Media Insider: AM transmissions of up to seven Auckland radio stations – including sport and Pacific broadcasts – threatened under RNZ plans to replace transmission masts
At the heart of the looming showdown are two prominent AM transmission masts on either side of Auckland's Northwestern Motorway, at the Lincoln Rd interchange in Henderson.
RNZ's AM transmission towers in West Auckland are used by 15 radio stations. Photo / Michael Craig
The red and white masts are well-known landmarks; 15 radio stations rely on them for their AM services.
There are eight on the 'northern' mast (Radio Waatea, Humm, BBC World Service, Chinese Voices, Newstalk ZB, Rhema, Radio Tarana and Radio Samoa) and seven on the 'southern' mast (531PI, RNZ National, Parliament, APNA, Ake 1179, Gold Sport AM and Sport Nation).
According to RNZ, both masts need replacing. The southern mast on Lincoln Rd is 153m high and 70 years old. The northern Selwood Rd mast is 122m high and 91 years old.
'The masts have a design life of 50 years, which RNZ has managed to extend until now,' says RNZ chief technology officer Mark Bullen.
RNZ says it needs to remove both masts and – while it insists no final decision has been made – it has proposed replacing just the northern mast.
Scotty Stevenson and Israel Dagg host Sport Nation's breakfast show, which broadcasts on 1476AM in Auckland.
Sources say RNZ has been prepared to build a new southern mast but only if every existing tenant agrees to pay increased fees. The radio industry is baulking at the proposed fees and wants to see RNZ's costings.
Under the one-mast scenario, RNZ would move RNZ National and Parliament from the southern mast to a new northern mast at the expense of at least one and possibly two of the existing northern mast stations.
Up to five other stations on the southern mast would also lose their AM transmissions, including Sport Nation – the Entain channel that has live cricket rights – and NZME's Gold Sport AM, which has live rugby rights.
Other AM stations on the southern mast are those that cater to specific communities in Auckland, including 531PI for the Pasifika community, APNA for the Indian, Fijian, Bangladeshi, Pakistani and Punjabi communities, and Ake 1179, the official station of Ngāti Whātua.
Many of the 15 stations have a digital presence, but for some of them, AM is the main or only means of transmission.
The radio industry says New Zealand still has strong AM audiences because of the country's geography, topography and high percentage of second-hand imported cars from Japan with radios that usually go up to only 90FM.
Media Insider understands some in the commercial radio industry are infuriated by RNZ's position, believing its proposed costs are inflated.
They are also angry about what they label sky-high, ongoing fees RNZ is proposing for those who are lucky enough to have a spot on the new northern mast.
The Radio Broadcasters Association has engaged a lawyer and fired a shot across RNZ's bow, threatening legal action.
It is understood that the lawyer has told RNZ that withdrawing transmission services would come at a high cost for the public and broadcasters. And that from a charter, public law and a plurality perspective, this included broadcasting to the Pacific Island, Samoan, Chinese, Indian, Māori, and Christian communities.
531PI hosts specialist Pacific language shows on the AM frequency each week.
RNZ's position
RNZ would not agree to chief executive Paul Thompson being interviewed for this story, instead providing a statement because it said it was in the middle of consultation with the industry.
RNZ chief executive Paul Thompson. Photo / Mark Mitchell
RNZ's Mark Bullen said in the statement that 'no legal proceedings have commenced'.
'While RNZ cannot speak to the specific intentions of the co-siters, we are in ongoing conversation with them,' he said.
Bullen said RNZ had engaged with the industry about AM transmission at its Henderson sites 'for many years'.
'Based on structural engineers' reports, we have decided to decommission both towers by June 2026 to ensure the health and safety of both sites,' Bullen said.
RNZ's transmission towers have been features of the West Auckland skyline for decades. Photo / Michael Craig
'The building of a new mast on the northern site would be sufficient to meet RNZ's transmission needs.
'RNZ is now talking to broadcasters ... about the financial viability of building a new mast on the southern site. Whether there are sufficient clients and ongoing revenue to make it financially prudent for RNZ to invest in the southern site [is] part of RNZ's consideration.'
