'India's Hypersonic Glide Missile Is In Advanced Stage': DRDO Chief To NDTV
New Delhi:
Indian weapons systems were a success during Operation Sindoor when India struck Pakistan during its 100-hour aerial battle, damaging enemy airfields, drones, and air defence systems.
BrahMos, Akash surface-to-air missile, the D4 anti-drone system, and other systems designed and developed by the country's premier defence research and development body, DRDO, performed exceptionally well. The chief of DRDO, Dr Samir V Kamat, spoke to NDTV about the future of BrahMos, India's quest to develop a hypersonic missile and the lessons learnt during Operation Sindoor.
The Future of BrahMos
The world's fastest supersonic cruise missile, BrahMos, was developed in partnership with Russia and struck Pakistani airfields during the conflict. BrahMos is universal - It can be launched from land, sea and air platforms. Dr Kamat shared an update on the developments in the BrahMos programme and said the scientists are looking at extending its range and having a smaller version capable of attaching to other fighter jets apart from the Su-30MKI.
"We are increasing the range of the BrahMos missile. We are also looking at making it smaller so it can be mounted on all our air platforms. Today's BrahMos can be mounted only on the Sukhoi 30. But we are working on making a smaller version of BrahMos, which we are calling BrahMos-NG, and then it can be mounted on any of our platforms," Dr Kamat said.
India's Hypersonic Missiles
The ongoing Iran-Israel aerial battle started with drones, long-range ballistic missiles, followed by Tehran using hypersonic missiles (capable of flying at speeds five times more than the speed of sound) that are manoeuvrable and evade enemy air defences.
India is not behind in its development of hypersonic. Last year, the DRDO test-fired a long-range hypersonic missile from the APJ Abdul Kalam Island off the coast of Odisha.
The @DRDO_India has successfully conducted a flight trial of its long range hypersonic missile on 16th Nov 2024 from Dr APJ Abdul Kalam Island, off-the-coast of Odisha.
Raksha Mantri Shri @rajnathsingh has congratulated DRDO, Armed Forces and the Industry for successful flight… pic.twitter.com/wq7yM2YS9f
— रक्षा मंत्री कार्यालय/ RMO India (@DefenceMinIndia) November 17, 2024
Dr Kamat spoke about the hypersonic missile system and said the agency is developing Hypersonic Cruise Missiles, meaning missiles that can travel consistently at hypersonic speeds and Hypersonic Glide Missiles or Vehicles (HGVs).
"The hypersonic glide missile is in a much more advanced state. We have done one development trial, and we expect that in the next two to three years, we will complete all the development trials, and then it will be inducted," the DRDO chief said.
"In hypersonic cruise missiles, we have recently proven scramjet propulsion for more than 1000 seconds, which is a major breakthrough. We hope the government will sanction a program to convert this scramjet propulsion into a hypersonic cruise missile weapon system. I estimate that it will take about five to seven years before it can be inducted," he added.
Iran recently used the Fattah-1 hypersonic missile against Israel in the ongoing conflict. These warheads can glide, with a booster, at hypersonic speeds at low altitude toward the target, making it difficult for air defences to neutralise them because of their manoeuvrability.
The DRDO chief further spoke about India's other weapon systems that are in development.
"We are working on a variety of air-to-air missiles. We are going for higher ranges than our present Astra, which we now call Astra Mark 2 and Astra Mark 3. We are looking at air-to-ground missiles, which are known as Rudram 2, Rudram 3 and Rudram 4, which will have increasing ranges. These are air-to-ground missiles. Then we are looking at a variety of surface-to-air missiles for air defence applications. You are aware of our program KUSHA. We are also working on a directed energy weapon for anti-drones. So, this will be based on both lasers and high-power microwaves," he said.
Dr Kamat shared an update on the Zorawar light tank, which was developed in record time by the DRDO. These tanks, intended for deployment in the rugged terrain of Ladakh, Sikkim and other high-altitude areas, completed their development trials, and user trials will start soon. The need for light tanks arose when India was engaged in a direct military engagement with the Chinese PLA in Ladakh in 2020, and the latter deployed its ZQ-15 Light Tanks to counter India's T-72 Ajeya and T-90 Bhishma tanks.
