Israeli ambassador says Hamas to blame as she is challenged on deaths of children in Gaza
Israel's ambassador to the UK has insisted children have "never" been targeted in Gaza and said Hamas should be blamed for every death.
Tzipi Hotovely was challenged on the deaths of innocent civilians by Wilfred Frost after two British surgeons, who have worked in Gaza during the Israeli bombardment, filmed video blogs for Sky News.
He asked how many children it is "legitimate and proportionate" to kill, including those being treated in hospital, in order to kill Hamas terrorists.
Follow live Israel-Iran updates:
Ms Hotovely said Israel was "not there to kill anyone" and "never targets civilians", with its attacks complying with international law.
Dr Victoria Rose, a consultant plastic surgeon, who has worked in Gaza hospitals for three separate periods, previously told Sky she felt the number of children coming through the doors was "barbaric".
She said there were "more innocent children, let alone adults, that are dying per Hamas scalp that you see".
Asked about her account, Ms Hotovely said: "We never targeted the children, it's Hamas that needs to be blamed…But they need to blame Hamas for creating this reality for the Palestinian people."
She added: "For every life lost in Gaza, you need to blame Hamas for committing the crimes on 7 October and for committing the war crimes by using people as human shields."
Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducted 251 people in the October 7 2023 attack.
The group is still holding 50 hostages, with less than half of them believed to be alive.
Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed more than 55,000 Palestinians, according to the Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza, which has said women and children make up more than half of the dead. It does not distinguish between civilians and combatants.
Ms Hotovely said Israel is "not interested in wars", adding: "So we are asking a very simple request from the international community - pressure Hamas to release our hostages and we will have a better condition to get to a ceasefire."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fed officials are starting to break rank and join Trump
Some Federal Reserve officials are joining President Donald Trump in calling for lower interest rates as soon as July. Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman on Monday downplayed the potential impacts of Trump's tariffs on prices and said the US central bank should swiftly lower rates to preserve the labor market's health. 'It is time to consider adjusting the policy rate,' Bowman said. 'Should inflation pressures remain contained, I would support lowering the policy rate as soon as our next meeting in order to bring it closer to its neutral setting and to sustain a healthy labor market.' Bowman is the second Fed official to join Trump in calling for lower borrowing costs. On Friday, Fed Governor Christopher Waller said tariffs will likely only result in a 'one-off' increase in inflation. Both Bowman and Waller are Trump appointees. For months, Fed officials have said they prefer to wait to see how Trump's major policy shifts affect the US economy first before considering further rate cuts. At its policy meeting earlier this month, the Fed kept its benchmark lending rate unchanged for the fourth consecutive time. But that strategy hasn't sat well with Trump, who has relentlessly lashed out at the central bank and its leader, Fed Chair Jerome Powell, for not lowering rates. Trump has hurled various insults at Powell, describing him as a 'fool' and a 'numbskull.' Now, the Fed's wait-and-see posture is slowly crumbling, even as tensions in the Middle East heat up, which raises the risk of higher global energy prices. And the jury is still out on the ultimate impact of Trump's tariffs. Bowman said it's possible the Israel-Iran conflict — which escalated over the weekend with the US striking at three Iranian nuclear sites — results in higher commodity prices. And there's still the lingering possibility of Trump's trade war also pushing up prices, she said. Still, that may not even result in higher consumer prices because businesses don't have much leverage to hike prices this time around, Bowman said. 'I am certainly attentive to these inflation risks, but I am not yet seeing a major concern, as some retailers seem unwilling to raise prices for essentials due to high price sensitivity among low-income consumers and as supply chains appear to be largely unaffected so far,' Bowman said. Bowman isn't the only Fed official seemingly not worried about the potential economic impact of the Israel-Iran conflict. Powell has said higher energy prices spurred by the conflict will likely be short lived. 'When there's turmoil in the Middle East, you may see a spike in energy prices, but it tends to come down. Those things don't generally tend to have lasting effects on inflation, although of course in the 1970s, they famously did,' Powell said in a news conference following the Fed's June 17-18 policy meeting. 'But, we haven't seen anything like that now. The U.S. economy is far less dependent on foreign oil than it was back in the 1970s,' he added. Economists have said the economic impact of the current conflict largely depends on how out of hand it gets. A forecast from analysts at EY-Parthenon shows that the US economy could contract by a massive 1.9% annualized rate if the Middle East plunges into an all-out regional war. But in a 'contained' scenario, the US economy could contract only slightly. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
31 minutes ago
- Forbes
Bitcoin Fell Below $100,000 This Weekend Amid ‘Escalating Geopolitical Uncertainty'