He said if RNZ decided 'not to fund the mast, RNZ is open to ideas from co-siters that would provide other viable, funded plans'.
'RNZ has also had discussions with Government officials on technical options around additional FM services, but were advised this is not viable.'
Bullen said replacing both masts would cost in the range of $7 million, with the southern mast estimated to be close to $3m.
'In summary, no final decision has been taken on the southern site and we are awaiting further feedback from co-siters who we have been engaging with regularly.'
The industry's position
Radio Broadcasters Association chair Jana Rangooni said the association had known for some time that the towers might need to be replaced or relocated.
'Until December last year, we had understood RNZ was looking at a range of options to do this,' Rangooni said.
'Our members and other broadcasters became concerned when a consultation process started in December. It appeared RNZ only intended to rebuild the northern tower. This means all southern tower AM radio stations could be taken off air, along with a number of the northern tower stations RNZ wants to move off that tower to accommodate themselves.
'We believe this raises numerous commercial and public law issues that we have flagged to RNZ on behalf of our members.'
Radio Broadcasters Association chairwoman Jana Rangooni says RNZ's plans for the towers raise commercial and public law issues. Photo / Supplied
Rangooni said she understood all broadcasters wanted to continue to broadcast on both towers at reasonable fees, similar to current pricing.
'We are aware RNZ is requiring increased fees of 200% to 400% uplift on these.
'We believe the option to provide both towers at current prices is a viable one for RNZ, taking into account that the northern tower needs to be built for them to remain broadcasting. The transmission profits they have made from the commercial broadcasters in the past decade would fund most of the southern tower.
'We would not expect commercial operators to be subsidising RNZ operations. We have expected that profits would be recognised towards tower replacement, given their age and well-known need for replacement.'
She said the association was also concerned RNZ would not meet with association members as an industry group 'to discuss all possible options'.
This included 'any joint approaches that might need to be made to the minister or relevant ministry'.
'We believe the option to build both towers based on current fees is a viable and indeed sensible one for a public broadcaster. Should they decide not to, we, along with the impacted broadcasters, will look at all avenues open to us to ensure the respective Pacific, Asian, religious, sporting and other audiences do not lose the services they rely on.
'Recognising these audiences fits well with the role of RNZ in the public interest at a time all New Zealand radio organisations are focused on maintaining and growing our local audiences.'
NZME chief audio officer Jason Winstanley said the company - which also owns the NZ Herald and Newstalk ZB - was disappointed with RNZ's position. NZME believed it was financially viable for the southern tower to be rebuilt.
'We don't believe the proposed cost increase to accommodate the rebuild of both towers is required, based on the financial modelling we've done,' said Winstanley.
'We have requested Radio NZ's modelling several times, but they have declined to provide it. We believe the millions of dollars all broadcasters have paid to date should be used to maintain and rebuild the towers.
'If the southern tower isn't rebuilt, 1332AM would cease broadcasting in Auckland. At that point, for Gold Sport to continue in Auckland, we'd need to find another frequency for it. We're urging Radio NZ to fully explore all options before a final decision is made by their board.'
Brian Kelly hosts Gold AM's The Country Sport Breakfast, which broadcasts on 1332AM in Auckland. Photo / Alex Cairns
MediaWorks director of content Leon Wratt told Media Insider: 'MediaWorks is continuing to work through the RBA with RNZ towards both AM towers at Henderson being replaced so all stations, including Humm on 702AM, remain on-air. With Henderson being Auckland's sole AM transmission site, the future of these stations now sits with RNZ.'
Entain Australia and New Zealand chief media officer Christopher Haigh said the company was 'actively working through potential distribution challenges with RNZ and are committed to bringing Sport Nation to audiences around the country'.
'We'll keep working on our AM/FM coverage plans, alongside bolstering our digital content offering, that already includes livestreaming of sport like cricket, netball and rugby league amongst others.'
While Sport Nation has an AM frequency in Auckland, it does not have an FM frequency.
Pacific Media Network
Pacific Media Network chief executive Don Mann. Photo / Mike Scott
Another impacted station is 531PI, operated by the Pacific Media Network, on the southern mast. It broadcasts 10 specific languages across specialist shows each week.