"Our pipeline is quite strong and in the next two to three years, several of our weapon systems and sensors will get inducted into our services," Dr Kamat said.
Stealth Fighter Programme And Lessons Learnt During Op Sindoor
India recently took a step forward in the direction of building an indigenous fifth-generation stealth fighter jet. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh approved the "execution model" for the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) that will be developed by Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA) in cooperation with industry partners.
"We have started work on it...Earlier, all our platforms, such as LCA Tejas Mark 1, LCA Mark 1A and LCA Mark 2, were done together, partnering with Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) as our production partner. But in the AMCA's case, we are looking at an expression of interest to identify a partner. This partner can be HAL, can be a private sector, or it could be a joint venture between HAL and a private sector or between two private sector companies," he said.
To a question about what lessons DRDO learnt from Operation Sindoor, the agency's chief said, "It is very clear to us now that all our weapon systems have to work in an electronically denied environment. The systems will be denied GPS and will be denied their communication. We have to develop fully autonomous weapon systems, which can work in any electronically denied environment."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Dealing with China: Lessons from Galwan clash, five years on
Just over five years ago, the Galwan clash between India and China saw 20 Indian and four Chinese soldiers killed. This year is also the 75th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the two countries. The bilateral relationship has been full of surprises and turmoil. It appears that India and China, two of the largest countries, economies and militaries, who share a disputed and unresolved border, do not understand each other. The violent clash of June 2020 was the first such incident since 1975. Peace was maintained on the Line of Actual Control (LAC) for almost four decades with the help of confidence-building mechanisms (CBMs). These were achieved after long and painstaking discussions, primarily to avoid any violence on the LAC. However, in the words of Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, 'So there was a clash, and a number of troops died on either side, and that has since, in a sense, overshadowed the relationship. So until we can restore peace and tranquillity on the border and ensure the agreements signed up to are adhered to, it's obviously difficult to carry on with the rest of the relationship'. But can India trust China to adhere to any agreements now? The long freeze between the neighbours after the 1962 war was revisited in 1988 with the 'normalisation' of ties and efforts were put in place to avoid a similar challenge. During Rajiv Gandhi's visit that year to Beijing, Deng Xiaoping said, 'We have both made mistakes and we can learn from each other. Why can't we share our experiences, our successes and failures? There is much we can achieve together. We can achieve nothing by being antagonists'. There was positive momentum after the visit and both sides engaged in an increased economic relationship (bilateral trade stands at around $118 billion). There was a lot of talk about cooperation. However, what has continued to be the driving factor is mistrust. Since 1988, there have been multiple stand-offs at the border, the most intense being in Doklam in 2017 — both armies stood eye to eye for 73 intense days. What complicates the situation further is that both countries are nuclear powerhouses and have advanced militaries. And both are vying to grow their global influence. The Galwan clash underscored the fragility of the relationship. It took almost four-and-a-half years and multiple rounds of bilateral talks at various levels to achieve a breakthrough. In October 2024, it was announced that India and China have agreed on patrolling rights in the Ladakh region. Foreign Vikram Misri said: 'Agreement has been arrived at on patrolling arrangements along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in the India-China border areas, leading to disengagement and a resolution of the issues that had arisen in these areas in 2020 and we will be taking the next steps on this.' However, it appears that disengagement will be a long process. China appears keen to discuss restarting the people-to-people and economic engagement. After Galwan, India banned several Chinese apps and stopped major Chinese investments and direct flights. After the thaw, China has been keen to restart direct flights. It has issued around 85,000 visas and has resumed the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra for Indians. On the other hand, India