Fur imported and sold in UK should be banned
Fur imported and sold in the UK should be banned, an MP has said.
While fur farming has been banned in Wales and England since 2000, many types of fur are still legally imported and sold.
Ruth Jones, Labour MP for Newport West and Islwyn, has introduced a Private Members' Bill to Parliament that would prohibit the import and sale of new fur products.
The British Fur Trade Association (BFTA) accused Jones of being the "wardrobe police", adding the ban would be "unenforceable and unworkable" and may breach trade agreements with the EU and the US.
How my challenge to stop buying new clothes has gone
Designer brings Welsh myths to London Fashion Week
Miners' strike designs help Welsh fashion find voice
Jones said: "Twenty years ago, a Labour government banned fur farming because it was cruel and inhumane.
"If we think it's cruel and inhumane to farm it, why are we importing it? It doesn't make sense."
The MP added: "Caged animals are kept in dreadful, inhumane conditions just to provide fur for a declining industry.
"Faux fur could do the job just as well."
Sonul Badiani-Hamment, UK director for animal welfare organisation Four Paws, recently presented a petition with one-and-a-half million signatures in support of a fur-free Britain, alongside other campaigners.
"There isn't any justification for the cruelty experienced by these animals on fur farms," she said.
"Country after country are leaving the market. Sweden recently committed to decommissioning the fur trade entirely."
The British Fashion Council attended one of the campaign group's events in Parliament to support the proposed bill, she said.
Ms Badiani-Hamment said she had noticed the fashion industry changing, adding there were "very few designers left in the country handling fur".
"It's just not desirable."
But Mel Kaplan, who works at Vintage Fur Garden in London, said demand for vintage fur was growing.
"We have queues going out the door in the winter," she said.
"Over the past three years, there's been a resurgence in the want for vintage fur.
"I think younger people especially are looking more to vintage clothing in general. I think fast fashion has taken a decline in popularity."
Furriers in the UK sell a variety of fur that has been imported from other countries.
The import or export of cat and dog fur, and products containing their fur, is banned. There is also a ban on selling cat and dog fur in the UK market.
The new bill calls for a ban on all new fur being imported or sold in the UK and would not apply to vintage items.
Ms Kaplan said all the coats and jackets in their store were from the 1950s, 60s, 70s, and 80s.
The shop has a rigorous process when acquiring fur products to ensure that what they are selling is vintage, not new fur, she added.
Ms Kaplan also said vintage fur was sustainable, adding: "If it were to be discarded, it would go back into the earth, everything - all the fibres and the fur is natural.
"I don't support the making of new furs, I don't support the farming and I don't support the sale of it, but I can get behind a piece that was already made with the intention of being worn so it can carry on being worn."
In a statement, the BFTA warned that a ban could cost thousands of skilled British jobs.
"Standards in the fur sector are among the highest of any form of animal husbandry with rigorous and comprehensive animal welfare standards, third-party inspection and strict international and national laws," it said.
"Fur is popular as evidenced by the number of young people choosing to wear it who are rejecting oil-based fast fashions often made in sweatshop conditions.
"MPs like Ruth Jones should respect that others are happy to wear high-welfare fur, rather than acting like the wardrobe police."
The second reading of the bill is expected to take place in Parliament on 4 July.
Meanwhile, the UK government said it was building a "clear evidence base to inform future action", with an updated animal welfare strategy due to be published later this year.
