America is making a dangerous bet by trading principles for short-term expediency in its engagement with Pakistan
Srinath Sridharan Washington under Trump opting to engage with Pakistan's military chief despite Rawalpindi's record on terror undermines the values the US champions. Transactional geopolitics may serve the short-term interests of some, but cannot shape the destiny of nations that seek dignity, stability and peace. The US–Pakistan relationship has long been a case study in diplomatic cynicism.
Gift this article
'I love Pakistan," said US President Donald Trump this week, quickly following up with another flourish: 'I stopped the war." He was referring to the ceasefire that followed India's Operation Sindoor, implying that his intervention averted an escalation between two nuclear powers.
'I love Pakistan," said US President Donald Trump this week, quickly following up with another flourish: 'I stopped the war." He was referring to the ceasefire that followed India's Operation Sindoor, implying that his intervention averted an escalation between two nuclear powers.
In a country where 'I love New York" or 'I love Boston" merchandise is part of pop-cultural retail tradition, it is perhaps the first time that a sitting American president has publicly professed such open affection—not for a US city but for a foreign nation, and one long entangled with terror networks and given to military overreach.
Also Read: Pakistan's economy must escape the clutches of its armed forces
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi promptly corrected the record the same day, clarifying (yet another time) that it was Islamabad that had sought de-escalation unilaterally.
But Trump's insistence on claiming credit for a crisis he neither resolved nor influenced reveals a deeper, far more disturbing pattern: America's habitual romanticism of tactical deals with regimes entangled in terrorism while ignoring the long-term consequences for regional stability.
This is not just bad optics. It is bad policy.
The US, once considered the torchbearer of democratic values, seems increasingly willing to bypass elected governments in favour of military establishments and shadow power centres. Nowhere is this more evident than in its dealings with Pakistan.
A nation that has harboured extremist groups, undermined civilian authority and used terror as statecraft continues to enjoy relevance in Washington's foreign policy playbook. The White House praises the arrest of a single militant as evidence of cooperation, even as Pakistan's terror infrastructure remains intact—undisturbed, deliberate, and institutional.
Also Read: Nitin Pai: How to dissuade Pakistan from deploying terrorism
It is hard to ignore the irony. America claims to lead the free world, yet chooses to transact with regimes that represent the antithesis of the values it espouses. The consequence is moral abdication.
This dynamic plays out repeatedly: from the resurgence of Taliban in Afghanistan to the safe haven for Osama bin Laden near a military cantonment in Abbottabad in Pakistan; from cross-border attacks in Mumbai, Pathankot, Pulwama and Uri to the continued radicalization in Pakistan's heartlands.
The fingerprints are clear. So is the complicity. Yet, the US persists in treating Islamabad as a necessary partner—sometimes to broker influence in Kabul, other times to play the middleman in Kashmir, and often just to retain access and leverage in the region.
It would be naïve to believe that the US-Pakistan relationship incentivizes reform. In truth, it legitimizes impunity. The Pakistani military, emboldened by its transactional value to Washington, continues to weaken democratic institutions at home and fund destabilizing proxies abroad.
Every such engagement strengthens the perception that terrorism can be bartered for aid and extremism for arms.
The contradiction becomes even sharper when viewed in the context of the Indo-Pacific. The US claims to rely on India as a democratic counterweight to China. It deepens defense ties, invests in the Quad and speaks of a free and open Indo-Pacific.
Yet, it simultaneously chooses to ignore the very forces that threaten that vision by rewarding a regime that profits from regional unrest. This inconsistency is not lost on New Delhi.
The US–Pakistan relationship has long been a case study in diplomatic cynicism. From selective partnerships to a repeated pattern of 'doing more" without consequence, Washington is an expert in the language of strategic necessity while turning a blind eye to long-term costs.
But tactical flexibility cannot replace principled engagement. It does not produce allies; it breeds dependencies. Pakistan, meanwhile, has mastered the art of offering just enough cooperation to keep US interest alive while maintaining its core strategy of plausible deniability and proxy warfare.
Credibility, not convenience, must now become the real currency of global order. Especially in a world grappling with great-power tensions—from Ukraine to the Taiwan Strait to West Asia—the US must ask itself a fundamental question: Can it afford to keep trading principles for short-term proximity?