has continued to reiterate that no significant developments can be achieved if the border issue is unresolved. Galwan is a major recent reminder of what the border is capable of doing. It can push the countries as well as the region into uncertainty. India has continued to focus on building capabilities in the border region and developing infrastructure that can help in the proper management and movement of troops and equipment. The most prominent of these is the all-weather Sela Tunnel in Arunachal Pradesh. Even after years of positive statements and shows of bonhomie, the neighbours appear to be just talking at each other. The talks of people-to-people interaction by China and the fact that India continues to reiterate the centrality of the border for a genuine stable relationship to exist shows the gap in perception and understanding. This gap needs to be bridged sooner rather than later. For Beijing, when it comes to its relations with New Delhi, it is economic dynamics that matter. New Delhi, however, should not forget the lessons from Galwan and ignore the fragility of diplomatic measures, which can clearly be ignored and trampled by China. The writer is associate professor, OP Jindal Global University
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
India Inc's AI reality check: Why 92% still struggle to scale AI
Only BFSI (71%) and ITES (80%) show signs of AI maturity — but even they face integration and governance and retail sectors have >60% AI experimentation, but governance, ethics, and backend integration stall AI being a boardroom buzzword, only 8% of enterprises have realized business-scale AI value. AI might be the star of corporate town halls and keynote speeches, but behind the curtains of glossy brochures and tech summits lies an inconvenient truth: the vast majority of Indian enterprises are nowhere close to AI maturity. According to the ETCIO Intelligence Report AI Playbook – GPUs, Strategies & Readiness Index 2025, a staggering 92% of organizations remain stuck in pilot or exploratory phases. Only a slim 8% have fully implemented AI initiatives. This discrepancy reveals a telling reality—while boardrooms are bullish about AI's potential, operationalizing it at scale remains an uphill task. For a quarter of surveyed firms, AI remains an abstract concept—a buzzword to explore rather than a tool to deploy. Pilot paralysis: From proof of concept to proof of value What's keeping India Inc from achieving AI lift-off? At the heart of the issue lies an ROI dilemma. AI pilots, often built around automation or chatbots, fail to deliver tangible business impact. 'Boards demand measurable business value,' the report notes, 'but most AI efforts focus on narrow use cases with limited bottom-line value.' In response, many CIOs are shifting their KPIs from 'proof of concept' to 'proof of value,' with a sharper focus on metrics like Return on Employee (RoE). 'AI has moved beyond proof of concept - it's now about proof of value. With data at its core, the true success metric is ROE: Return on Employee, where enhanced productivity and smarter efficiency reveals AI's real impact,' says Rakesh Bhardwaj, Group Chief Information Officer, Lupin. The infrastructure conundrum: Legacy systems as a bottleneck India's digital backbone—comprising legacy ERP, SCADA, MES, and siloed data systems—is not AI-ready. In manufacturing, for instance, only 57% of firms report any form of AI adoption. Even among these, most remain confined to pilot projects, thanks to fragmented operational technology and poor data standardization. The BFSI sector leads India's AI journey in terms of adoption maturity. Banks and insurers are embedding AI into fraud detection, underwriting, and customer service. But deeper integration is still constrained by legacy systems and high implementation costs. 'AI adoption in BFSI is not just about improving efficiency. It is redefining resilience, security, compliance and customer experience at scale,' says Sampath Manickam , Chief Technology Officer, National Stock Exchange of India. 'As we integrate AI-driven solutions, the emphasis must remain on ethical innovation, regulatory compliance and long-term value creation.' In retail and consumer goods, the maturity is mixed. While digital-native firms and FMCG giants leverage AI for personalization and supply chain visibility, traditional retailers are still stuck on basic digital transformation journeys. Data privacy and ERP integration issues loom large. In healthcare and pharma, AI use cases are growing—from diagnostics and imaging to drug discovery. However, full-scale adoption is rare, and ethical concerns around bias and explainability are front and center. ITES players show relative maturity. Roughly 60% have implemented AI for customer service automation, IT ops, or HR analytics. But only 8% have embedded AI into core functions. The rest remain tactical, often boxed into non-core deployments due to legacy constraints and unclear ROI. Talent deficit vs tool overload Another major hurdle? – People. Despite the explosion of AI platforms and APIs, there is a severe shortage of skilled professionals—particularly AI engineers, data scientists, and MLOps experts. 