Bitcoin prices declined below the $100,000 this weekend. Bitcoin prices dropped below $100,000 this weekend, briefly trading below that crucial level as global markets responded to the latest developments in the conflict between Iran and Israel. The world's most valuable digital currency by total market value approached $98,400 on Sunday, June 22, according to Coinbase data from TradingView. As recently as Friday, June 20, the cryptocurrency had been trading above $105,000. Jacob Joseph, Senior Research Analyst at CoinDesk Data, commented on this decline, stating via email that 'This movement has coincided with escalating geopolitical tensions involving the U.S., Israel, and Iran.' 'Investor sentiment appears to have become more cautious amid uncertainty over potential U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict, which has likely contributed to the broader retreat seen in risk assets,' he continued. Marc P. Bernegger, cofounder of crypto fund of funds AltAlpha Digital, offered a similar take, indicating that 'Escalating geopolitical issues, particularly in the Middle East, were cited as a trigger for market uncertainty.' 'Tensions between Israel and Iran may have prompted capital flight from risk assets like Bitcoin, pushing prices below the $100,000 psychological support level,' he clarified through emailed commentary. James Maxfield, head of trading for Gemini EU, also chimed in, emphasizing the losses bitcoin (and ether) suffered over the weekend. 'This followed U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, which triggered a sharp selloff across crypto markets,' he said through email. 'The downturn came after President Trump confirmed the strikes and warned that further military action was possible, fueling fears of broader conflict.' Potential Impact On Energy Markets Some analysts have voiced concerns about how the ongoing conflict in the Middle East could affect global energy markets. Dom Kwok, cofounder and COO of educational platform EasyA, spoke to this matter, specifying via email that 'Fears around Iran potentially closing the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20% of global oil flows, have sparked concern.' Last year, 20 million bpd moved through this straight on average, which amounted to approximately 20% of petroleum liquids consumed by the global market, according to an analysis conducted by the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Should this straight close, industry participants will have some very limited options for moving oil out of this area. As a result of these factors, the EIA has described the Strait of Hormuz as 'one of the world's most important oil chokepoints.' 'If disrupted, oil prices could spike, driving inflation higher,' Kwok noted. 'Historically, inflationary pressure prompts investors to exit perceived high-risk assets and shift towards cash and gold." The analyst shed further light on the subject, offering greater detail on the market's response to the latest geopolitical developments. 'Importantly, this isn't a crypto-specific reaction. It's a classic flight-to-safety move,' he stated. 'In times of conflict, forecasting future risk becomes nearly impossible, so capital flows to traditionally safer assets. While many believe Bitcoin should serve as a hedge, institutions still classify it as a high-risk asset.' 'Fortunately, these shocks are often short-lived,' he added. 'Temporary supply disruptions rarely result in lasting inflation unless prolonged.' 'Past events, like COVID's initial crash, show that such dips can offer compelling long-term buying opportunities. The fact BTC has bounced back above $100,000 shows this.'
Forbes
36 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump Makes Veiled Threat Against Former Russian President Medvedev For Suggesting Support For Iran
President Donald Trump attacked senior Russian official Dmitry Medvedev in a rambling Truth Social post Monday after the former Russian president accused Trump of having 'pushed the U.S. into another war' and suggested other countries would supply Iran with nuclear weapons—moments before Iran fired missiles at a U.S. military base in Qatar. President Donald Trump raises his fist as he boards Air Force One before departing Morristown ... More Municipal Airport in Morristown, New Jersey on June 21, 2025. (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images Trump accused Medvedev, the deputy chair of the Security Council of the Russian Federation and former president of Russia from 2008-2012, of 'casually throwing around the 'N' word (Nuclear!)', writing 'the 'N word' should not be treated so casually. I guess that's why Putin's 'THE BOSS.'' Trump seemingly facetiously asked his social media followers to 'let [him] know' if Medvedev really said 'he and other Countries would supply Nuclear Warheads to Iran.' Trump was responding to a series of tweets from Medvedev over the weekend in which he said 'a number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads,' though he did not say Russia would. Trump made the statements about Medvedev moments before Iran fired missiles at a U.S. military base in Qatar in retaliation for the U.S. military's attack on three nuclear sites in Iran over the weekend. In the post, Trump also praised the nuclear submarines deployed in Saturday's attacks, calling them 'the most powerful and lethal weapons ever built' and 'far and away the strongest and best equipment we have.' Key Background Russian President Vladimir Putin condemned the U.S. military's strike on Iran's nuclear facilities early Monday, calling it an 'absolutely unprovoked act of aggression' that 'has no basis or justification' following a meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Moscow. Putin said 'it is unclear what kind of support would Moscow be willing to provide Iran.' Iran Launches Attack On U.S. Base In Qatar (Forbes) Trump Says U.S. Struck Three Iran Nuclear Sites—Tehran Says This Starts A 'Dangerous War' (Forbes) Trump's Strike On Iran Draws Criticism From Democrats—World Leaders Call For De-escalation (Forbes)
