New US sonar tech to hunt hidden WWII-era bombs buried at 400+ underwater sites
More than 400 underwater sites across the U.S. may be contaminated with unexploded ordnance (UXO)—decades-old bombs and munitions that failed to detonate and now pose serious safety risks, especially in shallow waters now transitioning to public use.
Connor Hodges, a Ph.D. student at the University of Texas at Austin, is working on advancing underwater detection by studying how UXOs degrade over time and how those changes affect their acoustic signatures.
'Many of these sites are in shallow water, potentially posing a threat to human safety, and date back several decades,' said Hodges. 'This long exposure to the environment leads to corrosion as well as encrustation in the form of barnacles or algal growth.'
UXOs may remain dormant for decades, but if disturbed—stepped on, struck, or moved—they could still detonate. Traditional sonar systems rely on recognizing shapes and materials underwater.
But as corroded bombs lose their distinct appearance, they begin to blend into the seabed. The acoustic signals they return weaken or shift, increasing the chance of false negatives during surveys.
To better understand how aged UXOs behave acoustically, Hodges and his team examined a series of AN-Mk 23 practice bombs—small-scale training bombs used during WWII. These particular munitions had been submerged in a brackish pond on Martha's Vineyard for over 80 years.
The researchers compared the sonar response of these corroded, biofouled bombs with that of pristine ones. They measured how sound waves scattered off the bombs from various angles and directions, discovering that degradation significantly changes the object's acoustic resonance and returns a much weaker signal.
'Acoustic scattering techniques give an insight into the internal structure of the object imaged, as well as a method to 'see' into the seafloor,' said Hodges.
As military sites are repurposed for civilian use, understanding how old munitions interact with sonar becomes increasingly vital. Hodges emphasizes the importance of UXO detection in environmental remediation and public safety:
'There is a risk of detonation if they are stepped on or otherwise disturbed,' he added. 'This poses a larger risk to human safety in shallow waters, and UXO identification and recovery becomes vital as old sites are transitioned away from military use.'
Hodges plans to expand his work to include other types of munitions and explore different corrosion and encrustation scenarios. His research may ultimately contribute to more reliable models for sonar-based UXO detection—critical tools for military, environmental, and humanitarian operations.
'Underwater UXO can be tricky to find and recover, so it is important that this can be done safely and effectively,' said Hodges. 'We hope this work will ultimately help save lives.'
Hodges will discuss this research on Monday, May 19, at 8 am CT as part of the joint 188th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and 25th International Congress on Acoustics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
4 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
‘We are still here, yet invisible.' Study finds that U.S. government has overestimated Native American life expectancy
Official U.S. records dramatically underestimate mortality and life expectancy disparities for Native Americans, according to a new, groundbreaking study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. The research, led by the Boston University School of Public Health, provides compelling evidence of a profound discrepancy between actual and officially reported statistics on the health outcomes of American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) populations in the U.S. The study, novel in its approach, tracks mortality outcomes over time among self-identified AI/AN individuals in a nationally representative cohort known as the Mortality Disparities in American Communities. The researchers linked data from the U.S. Census Bureau's 2008 American Community Survey with official death certificates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Vital Statistics System from 2008 through 2019, and found that the life expectancy of AI/AN populations was 6.5 years lower than the national average. They then compared this to data from the CDC's WONDER database, and found that their numbers were nearly three times greater than the gap reported by the CDC. Indeed, the study found that the life expectancy for AI/AN individuals was just 72.7 years, comparable to that of developing countries. The researchers also uncovered widespread racial misclassification. The study reports that some 41% of AI/AN deaths were incorrectly classified in the CDC WONDER database, predominantly misrecorded as 'White.' These systemic misclassifications drastically skewed official statistics, presenting AI/AN mortality rates as only 5% higher than the national average. When they adjusted the data to account for those misclassifications, the researchers found that the actual rate was 42% higher than initially reported. The issue of racial misclassification 'is not new for us at all,' said Nanette Star, director of policy and planning at the California Consortium for Urban Indian Health. The recent tendency for journalists and politicians to use umbrella terms like 'Indigenous' rather than the more precise 'American Indian and Alaska Native' can obscure the unique needs, histories and political identities of AI/AN communities, Star noted, and contribute to their erasure in both data and public discourse. 'That is the word we use — erasure — and it really does result in that invisibility in our health statistics,' she said. Issues related to racial misclassification in public records persist across the entire life course for AI/AN individuals, from birth to early childhood interventions to chronic disease and death. Star noted that in California, especially in urban regions like Los Angeles, Native individuals are frequently misidentified as Latino or multiracial, which profoundly distorts public health data and masks the extent of health disparities. 