The view from isolation: Amid the relentless ill tidings, at least the faithless fairy wrens make sense
The United States, having given itself over to the absurdly erratic Donald Trump and his cabinet of lickspittles, was proving it could no longer be counted on for almost any major decision that lasted more than a blink.
Loading
Tariffs in Trump's hands had become a global pea-and-thimble trick. His promise to bring international peace was proving not worth an Israeli shekel, a Gazan child's life, a Ukrainian hryvnia, a Russian rouble or now, an Iranian rial.
His latest effort, to demand via text on his Truth Social the ' unconditional surrender ' of Iran, came barely a nanosecond after indicating he wanted to stay out of the Israel-Iran mess.
Oh, and who might have imagined, before it came to pass, a president deploying 4000 National Guard troops and 700 US Marines to quell what were relatively low-level protests by civilians against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) brutes?
Why, it was only a few months ago Trump himself had pardoned all those who had been indicted or found guilty of attacking the US Capitol on January 6, 2021.
Unsurprisingly, polling by the Australian foreign affairs think tank the Lowy Institute revealed this week that almost two-thirds of Australians now hold little to no trust in the United States to act responsibly in world affairs.
The only surprise is that 36 per cent of Australians still hold some form of trust in the Trump outfit.
Watching the fairy wrens bobbing around the lawn, I recalled my first trip overseas, a study tour to the US in the 1970s. I stayed with a series of hosts who proved unfailingly hospitable and generous.
A couple of my American hosts tried to persuade me that the disgraced ex-president Richard Nixon wasn't really a bad person, and was the victim of a witch hunt.
We cordially agreed to disagree, and I never once felt that expressing a view could get me into any sort of strife. Free speech seemed genuinely treasured, and the perspectives of those from across the oceans seemed welcome.
It was, I reflected, so very long ago.
What had happened to those mild Americans of half a century ago?
Muttering something unkind about Trump these days could get you deported or worse, your university could lose its funding or your law firm could be locked out of government contracts.
While I pondered the menace in these developments, Trump's defence secretary, the greasy-haired ex-Fox News host Pete Hegseth – who would barely appear out of place in the sales office of a backstreet used-car yard – was hectoring Australia over its defence expenditure.
We may, of course, need to seriously review our defence capabilities, and it's nothing new for the US to press us on the military's share of GDP. Back in 2013, Richard Armitage, the former deputy secretary of state in the George W. Bush administration, called Australia's defence spending inadequate and accused Australia of wanting a free ride on the US.
Armitage, however, was a serious man of vast experience. Is there any pressing reason we should listen to a fellow like Hegseth, who is so lacking in smarts that he was caught out sharing on a leaky chat group the details of a US strike on Yemen?
Why, this defence secretary couldn't organise America's immense military machine to turn on a stupendously expensive birthday parade for Trump that was much more than a sad-sack march-past.
As for Australia's spending, did Hegseth even send a receipt for our $500 million down payment this year on the $3 billion Australia has promised to prop up the US' submarine industry?
Has an acronym ever sounded quite as ugly as AUKUS?
Back home, what was supposed to be Australia's federal opposition – having been eviscerated at the recent election after its brains trust thought it was smart to assume a MAGA-lite approach – was meaninglessly splitting itself asunder before hurrying back to a shaky coupling of convenience.
Even closer, what is supposed to be the Victorian Liberal Party was tearing itself to shreds. Again.
The forces for and against offering bankruptcy relief to former leader John Pesutto, spurred by factional hatreds old and new, were still furiously facing off at the time of writing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
37 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Russian drones slam into two Ukrainian cities
Russian drones have slammed into two Ukrainian cities, killing at least one person in night-time attacks, authorities say, as a Kremlin official says he expects an announcement on dates for a fresh round of direct peace talks. Russia's drone assault targeted the southern Ukraine port city of Odesa and the northeastern city of Kharkiv, hitting apartment blocks, officials said on Friday. The barrage of more than 20 drones injured almost two dozen civilians, including girls aged 17 and 12, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said. "Russia continues its tactics of targeted terror against our people," Zelenskiy said on messaging app Telegram, urging the United States and the European Union to crank up economic pressure on Russia. Russia has shown no signs of relenting in its attacks, more than three years after it invaded its neighbour. It is pressing a summer offensive on parts of the roughly 1000km front line and has kept up long-range strikes that have hit civilian areas. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the date for the next round peace talks was expected to be agreed upon next week. Kyiv officials have not recently spoken about resuming talks with Russia, last held when delegations met in Istanbul on June 2, though Ukraine continues to offer a ceasefire and support US-led diplomatic efforts to stop the fighting. The two rounds of brief talks yielded only agreements on the exchange of prisoners and wounded soldiers. Ukraine and Russia's defence ministry announced the latest swap on Friday, although they did not specify how many troops were involved. Zelenskiy said most of those returning home had been in captivity for more than two years. A fire caused by Russia's night-time strike on Odesa engulfed a four-storey residential building, which partly collapsed and injured three emergency workers. A separate fire spread across the upper floors of a high-rise, leading to the evacuation of about 600 residents. In Kharkiv, at least eight drones hit civilian infrastructure, injuring four people, including two children, according to Ukraine's Emergency Service. Russia launched 80 Shahed and decoy drones overnight, Ukraine's air force said, claiming that air defenses shot down or jammed 70 of them.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Global Islamic politics expert says Israel's claims about Iranian nuclear weapon 'at odds' with intelligence reports as Netanyahu 'desperate' to involve Trump in war