'There is a huge shortage of skilled talent because modern education is unable to keep up with the speed of change,' says Priya Dar, CIO, Valvoline Cummins . 'We are not experimenting enough and limitations of industry-specific tools lead to customizations that need skills, time, and money. What we are doing is simple—upskilling, leaning on open source, and outsourcing some innovation to smaller partners working on specific use cases.' Organizations are responding with hybrid strategies: reskilling programs, partnerships with academic institutions, and tapping global talent pools via remote work. 'Our leadership emphasizes innovation, operational excellence, and customer-centricity as core pillars of our growth strategy,' adds Kavita Bijlani, Head of IT & RAD, Bausch + Lomb. 'We are up-skilling and re-skilling our employees by rolling out training programs on AI/ML through virtual platforms. To overcome local shortages, we are tapping into global and regional talent pools.' Integration complexity: The silent killer Even when talent and tools are available, most AI projects flounder during integration. ETCIO Intelligence survey revealed that poor post-deployment support and a lack of plug-and-play capabilities remain key friction points—particularly in sectors like BFSI and healthcare, where compliance demands are non-negotiable. As Anand Sinha, CIO, Birlasoft, explains: 'Organizations address the shortage by upskilling existing staff, recruiting from diverse backgrounds, and using global remote talent… Automation and low-code AI tools are adopted to reduce reliance on specialists.' Who's Winning and Who's Lagging? A Sectoral Snapshot ITES (80%) and BFSI (71%) lead due to digital maturity and strong risk/compliance needs. Healthcare (70%) is gaining traction in diagnostics and drug discovery, but lags in AI governance. Retail (61%) shines in front-end CX but falters on backend integrations. Manufacturing (57%) struggles with data quality and fragmented tech environments. From projects to platforms: Global lessons for India Inc The report emphasizes that successful AI transformation isn't about isolated pilots—it's about 'platformization'. Giants like JPMorgan (COIN platform) and Siemens (AI-augmented digital twins) show the way. Indian firms must follow suit by institutionalizing AI Centers of Excellence, building explainable AI systems, and investing in scalable data infrastructure. To paraphrase Rucha Nanavati of Mahindra & Mahindra: 'AI has moved from curiosity to boardroom mandate. The challenge now is not in adopting AI—but in delivering on its promise.' The next 24 months represent a defining window. For India Inc., this is the moment to evolve from pilot purgatory to platform-powered performance. The age of AI has begun—now it's time to make it real. The AI Playbook | ET CIO
Mint
29 minutes ago
- Mint
America is making a dangerous bet by trading principles for short-term expediency in its engagement with Pakistan
Srinath Sridharan Washington under Trump opting to engage with Pakistan's military chief despite Rawalpindi's record on terror undermines the values the US champions. Transactional geopolitics may serve the short-term interests of some, but cannot shape the destiny of nations that seek dignity, stability and peace. The US–Pakistan relationship has long been a case study in diplomatic cynicism. Gift this article 'I love Pakistan," said US President Donald Trump this week, quickly following up with another flourish: 'I stopped the war." He was referring to the ceasefire that followed India's Operation Sindoor, implying that his intervention averted an escalation between two nuclear powers. 'I love Pakistan," said US President Donald Trump this week, quickly following up with another flourish: 'I stopped the war." He was referring to the ceasefire that followed India's Operation Sindoor, implying that his intervention averted an escalation between two nuclear powers. In a country where 'I love New York" or 'I love Boston" merchandise is part of pop-cultural retail tradition, it is perhaps the first time that a sitting American president has publicly professed such open affection—not for a US city but for a foreign nation, and one long entangled with terror networks and given to military overreach. Also Read: Pakistan's economy must escape the clutches of its armed forces Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi promptly corrected the record the same day, clarifying (yet another time) that it was Islamabad that had sought de-escalation unilaterally. But Trump's insistence on claiming credit