We surveyed 1,500 Florida kids about cellphones and their mental health – what we learned suggests school phone bans may have important but limited effects
In Florida, a bill that bans cellphone use in elementary and middle schools, from bell to bell, recently sailed through the state Legislature.
Gov. Ron DeSantis signed it into law on May 30, 2025. The same bill calls for high schools in six Florida districts to adopt the ban during the upcoming school year and produce a report on its effectiveness by Dec. 1, 2026.
Parents are divided on the issue. According to a report from Education Week, many parents want their kids to have phones for safety reasons – and don't support bans as a result.
But in the debate over whether phones should be banned in K-12 schools – and if so, how – students themselves are rarely given a voice.
We are experts in media use and public health who surveyed 1,510 kids ages 11 to 13 in Florida in November and December 2024 to learn how they're using digital media and the role tech plays in their lives at home and at school. Their responses were insightful – and occasionally surprising.
Adults generally cite four reasons to ban phone use during school: to improve kids' mental health, to strengthen academic outcomes, to reduce cyberbullying and to help limit kids' overall screen time.
But as our survey shows, it may be a bit much to expect a cellphone ban to accomplish all of that.
Some of the questions in our survey shine light on kids' feelings toward banning cellphones – even though we didn't ask that question directly.
We asked them if they feel relief when they're in a situation where they can't use their smartphone, and 31% said yes.
Additionally, 34% of kids agreed with the statement that social media causes more harm than good.
And kids were 1.5 to 2 times more likely to agree with those statements if they attended schools where phones are banned or confiscated for most of the school day, with use only permitted at certain times. That group covered 70% of the students we surveyed because many individual schools or school districts in Florida have already limited students' cellphone use.
Some 'power users' of cellphone apps could likely use a break from them.
Twenty percent of children we surveyed said push notifications on their phones — that is, notifications from apps that pop up on the phone's screen — are never turned off. These notifications are likely coming from the most popular apps kids reported using, like YouTube, TikTok and Instagram.
This 20% of children was roughly three times more likely to report experiencing anxiety than kids who rarely or never have their notifications on.
They were also nearly five times more likely to report earning mostly D's and F's in school than kids whose notifications are always or sometimes off.
Our survey results also suggest phone bans would likely have positive effects on grades and mental health among some of the heaviest screen users. For example, 22% of kids reported using their favorite app for six or more hours per day. These students were three times more likely to report earning mostly D's and F's in school than kids who spend an hour or less on their favorite app each day.
They also were six times more likely than hour-or-less users to report severe depression symptoms. These insights remained even after ruling out numerous other possible explanations for the difference — like age, household income, gender, parent's education, race and ethnicity.
Banning students' access to phones at school means these kids would not receive notifications for at least that seven-hour period and have fewer hours in the day to use apps.
However, other data we collected suggests that bans aren't a universal benefit for all children.
Seventeen percent of kids who attend schools that ban or confiscate phones report severe depression symptoms, compared with just 4% among kids who keep their phones with them during the school day.
This finding held even after we ruled out other potential explanations for what we were seeing, such as the type of school students attend and other demographic factors.
We are not suggesting that our survey shows phone bans cause mental health problems.
It is possible, for instance, that the schools where kids already were struggling with their mental health simply happened to be the ones that have banned phones. Also, our survey didn't ask kids how long phones have been banned at their schools. If the bans just launched, there may be positive effects on mental health or grades yet to come.
In order to get a better sense of the bans' effects on mental health, we would need to examine mental health indicators before and after phone bans.
To get a long-term view on this question, we are planning to do a nationwide survey of digital media use and mental health, starting with 11- to 13-year-olds and tracking them into adulthood.
Even with the limitations of our data from this survey, however, we can conclude that banning phones in schools is unlikely to be an immediate solution to mental health problems of kids ages 11-13.
Students at schools where phones are barred or confiscated didn't report earning higher grades than children at schools where kids keep their phones.
This finding held for students at both private and public schools, and even after ruling out other possible explanations like differences in gender and household income, since these factors are also known to affect grades.
