Who Gets Panzer Tattooed on Their Arm?

On the long list of reasons the United States could have lost World War II—the terribly effective surprise Japanese attack, an awful lack of military readiness, the relatively untrained troops—there is perhaps no area in which Americans were more initially outmatched than armament. Americans had the M4 Sherman, a tank mass-produced by Detroit automakers. Germans had the formidable panzer, a line of tanks with nicknames such as Panther and Royal Tiger that repeatedly outgunned the Americans. In the 1940s, you couldn't pick up a newspaper in the United States without reading about the panzer's superior maneuverability and robust armor, qualities that made it especially hard for Americans to stop. 'This doesn't mean our tanks are bad,' The New York Times reported in January 1945. 'They are the best in the world—next to the Germans.'
The panzer invoked Nazi might and aggression even decades after the war ended. Sylvia Plath's 'Daddy,' first published in 1965, contains this stanza: 'Panzer-man, panzer-man, O You—— / Not God but a swastika / So black no sky could squeak through.' In the 2000s, popular video-game franchises—including Call of Duty, Battlefield, and Medal of Honor—released installments set during World War II that featured the panzer, etching it into the collective consciousness of a new generation of Americans.
So you can see why it's noteworthy that Joseph Kent, Donald Trump's nominee to head the National Counterterrorism Center, has a panzer tattoo. Last month, Mother Jones's David Corn uncovered a shirtless picture of Kent from 2018, in which he has the word PANZER written down his left arm. Why? It's not clear. Kent did not respond to multiple requests for comment, and the Trump administration hasn't offered an explanation either. Olivia C. Coleman, a spokesperson for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, directed me to a post on X in which Ashley Henning, a deputy chief of staff at the agency, calls Kent a 'selfless patriot who loves this country and his family.'
Kent's tattoo is all the more curious considering his background. A former member of the Army Special Forces who twice ran for Congress in Washington State, he has had repeated interactions with far-right extremists. During his unsuccessful 2022 congressional bid, Kent consulted with Nick Fuentes, the young white supremacist, and hired a campaign adviser who was a member of the Proud Boys, a violent far-right group. (Kent ultimately disavowed Fuentes, and his campaign said that the Proud Boys member, Graham Jorgensen, was a low-level worker). The tattoo 'could mean that he's glorifying the Nazis. Or it could have a different context,' says Heidi Beirich, a co-founder of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, an organization that tracks right-wing extremism. Despite what the word evokes in history, panzer references are not common on the far right, Beirich told me. 'I don't think I've run across a panzer.'
Other discernible possibilities make less sense. Right-wing accounts on X have spread the claim that Kent has jäger—German for 'hunter'—tattooed on his other arm. The two tattoos together would add up to 'tank hunter.' The accounts claim that heavy-anti-armor-weapons crewman was one of Kent's jobs in the Army. It's oddly specific enough to sound plausible, except that I couldn't find any evidence that Kent was part of an anti-tank unit—let alone one that would be targeting German tanks—or that he even has a jäger tattoo on his other arm. (Let me point out that Kent could resolve all of this by simply rolling up a sleeve.) There aren't many other explanations. The United States Army has an installation on a base outside Stuttgart, Germany, called Panzer Kaserne, but there's no information to suggest that Kent was ever deployed there. All we're left with is a strange tattoo associated with Nazi Germany.
Of course, people frequently make strange tattoo choices. Some get ones they come to regret, and plenty have tattooed foreign words onto their body that they don't fully understand. Yet it's reasonable to wonder about the messages a person decides to make permanent on their body. Tattoos can connote in-group belonging or membership to a subculture. Olympians are known to get tattoos of the Olympic rings to commemorate competing in the games. Bikers famously love getting tattoos of skulls and flames. And then there are white supremacists, who have emblazoned themselves with swastikas, Norse runes, the SS logo, and other symbols. Why settle for a T-shirt or a flag when you can carve your values into your skin?
The Trump administration seems to strongly agree with the notion that tattoos are meaningful—but only when convenient for the president's agenda. Consider Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Maryland resident the Trump administration deported to El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT, prison camp last month. Garcia was living with protected legal status in the U.S., and the government's own lawyers have acknowledged that he was deported because of an 'administrative error.' Trump loyalists have doubled down on Garcia's detention, in part pointing to his tattoos. On Truth Social, Trump posted a picture of Garcia's knuckle tattoos—a leaf, a smiley face, a cross, and a skull. The photo was altered with text above each symbol to spell out M-S-1-3, suggesting Garcia's tattoos are a code for the gang MS-13. (Criminal-justice professors doubt that claim.) In an interview with ABC this week, Trump insisted it's 'as clear as you can be' that Garcia has MS-13 tattooed on his knuckles, even as ABC's Terry Moran noted that the actual M-S-1-3 in the photo Trump has distributed clearly is Photoshopped in.
