Taxes on super rich and tech giants stall under Trump
AFP | Paris
Global tax plans targeting billionaires and multinational companies are running aground, with the United States torpedoing reforms under President Donald Trump.
The billionaire real estate tycoon has pulled the United States out of an international deal on taxing multinationals and threatened tariffs on countries that target US tech giants.
Here is a look at the state of play:
Big tech taxes
Countries have accused Amazon, Microsoft, Google owner Alphabet and Facebook's parent company Meta of sidestepping local taxes. Trump issued a warning on February 21 to countries that would hit big tech and other US companies with fines or taxes that are 'discriminatory, disproportionate' or designed to transfer funds to local companies.
'My administration will act, imposing tariffs and taking such other responsive actions necessary to mitigate the harm to the United States,' he said in the memo.
The move reopens a rift between Washington and its allies over taxing digital services. During his first term, Trump threatened to slap tariffs on US imports of champagne and French cheese after France rolled out a digital services tax in 2019.
Seven other countries have followed France's lead since then. The tax generated 780 million euros ($887 million) for the French government last year. Now the European Union is threatening to impose a tax on digital services if negotiations fail over Trump's plans to impose 20 percent tariffs on EU goods.
Britain, which is hoping to strike a trade deal with the United States, may reconsider its own digital levy, which currently brings in £800 million annually. British Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds has said the digital tax is not 'something that can never change or we can never have a conversation about'.
Global corporate tax
Nearly 140 countries struck a deal in 2021 to tax multinational companies, an agreement negotiated under the auspices of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
The OECD agreement has two 'pillars'.
The first provides for the taxation of companies in countries where they make their profits, a move aimed at limiting tax evasion. It primarily targets tech giants.
Pillar two, which sets a minimum global rate of 15 percent, has been adopted by around 60 economies, including Brazil, Britain, Canada, the EU, Switzerland and Japan.
Daniel Bunn, head of the Tax Foundation, a US non-profit think-tank, said negotiations on implementation of the first pillar 'have been stalled for some time', even under Joe Biden's presidency. Franco-American economist Gabriel Zucman told AFP that the EU's reaction in the coming weeks 'will be crucial'.
'If the EU and other countries give up and allow American multinationals to exempt themselves, it will unfortunately spell the end of this very important agreement,' he said.
Tax the rich
Efforts to tax the world's ultra-wealthy are also stalling. Brazil used its time as chair of the G20 to push for a plan to impose a two percent minimum tax on the net worth of individuals with more than $1 billion in assets, a project estimated to raise as much as $250 billion per year.
The Biden administration baulked at the plan and it is unlikely to get any traction with Trump -- a billionaire himself and proponent of tax cuts -- at the White House.
Almost a third of the world's billionaires are from the United States -- more than China, India and Germany combined, according to Forbes magazine.
At a recent conference in Paris, French economist Thomas Piketty said the world cannot wait for the G20 to all agree.
'We need individual countries to act as soon as they can,' he said.
'History suggests that once you have a couple of countries who adopt a certain kind of reform, in particular powerful countries, it becomes sort of a new standard.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Insider
3 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
US Resumes Student Visas With Stricter Social Media Vetting
The State Department announced new vetting requirements on June 18, including social media screening for all student visa applicants. 'The State Department is committed to protecting our nation and our citizens by upholding the highest standards of national security and public safety through our visa process. A U.S. visa is a privilege, not a right,' the State Department said in a press release. While student visa interviews—previously paused as the government reviewed its visa policy—have resumed, applicants will now be expected to set their social media profiles to 'public' to allow screening by U.S. diplomatic officials. Failure to do so could be interpreted as an effort to hide certain online activity. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said that those who may cause trouble for the United States or its allies, including violence or harassment against certain ethnic groups or supporting designated terrorist groups, could have their student visa applications rejected. 'Every visa adjudication is a national security decision,' the State Department said. 'The United States must be vigilant during the visa issuance process to ensure that those applying for admission into the United States do not intend to harm Americans and our national interests, and that all applicants credibly establish their eligibility for the visa sought, including that they intend to engage in activities consistent with the terms for their admission.' The development comes roughly three weeks after a senior State Department official confirmed to The Epoch Times that it had ordered American embassies worldwide to pause student visa interviews as the agency works to enhance its vetting process. In an internal cable signed by Rubio and leaked to the media on May 27, the agency said it was considering making strict social media vetting a requirement for all foreign students applying to study in the United States. On Wednesday, ahead of the announcement, The Epoch Times learned that student visa interviews had resumed with the new rules in place. Consular officers are also directed to review social media activity for signs of the applicant having possible disdain for the United States and its government, citizens, culture, founding principles, or institutions. These changes will affect any applicants for the student (F), vocational (M), and exchange visitor (J) visas and are intended to bolster national security. When the State Department paused student visa interviews late last month, agency spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said the Trump administration takes 'very seriously the process of vetting who it is that comes into the country.' 'We've always vetted people trying to come in. We've always looked at visas seriously,' she said. 'Whether they be students, or if you're a tourist who needs a visa, or whoever you are, we're going to be looking at you.' The very next day, Rubio announced that the United States would begin revoking visas for Chinese students, including any with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in 'critical fields.' In a short statement, the State Department confirmed that it would work with the Department of Homeland Security to 'aggressively revoke' the visas while revising visa criteria to 'enhance scrutiny of all future visa applications' from China and Hong Kong. The State Department has accused the Chinese regime of monitoring its students abroad and mobilizing them through the Chinese Students and Scholars Association. Some of that group's U.S. branches have openly admitted to being directed, supported, or financed by Chinese consulates.