for a crisis he neither resolved nor influenced reveals a deeper, far more disturbing pattern: America's habitual romanticism of tactical deals with regimes entangled in terrorism while ignoring the long-term consequences for regional stability. This is not just bad optics. It is bad policy. The US, once considered the torchbearer of democratic values, seems increasingly willing to bypass elected governments in favour of military establishments and shadow power centres. Nowhere is this more evident than in its dealings with Pakistan. A nation that has harboured extremist groups, undermined civilian authority and used terror as statecraft continues to enjoy relevance in Washington's foreign policy playbook. The White House praises the arrest of a single militant as evidence of cooperation, even as Pakistan's terror infrastructure remains intact—undisturbed, deliberate, and institutional. Also Read: Nitin Pai: How to dissuade Pakistan from deploying terrorism It is hard to ignore the irony. America claims to lead the free world, yet chooses to transact with regimes that represent the antithesis of the values it espouses. The consequence is moral abdication. This dynamic plays out repeatedly: from the resurgence of Taliban in Afghanistan to the safe haven for Osama bin Laden near a military cantonment in Abbottabad in Pakistan; from cross-border attacks in Mumbai, Pathankot, Pulwama and Uri to the continued radicalization in Pakistan's heartlands. The fingerprints are clear. So is the complicity. Yet, the US persists in treating Islamabad as a necessary partner—sometimes to broker influence in Kabul, other times to play the middleman in Kashmir, and often just to retain access and leverage in the region. It would be naïve to believe that the US-Pakistan relationship incentivizes reform. In truth, it legitimizes impunity. The Pakistani military, emboldened by its transactional value to Washington, continues to weaken democratic institutions at home and fund destabilizing proxies abroad. Every such engagement strengthens the perception that terrorism can be bartered for aid and extremism for arms. The contradiction becomes even sharper when viewed in the context of the Indo-Pacific. The US claims to rely on India as a democratic counterweight to China. It deepens defense ties, invests in the Quad and speaks of a free and open Indo-Pacific. Yet, it simultaneously chooses to ignore the very forces that threaten that vision by rewarding a regime that profits from regional unrest. This inconsistency is not lost on New Delhi. The US–Pakistan relationship has long been a case study in diplomatic cynicism. From selective partnerships to a repeated pattern of 'doing more" without consequence, Washington is an expert in the language of strategic necessity while turning a blind eye to long-term costs. But tactical flexibility cannot replace principled engagement. It does not produce allies; it breeds dependencies. Pakistan, meanwhile, has mastered the art of offering just enough cooperation to keep US interest alive while maintaining its core strategy of plausible deniability and proxy warfare. Credibility, not convenience, must now become the real currency of global order. Especially in a world grappling with great-power tensions—from Ukraine to the Taiwan Strait to West Asia—the US must ask itself a fundamental question: Can it afford to keep trading principles for short-term proximity? The answer becomes clearer when we examine Washington's recent diplomatic posturing over multiple global flashpoints—Ukraine-Russia, Israel-Iran and India-Pakistan. In each, the pattern is strikingly similar: choreographed pronouncements of peacemaking, fleeting moments of engagement and self-congratulatory claims of having 'brokered peace." For India, the implications are significant. A natural partner to the US, India must now calibrate its engagement with clarity and conviction. If the foundation of partnership is shared democratic values, then New Delhi must insist on consistency, not just in defence or economics but in principle. A rules-based international order cannot be built on selective amnesia or political expedience. It requires holding rule-breakers accountable. And it demands that peace not be sacrificed at the altar of tactical diplomacy. Affection in diplomacy is not measured by slogans, but by the values one chooses to embrace—and the silences one is willing to overlook. India, with its civilizational depth and global aspirations, must engage the world on its own terms. Our diplomacy must be grounded in self-respect, not shaped by shifting Washington moods. Because, at the end of the day, transactional geopolitics may serve the short-term interests of some, but cannot shape the destiny of nations that seek dignity, stability and real peace. The author is a corporate advisor and author of 'Family and Dhanda' Topics You May Be Interested In
