Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds rejects GOP bill to increase regulations on carbon dioxide pipeline
Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds on Wednesday rejected a bill that could have introduced more complications for a massive carbon-capture pipeline project routed across several Midwestern states, issuing a rare veto in the Republican-controlled statehouse.
The legislation was designed by Iowa House Republicans to increase regulations of Summit Carbon Solutions' estimated $8.9 billion, 2,500-mile project that cuts across Iowa and already has an approved permit in the state.
But in the Senate, it exposed a rift within the party over how to protect property rights. It also provoked loud opposition from members of Iowa's powerful ethanol industry, which argued the project is essential for Iowa's agricultural dominance, for farmers and for construction jobs.
Even with the relief from Reynolds' veto, Summit will likely have to readjust plans after South Dakota's governor signed a ban on the use of eminent domain — the government seizure of private property with compensation — to acquire land for carbon dioxide pipelines. Summit's permit application was also rejected in South Dakota.
The project has permit approvals in Iowa, Minnesota and North Dakota but faces various court challenges.
The Iowa bill would have prohibited the renewal of permits for a carbon dioxide pipeline, limited the use of such a pipeline to 25 years and significantly increased the insurance coverage requirements for the pipeline company.
Those provisions would likely have made it less financially feasible for a company to build a carbon dioxide pipeline.
As the legislative session wound down, a dozen Republican senators insisted their leaders bring the House-approved bill to the floor for a vote after several years of inaction. The stalemate ended in a long and divisive debate among the Iowa Senate's Republican supermajority, with senators openly criticizing one another and exposing the closed-door discussions that got them there.
The pipeline's many critics have for years begged lawmakers for action. They accuse Summit of stepping on their property rights and downplaying the safety risks of building the pipeline alongside family homes, near schools and across ranches.
Lee Enterprises and The Associated Press reviewed hundreds of cases that reveal the great legal lengths the company went to to get the project built. In South Dakota, in particular, a slew of eminent domain legal actions to obtain land sparked a groundswell of opposition that was closely watched by lawmakers in Iowa as well.
But as debate in the state Senate seemed inevitable, dozens of Summit employees and leaders and members of the Iowa Corn Growers Association, the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association and labor unions made a big showing as well.
The pipeline was proposed to carry carbon emissions from ethanol plants in Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota to be stored underground permanently in North Dakota. By lowering carbon emissions from the plants, the pipeline would lower their carbon intensity scores and make them more competitive in the renewable fuels market.
The project would also allow ethanol producers and Summit to tap into federal tax credits.
Iowa Renewable Fuels Association Executive Director Monte Shaw said in a May 12 statement after the vote that a majority of the Iowa Senate "turned their back on Iowa agriculture."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
32 minutes ago
- CNET
Upgrade Your Home Security With Up to 62% Off Some of Our Absolute Favorite Arlo Security Cameras
Home security cameras are so versatile these days. From keeping an eye on pets or kids to deterring package theft and protecting your home while you're sleeping or away, there are plenty of reasons for you to invest in some cameras for your space. Right now Woot is making it even easier to get your hands on some for cheap, marking down a number of Arlo security cameras by up to 62%. Prices start at just $67. If you're looking for outside security there are a few options, but one of the best deals in this sale is the Arlo Ultra 2 Spotlight camera bundle. The cameras have 4K HDR, a 180-degree field of view, great smart home support and local storage. It's our pick for the best wireless 4K home security camera of 2025. Our biggest gripe was the price, but this deal alleviates that worry. Along with two cameras, you'll also get a SmartHub, a power adapter, two rechargeable batteries, two ethernet cables and mounting kits. This bundle would normally run you $600, but a nice 50% discount slashes that price in half so that you'll pay only $300 if you act fast. For something with a dual function, try the Arlo Pro 3 Floodlight security camera. It has a motion-activated floodlight that can reach up to 3,000 lumens, which is great for when you get home late at night. But it will also ensure anyone in your driveway is illuminated and recorded just in case they're up to something nefarious. The camera itself has 2K resolution, color night vision and two-way audio. It's also one of our favorite options for security cameras with floodlights for 2025 and won our Editors' Choice award. Regularly priced at $250, you can get yours for just $120 at Woot. Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money. For indoor coverage, grab yourself a 2-pack of 2nd-gen Arlo Essential security cameras for $67. These indoor cameras are currently our pick for the best overall nanny cam of 2025 thanks to its 2K resolution, solid two-way audio, clear night vision and zoom capabilities. There are some other choices available as well, so be sure to shop the entire sale selection to grab exactly what you need for your home. And don't forget -- Prime members get free shipping, too. Just be sure to log in with Amazon before placing your order. Why this deal matters There are a ton of great options in this sale, including some of our top picks of 2025. If you've been considering getting a home security camera (or several), now is the time. It's rare to see so many discounts saving you half the cost -- or more -- and we are fairly certain these offers will sell out quick. Lock in your order soon to avoid disappointment.