'If that southern tower goes, there won't be any AM transmission of pan-Pacific languages in Auckland,' said PMN chief executive Don Mann.
'It'll be the end of terrestrial AM transmission of publicly-funded Pacific languages.'
531PI is not part of the GFK radio ratings survey, but Mann said Pacific Media Network, through its various platforms, targeted the 440,000 Pacific Islanders living in New Zealand, about 275,000 of whom were in Auckland.
'Our roots are in linear terrestrial transmission, but we do use third-party platforms, we do use multimedia. We do use visual content, and we stream.
'But the issue is that target audience. The target audience for 531AM, given that it's a language channel, is the Pacific people [for whom] English is not their first language.
'Their first language is Pacific. It's generally an older audience that's been trained over 35 years to listen by appointment on linear radio.'
For example, the Tongan community knew their show was broadcast at 3pm every Wednesday; the Samoan community knew their show was on 3pm every Thursday.
While PMN had made strong gains and growth in multimedia, Mann said there were still issues for some in the Pasifika community not having easy access to online connectivity or devices.
Mann said the industry accepted there was probably a limited timespan for AM transmission, whether that was 'five years or 10 years, or whatever, I don't know'.
It was an issue being grappled with across the world.
AM still played a critical role in emergency situations, and for ethnic communities, that timespan tail was likely a bit longer when they relied on specialist languages.
'It will be a critical situation if we just turn off terrestrial broadcasting to an older Pacific audience.'
Radio Tarana chief executive Robert Khan said Tarana was offered a position on the new northern tower, but the fees had doubled. 'If we don't accept it, we're out of business, quite frankly. The choice was yay or nay - yay if you want your lifeline, nay if you don't want your lifeline.'
Further questions for RNZ
Media Insider went back to RNZ with further questions on Friday.
'RNZ has not made a final decision on the southern mast. If we decide not to fund the replacement mast, then RNZ is open to ideas from co-siters that would provide viable plans consistent with our charter,' said a spokesman.
RNZ says it has been through a fair and robust process with other broadcasters over future AM transmission options. Photo / Michael Craig
'RNZ has a primary responsibility to prudently use its funding to create public media content for audiences. That means we need to ensure all infrastructure investment is affordable while also providing the best value to New Zealanders. RNZ is not established as an infrastructure provider to other broadcasters who have independently secured AM licences from the Crown.
'To fund a southern mast, RNZ must be able to recover its costs and take into account the risks and uncertainties involved. This means we have proposed an increase in fees.
'The majority of RNZ's infrastructure investment has been in maintaining its AM network, which has never been profit-driven. The goal has been to maintain a resilient national network for our services, given our statutory emergency lifeline role.'
RNZ did not directly respond to a question about why it had not met the industry as a group but said it had embarked on a 'fair and robust process' with each broadcaster.
Editor-at-Large Shayne Currie is one of New Zealand's most experienced senior journalists and media leaders. He has held executive and senior editorial roles at NZME including Managing Editor, NZ Herald Editor and Herald on Sunday Editor and has a small shareholding in NZME.