There are limits to our findings here: Grades are not a perfect measure of learning, and they're not standardized across schools. It's possible that kids at phone-free schools are in fact learning more than those at schools where kids carry their phones around during school hours – even if they earn the same grades.
We asked kids how often in the past three months they'd experienced mistreatment online – like being called hurtful names or having lies or rumors spread about them. Kids at schools where phone use is limited during school hours actually reported enduring more cyberbullying than children at schools with less restrictive policies. This result persisted even after we considered smartphone ownership and numerous demographics as possible explanations.
We are not necessarily saying that cellphone bans cause an increase in cyberbullying. What could be at play here is that at schools where cyberbullying has been particularly bad, phones have been banned or are confiscated, and online bullying still occurs.
But based on our survey results, it does not appear that school phone bans prevent cyberbullying.
Overall, our findings suggest that banning phones in schools may not be an easy fix for students' mental health problems, poor academic performance or cyberbullying.
That said, kids might benefit from phone-free schools in ways that we have not explored, like increased attention spans or reduced eyestrain.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Justin D. Martin, University of South Florida and Chighaf Bakour, University of South Florida
Read more:
Do smartphones belong in classrooms? Four scholars weigh in
How old should kids be to get phones?
Kids with cellphones more likely to be bullies – or get bullied. Here are 6 tips for parents
The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

5 hours ago
Turkish authorities detain prominent journalist for allegedly threatening Erdogan
Istanbul -- Turkish authorities detained a prominent journalist for allegedly 'threatening' President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, according to state media. The detention of Fatih Altayli, whose daily commentaries on YouTube attract hundreds of thousands of viewers, comes amid a widespread crackdown on the opposition. State-run Anadolu Agency said he was questioned after his detention late Saturday over a comment he made following a recent poll that showed more than 70% of the public opposed a lifetime presidency for Erdogan, who has been in power for more than two decades. On his YouTube channel, Altayli said Friday he wasn't surprised by the result and that the Turkish people preferred checks on authority. 'Look at the history of this nation... this is a nation which has strangled its sultan when they didn't like him or want him. There are quite a few Ottoman sultans who were assassinated, strangled, or made to look like suicide.' An investigation was immediately launched by the Istanbul Public Prosecutors' Office. During questioning, Altayli denied threatening the president, according to Halk TV's website. It remains unclear whether Altayli has been released. Officials from municipalities controlled by the main opposition Republican People's Party have faced waves of arrests this year, including Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, who was detained in March over allegations of corruption.


Boston Globe
9 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Mass. considers scrapping religious exemptions for vaccinations
Advertisement In Massachusetts, parents can write a letter stating that a vaccine conflicts with their 'sincerely held religious belief' in order to exempt their children from vaccination requirements needed to enroll in public schools. State Rep. Andy Vargas and State Sen. Edward Kennedy both Advocates who oppose the exemptions say that religious exceptions are being misused by parents who are hesitant about vaccinating their children. Advertisement 'It's definitely a general pattern of people abusing the exemption, especially since But parents across the state came to Beacon Hill to testify in support of religious exemptions at a hearing of the Legislature's Joint Committee on Public Health. They said exemptions were essential to their first amendment right to practice their religion and to honor the concept of informed consent. 'I'm curious why diversity, equity and inclusion is not being applied to those with sincerely held religious beliefs,' Lisa Ottaviano said while testifying at the hearing. Some speakers at the hearing said they were uncomfortable with the components of certain vaccines. 'We should not be forced into violating our moral conscience by injecting products developed from aborted fetuses such as the MMR, the varicella vaccines,' said Nicholas Kottenstette, a Catholic father of four from Sterling, Massachusetts. Vaccines don't contain fetal cells, Others testifying against the bill said they wanted to protect religious exemptions because they felt that accountability measures for vaccine manufacturers were insufficient. 