Why politicians in India are offering cows and cash to encourage having kids
A politician in southern India has offered new parents 50,000 rupees ($911) if they have a third child, as long as it's a girl.
If it's a boy, the offer is a cow.
The promise from Kalisetti Appalanaidu, an MP from the state of Andhra Pradesh, reflects heightened anxiety over population in southern India.
Leaders in some of India's biggest southern states are now offering incentives for people to have bigger families — a dramatic shift in a country that, for more than 50 years, actively promoted smaller families.
The reversal in population policy comes as India prepares for a long-delayed national census and a political process known as delimitation, which could dramatically reshape who holds power in the country's parliament.
Delimitation is the redrawing of the boundaries of India's parliamentary constituencies based on population.
The ongoing process was frozen in 1976 so that nationwide family planning efforts did not affect states' political representation in the union.
However, the Modi government has indicated it will restart the process of delimitation after India conducts its census in 2027.
The goal is to ensure that each elected representative in India's lower house, the Lok Sabha, represents roughly the same number of people.
But this has sparked concerns in India's south.
For decades, states like Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh had reduced their birth rates through proactive family planning policies.
In contrast, many northern states have higher fertility rates.
Under the delimitation formula, states with faster-growing populations could gain more seats in parliament, while states that have successfully curbed their population growth may lose political influence.
Seeing a loss of political power on the horizon, some leaders are urging citizens to reverse decades of population control and start having more children.
Both Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu and Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin have spoken publicly about the need for population growth to protect their states' political representation.
Mr Stalin encouraged his constituents to start having children "immediately".
In the meantime, there have been calls for the redrawing of boundaries to be delayed.
"We have requested that the delimitation freeze be extended for another 25 years," said Manu Sundaram, a spokesperson for Tamil Nadu's ruling party, the DMK.
In 2004, then-treasurer Peter Costello introduced a baby bonus — a one-time cash payment of up to $5,000 for new parents.
The goal was to encourage population growth.
It appeared to modestly increase the birth rate before it was eventually scrapped in 2014.
In India, while politicians worry about seats in parliament, many families say that getting by is the priority — and that cash handouts won't change their reality.
Malleshwari, a 28-year-old woman from a tribal community in Andhra Pradesh, has one child and says that is enough.
"Considering the uncertainties of health and life, I would rather have one child and give them everything I can," she said.
She said she believed the government needed to change its priorities if it really wanted to support families.
"The main focus should be on education. The government must provide free and quality education. Not just academic, but life and vocational skills," she said.
"Simply offering money as an incentive to have children will not be enough or widely accepted."
Keshav, a 32-year-old tribal man working with an NGO, said his own upbringing had been marked by poverty and domestic violence and he did not want to see that cycle repeated.
"Without being able to provide a good education, financial stability and a healthy lifestyle, I don't think it's right to bring more children into this world," he said.
Those working closely with women and health care in southern India say the proposed strategy is misguided.
Andhra Pradesh women's advocate Keerthi Bollineni said short-term cash incentives missed the bigger picture.
"Sustainable population growth is essential," she said.
Andhra Pradesh MP Appala Naidu has acknowledged women need more support — and part of his plan has been to promise greater access to maternity leave.
But these moves are unlikely to have a measurable effect before the census in 2027.
Dr Geetha Devi, a gynaecologist with more than 30 years of experience in Andhra Pradesh, said she was already seeing the limitations of the politicians' approach.
She said investment in health care needed to be the priority.
"To some extent [the incentives] may work. But educated and working women, I don't think they will be influenced by 50,000 rupees and a cow," she said.
"Nowadays I see many families having a single child … I know many people who are having only one child in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and other southern states."
"If you encourage population growth, we have to improve our healthcare system first," she said.