Gulf Insider
18 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
US Intel: Iran Likely To Pursue Nukes If US Joins Israel's War
Reiterating a long-running US intelligence community consensus that Iran has not been building a nuclear bomb, US intelligence officials are warning that an American entry into Israel's war would likely incentivize Iran to pursue becoming a nuclear-weapon state after all. Meanwhile, insiders say President Trump is wary of turning Iran into 'another Libya' if Israel's regime-change ambitions are somehow realized. In other major developments: President Trump on Thursday issued a statement seemingly granting more time for a diplomatic solution: 'Considering there's a significant likelihood of negotiations that may or may not happen with Iran soon, I will determine whether or not to engage in the next two weeks.' The Pentagon's Defense Threat Reduction Agency has advised top officials that America's formidable 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs may be insufficient to destroy Iran's nuclear enrichment facility buried in a mountain at Fordo — and that doing so may require a nuclear bomb. Otherwise, even in the wake of bombings of various other facilities, Iran could conceivably be capable of producing a bomb if it decided to. buried in a mountain at Fordo — and that doing so may require a nuclear bomb. Otherwise, even in the wake of bombings of various other facilities, Iran could conceivably be capable of producing a bomb if it decided to. Steve Bannon joined Donald Trump for lunch at the White House on Thursday; Bannon is staunchly opposed to America entering Israel's war , telling an audience, 'We can't do this again. We'll tear the country apart. We can't have another Iraq.' , telling an audience, 'We can't do this again. We'll tear the country apart. We can't have another Iraq.' Iranians have largely been cut off from the internet for more than 36 hours, with some observers claiming it reflects the government working to stifle domestic dissent, but most attributing it to Iranian wariness of potential cyberattacks . . Israel and Iran traded more attacks over Thursday night, with the Israeli Air Force claiming it hit ballistic missile launchers, missile production facilities and a nuclear research center, and Iran hitting the city of Beersheba, with unconfirmed reports of damage to a Microsoft building. Speaking to the New York Times , senior intelligence officials say a US strike on the uranium enrichment facility buried under 300 feet of mountainous rock at Fordo, or a US-facilitated assassination of Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, would probably push Iran to build a nuclear bomb to deter further aggression against it. In 2003, Khamenei issued a religious order — or fatwa — prohibiting the development of any kind of weapon of mass destruction. That edict is 'right now holding,' a senior intel official told the Times . One of the officials cast doubts on Israeli claims that Iran could have a bomb in 15 days. Iran would first have to take uranium it's already enriched to 60% and enrich it to 90%. That's probably the easiest part. Next, they'd have to construct a nuclear explosive device, and miniaturize it so it can fit inside a missile warhead. As an alternative, US intel analysts speculate that Iran could build a crude, 10,000-pound Hiroshima-style bomb that would have to be dropped by plane — which wouldn't be a particularly credible deterrent. The analysts say that, contrary to Israeli claims, it would take between several months and a year to have a missile-ready warhead after a hypothetical decision to pursue one. Of course, it's always worth noting that Netanyahu has been warning of an imminent Iranian nuclear bomb since 1992 — when he said they would have one by 1997 at the latest. 🤯 WOW:2,780 year old israelite tablet finally translated to reveal its message:'Persia is only weeks away from developing a nuclear weapon' — Not Sure Gnosis 🦈 (@ViceLitty) June 18, 2025 The US assessment that Iran has not decided to pursue a nuclear weapon comes three months after the same conclusion was shared with Congress by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, which in turn came 18 years after the intelligence community first made that assessment. When confronted with Gabbard's testimony in the wake of Israel's bombing-and-mass-assassination attack on Iran, Trump told a reporter, 'I don't care what she said. They were very close to getting a nuke.' Vice President JD Vance offered his own flimsy deflection in a social media post, writing 'Tulsi's testimony was in March, and a lot has changed since then.' Thursday's remarks from senior intel officials severely undercut Trump's and Vance's characterizations. Unlike nuclear-weapon-state Israel, Iran is a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and has long insisted that its nuclear program is peaceful. In 