The answer becomes clearer when we examine Washington's recent diplomatic posturing over multiple global flashpoints—Ukraine-Russia, Israel-Iran and India-Pakistan. In each, the pattern is strikingly similar: choreographed pronouncements of peacemaking, fleeting moments of engagement and self-congratulatory claims of having 'brokered peace."
For India, the implications are significant. A natural partner to the US, India must now calibrate its engagement with clarity and conviction. If the foundation of partnership is shared democratic values, then New Delhi must insist on consistency, not just in defence or economics but in principle.
A rules-based international order cannot be built on selective amnesia or political expedience. It requires holding rule-breakers accountable. And it demands that peace not be sacrificed at the altar of tactical diplomacy.
Affection in diplomacy is not measured by slogans, but by the values one chooses to embrace—and the silences one is willing to overlook.
India, with its civilizational depth and global aspirations, must engage the world on its own terms. Our diplomacy must be grounded in self-respect, not shaped by shifting Washington moods.
Because, at the end of the day, transactional geopolitics may serve the short-term interests of some, but cannot shape the destiny of nations that seek dignity, stability and real peace.
The author is a corporate advisor and author of 'Family and Dhanda' Topics You May Be Interested In
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Los Angeles Dodgers spark outrage after blocking Donald Trump-backed ICE agents from stadium access
Los Angeles Dodgers spark outrage after blocking Donald Trump-backed ICE agents from stadium access (Image via Getty) On June 19, a daring action thrust the Los Angeles Dodgers into the national limelight as they barred federal ICE agents, associated with a Trump endorsed immigration enforcement effort, from Dodger Stadium. The impromptu showdown elicited a wave of responses online and among activists in the streets of Los Angeles. What happened in front of the stadium and why are some fans cheering the action? Los Angeles Dodgers refuse entry to ICE agents at Dodger Stadium on June 19 On June 19, 2025, early morning, a fleet of unmarked vans carrying ICE agents linked to Donald Trump 's administration pulled up near Dodger Stadium. The agents sought permission to access the parking lots but were told 'no' by the Dodgers organization. Within minutes, dozens of protestors who oppose immigration raids gathered outside the gates in response. While ICE later denied being there, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) clarified the vehicles belonged to Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and were not on enforcement duty. The Dodgers president Stan Kasten confirmed the team's stance on X (formerly Twitter), stating the request was official and the team denied access. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Seniors Born 1941-1979 Receive 55 Benefits This Month if They Ask WalletJump Learn More Undo Los Angeles police then facilitated a safe departure for agents amid the crowd presence. Los Angeles Dodgers face public reaction and political pressure after bold action The decision shocked many. Fans and public officials weighed in loudly. California Governor Gavin Newsom praised the Dodgers for opposing raids that threaten immigrant communities. Dodgers player Kiké Hernández also spoke out, calling the enforcement 'wrong for our city' on X. Conversely, critics questioned the team's stance, asking if sports venues should mix with politics. Also Read: Dodgers' Andy Pages Accuses Dylan Cease Of Intentionally Hitting Him With 98 MPH Pitch The incident sparked debate across social platforms like Reddit's r/law and X, where users shared memes such as 'Ice has been run off' to highlight the blow to the Trump-aligned ICE agency. Some argue the Dodgers are setting a national example, while others say they overstepped. This development comes amid a wave of anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles since June 6, following a surge in raids under President Trump's directives. For the Dodgers, who have a large Latino fan base, today's move not only showed solidarity but also amplified questions about public venues' roles in political and community issues. Game On Season 1 kicks off with Sakshi Malik's inspiring story. Watch Episode 1 here
The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Left stages protest in Ballari condemning attacks on Palestine and Iran
On the occasion of National Communal Harmony Day, various Left parties staged a protest in front of the Deputy Commissioner's office in Ballari, condemning the 'imperialist aggression' against Palestine and Iran. The demonstration strongly denounced the alleged massacre being carried out by Israel in Gaza with the support of the United States, as well as the recent bombing of Iran. Protesters urged the Indian government to oppose the war-mongering policies of the United States and Israel and to adopt an unequivocal anti-war stance. Addressing the gathering, district secretary of SUCI(C) S. Radhakrishna Upadhya said that creating conflict zones across the globe to sell arms and increase profits is the business model of American capitalists. 'U.S. President Donald Trump represents these capitalist interests. Facing an economic crisis, the United States seeks revival through artificial means like war. To counter this war-hungry agenda of America, Israel and other imperialist nations, global anti-war and workers movements must be intensified to push back against imperialist designs,' he said. CPI(M) district secretary Satyababu stated that Israel, emboldened by U.S. support, has been conducting barbaric bombing campaigns on Gaza for the past two years, violating ceasefire agreements. 'Schools, hospitals, and mosques have been targeted and over 55,000 Palestinian civilians, including a large number of women and children, have been killed. Now, it has launched airstrikes on Iran, killing several 'key figures',' he said. Veteran trade union leader T.G. Vitthal remarked that the BJP-led Union government aligned itself with the interests of the U.S. and Israel, thereby undermining India's anti-imperialist legacy rooted in the freedom movement. Many labour leaders, including Pramod, A. Devadas, Chandra Kumari, Guru Murthy, Somashekhar Gowda, Shanta, Nagarathna and Hanumappa, participated in the agitation.