'I started meeting more people whose children had reactions to vaccines that were adverse, so I started doing my own research and learnt a lot of concerning things like how pharmaceutical companies have legal protection against being sued,' Maureen Trettel, a grandmother from Milford said. Advertisement Similar bills have been filed in previous sessions, so the debate over religious exemptions for vaccines in Massachusetts has been going on since at least 2019, well before the COVID-19 pandemic that made vaccines a polarizing issue. The elevation of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a vaccine skeptic, to U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services has drawn even more interest to the issue. Last week, Kennedy Logan Beyer, an aspiring pediatrician pursuing an MD/PhD degree in public health at Harvard, spoke in favor of eliminating religious exemptions. While volunteering at a Special Olympics event, Beyer spoke to a parent who told her that she was worried that vaccines caused autism. The mother told Beyer that she was planning to apply for a religious exemption because she was unsure about vaccinating her children. 'She told me that her family 'didn't really go to church' but you don't have to prove anything to get the exemption,' Beyer said. Beyer said that this incident made her concerned about growing vaccine hesitancy and inspired her to testify. 'At the hearing, so many parents said they just want to do what's best for their children … I love that instinct,' Beyer said, 'But I know that passing policies that help facilitate more kids getting vaccinated is really what can keep children safe.' Advertisement Harrison, mother of cancer-survivor Miranda, also understands the instinct of parents on the other side of the issue, even if she disagrees with them. In addition to Miranda, Harrison has twin six-year old boys who both have autism. 'I can know the grief and shock that parents experience when they find out their kid has autism. I get it,' Harrison said. 'But vaccines are not to blame ... autism is a result of Around 16,000 children in Massachusetts are unvaccinated without claiming an exemption — a group that the state describes as 'noncompliant students' in its documents. Many parents in opposition to the bills questioned why the bills were trained just on the 2,000 students who did have religious exemptions. 'I'm curious why the Legislature is targeting the small percentage of children with religious exemptions and ignoring the huge gap population,' said Ottaviano testifying at the hearing. Advocates for the bills said the new provisions that mandate that all schools must report vaccination numbers to the state's department of public health would address these noncompliant students as well. 'That's what the data reporting is about, we want to make sure that schools have accurate records,' Blair of Massachusetts Families for Vaccines said. 'If there is a gap … they should reach out to those students to find out why the records are not on file.' Speakers in favor of the bills were focused on eliminating religious exemptions in order to protect children who cannot be vaccinated due to medical reasons like allergies or problems with their immune systems. 'It's actually those people … that we're really doing this for, because they're the ones who depend on herd immunity,' Blair said. Advertisement Angela Mathew can be reached at


Newsweek
11 hours ago
- Newsweek
Videos of Iranians Sharing 'Final Glimpse' of Homes Flood Social Media
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Iranian social media users are sharing pictures and videos of their homes and of Iran in what one described as a "final glimpse" as many flee their homes. It comes as the U.S. has directly entered the war between Israel and the Islamic Republic. The Context The conflict between Israel and Iran has dramatically escalated in recent days. On Saturday evening, President Donald Trump announced military action on Iran and said that the U.S. had attacked sites in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, marking the first U.S. intervention in the conflict. A banner bearing a painting that represents members of Iranian society on a building in Tehran, with a message that reads in Farsi: "We are all soldiers of Iran" on June 22, 2025. A banner bearing a painting that represents members of Iranian society on a building in Tehran, with a message that reads in Farsi: "We are all soldiers of Iran" on June 22, 2025. AFP via Getty Images What To Know On Monday, June 16, Trump issued a warning telling "everyone" in Tehran to "immediately evacuate" the city. This came after a warning from the Israel Defense Forces, which was shared in a post to their Persian language account on Sunday, June 15, which said that anyone near sites linked to Iran's military should "immediately leave these areas and not return until further notice." Iran itself has a population of 92.4 million, and Tehran has an estimated population of 9.7 million, according to the World Population Review. The account @ayparamobina on