockpit voice recorder, which captures audio including voices, alarms and background noises from the cockpit, and the flight data recorder, which logs flight parameters like engine performance and the plane's speed and altitude. Mr Chandrasekaran also said the flight's captain, Sumeet Sabharwal, was very experienced with over 11,500 hours of flying experience behind him, while his first officer Clive Kunder, had more than 3,400 hours. 'What I hear from colleagues is that they were excellent pilots and great professionals,' he said. 'So we can't jump to any conclusions.' A team of experts from Boeing, engine supplier GE Aerospace and representatives from the UK and US have joined the Indian-led investigation. Funeral services have begun for the casualties of India's worst aviation disaster in three decades, with families laying their loved ones to rest across the country. The sole survivor of the crash, 40-year-old British man Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, helped carry the coffin of his younger brother Ajay, who was also on the flight, in a funeral procession through the streets of Diu, a coastal town in India's east, on Wednesday. Mr Ramesh was only released from hospital a day earlier and still had bandages on his face. The bodies of more than 200 victims have been identified, with the families of others still waiting for their loved ones to be returned to them.
ABC News
2 days ago
- ABC News
Donald Trump hosts Pakistani army chief, disagrees with India over India-Pakistan war mediation
US President Donald Trump has hosted Pakistan's army chief at the White House, an unprecedented meeting that analysts say risks worsening a disagreement with India. The meeting on Wednesday local time was the first time a US president had hosted the powerful head of Pakistan's army, widely regarded as having sway over the country's national security policies, at the White House, unaccompanied by senior Pakistani civilian officials. Mr Trump told reporters he had thanked Field Marshal Asim Munir for ending the war with India, and also praised Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who he spoke to on Tuesday night. "Two very smart people decided not to keep going with that war; that could have been a nuclear war," Mr Trump told reporters. Asked earlier what he wanted to achieve from meeting Pakistan's army chief, Mr Trump told reporters: "Well, I stopped a war … I love Pakistan. I think Modi is a fantastic man. I spoke to him last night. We're going to make a trade deal with Modi of India. "But I stopped the war between Pakistan and India. This man was extremely influential in stopping it from the Pakistan side, Modi from the India side, and others," he said. "They were going at it — and they're both nuclear countries. I got it stopped." However, the Indian government says the US was not responsible. Mr Modi told Mr Trump in their call on Tuesday that the ceasefire was achieved through talks between the Indian and Pakistani militaries and not US mediation, India's most senior diplomat, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, said in a statement. "Talks for ceasing military action happened directly between India and Pakistan through existing military channels, and on the insistence of Pakistan. Prime Minister Modi emphasised that India has not accepted mediation in the past and will never do," said Mr Misri. The heaviest fighting in decades between India and Pakistan was sparked by an April 22 attack in Indian Kashmir that killed 26 people. New Delhi blamed "terrorists" backed by Pakistan, a charge Islamabad denies. Pakistan has thanked Washington for playing a mediating role; however, India has repeatedly denied any third-party mediation. "Islamabad is leaning on Trump to push India for direct India-Pakistan talks, while Delhi is refusing to hold bilateral talks on external pressures," said Muhammad Faisal, a South Asia security researcher based at the University of Technology Sydney. He said a "tense calm" has prevailed between the two sides. They have withdrawn troops after the escalation in Kashmir, but India is refusing to resume adherence to the Indus Waters Treaty. Tourism operators in Kashmir said there had been few tourists in the scenic Himalayan region since the attacks. Mr Trump said last month that India and Pakistan agreed to a ceasefire after talks mediated by the US, where he urged the countries to focus on trade instead of war. Previously, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that both sides had agreed to hold talks on a "broad set of issues at a neutral site". "Pakistan is now trying to hold India and the US to this commitment, while Delhi is distancing itself," Mr Faisal told the ABC. Michael Kugelman, of the Asia Pacific Foundation think tank, said India-US ties, which have thrived in recent years, could suffer if Trump continued to make remarks about a US role in the ceasefire. "For Delhi, it all boils down to an age-old question: How much can it tolerate US-Pakistan cooperation without having it spoil US-India relations — a partnership that's thrived in recent years." Mr Munir was expected to press Mr Trump not to enter Israel's war with Iran and seek a ceasefire, Pakistani officials and experts said. A section of Pakistan's embassy in Washington represents Iran's interests in the United States, as Tehran does not have diplomatic relations with the US. The meeting represented a major boost in US-Pakistan ties, which had largely languished under his predecessor Joe Biden, as both courted India as part of efforts to push back against China. ABC/wires