[Read: An 'administrative error' sends a Maryland father to a Salvadoran prison]
At least some of the hundreds of other immigrants who have been deported to CECOT appear to have been targeted simply for having the wrong tattoos. Andry José Hernández Romero, a makeup artist with no confirmed gang affiliation, was deported after his crown tattoos were reportedly mistaken for symbols associated with Tren de Aragua. Neri José Alvarado Borges, according to his family and friends, was deported for his tattoos, including an autism-acceptance symbol that he got in support of his younger brother.
Tom Homan, the White House's 'border czar,' has claimed that tattoos alone are not being used to label people as gang members. I reached out to the White House for comment, but received only another response from Coleman, the ODNI spokesperson, pointing to another post on X by Henning. This post mocks the fact that The Atlantic had contacted them to ask questions. In reference to Kent's tattoo, Henning wrote, 'Should we just reply that it's photoshopped?' and then included a video clip of Trump's ABC interview. To put this in plain terms: I asked the administration to address concerns that one of the president's nominees has a tattoo associated with Nazis, and its response was to make a joke.
Trump's secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, has some questionable tattoos of his own. On the right side of his chest, Hegseth has a large Jerusalem Cross: It has even sides and looks like a plus symbol, with four smaller crosses in each quadrant. On his right arm, Hegseth has a large tattoo of Deus vult (Latin for 'God wills it'), written in Gothic script. Also on Hegseth's right arm is a tattoo of the Arabic word Kafir, which commonly translates to 'infidel' or 'unbeliever.'
Both the Jerusalem Cross and Deus vult date back to the Crusades, the bloody series of wars between Christians and Muslims during the Middle Ages. But modern extremists have co-opted them to invoke a new war on Muslims. Insurrectionists who mobbed the Capitol on January 6, 2021, flew a Deus vult flag and wore shirts that featured it and the Jerusalem Cross. The Trump administration defends Hegseth's ink: In an email, Deputy Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson said that Hegseth's tattoos 'depict Christian symbols and mottos used by Believers for centuries,' and that 'anyone attempting to paint these symbols and mottos as 'extreme' is engaging in anti-Christian bigotry.'
[Read: A field guide to flags of the far right]
The Jerusalem Cross is still occasionally used in non-extremist religious contexts, Matthew D. Taylor, the senior Christian scholar at the Institute for Islamic, Christian, and Jewish Studies, in Baltimore, told me. 'If that was the only tattoo he had, I'm not sure how I would interpret that,' he said. But Taylor finds Hegseth's Deus vult tattoo to be noteworthy. 'Deus vult is not a common symbol. It has very strong connotations,' he said. During the Crusades, Deus vult was the 'phrase that sanctioned violence against Muslims.' Other members of the military have also tattooed Kafir on themselves, reportedly in an act of defiance against Islamic terrorism, especially those who have seen combat in the Middle East, as Hegseth has. An American soldier with a Kafir tattoo might be interpreted as a provocation—essentially, I'm an infidel. Come and get me. Taylor reads Hegseth's Kafir tattoo as 'a signal of aggression towards Islam and embracing Islamic aggression towards himself.' When Hegseth's three tattoos are taken together, Taylor said, 'it's not hard to interpret what he's trying to signal.'
Maybe both Hegseth and Kent have bad luck and got their tattoos without knowing what they might signal. Maybe they just don't care about the possible darker implications. But this is the constant problem of trying to make sense of the signs from people in Trump's orbit—the recurrent use of white supremacists' favorite sequence of numbers, ambiguous (and sometimes unambiguous) Nazi salutes, and other dog-whistling. How much benefit of the doubt really should be given? At some point, there's not a lot of room to interpret things any other way. As of 2024, Hegseth was a member of the Tennessee congregation of an Idaho-based church run by a Christian nationalist. He has appeared to express support for a relatively niche theocratic ideology that advocates for laws to be subordinate to the perspectives of Christian conservatism. Kent, in addition to associating with Fuentes during his first congressional campaign, was interviewed by the Nazi sympathizer Greyson Arnold. (Following the interview, a campaign spokesperson said that Kent was unaware of Arnold's beliefs.)
Trump's White House operates on inconsistency. High prices on consumer goods are bad, unless they are the result of the tariffs. Unelected bureaucrats must be excised from the government, unless they are Elon Musk and his team at DOGE. Free speech is a tenet of American values that is to be vehemently upheld, unless people say things that Donald Trump does not like. Tattoos matter. Except they also don't. They are a sufficient admission of guilt—sufficient enough to disqualify you for due process, even—unless you are part of Trump's team. If you're on the losing side, there is no recourse. If you're on the winning side, there are no consequences.
Article originally published at The Atlantic

