The deadline approaches for Trump's ‘90 deals in 90 days.' So far he has ‘frameworks' for two
President Donald Trump and his team promised '90 trade deals in 90 days,' but so far he has only 'framework' agreements for two countries in place.
Trump's sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs ushered in on April 2 are set to go into effect on July 8.
Skeptics said little progress has been made on making trade deals, leaving American businesses to deal with economic uncertainty.
'We were promised '90 deals in 90 days.' What we have at this point are 'general frameworks' for the U.K. and China,' Marc Short, who served in Trump's first administration as legislative affairs director, told Politico.
Short, who also served as Vice President Mike Pence's chief of staff, said the Trump administration will 'hail these general frameworks as really significant breakthrough deals,' but other countries are watching closely.
'Other countries are seeing that, if I wait this out, [Trump's] going to be overly sensitive to bond market yields, or he's going to get himself into trouble, and then he's going to need to get out of it with a deal,' Short added.
This week's trade deal progress with China has been touted as a major win by the White House. 'We're in a solid place going forward in these negotiations, because the country that could most push back here, tried to push back and it didn't really go well for them,' a White House official told Politico, adding that the administration 'feels good' about negotiations with others.
Trump declared the deal was 'done' pending a 'final approval' by him and Chinese President Xi Jinping in a Truth Social post Wednesday.
Last month the U.K. achieved a series of significant carve-outs from sweeping U.S. tariffs on its carmakers, steelworks and farmers.
But the odds of scoring '90 deals in 90 days,' as White House trade adviser Peter Navarro touted in April, are now looking unlikely.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said it was 'highly likely' the July 8 deadline could slide for countries who are engaging in good faith negotiations with the U.S.
'There are 18 important trading partners. We are working toward deals on those, and it is highly likely that those countries — or trading blocs, as in the case of the EU — who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward to continue good faith negotiations,' Bessent told the House Ways and Means Committee this week.
Trump also suggested he would be open to deadline extensions but said he did not believe it was 'a necessity.'
'We're rocking in terms of deals,' Trump said Wednesday. 'We're dealing with quite a few countries and they all want to make a deal with us.'
The president said that letters specifying the terms of trade deals with dozens of countries would be going out in the coming weeks.
'At a certain point, we're just going to send letters out ... saying, 'This is the deal. You can take it, or you can leave it,'' Trump said. 'So at a certain point we'll do that. We're not quite ready.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Highest-paying jobs in Germany: Official data and job postings reveal top salaries
Germany is the world's third-largest economy, with a projected GDP of $4.74 trillion (€4.12tn) in 2025. According to IMF estimates from April of this year, it ranks among the top 20 countries in GDP per capita, with its total standing at $55,911 (€47,206). Germany is also the top EU destination for immigrants in total — combining arrivals from both within and outside the bloc, according to Eurostat. Some of them are highly skilled and dream of finding good, well-paid jobs. So, what are the highest-paying positions in Germany, and what are the average annual earnings for these roles? Euronews Business takes a closer look at the highest salaries in Germany using two sources that reflect different aspects of the job market. The first is the gross earnings dataset from the Federal Statistical Office (Destatis) from April 2024. While the data is reported monthly, it has been converted into annual figures by multiplying by 12. Euronews has also looked at job postings from global hiring firm Indeed, covering annual earnings from May 2024 to April 2025. According to Destatis, aviation is the top-paying sector in Germany, with a median gross annual salary of €336,000. Median earnings in this field typically start from €132,000. In the healthcare industry, median annual earnings range between €108,000 and €156,000, followed by the legal and judiciary sector, where salaries fall between €84,000 and €144,000. In academia and research, median salaries range from €72,000 to €120,000, closely followed by the IT and engineering sector, where salaries fall between €72,000 and €114,000. Public sector employees are also well paid, with median salaries ranging from €60,000 to €114,000. Retail and services represent the lowest-paid sector, with median annual earnings ranging from €30,000 to €42,000. The average gross monthly earnings in April 2024 were €4,634, amounting to €55,608 annually in Germany. Pilots have the highest median annual gross earnings in Germany, with salaries varying based on experience