French fashion giant to ban use of fur
Queen Camilla will buy no more real-fur items
Soaring cost of King's Guards' real fur bearskin caps revealed
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
GB News presenter claims he was sacked for calling Suella Braverman a racist
A former GB News presenter has claimed he was sacked for calling Suella Braverman a racist on air. Albie Amankona, who was dropped by the broadcaster last year, is taking the channel to an employment tribunal over a string of claims including racial discrimination and unfair dismissal. Mr Amankona, a Tory commentator who presented debate programme The Saturday Five, left the broadcaster shortly after stating that he believed Ms Braverman was 'a racist and a thoroughly bigoted woman'. GB News issued an apology to the former home secretary, saying the comments 'crossed a line between robust debate and causing unnecessary offence'. The broadcaster added that Ms Braverman was 'understandably upset'. Mr Amankona alleges that he was taken off air as a result of the comments. He is crowdfunding his claim, which also includes allegations of harassment and victimisation, through the Good Law Project, a legal campaign group founded by outspoken barrister Jo Maugham. Mr Amankona said: 'I regret that it has come to this, I have tried very hard to resolve matters privately and in good faith. Like so many fair-minded Britons I believe in free speech, fairness, the rule of law and I know right from wrong. GB News claims to stand for these values. 'My experience tells a different story. They must be held accountable, not only for cancelling me, but for seemingly treating non-white employees differently from white employees, and for abandoning the very values we Britons hold dear.' The Good Law Project said: 'GB News likes to brand itself as a champion of free speech and journalistic independence. But when one of its own presenters dared to call out racism and intolerance, the response was swift and severe: he was dropped instantly. 'It's a familiar pattern – when free speech aligns with their agenda, they celebrate it. But the moment it challenges their narrative, the mask slips.' GB News denies the claims. A spokesman said: 'Mr Amankona's claim is misconceived, without merit and being robustly defended. As the claim is ongoing we do not propose to comment further.' Mr Amankona is a broadcaster and activist who co-founded the Conservatives Against Racism For Equality group. He presented the GB News programme from March 2023 until August 2024, and has made regular appearances on other broadcasters including the BBC, LBC and Sky News. The legal challenge marks the latest twist in a turbulent few years for GB News, which has courted controversy since its launch in 2021 as a challenger to incumbents such as the BBC. Ofcom has found the channel in breach of broadcasting rules a dozen times over impartiality issues including its use of politicians as presenters. But in a major victory earlier this year, GB News successfully challenged Ofcom's decisions in the High Court, leading to several impartiality rulings being dropped. Nevertheless, the start-up is still locking horns with the watchdog, which is now consulting on plans to broaden its ban on politicians acting as news presenters. Angelos Frangopoulos, GB News chief executive, has accused Ofcom of having a 'jailer' mentality towards broadcasters, while co-owner Sir Paul Marshall last month claimed the regulator was unfairly punishing the channel under pressure from Left-wing activists. Ofcom has insisted it enforces its rules 'fairly and proportionately'. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lammy urges Reform's newest MP to ‘get some help' over ‘conspiracy theories'
David Lammy has urged a Reform UK MP to 'get some help' because she is 'swallowing conspiracy theories'. Sarah Pochin had asked the Foreign Secretary whether the US felt unable to use the UK-US airbase on Diego Garcia, following the Government's deal with Mauritius over the Chagos Islands. Responding during a statement on the Middle East, Mr Lammy said the MP for Runcorn and Helsby should 'get off social media'. The UK-operated base in the Chagos Islands was not used in the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, Foreign Office minister Stephen Doughty has said. He added that the US did not ask to use it, as he answered questions from the Foreign Affairs Committee on Monday. Speaking in the Commons, Ms Pochin said: 'Is he (Mr Lammy) able to explain to the House whether the United States felt unable to use the Diego Garcia base and have to refuel, in a highly dangerous operation three times because of that, because of your deal that you did with the with the Mauritians, that would then tell the Chinese, that would then tell the Iranians?' Mr Lammy replied: 'The honourable lady has got (to) get off social media, has got to get some help… because she is swallowing conspiracy theories that should not be repeated in this House.' The deal over the Chagos Islands follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice which says the islands should be handed over to Mauritius. As well as establishing a £40 million fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay Mauritius at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms. During the statement on Monday, Mr Lammy was pressed by MPs on the UK's position following the US military action. Conservative MP Lincoln Jopp (Spelthorne) said: 'Does His Majesty's Government support or oppose US military action against Iran at the weekend?' Mr Lammy replied: 'His Majesty's Government will continue to work with our closest ally, as I was last week in Washington DC.' Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin (Tunbridge Wells) said: 'What is UK Government policy on whether regime change should be pursued in Iran?' Mr Lammy replied: 'It is not our belief that it's for us to change the regime of any country, that it must be for the people themselves.' SNP MP Brendan O'Hara (Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber) said: 'We've been here for an hour, and still the Foreign Secretary appears incapable of saying whether he supports or condemns America's actions, or whether he regards them as being legal or not. 'And nowhere in this statement does the role of international law even merit a mention. So will the Foreign Secretary take this opportunity now to tell us whether he believes that America's unilateral action was compliant with international law?' Mr Lammy replied: 'I've got to tell (Mr O'Hara), I qualified and was called to the bar in 1995, I haven't practised for the last 25 years. 'It is not for me to comment on the United States' legal validity. I would refer him to article 51 and article two of the UN Charter, and he can seek his own advice.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Iran Should ‘Take the Off Ramp' and Negotiate, UK Foreign Minister Says
U.K. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities 'cannot destroy the knowledge Iran has acquired over several decades,' reiterating the need for a diplomatic solution. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