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Fox News

9 minutes ago

• Fox News

Elite university professor sparks social media backlash after revealing what Iran should do next: 'This demon'

A professor at Georgetown University is in hot water on social media over a post where he explained his "hope" for Iran doing "some symbolic strike" on a U.S. military base, igniting backlash on social media and calls for him to be fired. "I'm not an expert, but I assume Iran could still get a bomb easily," Dr. Jonathan Brown, the Alwaleed bin Talal chair of Islamic Civilization in the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, posted on X on Sunday after the U.S. struck Iranian nuclear sites on Saturday night. "I hope Iran does some symbolic strike on a base, then everyone stops. I'm surprised this is what these FDD/Hasbara people have been auto-erotically asphyxiating themselves for all these years. Ironically, the main takeaways (in my non-expert opinion, and I'm happy to be corrected) from all this have nothing to do with a US attack: 1) Iran can take a licking; 2) if Israel attacks Iranian cities, it gets f---ed up pretty bad. I mean I've been shocked at the damage Iranian missiles caused; 3) despite his best efforts, Reza Pahlavi HVAC repair services still only third best in Nova." Many conservatives on social media immediately reacted to the post and interpreted it as a college professor wishing for Iran to attack U.S. soldiers or at least put them in harm's way. "Are you kidding me?" conservative commentator Sage Steele posted on X in response to the post being picked up by the conservative influencer account LibsofTikTok. A 'Professor of Islamic Civilization' at @Georgetown 'hopes Iran does some symbolic strike' on Americans," GOP Rep. Randy Fine posted on X. "Some civilization. The President of Georgetown will be before @EdWorkforceCmte soon. This demon had better be gone by then. We have a Muslim problem in America." "A Georgetown professor wants Iran to attack a US base," Foundation for the Defense of Democracies CEO Mark Dubowitz posted on X, before providing information on the background of Brown's wife. "Brown is married to Laila Al-Arian, a journalist for the Muslim Brotherhood propaganda outlet Al Jazeera. Her father, Sami Al-Arian, was deported from the U.S. to Turkey. He was accused of providing material support to the US-designated and Iran-backed terrorist organization Palestinian Islamic Jihad." Brown's father-in-law, Sami Al-Arian, was deported from the United States to Turkey in 2015 after a long legal battle where he pleaded "guilty" to supporting Palestinian Islamic Jihad, a terrorist organization, according to Politico. A 2006 Department of Justice press release said he acknowledged "in the plea agreement that he knew the PIJ used acts of violence as a means to achieve its objectives. Nevertheless, Al-Arian continued to assist the terrorist organization, for instance, by filing official paperwork to obtain immigration benefits for PIJ associate Bashir Nafi, and concealing the terrorist associations of various individuals associated with the PIJ." "Al-Arian admits that he performed services for the PIJ in 1995 and thereafter, when he was a professor at the University of South Florida and after he knew that the PIJ had been designated by President Clinton as a terrorist organization," the press release said. "I went to graduate school with Jonathan Brown," Jewish People Policy Institute fellow Dr. Sara Yael Hirschhorn posted on X. "I'm appalled to see him calling for Iran to attack U.S. troops and his awe at attacks on Israeli civilians. @Georgetown- enough!" "These are the people teaching your kids at colleges and Universities," conservative influencer Laura Loomer posted on X. "@Georgetown should fire him." In a follow-up post on Monday morning, Brown told his followers he deleted the post and explained why. "I deleted my previous tweet because a lot of people were interpreting it as a call for violence," Brown posted on X. "That's not what I intended. I have two immediate family members in the US military who've served abroad and wouldn't want any harm to befall American soldiers… or anyone!" When reached for comment on his controversial post, Brown told Fox News Digital he "meant something like right after Solimani was killed, with telegraphed warning and no American casualties and no one felt any further need for attacks." "I was calling for de-esclation as I am very opposed to American involvement in foreign wars," he continued. A Georgetown University spokesperson told Fox News Digital the university was "appalled" by the social media post. "We are appalled that a faculty member would call for a 'symbolic strike' on a military base in a social media post. The original statement is from an individual faculty member and not the University, and the faculty member has since deleted the post and stated that he would not want any harm to befall American servicemembers," the spokesperson said. "We are reviewing this matter to see if further action is warranted. We take our community's concerns seriously and condemn language which is deeply inconsistent with Georgetown University's values." President Donald Trump announced the U.S. had struck a trio of nuclear facilities in Iran via a Saturday evening Truth Social post, which was not preceded by any media leaks of prior indication such strikes were imminent. The president ordered U.S. B-2 stealth bombers to carry out strikes against Iran's Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities. "Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated," Trump said. "And Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks would be far greater and a lot easier."