NDTV
23 minutes ago
- NDTV
No US In NATO? That's Ok. Rafale Calling, Says Emmanuel Macron On X
New Delhi: Emmanuel Macron has a message for the rest of Europe - the Rafale fighter jet is calling. The French President's quirky X post Friday afternoon featured an Apple iPhone with an incoming call from 'Rafale' and a close-up of the jet arcing over barren and rocky land. "European friends, you have a call," Macron wrote. Amusing, yes. But there was a clear message to the rest of Europe - 'we need to strengthen our combined defences and act independently on matters of continental security'. Macron has sought repeatedly to push the European Union to be self-reliant on defence, driven by concerns like Russia's war in Ukraine and Donald Trump's repeated warning to other NATO members - up your defence contributions to match that of the US, or risk losing the American military umbrella. European friends, you have a call. — Emmanuel Macron (@EmmanuelMacron) June 20, 2025 To that end the 'Rafale calling' X post is a shout-out to Europe to increase collaboration in matters of military hardware and reduce dependence on American imports. Rafale = 'Independent Europe'? But why is the Rafale a symbol for this European independence? Because it is almost entirely built and designed within Europe, in France, and its manufacturing and maintenance represents autonomy from Trump's administration. It is a 4.5 generation multirole fighter capable of air superiority and ground attack missions, with a range of munitions, including the Meteor, a beyond visual range air-to-air missile that can target enemy aircraft 150km away, and the SCALP cruise missile that has a range of 300km. Rafales also have the MICA, a versatile air-to-air missile. But, as capable as it is, in recent years many European nations have opted for the US' F-35 stealth fighter, a 5th generation aircraft widely seen as one of the most advanced in the world. In April India signed a deal to buy 26 Navy variants of the Rafale fighter jet (File). Poland and Finland, for example, chose the F-35. The former bought 32 F-35 Lightning II variants for US$4.6 billion, while Finland is in the process of buying 64 for US$9.4 billion. Apart from these two, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, Romania, Greece, Austria, Czechia, and other European countries also have F-35s parked in their airbases. All of this is despite the F-35's infamous fragility; a British F-35, for example, has been parked in at Thiruvananthapuram airport for nearly a week because of a "technical snag". Both the Rafale and the F-35 have seen combat; the former was used by the Indian Air Force during Operation Sindoor, Delhi's military response to the April terror attack in Pahalgam. To that end, Macron's 'Rafale calling' X post is seen as an 'ad' for EU military independence. 'Massive Common Funding' In March, ahead of a special summit, Macron called for "massive, common funding... probably hundreds of billions of euros... to define our capacity needs for a common defence". He said the need to make that shift had become all the more urgent because the US, under Trump's 'America First' foreign policy, was slowly but surely pivoting away from Europe. "It's quarter to the midnight. As there are doubts over the support of the Americans towards Europe over time, we need to mobilise hundreds of billions of euros... it is Europe's strategic wake-up moment," French daily Le Parisien quoted him as saying. "We must offer European alternatives to countries accustomed to US equipment... scaling up production of these will lower costs and create a self-sustaining defence network across Europe." He isn't alone in this; Friedrich Merz, then the incoming German Chancellor, said it was his "absolute priority" to strengthen his nation and Europe to "achieve independence from the US".