2015, Iran signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), by which it agreed to physical modifications, additional monitoring and other provisions that would assure outsiders that the country would be incapable of enriching uranium to a weapons-grade level. Though Iran was in full compliance, President Trump withdrew the United States from the JCPOA in 2018 and reimposed harsh economic sanctions on the country — having promised to do so in a 2016 presidential campaign fueled by $45 million from Israel-focused billionaires Sheldon and Miriam Adelson. His JCPOA withdrawal came just a month after Trump appointed archetypal Iran hawk and neocon John Bolton as National Security Advisor. After several days of the feeling that US engagement in Israel's war could be imminent, Trump's setting of a two-week timeframe for making that enormously consequential decision partially reflects his wariness that Iran could turn into a failed state if the Ayatollah's regime is toppled, according to administration officials who talked to the New York Post . One of the insiders said '[He] doesn't want it to turn into Libya…There are two reasons Trump talks about Libya: the first is the chaos after what we did to Gaddafi. The second is the Libya intervention made it more difficult to negotiate deals with countries like North Korea and Iran.' Seeking to appease the West, Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi famously surrendered his nuclear development program in 2003, only to be the victim of a US-NATO regime-change campaign in 2011 that culminated in his being anally raped with a bayonet and then savagely beaten to death. That dark chapter looms as a stark cautionary tale for rulers all around the world facing American demands. Meanwhile, Libyans continue to suffer from the result of that Barack Obama-Hillary Clinton toppling of Gaddafi, which led to utter chaos, blacks being sold in open-air slave markets and illegal immigrants pouring into Europe as they flee the Western-cultivated Hell-scape. Insiders say Trump has also raised the specter of the disastrous outcomes of US interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq. Trump's confrontation with the ghosts of failed interventions — past, present and future — comes as Tucker Carlson, other major conservative figures and legions of MAGA social-media users are urging him not to get America involved in another foreign policy disaster. Is the growing right-wing uproar having an effect?
Gulf Insider
18 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
How Much A Family In Europe Earns In A Year, Adjusted For Living Costs
Family income in Switzerland is the highest in Europe at €179,000 a year is the highest in Europe at €179,000 a year It's lowest in Türkiye at €23,000 a year at €23,000 a year However when adjusting for living costs, family income falls considerably in Switzerland, and grows 3x in Türkiye This data is sourced from Eurostat which no longer publishes comparative UK figures. A family is considered as two earning parents, both making exactly the average wage, with two dependent children. Figures are rounded. Comparing Ireland and Türkiye reveals the need to account for purchasing power vs nominal earnings. An Irish family makes about €96,000 a year after taxes and social security contributions. It's ranked 6th in the region. Meanwhile Türkiye is ranked last in euro earnings (at €23,000/year.) However, by PPS standards (which is an artificial value created by the EU that takes into account living costs), both countries average around 70,000 PPS. Which means residents in both countries have around the same purchasing power, despite wildly different euro earnings. Ranked by Euro Income Countries ISO Code Euro Income (2024) PPS Income (2024) 1 🇨🇭 Switzerland CHE €178,553 100,777 2 🇮🇸 Iceland ISL €116,411 73,988 3 🇱🇺 Luxembourg LUX €110,438 82,439 4 🇳🇱 Netherlands NLD €101,465 86,753 5 🇳🇴 Norway NOR €97,580 79,979 6 🇮🇪 Ireland IRL €95,776 69,833 7 🇦🇹 Austria AUT €93,722 83,870 8 🇩🇰 Denmark DNK €91,712 63,283 9 🇩🇪 Germany DEU €86,372 79,606 10 🇧🇪 Belgium BEL €80,070 68,222 11 🇫🇮 Finland FIN €76,150 61,224 12 🇸🇪 Sweden SWE €75,076 65,425 13 🇫🇷 France FRA €68,228 60,801 14 🇮🇹 Italy ITA €54,472 55,696 15 🇪🇸 Spain ESP €50,060 54,978 16 🇨🇾 Cyprus CYP €49,273 53,005 17 🇲🇹 Malta MLT €48,048 52,795 18 🇬🇷 Greece GRC €41,142 47,990 19 🇪🇪 Estonia EST €39,965 39,598 20 🇵🇱 Poland POL €39,120 54,982 21 🇸🇮 Slovenia SVN €38,209 42,679 22 🇨🇿 Czechia CZE €36,076 40,725 23 🇵🇹 Portugal PRT €35,394 40,804 24 🇱🇹 Lithuania LTU €34,128 41,570 25 🇸🇰 Slovakia SVK €32,940 39,294 26 🇱🇻 Latvia LVA €31,500 38,393 27 🇭🇺 Hungary HUN €29,788 41,718 28 🇭🇷 Croatia HRV €29,523 39,508 29 🇷🇴 Romania ROU €26,766 44,043 30 🇧🇬 Bulgaria BGR €23,375 39,515 31 🇹🇷 Türkiye TUR €22,880 72,731 N/A 🇪🇺 EU EUR €63,523 62,169 A family is two earning parents, both making exactly the average wage, with two dependent children.