"The public health system lacks doctors, functioning equipment and even basic repairs. Many centres are short on staff."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
13 hours ago
- ABC News
Why politicians in India are offering cows and cash to encourage having kids
A politician in southern India has offered new parents 50,000 rupees ($911) if they have a third child, as long as it's a girl. If it's a boy, the offer is a cow. The promise from Kalisetti Appalanaidu, an MP from the state of Andhra Pradesh, reflects heightened anxiety over population in southern India. Leaders in some of India's biggest southern states are now offering incentives for people to have bigger families — a dramatic shift in a country that, for more than 50 years, actively promoted smaller families. The reversal in population policy comes as India prepares for a long-delayed national census and a political process known as delimitation, which could dramatically reshape who holds power in the country's parliament. Delimitation is the redrawing of the boundaries of India's parliamentary constituencies based on population. The ongoing process was frozen in 1976 so that nationwide family planning efforts did not affect states' political representation in the union. However, the Modi government has indicated it will restart the process of delimitation after India conducts its census in 2027. The goal is to ensure that each elected representative in India's lower house, the Lok Sabha, represents roughly the same number of people. But this has sparked concerns in India's south. For decades, states like Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh had reduced their birth rates through proactive family planning policies. In contrast, many northern states have higher fertility rates. Under the delimitation formula, states with faster-growing populations could gain more seats in parliament, while states that have successfully curbed their population growth may lose political influence. Seeing a loss of political power on the horizon, some leaders are urging citizens to reverse decades of population control and start having more children. Both Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu and Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin have spoken publicly about the need for population growth to protect their states' political representation. Mr Stalin encouraged his constituents to start having children "immediately". In the meantime, there have been calls for the redrawing of boundaries to be delayed. "We have requested that the delimitation freeze be extended for another 25 years," said Manu Sundaram, a spokesperson for Tamil Nadu's ruling party, the DMK. In 2004, then-treasurer Peter Costello introduced a baby bonus — a one-time cash payment of up to $5,000 for new parents. The goal was to encourage population growth. It appeared to modestly increase the birth rate before it was eventually scrapped in 2014. In India, while politicians worry about seats in parliament, many families say that getting by is the priority — and that cash handouts won't change their reality. Malleshwari, a 28-year-old woman from a tribal community in Andhra Pradesh, has one child and says that is enough. "Considering the uncertainties of health and life, I would rather have one child and give them everything I can," she said. She said she believed the government needed to change its priorities if it really wanted to support families. "The main focus should be on education. The government must provide free and quality education. Not just academic, but life and vocational skills," she said. "Simply offering money as an incentive to have children will not be enough or widely accepted." Keshav, a 32-year-old tribal man working with an NGO, said his own upbringing had been marked by poverty and domestic violence and he did not want to see that cycle repeated. "Without being able to provide a good education, financial stability and a healthy lifestyle, I don't think it's right to bring more children into this world," he said. Those working closely with women and health care in southern India say the proposed strategy is misguided. Andhra Pradesh women's advocate Keerthi Bollineni said short-term cash incentives missed the bigger picture. "Sustainable population growth is essential," she said. Andhra Pradesh MP Appala Naidu has acknowledged women need more support — and part of his plan has been to promise greater access to maternity leave. But these moves are unlikely to have a measurable effect before the census in 2027. Dr Geetha Devi, a gynaecologist with more than 30 years of experience in Andhra Pradesh, said she was already seeing the limitations of the politicians' approach. She said investment in health care needed to be the priority. "To some extent [the incentives] may work. But educated and working women, I don't think they will be influenced by 50,000 rupees and a cow," she said. "Nowadays I see many families having a single child … I know many people who are having only one child in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and other southern states." "If you encourage population growth, we have to improve our healthcare system first," she said. "The public health system lacks doctors, functioning equipment and even basic repairs. Many centres are short on staff."
ABC News
2 days ago
- ABC News
Donald Trump hosts Pakistani army chief, disagrees with India over India-Pakistan war mediation
US President Donald Trump has hosted Pakistan's army chief at the White House, an unprecedented meeting that analysts say risks worsening a disagreement with India. The meeting on Wednesday local time was the first time a US president had hosted the powerful head of Pakistan's army, widely regarded as having sway over the country's national security policies, at the White House, unaccompanied by senior Pakistani civilian officials. Mr Trump told reporters he had thanked Field Marshal Asim Munir for ending the war with India, and also praised Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who he spoke to on Tuesday night. "Two very smart people decided not to keep going with that war; that could have been a nuclear war," Mr Trump told reporters. Asked earlier what he wanted to achieve from meeting Pakistan's army chief, Mr Trump told reporters: "Well, I stopped a war … I love Pakistan. I think Modi is a fantastic man. I spoke to him last night. We're going to make a trade deal with Modi of India. "But I stopped the war between Pakistan and India. This man was extremely influential in stopping it from the Pakistan side, Modi from the India side, and others," he said. "They were going at it — and