'It really does mask the true scale of premature mortality and health disparities among our communities,' Star said. Further, said Star, the lack of accurate data exacerbates health disparities. 'It really is a public health and justice issue,' she said. 'If you don't have those numbers to support the targeted response, you don't get the funding for these interventions or even preventative measures.' According to U.S. Census data, California is home to the largest AI/AN population in the United States. That means it has a unique opportunity to lead the nation in addressing these systemic issues. With numerous federally and state-recognized tribes, as well as substantial urban AI/AN populations, California can prioritize collaborative and accurate public health data collection and reporting. Star noted that current distortions are not always malicious but often stem from a lack of training. She suggested that California implement targeted training programs for those charged with recording this data, including funeral directors, coroners, medical doctors and law enforcement agents; allocate dedicated resources to improve the accuracy of racial classification on vital records; and strengthen partnerships with tribal leaders. The study authors suggest similar approaches, and there are numerous examples of successful cases of Indigenous-led health partnerships seen across Canada and the U.S. that have helped reduce health disparities among AI/AN communities that could be used as a template. These efforts would not only help to move toward rectifying historical inaccuracies, but also ensure that AI/AN communities receive equitable health resources and policy attention. 'When AI/AN people are misclassified in life and in death, it distorts public health data and drives inequities even deeper,' said Star. 'Accurate data isn't just about numbers — it's about honoring lives, holding systems accountable and making sure our communities are seen and served.'
Business Insider
15-06-2025
- Business Insider
The next wearable tech could be a face 'tattoo' that measures mental stress
Tattoos can reveal a lot about a person. One day, they could even reveal a person's brain waves. At least, that's the goal for researchers at the University of Texas at Austin. "This tattoo is not like a normal tattoo," Nanshu Lu, a professor in the university's Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, told Business Insider. Lu worked alongside engineering professor Luis Sentis and others to develop an ultra-thin, wireless wearable device that she compared to a temporary tattoo sticker. The non-invasive device, applied to the skin with an adhesive, measures brain activity and eye movement to gauge an individual's mental workload. Lu said the device is intended for people working in high-stakes or high-demand jobs, such as aircraft pilots, air traffic controllers, drone operators, and robot teleoperators. These jobs could be considered high-stress since they require focus, quick-thinking skills, and a small margin for error. "Technology is developing much faster than human evolution, so it is very hard to keep up with the technological demand in modern jobs," she said. "Therefore, it's very important not to overload the operator because not only would that jeopardize the outcome of the mission, it would also harm their health." Although the idea of an electronic tattoo might sound like something out of a sci-fi novel, humans and technology have been melding for a while. Nearly 40 years ago, for example, the first fully digital hearing aid became available to the public, according to the Hearing Health Foundation. And now, Elon Musk is embedding computer chips into people's brains through his company, Neuralink. Recent wearable tech inventions include smartwatches, Bluetooth headphones, VR headsets, and fitness trackers, to name a few. Some health-conscious folks invest in wearable technology like the Oura Ring, which collects data on everything from sleep activity to body temperature. However, those devices don't analyze brain activity and eye movement. "Over the years, we developed a series of non-invasive skin conformable e-tattoos to measure cardiovascular health, then measure the mental stress from the palm sweating," Lu said of previous devices she helped develop. "Now, finally, we move on to the brainwave." Lu said the device certainly isn't the first or only EEG sensor on the market, but it's smaller and lighter than previous models. Conducting an EEG test typically requires attaching electrodes to an individual's full scalp with a gel or paste to collect data, which can be time-consuming. Researchers at the University of Texas at Austin are attempting to streamline that process by proving mental workload can be measured only from the forehead. During lab tests, participants did memorization drills that involved a screen with flashing boxes. "In the past, there was no way to objectively assess mental workload. The subjects have to finish the test and then a questionnaire," Lu said. "But in the future, if we can implement some lightweight machine learning model directly on a microprocessor in the Bluetooth chip on e-tattoo, then yes, our goal is to one day be able to do it in real time." A report by Grand View Research said that the global wearable technology market was worth $84.2 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach $186.14 billion by 2030, underscoring consumers' willingness to integrate technology into their everyday lives. However, electronic tattoos won't be commercial anytime soon. Lu and her fellow researchers are still conducting tests on and developing the tech. Still, she can imagine a world where the e-tattoo is used by people not employed in high-stakes jobs. It could be used by "people who would like to focus as well as people who want to meditate to see if they are truly relaxed," Lu said.