and specific roles. Those in highly complex aviation roles earn a median salary of €342,072, and an average of around €337,152. Flying instructors in complex roles have a median annual salary of €281,592, ranking them second in terms of median earnings. Among the top 50 highest-paying jobs, four additional aviation roles are also featured: air traffic surveillance and control (complex) at €147,996 (5th), airline and aircraft pilots (complex) at €139,524 (6th), aircraft pilots at €122,484 (12th), and technical air traffic control (complex) at €109,188 (20th). Healthcare occupations dominate the list of highest-paying jobs in Germany, with 11 roles included in the top 50. At the top of the list are managers in human medicine and dentistry, earning a substantial €165,576 annually and ranking third overall. Among technical roles, highly complex positions in laboratory medicine and radiology follow closely, with median annual salaries of €131,556 and €129,012, respectively. Medical doctors are also well represented, especially those in surgical specialties, earning €118,668 per year. General or unspecified medical practitioners in highly complex roles can expect to earn around €100,000 annually. Managers in legal services and jurisdiction rank fourth overall, with a median annual salary of €149,280. Judges in highly complex roles follow at 38th place, with prosecutors and lawyers in similarly complex roles ranking just behind them, all earning around €95,000 annually. Not surprisingly, managerial positions across various sectors appear in the top 50 highest-paying jobs. These sectors include universities, technical research, computer science, public administration, IT systems, software development, accounting, business organisation, and media management. These managers typically earn more than €100,000 annually, with none earning less than €90,000. Perhaps one of the most surprising entries in the list is the magicians and illusionists sector, ranking eighth overall with annual earnings of €134,316. National security service employees in highly complex roles also feature in the top 50, with salaries just over €90,000. Indeed's list of highest-paying occupations also highlights broader salary trends. Corporate tax advisors top the chart with a median annual salary of €145,000 in Germany. Various sales roles come next in the ranking, such as managing directors and heads of sales, with median earnings ranging from €107,500 to €138,243. A labour law attorney earns €105,000, while general lawyers receive around €93,334. System Applications Product consultants earn just under €100,000, with senior system engineers following closely at €95,000. Other tech roles, such as IT security specialists and technical SAP consultants, have salaries around €90,000. In the management category, directors also earn approximately €90,000. There is only one medical profession appearing on the list — dentists — with a median wage of nearly €86,000 because 'physicians and surgeons' is excluded from Indeed's dataset, requiring a separate analysis. As jobs and skills continue to evolve, the highest-paying roles are expected to shift as well. 'We anticipate that AI/GenAI, green energy, cybersecurity, and biotechnology will produce new top-earning job titles over the next 5–10 years,' Pawel Adrjan, Director of Economic Research at Indeed, told Euronews Business. He noted that roles like AI ethicist, GenAI engineers, climate data analysts and key sustainability roles are gaining momentum and are likely to enter the upper salary tiers as demand for specialised expertise in these fields increases. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
How Senate Republicans want to change the tax breaks in Trump's big bill
WASHINGTON (AP) — House and Senate Republicans are taking slightly different approaches when it comes to the tax cuts that lawmakers are looking to include in their massive tax and spending cuts bill. Republicans in the two chambers don't agree on the size of a deduction for state and local taxes. And they are at odds on such things as allowing people to use their health savings accounts to help pay for their gym membership, or whether electric vehicle and hybrid owners should have to pay an annual fee. The House passed its version shortly before Memorial Day. Now the Senate is looking to pass its version. While the two bills are similar on the major tax provisions, how they work out their differences in the coming weeks will determine how quickly they can get a final product over the finish line. President Donald Trump is pushing to have the legislation on his desk by July 4th. Here's a look at some of the key differences between the two bills: The child tax credit currently stands at $2,000 per child. The House bill temporarily boosts the child tax credit to $2,500 for the 2025 through 2028 tax years, roughly the length of President Donald Trump's second term. It also indexes the credit amount for inflation beginning in 2027. The Senate bill provides a smaller, initial bump-up to $2,200, but the bump is permanent, with the credit amount indexed for inflation beginning next year. Trump promised on the campaign trail that