they're both nuclear countries. I got it stopped." However, the Indian government says the US was not responsible. Mr Modi told Mr Trump in their call on Tuesday that the ceasefire was achieved through talks between the Indian and Pakistani militaries and not US mediation, India's most senior diplomat, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, said in a statement. "Talks for ceasing military action happened directly between India and Pakistan through existing military channels, and on the insistence of Pakistan. Prime Minister Modi emphasised that India has not accepted mediation in the past and will never do," said Mr Misri. The heaviest fighting in decades between India and Pakistan was sparked by an April 22 attack in Indian Kashmir that killed 26 people. New Delhi blamed "terrorists" backed by Pakistan, a charge Islamabad denies. Pakistan has thanked Washington for playing a mediating role; however, India has repeatedly denied any third-party mediation. "Islamabad is leaning on Trump to push India for direct India-Pakistan talks, while Delhi is refusing to hold bilateral talks on external pressures," said Muhammad Faisal, a South Asia security researcher based at the University of Technology Sydney. He said a "tense calm" has prevailed between the two sides. They have withdrawn troops after the escalation in Kashmir, but India is refusing to resume adherence to the Indus Waters Treaty. Tourism operators in Kashmir said there had been few tourists in the scenic Himalayan region since the attacks. Mr Trump said last month that India and Pakistan agreed to a ceasefire after talks mediated by the US, where he urged the countries to focus on trade instead of war. Previously, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that both sides had agreed to hold talks on a "broad set of issues at a neutral site". "Pakistan is now trying to hold India and the US to this commitment, while Delhi is distancing itself," Mr Faisal told the ABC. Michael Kugelman, of the Asia Pacific Foundation think tank, said India-US ties, which have thrived in recent years, could suffer if Trump continued to make remarks about a US role in the ceasefire. "For Delhi, it all boils down to an age-old question: How much can it tolerate US-Pakistan cooperation without having it spoil US-India relations — a partnership that's thrived in recent years." Mr Munir was expected to press Mr Trump not to enter Israel's war with Iran and seek a ceasefire, Pakistani officials and experts said. A section of Pakistan's embassy in Washington represents Iran's interests in the United States, as Tehran does not have diplomatic relations with the US. The meeting represented a major boost in US-Pakistan ties, which had largely languished under his predecessor Joe Biden, as both courted India as part of efforts to push back against China. ABC/wires
News.com.au
3 days ago
- News.com.au
India, Canada return ambassadors as Carney, Modi look past spat
India and Canada agreed Tuesday to return ambassadors to each other's capitals, turning the page on a bitter spat over an assassination as Canada's new leader welcomed counterpart Narendra Modi. Prime Minister Mark Carney, who took office in March, invited Modi to the Canadian Rockies as a guest at the summit of the Group of Seven major economies. Carney's predecessor Justin Trudeau last year publicly accused India of involvement in the assassination of a Sikh separatist on Canadian soil and expelled the Indian ambassador, triggering a furious reciprocal response from India. Carney and Modi agreed that the two countries would name new high commissioners, as ambassadors are known between Commonwealth nations. The two leaders made the decision "with a view to returning to regular services to citizens and businesses in both countries," the Canadian prime minister's office said in a statement. The row had severely impeded diplomatic services between the two countries, which traded $9 billion in 2023 and have close cultural ties due to the vast Indian diaspora in Canada. Canada was obliged to suspend in-person services at all missions in India outside its embassy in New Delhi. Modi took a conciliatory tone as he met Carney at the mountain resort, saying that both Canada and India were "dedicated to democratic values." "The relationship between India and Canada is very important in many ways," Modi said. He congratulated Carney on guiding his Liberal Party to an election victory and said: "I am confident that and Canada will work together to make progress in many areas." - Politically sensitive - Carney said it was a "great honor" to welcome Modi to the G7 summit but made a passing allusion to the domestically sensitive row with a reference to "transnational repression." Carney said he hoped to work with India on "the issues that we look to tackle together, from energy security... the future of artificial intelligence, to the fight that we have against transnational repression and against terrorism." Sikh protesters rallied on the streets of Calgary, the closest large city to the summit, as many criticized Carney's inclusion of Modi, who is accustomed to invitations to major international gatherings despite criticism of his Hindu nationalist government's human rights record. The left-wing New Democratic Party, the fourth largest party in parliament which is not formally part of Carney's government, denounced the invitation to Modi and pointed to allegations of Indian surveillance against its former leader Jagmeet Singh, who is Sikh. "Continuing to engage Modi's government without accountability undermines all efforts to defend human rights, transparency, and the rule of law," it said in a statement before the visit. Canada is home to the largest Sikh population outside India. With some two percent of Canadian population and clustered in suburban swing areas, the community has exerted growing political influence. Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a naturalized Canadian citizen who advocated for an independent Sikh state called Khalistan, was shot dead in the parking lot of a Sikh temple in British Columbia in 2023. Trudeau accused India of direct involvement. Canada has accused India of directing a broad campaign of intimidation against Sikh activists in the country. India denied involvement in the killing and said Canada should take more action against violent advocates for Khalistan, which has been reduced to a fringe movement inside India. The United States, which has a warm relationship with India, also accused an Indian agent of involvement in an unsuccessful plot against a Sikh separatist on US soil but addressed concerns more quietly than Trudeau.