Yahoo
13-06-2025
- Yahoo
Researchers make concerning discovery after investigating bays: 'They're a threat to everything'
Microplastics are slipping out of Texas bays and into the Gulf of Mexico, where they can do even more damage to the environment — and possibly to us. Researchers at the University of Texas at Austin recently found that microplastics in Texas bays, particularly Matagorda Bay, are not accumulating in sediments as expected. Instead, they are being transported into the Gulf of Mexico. The study, published in Environmental Science & Technology, analyzed 122 sediment samples from Matagorda Bay, East Matagorda Bay, and San Antonio Bay. Findings showed relatively low concentrations of microplastics in the samples — only tens to hundreds of particles per kilogram of sediment, which is hundreds to thousands of times less than similar bayside environments around the world. This data was entirely unexpected, according to the researchers — especially with a plastic pellet factory directly on Matagorda Bay. The researchers attribute the findings to shallow depths in the respective bays, along with windy conditions and frequent hurricanes, which prevent microplastics from settling. And if these microplastics don't settle, they get swept into the Gulf — which sends these tiny particles of plastic on an even more destructive journey. As the researchers outlined in the study, once in the Gulf of Mexico, these microplastics absorb environmental chemicals and accumulate in marine life. This can pose risks to the broader ecosystem and human health, as these microplastics enter the food and water supply. "It's good that the bay is not a microplastic dump or hotspot," study co-author Cornel Olariu, a research associate professor in the Jackson School's Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, said in a statement. "But the bad thing is they move around much easier than we thought … and they're a threat to everything up to us." According to the Stanford Report, about 10 to 40 million metric tons of microplastics are released into the environment each year. Microplastics never disappear from the environment, contaminating waterways, soil, air — everything. While scientists are still learning exactly how microplastics impact animals, people, and the planet, it's clear that these pervasive plastic particles cause long-term damage. A 2020 study found that humans inhale approximately 16.2 bits of microplastics every hour. That's the equivalent of a credit card per week. Harvard Medicine highlights that microplastic exposure is linked to a wide range of human health impacts, including reproductive issues, cancers, inflammation, lung and liver problems, hormone disruptions, and changes to the gut microbiome. Understanding how and where microplastics travel is key to effectively tackling their environmental impact. This particular study marks the first time researchers have examined the prevalence of microplastics in Texas bay sediments, providing crucial baseline data for further research. Do you worry about air pollution in and around your home? Yes — always Yes — often Yes — sometimes No — never Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. As a next step in the research, the authors are developing models to trace the pathways of Texas bay microplastics, hoping to see where they collect if not in the bays. In the meantime, there are global efforts to reduce plastic usage to help combat microplastic prevalence. But with the prevalence of plastic in our lives and our environment, completely avoiding microplastics is not only unlikely — it's impossible. Still, there are simple ways to reduce your exposure. Opt for clothing made from natural fibers, skip plastic food packaging when you can, and bring reusable bags instead of relying on single-use plastics. Since microplastics are also in the air we breathe, regular vacuuming and using a HEPA air purifier can help limit indoor exposure. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
