Wayfarers Chapel may have new home at unused military site

Southern California's iconic glass chapel may have found a new home in Rancho Palos Verdes.
The famed Wayfarers Chapel was closed indefinitely last year due to unprecedented shifting of the ground below it. The church's leadership team made the decision to disassemble the beloved California landmark and wedding venue and reassemble it in another location.
This week, church officials announced that they may have found the chapel's new grounds.
According to the church's website, a new proposed location has been identified at Battery Barnes, a former munitions storage facility for the U.S. Coast Guard, adjacent to Rancho Palos Verdes City Hall.
The four-acre property overlooking the Pacific Ocean was utilized during World War II and remains under Coast Guard jurisdiction. But city officials say the property has been unused for several years and the only structure on the land is vacant.
The glass chapel, which was designated a Historic National Landmark in 2023, could be rebuilt on the hilltop above Point Vicente Lighthouse, a still active navigational landmark that is also the property of the Coast Guard.
While the site has been tabbed as the future home to Wayfarers Chapel, and renderings have been made to show what the new campus may look like, church officials still need to procure the space and raise enough funds to reassemble the church and rebuild the surrounding infrastructure.
The popular wedding chapel, which was designed by famed architect Lloyd Wright (son of Frank Lloyd Wright) in the 1940s, previously stood among a crowd of trees that overlooked Abalone Cove, an area of the California coast that has experienced an ongoing, slow-moving 'geologic hazard.'
Its campus in Rancho Palos Verdes had survived landslides and erosion for years, but those conditions have worsened since 2024, with homes swallowed by shifting hillsides and once-straight roads turned into winding, sloping slaloms.
The chapel has hosted thousands of weddings, including celebrity nuptials, since it opened in 1951. It was closed to the public in February 2024, in hopes that the shifting of land would eventually slow down. But the ground continued to move as much as seven inches per week, officials said at the time.
The chapel was fully disassembled in July 2024, and carefully placed into dedicated storage space.
Dan Burchett, the chapel's executive director, said last year that rebuild efforts could cost as much as $20 million. It's unclear if those estimates have changed in 2025.
If the church is able to secure the site and rebuild at the old military property, the new campus would feature a museum, a visitor's center and 'tranquil gardens,' the church website says.
If leaders secure the money, the site will be rebuilt with a visitor's center, a museum, a cafe and gardens, according to the website, and guests will be treated to the same sweeping ocean views.
For additional information about the proposed site, click here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

San Francisco Chronicle​

7 hours ago

• San Francisco Chronicle​

S.F. shouldn't forget where it came from: U.S. Army helped shape city

Missiles are flying in the Mideast air, but I still can't get over the parade to celebrate the Army's 250th anniversary in Washington last weekend. It was Flag Day, as well as President Donald Trump's birthday. The president took the salute himself. Seven thousand troops marched, and the White House said 250,000 patriots watched. The big parade was overshadowed by events including the huge anti-Trump No Kings rallies across the country, political killings in Minnesota, a horrific air crash in India and the Israeli raids on Iran. It nearly rained on the Army's parade, the crowds were smaller than anticipated, the troops seemed dispirited, and the World War II armored vehicles looked like creaky relics. It was all 'a little underwhelming,' a reporter from the British Guardian newspaper wrote. The American social media was full of scorn. The soldiers didn't even march in step, some wrote. I read these statements with some sadness. Given the way things are going, it is possible that some of the soldiers on parade last week may soon be in a war, especially because a lot of them were from infantry units. They could be there tomorrow, or next week. So I watched the parade with a wary eye. Some of it is personal: I used to be a soldier myself, long ago. Like millions of men of my vintage, I was drafted into the Army during the Cold War. I did five years, counting some reserve duty. I disliked the Army — all of us did — but came to respect it. Then later, through one of those turns of fortune, I did two turns as a war correspondent for the Chronicle, both in the Mideast. I was with the Seventh Infantry Regiment during the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and my unit was in combat. I saw what these Mideast adventures are like in real life. The city of San Francisco and the region around it has a long connection to armies — first to foreign militaries and then to our own. Soldiers of the Spanish Army were the first Europeans to see San Francisco Bay, and in 1776, a colonial expedition from Mexico led by a lieutenant colonel named Juan Bautista de Anza located the site of Mission San Francisco de Asis and what became the Presidio of San Francisco. The Presidio was a military post for the next 219 years — first Spanish, then Mexican and, finally, an American garrison in 1847. The Presidio was one of the places where this part of California began. As the city and the region grew up around it, the fort by the Golden Gate became the most important military post in the country. The was first created to defend the magnificent harbor from foreign invasion, with cannons ringing the entrance to the harbor at Fort Point and Alcatraz Island. Army troops at the Presidio rode off to the Indian wars, to the conquest of the Philippines. Massive guns in the Marin Headlands could defeat any naval attack. In World War II, the Presidio and Fort Mason were staging areas for the war in the Pacific. More than 2 million soldiers, sailors and Marines sailed out the Golden Gate during World War II, and thousands more in the Korean War. During the Cold War, dozens of Nike missile sites covered the hills around the Bay Area in the tense times when nuclear war with the Soviet Union seemed imminent. It was our last line of defense. The war never came; the Presidio and the other military bases around the bay never fired a shot in anger. The military performed one service that affects everyone in the region to this day. The Army was the steward of an immense tract of open space from the Marin coast down nearly to Santa Cruz County, including Alcatraz and Angel islands, with the Presidio of San Francisco as its crown jewel. Most of it became part of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, a park nearly three times the size of San Francisco. It was created by citizen activists including Amy Meyer and Edgar Wayburn, plus political leaders such as Phillip Burton and Nancy Pelosi, but it would never have happened without the stewardship of the Army. The Army fired its last cannon salute at day's end on June 23, 1995 — 30 years ago Monday. It was the day the Army turned over the Presidio to the National Park Service. A bugler played 'To the Colors,' and soldiers lowered the flag, slowly, carefully. Then, with a band playing 'The Stars and Stripes Forever' and led by 11 generals, the last U.S. Army soldiers marched from the parade ground out to the Presidio gate at Lyon and Lombard streets. A man who identified himself as John marched on the street, alongside the soldiers. He limped a little. He said a piece of shrapnel from Vietnam still bothered him. Still, he kept up. 'You never forget how to march,' he said. As far as I know, that was the last Army parade in San Francisco.