Newsweek

22 minutes ago

• Newsweek

Nationwide McDonald's Boycott This Week: Latest Update From Organizer

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The organization behind a nationwide boycott of McDonald's that is set to start on Tuesday said the movement is "about more than burgers and fries." As part of its ongoing "Economic Blackout Tour," The People's Union USA, the movement behind recent boycotts of Target and Walmart, is urging Americans to refrain from eating at the fast-food chain between June 24 and June 30. "This is about power," the organization said in a post shared by its founder John Schwarz on Instagram on Saturday. "When we unite and hit corporations in their wallets, they listen." Newsweek has reached out to McDonald's via email for comment. Why It Matters The first half of 2025 has been marked by boycotts of several household-name companies, sparked by certain corporations rolling back diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, as well as wider pushback against practices such as tax avoidance and underpaying workers. Since late 2023, McDonald's has also been battling a boycott led by the pro-Palestinian Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement for alleged complicity with the actions of the Israeli military in the Gaza Strip. What To Know The People's Union USA describes itself on its website as "a grassroots movement focused on economic resistance, corporate accountability, and real justice for the working class." Since February, the group has orchestrated boycotts of Amazon, Walmart and Target, as well as periodic "economic blackouts," during which it says Americans should "avoid shopping, streaming, online orders, fast food, and everything in between," and rely exclusively on small, local businesses. The movement said it is demanding "fair taxes, an end to price gouging, real equality, and corporate accountability" through its upcoming boycott of McDonald's. Last week, The People's Union USA accused McDonald's in an Instagram post of engaging in "performative DEI with no meaningful change." The movement also alleged that the company pays its workers low wages and suppresses workers' rights and union efforts. An exterior view of the McDonald's restaurant at the Lycoming Mall. An exterior view of the McDonald's restaurant at the Lycoming Mall. Alamy Live News via AP What People Are Saying The People's Union USA in an Instagram post shared by founder John Schwarz: "This is a show of strength, solidarity, and people powered change. Let them feel it. Let them hear us. Let this be just the beginning." Chris Kempczinski, chairman and CEO of McDonald's Corporation, in a January 2024 LinkedIn post: "I also recognize that several markets in the Middle East and some outside the region are experiencing a meaningful business impact due to the war and associated misinformation that is affecting brands like McDonald's. This is disheartening and ill-founded." Genna Gent, vice president of government relations for McDonald's, in a 2019 letter to the National Restaurant Association and obtained by Politico: "Going forward, McDonald's Corporation will not use our resources, including lobbyists or staff, to oppose minimum wage increases at the federal, state or local levels. Nor will we participate in the association advocacy efforts designed expressly to defeat wage increases." What Happens Next? The People's Union USA said it is planning an economic blackout for July 4, along with boycotts of Starbucks, Amazon and Home Depot throughout the month. During the month of August, the movement is planning boycotts of Walmart, McDonald's and Lowe's. Do you have a story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have any questions about this story? Contact LiveNews@