Watch Media Insider - The Podcast on YouTube, or listen to it on iHeartRadio, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Former New Zealand PM Helen Clark Blames Cook Islands For Creating A Crisis
Article – RNZ Helen Clark says the Cook Islands government entered into a strategic partnership with a major power nation – China – without consulting New Zealand. Lydia Lewis, RNZ Pacific Presenter/Producer Former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark believes the Cook Islands, a realm of New Zealand, caused a crisis for itself by not consulting Wellington before signing a deal with China. The New Zealand government has paused more than $18 million in development assistance to the Cook Islands after the latter failed to provide satisfactory answers to Aotearoa's questions about its partnership agreement with Beijing. The Cook Islands is in free association with New Zealand and governs its own affairs. But New Zealand provides assistance with foreign affairs (upon request), disaster relief, and defence. The 2001 Joint Centenary Declaration signed between the two nations requires them to consult each other on defence and security, which Winston Peters said had not been honoured. Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown both have a difference of opinion on the level of consultation required between the two nations on such matters. 'There is no way that the 2001 declaration envisaged that Cook Islands would enter into a strategic partnership with a great power behind New Zealand's back,' Clark told RNZ Pacific on Thursday. Clark was a signatory of the 2001 agreement with the Cook Islands as New Zealand prime minister at the time. 'It is the Cook Islands government's actions which have created this crisis,' she said. 'The urgent need now is for face-to-face dialogue at a high level to mend the NZ-CI relationship.' Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has downplayed the pause in funding to the Cook Islands during his second day of his trip to China. Brown told parliament on Thursday (Wednesday, Cook Islands time) that his government knew the funding cut was coming. He also suggested a double standard, pointing out that New Zealand has entered also deals with China that the Cook Islands was not 'privy to or being consulted on'. A Pacific law expert says that, while New Zealand has every right to withhold its aid to the Cook Islands, the way it is going about it will not endear it to Pacific nations. Auckland University of Technology (AUT) senior law lecturer and a former Pacific Islands Forum advisor Sione Tekiteki told RNZ Pacific that for Aotearoa to keep highlighting that it is 'a Pacific country and yet posture like the United States gives mixed messages'. 'Obviously, Pacific nations in true Pacific fashion will not say much, but they are indeed thinking it,' Tekiteki said. Since day dot there has been a misunderstanding on what the 2001 agreement legally required New Zealand and Cook Islands to consult on, and the word consultation has become somewhat of a sticking point. The latest statement from the Cook Islands government confirms it is still a discrepancy both sides want to hash out. 'There has been a breakdown and difference in the interpretation of the consultation requirements committed to by the two governments in the 2001 Joint Centenary Declaration,' the Ministry for Foreign Affairs and Immigration (MFAI) said. 'An issue that the Cook Islands is determined to address as a matter of urgency'. Tekiteki said that, unlike a treaty, the 2001 declaration was not 'legally binding' per se but serves more to express the intentions, principles and commitments of the parties to work together in 'recognition of the close traditional, cultural and social ties that have existed between the two countries for many hundreds of years'. He said the declaration made it explicitly clear that Cook Islands had full conduct of its foreign affairs, capacity to enter treaties and international agreements in its own right and full competence of its defence and security. However, he added that there was a commitment of the parties to 'consult regularly'. This, for Clark, the New Zealand leader who signed the all-important agreement more than two decades ago, this is where Brown misstepped. Clark previously labelled the Cook Islands-China deal 'clandestine' which has 'damaged' its relationship with New Zealand. RNZ Pacific contacted the Cook Islands Ministry of Foreign Affairs for comment but was advised by the MFAI secretary that they are not currently accommodating interviews.
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Government, Opposition Scrap Over Common Infrastructure Ground
Article – RNZ Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop has agreed to work with his counterparts on the 30-year plan, but the discussion got heated. A reference to $250,000 was corrected to $250 million in this story. Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop has committed to working directly with the Opposition, when putting together the Government's response to the 30-year infrastructure plan due out next week. He says that co-operation comes on the proviso that infrastructure decisions are always political in nature – and it did not stop the discussion from repeatedly descending into a fingerpointing tit-for-tat over which government was to blame for what. Labour housing, infrastructure and public investment spokesperson Kieran McAnulty kicked off the scrutiny week select committee hearing on Thursday afternoon, making an effort to 'start on a positive note' on how bipartisanship could work for infrastructure policy, suggesting that would provide more certainty to the sector. 'I agree,' Bishop said. 'That's part of the reason why we campaigned on a 30-year national infrastructure plan being developed in government.' The plan has been developed independently by the Infrastructure Commission since late 2023 and is due to be launched at Parliament next week, with the government required to respond within six months. Bishop said he planned a Parliamentary debate, so all the political parties' views could be included in that response, but McAnulty wanted more. 