The Hill

8 hours ago

• The Hill

Gabbard's standing in Trump World comes into question

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's strength and standing within the Trump administration is coming under question after the president twice publicly brushed off her testimony that Iran is not close to developing a nuclear weapon, and amid reports of tensions between the two. President Trump nominated Gabbard as his intelligence director despite some doubts from both parties, and her anti-war stance fits in with the MAGA movement's aversion to getting the U.S. sucked into foreign conflicts. But the two are not longtime allies, and she increasingly appears to be on the outside looking in as Trump crafts his policy on the Israeli-Iran war. 'She was rewarded for sticking by Trump during the 2024 election and being a fierce advocate for him, particularly as it relates to military intervention,' one Trump ally said of Gabbard, explaining why Trump nominated her to the intelligence post. A video Gabbard posted on social media last week following a visit to Hiroshima, the Japanese city where the U.S. dropped an atomic bomb near the end of World War II, has come under heavy attention in Trump World. In the more than three minute video, which was posted to her personal account on social platform X, Gabbard details the devastating consequences of nuclear warfare and accuses 'political elite and warmongers' of 'carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers.' Some saw Gabbard as getting ahead of the White House's messaging on Iran and Israel when it came to the video. 'It's not a time for politics, but for pragmatism,' the Trump ally said, noting the decisions Trump has to make on whether to involve the U.S. directly in the war by bombing the Fordow nuclear facility. That facility is buried in an Iranian mountain, and only U.S. bombs and flights may be able to get to it. Gabbard's office has pushed back hard on any suggestion of a split. Olivia Coleman, Gabbard's press secretary, called such reporting a 'lazy regurgitation of a fake news story' disputed by the White House and Vice President Vance. 'While the Director is busy briefing the President, Vice President, and national security cabinet every day on the ongoing conflict, The Hill continues to spin lies made up by bored, irrelevant anonymous sources with nothing better to do than sow fake division,' Coleman said in a statement. 'The Director remains focused on her mission: providing accurate and actionable intelligence to the President, cleaning up the Deep State, and keeping the American people safe, secure, and free.' Vance this week praised Gabbard as 'a veteran, a patriot, a loyal supporter of President Trump and a critical part of the coalition he built in 2024.' But there are also questions from some in Congress about Gabbard's role. The intelligence director was set to appear before Senate Intelligence Committee leaders this week only to abruptly cancel. 'We were told that she was called to meetings at the White House,' Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) told reporters Wednesday. 'So her presence before the Intelligence Committee was canceled today. It'll be postponed to a different time.' Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the vice chair of the panel, said he has 'no idea what our policy is right now towards Iran other than chaos.' But he also offered some support for Gabbard and her delivery of intelligence information, while questioning whether Trump is listening to her enough. 'I will say this, there has been no change in the intelligence from what Gabbard did say that was true back in March, that [there is] no evidence that Iran had moved towards a weapon, and the point that the president may be taking action with no consultation — we've seen about endless wars in the Middle East, how this happens. And again, I have no idea what his plan is, what our plan is.' 'If this president wants to completely ignore the intelligence community, we are playing in dangerous ground, and this is exactly the way we got ourselves into Iraq,' he said. Gabbard has long cautioned against U.S. intervention in foreign wars — a position that aligned the former progressive darling with the 'America First' mantra when it comes to foreign policy. Trump said Thursday he would decide whether to take direct action in the next two weeks, a sign he is still holding out hope for a diplomatic solution. Gabbard has been in attendance for meetings this past week in the Situation Room, but Trump has reportedly leaned more on the counsel of officials like Secretary of State Marco Rubio, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine. 