Bloomberg
33 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Tesla Robotaxi Videos Show Speeding, Driving Into Wrong Lane
Tesla Inc. 's self-driving taxis appeared to violate traffic laws during the company's first day offering paid rides, with one customer capturing footage of a left turn gone wrong and others traveling in cars that exceeded posted speed limits. In a video taken by Rob Maurer, an investor who used to host a Tesla podcast, the Model Y he's riding in enters an Austin intersection in a left-turn-only lane. The Tesla hesitates to make the turn, swerves right and proceeds into an unoccupied lane meant for traffic moving in the opposite direction.
CNN
34 minutes ago
- CNN
Tesla finally begins long-promised robotaxi service
Tesla's much-publicized robotaxi service began this weekend — but only in one neighborhood in Austin, Texas, only for a select group of the company's fans and only with a Tesla employee in the front passenger seat. It was a far more modest rollout for robotaxis than Tesla CEO Elon Musk had promised. While other companies have already achieved and surpassed this initial test, Tesla fans still cheered the unassuming launch as a game-changing first step. Musk has promised since 2019 that Tesla was on the verge of providing a wide-ranging ride-hailing service that would change the basic way riders get around, including the promise that Tesla owners would profit from renting their cars to the service. Last fall, Musk debuted a prototype for a 'Cybercab' without a steering wheel or pedals, and he said the service would greatly change the financial outlook for Tesla, making it the most valuable company on the planet. But the start of the Tesla service Sunday was only a fraction of any of that. A small number of company-owned cars were used and they were existing Model Y vehicles — not Cybercabs, which are not yet allowed on roads, let alone produced on a mass scale. It was not even the most extensive robotaxi service in Austin — a joint effort between Uber and Waymo, the self-driving car unit of Google parent Alphabet, has been up and running in Austin since March. But the Austin test pressed on regardless. The rides were made available to a select group of Tesla fans, according to Dan Ives, a tech analyst with Wedbush Securities and an effusive Tesla bull, and Joey Klender, who writes for the site Klender and a member of Ives' team took multiple rides in a Tesla Model Y robotaxi on Sunday. Ives' note to clients, which cited how a Tesla 'safety monitor' sat in the front passenger seat while no person was in the driver's seat, praised the quality of the rides taken by his team member. 'We took a route through a park with dirt roads and traffic cones, yet the car was able to navigate perfectly and picked us up right at our exact location,' Ives said in the note. 'To really put it into perspective, there was a moment where we drove up a narrow road going up a hill with cars parked on both sides with oncoming traffic and people opening their car doors into the road and the Robotaxi masterfully maneuvered.' But it was not all smooth sailing, with multiple videos showing the car making mistakes. In one YouTube video, the robotaxi drove on the wrong side of the road after it attempted and abandoned a left turn, only to continue traveling down the street on the opposite side of a double yellow line before making the left turn on the following block. Fortunately, there were no vehicles driving on the other side of the road. A separate YouTuber posted a video in which the robotaxi kept driving past its destination for several minutes as he tried to get it to pull over so he could get out. 'Please exit safely,' a screen in the rear seat of the car said, as it continued driving down the road. All the rides on Sunday, no matter the distance, cost $4.20, a favorite number of Musk based on its association with marijuana. Musk reposted tweets on X from others who took rides on the initial day of service. Unsurprisingly, all the posts were positive. Musk and his fans have insisted the service will rapidly be expanded to other cities and will dramatically change the financial performance of Tesla. But the EV maker is playing a game of catch up. Waymo, a unit of Google parent Alphabet, has been providing paid rides since 2020, and now provides more than 250,000 rides a week to paying riders in Austin, Phoenix, Los Angeles and San Francisco. It soon plans to expand the service to Atlanta, Miami and Washington, DC. General Motors pulled the plug on its own self-driving car hailing service in December, citing the 'considerable' resources needed and 'an increasingly competitive robotaxi market.' It also had an accident in which one of its robotaxis in San Francisco hit a pedestrian and dragged the woman along the road for 20 feet. The woman had already been hit by a human-driven car before she was struck by GM's robotaxi. California authorities ordered the company to halt its operations in the state as a result.