'At the moment, frankly, the attitude of some ministers of bipartisanship is, 'We'll work with you, if you agree with us', and I don't think that's good enough,' he said, garnering an emphatic 'yeah' from Green MP Julie Anne Genter. Bishop said completely depoliticising infrastructure was not possible, which was to be expected in a democracy. 'You know, if we all agreed, this would be a fairly boring place,' he said. McAnulty agreed with an agreement to disagree. 'We think some of the things you've done are stupid… what I would like to see is a commitment,' he said. 'There's an opportunity there to work with the other side to actually identify where there is broad agreement and include that in your response.' More than just a debate, he wanted the response to include an explanation of which infrastructure projects the government and opposition parties agreed on. Bishop: 'I'm happy to commit to that now. Just making the obvious point … we may not always agree. 'For example, you guys have got to figure out where you're at on PPPs, for example, because you've had about nine different positions. McAnulty: 'We know where we're at with that.' Bishop: 'You sure?' McAnulty: 'Yes, I am actually… this is one of the things that I'm actually trying to avoid, right, is that we can't help ourselves. 'This is the game we're in. We talk about bipartisanship, but we also take every opportunity to have a crack at each other.' Bishop: 'Well, you just said some of the stuff we've done was stupid.' McAnulty: 'Exactly my point, we can't help ourselves.' Bishop said parties could agree on a lot, when it came to infrastructure, and 'sometimes there's a bit more heat than light in this debate'. McAnulty said he did not think the public would know that. The minister pressed on, deferring to Infrastructure Commission chief executive Geoff Cooper to explain the projects expected across the country from about 110 organisations, including all but 14 of the country's councils. The result was a list showing investment worth $206 billion, broken down by region and sector, which Cooper said started to paint a much clearer picture of investment. 'The point is to have… almost a single source of truth for what's in the pipeline,' Bishop said. Committee chair Andy Foster – a former Wellington mayor – said the information should be included in councils' long-term plans and they should be contributing. Bishop had an easy solution. 'Well, if they don't do it, we can just mandate that they do it – but I'd rather not, because that takes time and money,' he said. 'I'd rather they just do it.' 'Enough of those mandates for councils,' interjected Labour local government spokesperson Tangi Utikere. 'We make them do all sorts of things for the right reasons and this would be the same thing,' Bishop responded. Clashes over cancellations While the first half hour was not entirely bonhomie, unicorns and rainbows, the verbal finger pointing was surely on show in the second half of Bishop's appearance. McAnulty asked if the minister accepted cancelling projects across successive governments had affected sector confidence. 'Depends exactly what you're talking about,' Bishop said. 'I accept that, after 2017, the radical change in direction of the National Land Transport Plan at the time had a significant impact.' 'So you're willing to say that one government cancelled projects that had an effect, but you're not willing to concede that you guys cancelling projects has?' McAnulty responded. Bishop said it showed the limits of bipartisanship. 'Our view was that they're the wrong projects for the country, he said. 'Depends which one, but generally too expensive, not good value for money, in some cases undeliverable. 'It was the right thing to do to say, 'You know what, we're actually just not going to proceed with that'.' Genter said many council projects were also defunded under the coalition and the iReX ferry replacement could have been rescoped, rather than dumped. Predictably, this kicked off a four-minute cancellation-measuring contest – which government cancelled more projects? Who cancelled more projects that were already contracted? 'You can have an intention to do something, it doesn't mean it will end up happening,' Bishop concluded – or seemed to. 'The last government lived in fiscal fantasy land.' 'Only because your government made a decision to give billions of dollars to landlords,' Genter fired back. Foster was eager to move on, asking Bishop about whether Kāinga Ora had managed to bring social housing build costs down to the same level as private developers – a topic well traversed in the last scrutiny week in December. The minister did not have the latest numbers, 'because this is not the vote Housing and Urban Development estimates', but the agency was making 'good progress' and would report back on that publicly. He and Utikere then argued some more over the roughly $250 million allocated for cancellation of the ferries contract – whether that was part of Bishop's responsibilities – with Bishop saying it belonged to Rail Minister Winston Peters and Utikere saying, when they'd asked Peters, he'd referred it to Bishop. Utikere: 'And the minister doesn't even know … that's very disappointing.' Bishop: 'Yes. So's your behaviour.' Utikere: 'No, it's not actually, minister, my behaviour is about scrutinising the executive – that is our responsibility. 'It is disappointing that you don't know the answer to just over a quarter of a billion dollars' worth of taxpayers money that has been set aside in your Budget.' Foster stepped in again, suggesting Bishop's answer was that it was best for his ministerial staff to provide an answer and they did. Treasury deputy secretary Leilani Frew said negotiations for the ferry contract exit were still continuing, as well as wind-down costs. The discussion soon wound down too – after a series of patsy questions and a discussion about the causes of 15,000 fewer people being employed in construction. Bishop argued it was an expected side-effect of bringing down the official cash rate, which would – in turn – have the biggest effect on reinvigorating the sector, McAnulty argued housing could be an avenue for stimulating growth. In the end, the public got a commitment to bipartisanship. Whether it lasts remains to be seen, but investors watching this scrappy select committee may be hesitant to bet the house on it.