'The president hears all voices across the country, and he makes decisions based on his instincts. And he has always said diplomacy is his first option,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday. Trump raised eyebrows this past week with his remarks about Gabbard when he was asked about her testimony from March indicating that Iran was not as close to developing nuclear capabilities as Israel claimed. 'I don't care what she said. I think they were very close to having one,' Trump told reporters on Air Force One in the wee hours of Tuesday morning. On Friday, Trump more explicitly said Gabbard was 'wrong' in her assessment about Iran's nuclear ambitions. Gabbard was also absent from a meeting at Camp David earlier this month between Trump and his national security team. Gabbard was on National Guard duty at the time, and her allies have noted that she was in attendance for White House meetings the next day. Well before the latest flare up between Israel and Iran, Gabbard had been critical of Trump during his first term for pulling out of the Iran nuclear deal and assassinating a top general. Though the latest video didn't reference the matter, some in the White House saw it as off-message — a quality known to irritate the president. Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) said that while Gabbard's anti-interventionist stance could depart from Trump's on the Iran-Israeli war, Gabbard's pattern in office has been to curate intelligence to suit the White House's prerogatives rather than to contradict the president. 'It seems like she's, at times, on the other side of things from the president, which, you know, I didn't vote for her,' he said. 'She tends to find the answer, and then goes and tries to find the evidence to support her answer. [That's] exactly the opposite way you should be analyzing national security issues, right? You should start with the intelligence and then try to come to the conclusion. … she goes to the conclusion first and then tries to come up with the evidence to support her conclusion. That's not helpful to this president or any president.' An administration official said it is Gabbard's job to provide Trump with timely, accurate and actionable intelligence, and she will continue to do so. The White House has shunned any suggestion Trump has lost faith in any member of his national security team — remarks that come amid reporting that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has also not played a key role in mapping out a response. 'President Trump's Peace through Strength foreign policy is a tried-and-true approach that keeps America safe and deters global threats,' White House communications director Steven Cheung said in a statement. 'Efforts by the legacy media to sow internal division are a distraction that will not work,' Cheung added. 'President Trump has full confidence in his entire exceptional national security team.'

Yahoo

14 hours ago

• Yahoo

German camp memorial offers Russian tour to mark 'forgotten victims'

A memorial for the Nazi-era concentration camp of Bergen-Belsen in northern Germany is set to offer a guided tour in Russian on Sunday to commemorate the site's "forgotten victims" from the Soviet Union. The camp, which was liberated by the British Army in April 1945, is well known as the place where Jewish schoolgirl Anne Frank died during World War II. However, it also included some 20,000 Soviet prisoners of war who were forced to work in the camp after July 1941. With insufficient accommodation available, the men lived in open fields and sought shelter in makeshift huts and caves. More than 14,000 of them died of cold, hunger and disease in the winter of 1941-42 alone. To mark the 84th anniversary of Nazi Germany's invasion of the Soviet Union, a 90-minute tour is to be offered in German and Russian, leading from the memorial site to the nearby prisoner of war cemetery. There are 19,580 people buried in the cemetery, with historian Katja Seybold working on creating a list of the names of those who died. Almost 13,000 of the names have been identified, the researcher said. Interviews with surviving prisoners of war can be listened to at the Bergen-Belsen Documentation Centre. Interest in the fate of the prisoners of war is growing, said Seybold. Many Ukrainians who have fled to Germany in recent years have also visited the memorial and the cemetery. The prisoner of war camp closed three months before the site's liberation by the British Army. According to Seybold, this may explain why the fate of the prisoners of war was left untold for so long. A total of some 70,000 people lost their lives at Bergen-Belsen. Around 120,000 men, women and children were interned in the concentration camp between 1943 and 1945, around 52,000 of whom died.