he would seek to end income taxes on tips, overtime and Social Security benefits. Also, he would give car buyers a new tax break by allowing them to deduct the interest paid on auto loans. The House and Senate bills incorporate those promises with temporary deductions lasting from the 2025 through 2028 tax years, but with some differences. The House bill creates a deduction on tips for those working in jobs that have customarily received tips. The House also provides for a deduction for overtime that's equal to the amount of OT a worker has earned. The Senate bill comes with more restrictions. The deduction for tips is limited to $25,000 per taxpayer and the deduction for overtime is limited to $12,500 per taxpayer. The House and Senate bills both provide a deduction of up to $10,000 for interest paid on loans for vehicles made in the United States. And on Social Security, the bills don't directly touch the program. Instead, they grant a larger tax deduction for Americans age 65 and older. The House sets the deduction at $4,000. The Senate sets it at $6,000. Both chambers include income limits over which the new deductions begin to phase out. The caps on state and local tax deductions, known in Washington as the SALT cap, now stand at $10,000. The House bill, in a bid to win over Republicans from New York, California and New Jersey, lifts the cap to $40,000 per household with incomes of less than $500,000. The credit phases down for households earning more than $500,000. The Senate bill keeps the cap at $10,000. That's a non-starter in the House, but Republicans in the two chambers will look to negotiate a final number over the coming weeks that both sides can accept. The House bill prohibits states from establishing new provider taxes or increasing existing taxes. These are taxes that Medicaid providers, such as hospitals, pay to help states finance their share of Medicaid costs. In turn, the taxes allow states to receive increased federal matching funds while generally holding providers harmless through higher reimbursements that offset the taxes paid. Such taxes now are effectively capped at 6%. The Senate looks to gradually lower that threshold for states that have expanded their Medicaid populations under the Affordable Care Act, or 'Obamacare,' until it reaches 3.5% in 2031, with exceptions for nursing homes and intermediate care facilities. Industry groups have warned that limiting the ability of states to tax providers may lead to some states making significant cuts to their Medicaid programs as they make up for the lost revenue in other ways. The Medicaid provision could be a flashpoint in the coming House and Senate negotiations. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., was highly critical of the proposed Senate changes. 'This needs a lot of work. It's really concerning and I'm really surprised by it,' he said. 'Rural hospitals are going to be in bad shape.' The House bill would allow companies for five years to fully deduct equipment purchases and domestic research and development expenses. The Senate bill includes no sunset, making the tax breaks permanent, which was a key priority of powerful trade groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Republicans in both chambers are looking to scale back the clean energy tax credits enacted through then-President Joe Biden's climate law. It aimed to boost the nation's transition away from planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions toward renewable energy such as wind and solar power. Under the Senate bill, the tax credits for clean energy and home energy efficiency would still be phased out, but less quickly than under the House bill. Still, advocacy groups fear that the final measure will threaten hundreds of thousands of jobs and drive up household energy costs. The House bill would allow millions of Americans to use their health savings accounts to pay for gym memberships, with a cap of $500 for single taxpayers and $1,000 for joint filers. The Senate bill doesn't include such a provision. The House reinstates a charitable deduction for non-itemizers of $150 per taxpayer. The Senate bill increases that deduction for donations to $1,000 per taxpayer. Republicans in the House bill included a new annual fee of $250 for EV owners and $100 for hybrid owners that would be collected by state motor vehicle departments. The Senate bill excludes the proposed fees. ___
42 minutes ago
How Senate Republicans want to change the tax breaks in Trump's big bill