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Cook Islands PM slams NZ over funding pause
By Caleb Fortheringham of RNZ Pausing nearly $20 million in development assistance is "patronising" and "inconsistent with modern partnership", Prime Minister Mark Brown has told the Cook Islands parliament. New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters has paused $18.2 million in development assistance to the Cook Islands, due to a lack of consultation regarding a partnership agreement and other deals signed with Beijing earlier this year. The pause includes $10 million in core sector support, which represents four percent of the country's budget. On Wednesday local time, Brown said the money would have been used for health, education and tourism marketing. "The relationship between the Cook Islands and New Zealand is defined by partnership, not paternalism," he told his parliament on Thursday. "Decisions to unilaterally pause core sector support reflect a patronising approach, inconsistent with modern partnership." The 2001 Joint Centenary Declaration signed between the two nations requires them to consult each other on defence and security, which Peters said had not been lived up to, but Brown said the declaration was "explicitly clear" that the Cook Islands could enter international agreements in its own right. "Where we are finding our divergence of views is in the provision relating to the consultation obligations and rights of both parties to the declaration. "We are committed to addressing this urgently. That is why we agreed to New Zealand's proposal to establish a formal dialogue mechanism to discuss the agreements and their implementation." Brown said there had been two meetings so far - one in April and May. "It is disappointing that political commentary from within New Zealand has come at a time when official dialogue continues," he said. "Such commentary undermines genuine and concerted efforts by our senior officials to mend the erosion of trust and confidence that, to be clear, has been experienced on both sides." Peters' office was approached for a response on Brown's comments. A spokesperson for Peters said they would make no further comment and stood by the statements issued Thursday. In parliament, Brown suggested a double standard from New Zealand and said he was "not privy to or consulted on" agreements New Zealand may enter into with China. Brown said he was surprised by the timing of the announcement. "Especially, Mr Speaker, in light of the fact our officials have been in discussions with New Zealand officials to address the areas of concern that they have over our engagements in the agreements that we signed with China." Peters previously said the Cook Islands government was informed of the funding pause on June 4. He also said it had nothing to do with Prime Minister Christopher Luxon visiting China. Brown said he was sure Luxon would ensure good outcomes for the people of the realm of New Zealand on the back of the Cook Islands state visit and "the goodwill that we've generated with the People's Republic of China". "I have full trust that Prime Minister Luxon has entered into agreements with China that will pose no security threats to the people of the Cook Islands. "Of course, not being privy to or not being consulted on any agreements that New Zealand may enter into with China." The Cook Islands is in free association with New Zealand and governs its own affairs, but New Zealand provides assistance with foreign affairs (upon request), disaster relief and defence. Former Cook Islands Deputy Prime Minister and prominent lawyer Norman George said Brown "should go on his knees and beg for forgiveness, because you can't rely on China". "[The aid pause] is absolutely a fair thing to do, because our Prime Minister betrayed New Zealand, and let the government and people of New Zealand down." Not everyone agrees. Rarotongan artist Tim Buchanan said Peters was being a bully. "It's like he's taken a page out of Donald Trump's playbook, using money to coerce his friends," Buchanan said. "What is it exactly do you want from us, Winston? What do you expect us to be doing to appease you?" Buchanan said it had been a long road for the Cook Islands to get where it was now and New Zealand seemed to want to knock the country back down.