Chicago Tribune

24 minutes ago

• Chicago Tribune

President Donald Trump wants oil producers to pump more crude amid jitters that Iran may close critical shipping lane

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Monday called for the U.S. and other oil-producing economies to pump more oil as crude prices remain volatile following U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Trump urged stepped-up production as the White House sharpened its warnings to Iran against closing the Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil and gas shipping lane, in retaliation for the U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear program. 'To the Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!' Trump posted on social media. He added, 'EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I'M WATCHING! YOU'RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON'T DO IT!' The push by Trump comes at an uncertain moment as U.S. embassies and military installations in the Middle East are on high alert for potential retaliation. Global markets are trying to ascertain what lays ahead after the U.S. struck key Iranian nuclear facilities with a barrage of 30,000-pound bunker busting bombs and Tomahawk missiles. Iran's parliament has approved cutting off the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow shipping lane in the Persian Gulf that about 20% of global oil and gas passes through. It's now up to Iran's national security council to decide whether to move forward with the idea, which could lead to a spike in the cost of goods and services worldwide. The price of oil jumped 4% shortly after trading began on Sunday night, but it quickly pared back as the focus shifted from what the U.S. military did to how Iran would react. Oil futures were flip-flopping in Monday morning trading between gains and losses. They still remain higher than they were before the fighting began a little more than a week ago. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt warned Tehran anew against closing the strait, saying, 'the Iranian regime would be foolish to make that decision.' The State Department has doubled the number of emergency evacuation flights it is providing for American citizens wishing to leave Israel, ordered the departure of nonessential staff from the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon. It also is stepping up travel warnings around the Middle East because of concerns Iran will retaliate against U.S. interests in the region. In an alert sent to all Americans worldwide and posted to its website on Sunday, the State Department warned all U.S. citizens abroad to exercise caution. The U.S. Embassy in Qatar issued an alert on its website Monday urging American citizens in the energy-rich nation to 'shelter in place until further notice.' Hours later, the Qatari government issued an extraordinary order to shut its busy airspace. Qatar, across the Persian Gulf from Iran, is home to Al Udeid Air Base, which hosts the forward headquarters of the U.S. military's Central Command. The embassy did not elaborate and did not respond to multiple requests for comment from The Associated Press. Many energy industry analysts are skeptical that Iran would go forward with a full closure of the strait, something that it has threatened to do in the past. Iran would face the possibility of retaliation against its own shipments and the possibility that the move would upset China, the biggest purchaser of Iranian crude. The U.S. and allies pressed Russia in the leadup to Moscow's 2022 invasion of Ukraine with threats to its oil industry, and then followed through as many Western oil companies pulled out of the country and the U.S. and Europe imposed sanctions on Russian industry. But Iran is far less integrated into the global economy than Russia, which was reliant on European markets for its oil and gas exports and still went forward with the invasion despite U.S. warnings. 'There's been a lot of suggestion as well that this isn't something that is incredibly likely, and that's generally attributed to economic interdependence, which I don't want to suggest doesn't matter. It absolutely does,' said Colby Connelly, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute. Connelly added, 'if the 2020s have taught us anything so far, it's that economic ties don't always prevent conflict.' In another development Monday, Leavitt appeared to play down Trump calling into question the future of Iran's ruling theocracy, seemingly contradicting his administration's earlier calls on Tehran to resume negotiations and avoid an escalation in fighting. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' Trump posted on social media. 'MIGA!!!' Leavitt said Trump's 'posture and our military posture has not changed.' 'The president was just simply raising a question that I think many people around the world are asking,' Leavitt said.