WASHINGTON -- House and Senate Republicans are taking slightly different approaches when it comes to the tax cuts that lawmakers are looking to include in their massive tax and spending cuts bill. Republicans in the two chambers don't agree on the size of a deduction for state and local taxes. And they are at odds on such things as allowing people to use their health savings accounts to help pay for their gym membership, or whether electric vehicle and hybrid owners should have to pay an annual fee. The House passed its version shortly before Memorial Day. Now the Senate is looking to pass its version. While the two bills are similar on the major tax provisions, how they work out their differences in the coming weeks will determine how quickly they can get a final product over the finish line. President Donald Trump is pushing to have the legislation on his desk by July 4th. Here's a look at some of the key differences between the two bills: The child tax credit currently stands at $2,000 per child. The House bill temporarily boosts the child tax credit to $2,500 for the 2025 through 2028 tax years, roughly the length of President Donald Trump's second term. It also indexes the credit amount for inflation beginning in 2027. The Senate bill provides a smaller, initial bump-up to $2,200, but the bump is permanent, with the credit amount indexed for inflation beginning next year. Trump promised on the campaign trail that he would seek to end income taxes on tips, overtime and Social Security benefits. Also, he would give car buyers a new tax break by allowing them to deduct the interest paid on auto loans. The House and Senate bills incorporate those promises with temporary deductions lasting from the 2025 through 2028 tax years, but with some differences. The House bill creates a deduction on tips for those working in jobs that have customarily received tips. The House also provides for a deduction for overtime that's equal to the amount of OT a worker has earned. The Senate bill comes with more restrictions. The deduction for tips is limited to $25,000 per taxpayer and the deduction for overtime is limited to $12,500 per taxpayer. The House and Senate bills both provide a deduction of up to $10,000 for interest paid on loans for vehicles made in the United States. And on Social Security, the bills don't directly touch the program. Instead, they grant a larger tax deduction for Americans age 65 and older. The House sets the deduction at $4,000. The Senate sets it at $6,000. Both chambers include income limits over which the new deductions begin to phase out. The caps on state and local tax deductions, known in Washington as the SALT cap, now stand at $10,000. The House bill, in a bid to win over Republicans from New York, California and New Jersey, lifts the cap to $40,000 per household with incomes of less than $500,000. The credit phases down for households earning more than $500,000. The Senate bill keeps the cap at $10,000. That's a non-starter in the House, but Republicans in the two chambers will look to negotiate a final number over the coming weeks that both sides can accept. The House bill prohibits states from establishing new provider taxes or increasing existing taxes. These are taxes that Medicaid providers, such as hospitals, pay to help states finance their share of Medicaid costs. In turn, the taxes allow states to receive increased federal matching funds while generally holding providers harmless through higher reimbursements that offset the taxes paid. Such taxes now are effectively capped at 6%. The Senate looks to gradually lower that threshold for states that have expanded their Medicaid populations under the Affordable Care Act, or 'Obamacare,' until it reaches 3.5% in 2031, with exceptions for nursing homes and intermediate care facilities. Industry groups have warned that limiting the ability of states to tax providers may lead to some states making significant cuts to their Medicaid programs as they make up for the lost revenue in other ways. The Medicaid provision could be a flashpoint in the coming House and Senate negotiations. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., was highly critical of the proposed Senate changes. 'This needs a lot of work. It's really concerning and I'm really surprised by it,' he said. 'Rural hospitals are going to be in bad shape.' The House bill would allow companies for five years to fully deduct equipment purchases and domestic research and development expenses. The Senate bill includes no sunset, making the tax breaks permanent, which was a key priority of powerful trade groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Republicans in both chambers are looking to scale back the clean energy tax credits enacted through then-President Joe Biden's climate law. It aimed to boost the nation's transition away from planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions toward renewable energy such as wind and solar power. Under the Senate bill, the tax credits for clean energy and home energy efficiency would still be phased out, but less quickly than under the House bill. Still, advocacy groups fear that the final measure will threaten hundreds of thousands of jobs and drive up household energy costs. The House bill would allow millions of Americans to use their health savings accounts to pay for gym memberships, with a cap of $500 for single taxpayers and $1,000 for joint filers. The Senate bill doesn't include such a provision. The House reinstates a charitable deduction for non-itemizers of $150 per taxpayer. The Senate bill increases that deduction for donations to $1,000 per taxpayer. Republicans in the House bill included a new annual fee of $250 for EV owners and $100 for hybrid owners that would be collected by state motor vehicle departments. The Senate bill excludes the proposed fees.