TikTok shared a post on the app which included a slideshow of images showing people's homes in Iran. The first image featured a home with bright colorful furniture, books and an open suitcase on the floor, and the following images showed the interiors of different people's homes. The first image had the text overlay "ppl in Tehran are taking one last picture before evacuating their home," and the post itself was captioned, "They are taking a picture in the hope that everything will be the same when they return. a picture to remember home by." The post has been viewed over 5 million times on TikTok alone, and it has also been reshared on X, formerly Twitter, and Instagram. Speaking to Newsweek via email, one account holder, Mobina, said "As an Iranian, I feel it is essential to clarify something that is often misunderstood from the outside. The people of Iran are now caught in a war that they never wanted." Mobina told Newsweek, "I, and the vast majority of Iranians, do not support this regime." A 2023 poll by the Netherlands-based GAMAAN polling agency found that 15 percent of Iran's population supported the regime. Mobina told Newsweek that the sharing of images "Reflects something very deep about Iranian identity." "People in Iran have always tried to live beautifully, to find joy, and to hold on to their humanity. That desire to create warmth, beauty, and life inside the walls of our homes is part of our culture and who we are," Mobina said. The account @shervin_nila shared a clip of their home in Iran. It had the text overlay, "This may be the last video I've made from our home in Tehran," and was captioned, "All we left behind to come to our hometown for all the plans we had may now be only a memory." It has been viewed over 150,000 times as of reporting. nurrraaaaa_ shared a compilation video on TikTok which featured clips of Iran. It had the text overlay, "Was that the final glimpse of my home?" and was captioned, "didn't realize it might be the last time I'd walk those streets." The account hedziworldtour shared a similar video, which featured clips of Iran and her in the country. It had the text overlay, "The world ended when it happened to my country," and was captioned, "They don't know Iran like I do (I have deep empathy for people of every country that has been through something like this, but words can't describe when it's happening to your own country and loved ones)." It has been viewed a million times at the time of writing. The sharing of these images has also prompted discourse online. The account Saax wrote on ayparamobina's TikTok video "WHY ARE PEOPLE SURPRISED THAT THEY HAVE BEAUTIFUL HOMES THAT LOOK LIKE OURS?! WHAT DO YOU THINK TEHRAN IS???" in a comment liked more than 20,000 times. Hedziworldtour shared a TikTok video addressing this, where she wrote, "Watching people comment about how surprised they are that Iranian homes look like they came out of pinterest bc your country has never been humanized a day in its life." The video has been viewed over half a million times as of reporting. Newsweek has reached out to nurrraaaaa_ and shervin_nila via TikTok, and to Hedziworldtour via email. Israel initially struck Tehran and other cities in "Operation Rising Lion," a campaign it said was designed to preempt a planned Iranian attack and to disrupt its nuclear capabilities, which Iran has said are for peaceful purposes. Following the U.S.'s strike on Iran, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said, "The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the U.N. Charter, international law and the NPT [Non-proliferation Treaty] by attacking Iran's peaceful nuclear installations." Following the strike, Trump gave an address to the nation, saying, "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace…Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight was the most difficult of them all, by far, and perhaps the most lethal." What People Are Saying Mobina told Newsweek via email: "For many Iranians, especially in cities like Tehran, Isfahan, or Shiraz, every detail of their home reflects who they are. The way they arrange their books, the carpets passed down from grandparents, the flowers on the balcony, or the artwork on the walls. "Many have taken and shared those final images of their homes with the hope that they might not be destroyed. That one day, they could return. These last photos are acts of remembrance, hope, and quiet resistance." One social media user wrote in a comment on ayparamobina's TikTok that was liked more than 65,000 times: "It's wild seeing homes that look like they came off Pinterest board in a country that is portrayed so negatively, but the people who live there have to flee their country. It just shows how alike we all are, but how our realities are just so drastically different." What's Next The leadership of Iran under Supreme Leader Ali Ayatollah Khamenei will decide whether to retaliate against the U.S. strikes or enter negotiations. The reactions of global powers Russia and China, both of whom are close to Iran, will also be critical.