An Australian global Islamic politics expert has urged the world to be "sceptical" of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claims after numerous intelligence reports concluded that Iran is not "close at all" to building a nuclear weapon. Professor Greg Barton from Deakin University told Sky News Netanyahu's strategy to close down Iran's nuclear program may not be as "clear cut and simple", as he would present it to be to President Donald Trump, in an attempt to persuade the US to join the Israeli assault. "I think that the way that Benjamin Netanyahu will sell it to Trump is that you just send in a couple of B2s over Fordow and it's done," Mr Barton told Sky News host Steve Price. "You've closed down the nuclear program and we're good. "But of course, it is not likely to be so clear cut and so simple." According to Axios, President Trump believes the US has leverage over Iran due to its bunker buster munitions – which Israel does not have – that are capable of destroying the Fordow nuclear enrichment facility that sits deep under a mountain. Mr Barton added the bunker buster bombs are unlikely to demolish Iran's nuclear program and could instead result in dangerous escalation of war in the Middle East. 'First of all, those B2 strikes with massive ordnance, penetrator bombs over Fordow, 90 metres underground, that likely wouldn't finish Iran's nuclear program,' he said. 'They'd probably scramble to take what they have left and actually move towards nuclear weapons. 'In the meantime, they're likely to strike out against US targets all around the Middle East and use their proxies to do so. 'So a very dangerous risk of escalation and a prolonged conflict.' When questioned about the validity of Netanyahu's claims about Iran's existential threat to Israel, Mr Barton said they were 'at odds' with other publicly available intelligence reports have said, including what Trump was briefed on by his own security adviser. Mr Barton highlighted Israel's remarkable capabilities at penetrating Iranian society and its defence apparatus, but noted other intelligence reports suggest 'Iran is some way off, it's not close at all' to building a nuclear weapon. 'It is possible they know something that no one else knows, but what all the other intelligence reports are saying is that Iran is some way off, it's not close at all,' he said. 'We can't know, we're sort of making a claim from Netanyahu who is desperate to involve Trump and America in this programme, and on balance you sort of want to be a bit sceptical about what he's saying for that reason.' Israel has been trading missiles with Iran since last Friday in an attempt to shut down any efforts of Tehran building an atomic weapon to wipe out the existence of the Jewish state. Netanyahu said the operations were to "strike the head of Iran's nuclear weaponisation program". White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told a media briefing on Thursday, local time, she had been asked to pass on a 'direct quote' from President Trump on the possibility of US intervention in the Israel-Iran war. 'Based on the fact that there is a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' she said, quoting the President. Ms Leavitt also urged sceptics of US involvement to 'trust' in President Trump's judgement, before emphasising his 'top priority' was to prevent Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Few believe Iran has nuclear weapons. We can't afford to repeat the Iraq War lie
The Middle East is once again in danger of exploding, with massive global geopolitical and economic implications. The leader who bears most responsibility for this is undoubtedly Benjamin Netanyahu. For years, the Israeli prime minister has doggedly pursued the demise of the Iranian Islamic regime in line with his power interests and his vision of Israel's security requirements. His stated goal has long been to bring down the 'Islamic empire in Iran', 'expand the Abraham Accords with Arabs' and once and for all end the Palestinians' aspirations for an independent state. As part of this Middle East master plan, he has also zeroed in on Iran's nuclear program. But let's not forget: No concrete evidence exists that Iran has been manufacturing nuclear weapons. In a congressional hearing earlier this year, the United States' Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard confirmed this fact. And earlier this week, Rafael Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said that 'on the basis of our evaluation, we came to the conclusion that we could not affirm that there is any systematic effort in Iran to manufacture a nuclear weapon'. Despite this, Netanyahu continues to insist that Iran is on course to produce nuclear weapons within weeks, and the US is teetering on entering the war in Israel's support. Meanwhile, he omits the fact that Israel itself has its own nuclear program. Though Israel has never formally confirmed or denied its nuclear arsenal, its national Atomic Energy Commission was established in 1952. By 1958, researchers believe the government had established a weapons development site in Dimona, and American intelligence from the 1960s stated that there was a reprocessing plant for plutonium production at the site. Loading As the Federation of American Scientists wrote in 2007, 'the existence of Israeli nuclear weapons is a 'public secret' by now due to the declassification of large numbers of formerly highly classified US government documents which show that the United States by 1975 was convinced that Israel had nuclear weapons'. According to the Centre for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, Israel today has at least 90 nuclear warheads and enough material to produce hundreds more. The United Nations' nuclear watchdog has also found that of the 30 countries capable of developing nuclear weapons, Israel is among nine that possess them (Russia, US, China, France, United Kingdom, Pakistan, India, Israel and North Korea).
